Commons:Deletion requests/2024/09/17

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

September 17

[edit]

Files uploaded by Route Mobile LTD (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Taylor 49 (talk) 20:58, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Thatonerandomgirl (talk) 01:17, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AI upscaped version of this image, however the AI upscale has removed a lot of detail, specifically the faces, which have been erased in several cases. Unusable so out of COM:SCOPE. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:51, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. The texture of the ground is also completely lost in this version, and there's an artificial sepia tone. This isn't an improvement. Omphalographer (talk) 03:47, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I agree, the original does not have enough resolution to improve without distortion. --RAN (talk) 04:06, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete AS (Artificial Stupidity), useless file. Keep the original File:The 1945 Cretan Derby between Ergotelis and OFI in the Victory Cup Final.jpg. Taylor 49 (talk) 21:01, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:52, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:55, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded for site; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Jeanpaul.yeswecan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright concerns: All of these documents have inadequate source and licensing information. All of them are tagged as self-created CC0, but most of the documents have named (and distinct) authors, and some of them contain copyright claims (e.g. File:IMBARAGA MUGUSHIMA.pdf: "Copyright © 2012" on page 2). It's possible that some of these documents are freely licensed, but there's no clear evidence establishing that.

I'm also concerned that some of these documents are simply outside the educational scope of Commons. Many of them appear to be religious tracts, like File:Ibyo tugorora-Ku isi hari amadini angahe.pdf or File:Ibyo tugorora -KIMWE MU ICUMI.pdf.

Omphalographer (talk) 02:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Jeanpaul.yeswecan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope / possible copyvio: similar to previous uploads, these files all have inadequate source and licensing information (including some clear copyvios like File:INDONGOZI Y'UMUKURU W'ITORERO RY'ABADIVE.pdf), and many of them appear to simply be out of scope for Commons (e.g. religious tracts like File:THE FALL OF BABYLON.pdf; slideshow presentations like File:Isukari-UMWICANYI MUHORANA.pdf).

Omphalographer (talk) 18:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not an own work, has transmission code. 186.173.159.196 02:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image similar to https://www.oshu-kankou.jp/archives/news/20180804.zat.002.pdf Nnh (talk) 02:33, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image similar to https://www.oshu-kankou.jp/archives/news/20180804.zat.002.pdf Nnh (talk) 02:33, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image similar to https://www.oshu-kankou.jp/archives/news/20180804.zat.002.pdf Nnh (talk) 02:34, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image similar to https://www.oshu-kankou.jp/archives/news/20180804.zat.002.pdf Nnh (talk) 02:34, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image similar to https://www.oshu-kankou.jp/archives/news/20180804.zat.002.pdf Nnh (talk) 02:34, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image similar to https://www.oshu-kankou.jp/archives/news/20180804.zat.002.pdf Nnh (talk) 02:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Although micropenis is in scope, this image is blurry and unused, and can be replaced by alternatives in the category A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep do we have other examples of such an extreme penis-to-testes size ratio? Dronebogus (talk) 19:07, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 03:11, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 03:11, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 03:11, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 03:14, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 03:14, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Indonesia.

A1Cafel (talk) 03:14, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 03:17, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 03:17, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 03:18, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 03:18, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 03:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 03:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama in Iran A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Out of scope: unused AI-generated image of an elaborately dressed woman. Omphalographer (talk) 03:26, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, from the upload context it appears to be intended as an image of Marie Antoinette (and I've added categories to reflect that), but it looks nothing like her. Belbury (talk) 08:43, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused AI-generated image of a tropical beach. Omphalographer (talk) 03:28, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as redundant to the many, many photographs of real beaches in Category:Beaches. Belbury (talk) 08:40, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused AI-generated fantasy flag. Omphalographer (talk) 03:28, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks @A1Cafel! If you don't mind, I'll spend some time today seeing if I can track down the local artist since they're pretty prolific currently, and I think I've seen them on social media since I first saw their work in public. I'll ask them about licensing and this wikimedia image. 174.21.217.207 21:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, verifying this last post was me. I forgot to log in. Catleeball (talk) 21:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused AI-generated image of a group of women at a market. Omphalographer (talk) 03:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused AI-generated image of a llama doll. Omphalographer (talk) 03:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Rhetos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: various AI-generated illustrations of various abstract topics, unlikely to be usable in educational content.

Omphalographer (talk) 03:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The images you suggest for deletion have been created with quite some effort to illustrate abstract concepts that are being discussed in philosophy and other branches of science. I know of no or at best only very few attempts at visualizing those concepts. The idea, for example, of commercial companies like chemical plants, showing analogies to biological beings, especially neural nets and brain-like structures, has been put forward by a number of authors since the late 1960ties. I have given some relevant bibliographical references in footnotes.

Also, philosophical speculations like Berkeleys doubt on physical reality and his esse est percipi keep recurring ever since the 18th century.

The images I have created are the results of many trials with many of previous creations being discarded by me. My purpose to upload such images to Wikimedia Commons is twofold. a) They may be used for illustrating some article. Or b) they may inspire the creation of future and better images.

Deletion would be OK if a better image could be provided to substitute for the old. Until better substitutes can be provided, I think, the images should be kept in the Category of ChatGPT generated images. They are neither large in size nor do they clutter any category in any distractive way.

No harm done and some potential usage are good arguments to keep the images. Rhetos (talk) 04:26, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
One more argument to keep the images: I always add the full prompt used to create the images. Thes prompts, together with the images as an output, reveal a lot about the inner workings of the AI. I have recently been listening to some lectures given by AI developers such as the academic Geoffrey Hinton. He stressed the point how generative AI tries to find features in words and meaning in sentences and passages. The images I uploaded, by being documented in some detail, also provide educational material for the study of the creation of images by AI. They therefore have a double purpose: a) illustrate some philosophical concept and b) illustrate the rationale of AI-image generation.

I know of no other platform on the internet where images can be uploaded with any documentary tools comparable to Commons or with any comparable reliabity as to persistence.

Deleting the images could potentially and irretrievably destroy some valuable material for future studies and illustration of the early years of AI. Again, please note and honor that I always try to add the full prompt and much context. Rhetos (talk) 05:04, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete These are simply not good illustrations of what they mean to depict and thus undermine credibility of using AI tools for illustrating philosophical subjects and so on which is possible instead of constructively adding something useful. E.g. Quantenobjekt (Steam punk-style) does not show anything about quantum mechanics really and is just some random badly generated AI image. Prototyperspective (talk) 09:04, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: again, I want to point out that the purpose of the images is twofold.
Documentation of AI-evolution: one would not remove an early flying machine from a museum because there are better ones today. In the near future, it will be difficult or impossible to recreate the shortcomings of the early days of AI (like distorted hands). Badly misshapen bodies, as they were frequent in the year 2021, have almost died out even with the cheapest AI tool available in 2024. Yet it would be interesting to have some such specimens in Commons for reference or analysis. So, in this case, possible imperfections should not be considered a reason for deletion, but instead for keeping the images. The important point is that the full prompt for the image has been provided. Deletion would be sensible, if Commons was flooded with poorly documented images. But I am careful to upload not too many images, to document their creation (e. g. references to literature) and to restrict them to categories where they do not interfere with photo-realistic illustrations.
Illustrating abstract concepts: I was, for example, trying to get DALL to show how invisible quantum states are translated into macroscopic states of measuring devices, which is a key idea Niels Bohr often expressed. I have found no illustration for this specific idea. The image uploaded was the best pick out of many tries (see above). The images are not random, but created with some effort. With other images, I have quoted literature for which the images are meant to be illustrations. To judge how well they depict the concepts, one has to know the concepts. I agree, that one can then argue from case to case how well the image fits the concept, but the concepts must be known. The value here is that some first illustration may inspire other people to create better images. Again I argue that deletion is fine once some better illustration can be provided. Rhetos (talk) 05:37, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It would make sense but not for these images and there are better images here that match your rationale. e.g. it doesn't show how invisible quantum states are translated into macroscopic states of measuring devices with low or improvable quality but some misgenerated nonsensical stuff that is not that. In general I agree that AI images that are not very good or have some misgenerated elements should be kept if there are no or only few images for the respective concept but I don't agree that it applies to these images. Prototyperspective (talk) 11:43, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No FoP for 2D works in Malta A1Cafel (talk) 03:33, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Out of scope: unused AI-generated image of a grotesque, cartoonish mouse. Omphalographer (talk) 03:34, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto for File:Rodentia ccz.webp. Same uploader, same subject matter. Omphalographer (talk) 03:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: logo unused outside userspace (possibly fantasy content). Omphalographer (talk) 03:36, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be a screenshot of a flying simulator --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 03:58, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, self-promotional logo; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:01, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Oscar otu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:02, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded for site; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:03, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by TheFashionCurator (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage outside sandbox, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I think people at the airport are well within scope. PaterMcFly (talk) 10:28, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope Astrinko (talk) 04:37, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Not clear pic Soumava2002 (talk) 04:41, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely the artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 04:44, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 04:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely the artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 04:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Out of scope Astrinko (talk) 05:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely the artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:04, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and the sculptor of this statue, Vasyl Ahibalov, died in 2002. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO until 2073.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:06, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sculptor https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q4056909 Venzz (talk) 06:43, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the information. I updated the DR. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:54, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Out of scope. Not educationally useful.It's just a sign announcing the meeting. Bart Buchtfluß (talk) 05:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely the artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine - 1965 monuments/busts

lNeverCry 04:35, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely the artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:15, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:19, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


T-shirt design is copyrighted - not de minimis Someone Not Awful (talk) 05:22, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete As F10/G3. wp:nonazis applies here. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 15:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Private picture - personality rights Someone Not Awful (talk) 05:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Private picture - personality rights Someone Not Awful (talk) 05:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Private picture - personality rights Someone Not Awful (talk) 05:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Private picture - personality rights Someone Not Awful (talk) 05:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Private picture - personality rights Someone Not Awful (talk) 05:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per WEBHOST and F10. In the future, please make 1 Dr for all uploads being deleted for the same reason by the same person. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 21:43, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Private picture - personality rights Someone Not Awful (talk) 05:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per COM:WEBHOST and F10. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 21:41, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Private picture - personality rights Someone Not Awful (talk) 05:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I feel like this user uploaded something similar before, but I can't check. Either way, F10. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 21:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:26, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:28, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:33, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:37, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:41, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:42, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:46, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely the artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely the artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:52, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely the artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So this image should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 05:55, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely the artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 05:59, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely the artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 06:01, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely the artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 06:03, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of ГОСТ 10807–78 to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:04, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Okay, we got it sorted. Mongolia44 17:36, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely the artist of this monument has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 06:06, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of ГОСТ 10807–78 to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:06, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Svg file Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Mongolia44 00:22, 22 December 2020 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 13:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of DOH Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:07, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Svg file Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Mongolia44 00:23, 22 December 2020 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 13:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A vector file of traffic signs has been replaced.This removal reorganized the traffic signs. Mongolia44 00:37, 1 November 2022 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 15:11, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of DOH Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:08, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of DOH Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:08, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect. มองโกเลีย๔๔ 04:52, 4 August 2019 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --DMacks (talk) 03:25, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A vector file of traffic signs has been replaced.This removal reorganized the traffic signs. Mongolia44 00:38, 1 November 2022 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 15:12, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of DOH Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:08, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect. มองโกเลีย๔๔ 01:24, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:55, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A vector file of traffic signs has been replaced.This removal reorganized the traffic signs. Mongolia44 00:40, 1 November 2022 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 15:12, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A vector file of traffic signs has been replaced.This removal reorganized the traffic signs. Mongolia44 00:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:58, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of DOH Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of DOH Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely the artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 06:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of DOH Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect. มองโกเลีย๔๔ 01:31, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:55, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Since this traffic sign is not in the form of a traffic sign of the Department of Highways and Department of Rural Roads. Please kindly request to delete this image as soon as possible. มองโกเลีย๔๔ 10:34, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

 Comment This sign may not be in the manual, but that doesn't mean it doesn't exist in some unofficial use. Fry1989 eh? 19:07, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Per COM:INUSE, That should be discussed in local community or removed in local wiki first. SCP-2000 01:16, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of DOH Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Picture​ on sign. มองโกเลีย๔๔ 10:21, 26 December 2018 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 18:16, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Svg file File:Thai Rural Road-สต6031 น1-1.svgFile:Cambodia Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Mongolia44 18:19, 23 June 2020 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 02:52, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of DOH Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:11, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Picture​ on sign. มองโกเลีย๔๔ 09:52, 26 December 2018 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 18:07, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect. มองโกเลีย๔๔ 04:37, 4 August 2019 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --DMacks (talk) 03:24, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A vector file of traffic signs has been replaced.This removal reorganized the traffic signs. Mongolia44 00:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:59, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of DOH Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:11, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 23:11, 9 September 2019 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:49, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of DOH Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect. มองโกเลีย๔๔ 17:38, 12 October 2019 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:36, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of DOH Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely the artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 06:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of DOH Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:14, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of DOH Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:14, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There must be no need to organize too many road signs and duplicate signs or any other file than SVG. Mongolia44 07:28, 3 June 2023 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 15:51, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of DOH Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:15, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely the artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 06:15, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect. มองโกเลีย๔๔ 01:42, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:55, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of DOH Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of DOH Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 15:13, 16 September 2019 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:29, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A vector file of traffic signs has been replaced.This removal reorganized the traffic signs. Mongolia44 00:45, 1 November 2022 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 15:13, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of DOH Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:17, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Picture​ on sign. มองโกเลีย๔๔ 09:52, 26 December 2018 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:58, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect. Svg file [[File:Thailand road sign บ-4|.svg มองโกเลีย๔๔ 13:10, 3 February 2020 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Érico (talk) 09:56, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A vector file of traffic signs has been replaced.This removal reorganized the traffic signs. Mongolia44 01:55, 10 November 2022 (UTC)


Kept: old upload, may be in external use, try to use categories for organising. --Krd 06:57, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of DOH Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:17, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely the artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 06:18, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely the artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 06:22, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely the artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 06:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Blurry and unused image, also potentially out of scope A1Cafel (talk) 06:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely the artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 06:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Overexposed image, nothing can be seen clearly A1Cafel (talk) 06:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete: nothing of value here. --bjh21 (talk) 16:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely the artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 06:33, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:33, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:33, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely the artist of this monument has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 06:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:36, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely the artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 06:37, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely the artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 06:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 06:40, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Do you also think we should delete pictures of buildings that were torn down because only currently-existing buildings should be shown on Commons? Was this signage ever used? If so, why on Earth would it be a good idea for us to delete it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely the artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 06:41, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely the artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 06:43, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely the artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 06:46, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Advertisement, no educational purpose. Velma (talk) 06:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Advertisement, no educational purpose. Velma (talk) 06:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Advertisement, no educational purpose. Velma (talk) 06:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely the artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 06:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely the artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 06:51, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


COM:Derivative work: a photograph-of-photograph. Original source and author unknown, possibly old enough for {{PD-Finland50}} but without more information it is impossible to know. MKFI (talk) 06:54, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To zdjęcie nie przedstawia Zaklikowa. Wprowadza w błąd użytkowników. Commons . Por. mapy. Pamulab (talk) 06:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Porównuję mapy i faktycznie wygląda na to że lokalizacja nie jest poprawna. Faktycznie wprowadza to w błąd. No cóż lepiej skasować niż wprowadzać w błąd. Dziękuję. Zuluanonymous (talk) 21:52, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely the artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 06:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely the artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years since it was created in 1988. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 07:05, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Unfortunately there's no FOP in Ukraine and it's pretty unlikely the artist of this statue has been dead for more then 70 years. So these images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 07:08, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 07:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 07:11, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Svg file Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 17:12, 15 March 2020 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - we do not generally delete pre-existing raster files for this reason. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:44, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A vector file of traffic signs has been replaced. This removal reorganized the traffic signs. Mongolia44 12:29, 22 October 2022 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:13, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 07:11, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 07:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A vector file of traffic signs has been replaced. This removal reorganized the traffic signs. Mongolia44 12:22, 22 October 2022 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:12, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear all, we would like to remove the traffic sign images that do not meet the standards of Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia Standard to prevent the complexity of the images and the use of images that are not in accordance with the government's specified format. Mongolia44 07:13, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Symbols of the Principality of Seborga

[edit]

Reasons for deletion request: All these files are not related with the Principality of Seborga per official sources (and they are also not used in general on Commons or other Wiki projects). --InfattiVedeteCheViDice (talk) 07:05, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Two different uploaders claiming ownership of the same photo. No exif, needs VRT to keep one

Gbawden (talk) 07:22, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove the Head of Shonia Brown.jpg. ShoniaBrown69 (talk) 13:51, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the typo: Please remove the Headshot of Shonia Brown.jpg ShoniaBrown69 (talk) 13:52, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 07:22, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Imbaraga mu Gushima Jeanpaul.yeswecan (talk) 07:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AI? image used on a fake draft/sandbox - Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Flickrwashing, account has 0 followers etc

Gbawden (talk) 07:51, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by ConcededBear657 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: per the description, this is a self-created flag representing an anime.

Omphalographer (talk) 07:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This Flie is used of my user page ConcededBear657 (talk) 08:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

لأنني أريد MOHAMMED RHARMAOUI (talk) 07:55, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

لأنني أريد MOHAMMED RHARMAOUI (talk) 07:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Whenevery (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are supposedly exhibits from a trial, which means that the Fandom license doesn't apply.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:17, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you clarify how it works with trial exhibits? I knew the public can request them FOI, but i don't know how that translates to here. I wanted to illustrate how the two crucial buildings and vehicles were related spatially. Whenevery (talk) 08:22, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The copyright is owned by whomever created it, unless it was a work for hire, in which case it's owned by whomever commissioned it. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is it possible to make a derivative diagram from it, that could be used in article? I have no skill in that area but i suppose it can't be too difficult as it's just objects. Whenevery (talk) 09:08, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom. Derivative work. A09 (talk) 08:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Source Energiateollisuus ry Author Veli-Pekka Sirola". VRT permission from Veli-Pekka Sirola needed. MKFI (talk) 08:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File source in metadata is File source: https://www.xenoserieswiki.org/wiki/File:Tetsuya_Takahashi.jpg , which leads me to believe that HPLWonder is not the owner of the copyright, so CC license is inapplicable. Sleeps-Darkly (talk) 08:33, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 08:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 08:40, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


old version of the logo when Hungary was supposed to organize Final 4 in Budapest. Hungary changed his mind, so Austria in now 1st in the official list (see File:2024 European Women's Handball Championship Logo.svg). Consequently this logo is now useless LeFnake (talk) 08:41, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's also possible it's too complex for PD-textlogo. As is File:2024 European Women's Handball Championship Logo.svg. Jonteemil (talk) 19:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 08:45, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the problem?--Lesnas ättling (talk) 13:34, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 08:45, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Please remove all my images of the RAF Bomber Command Memorial. I made a mistake uploading this. I misunderstood the intention behind "Wiki Loves Monuments UK" competition run in September 2024. Now I realise this memorial doesn't apply to Wiki Loves Monuments. I mistakenly thought the competition was documenting all sculptural memorials in the UK. After reading the first paragraph on the competition webpage I realized the competition is documenting listed buildings and scheduled monuments (I don't read carefully enough at all!). And there are far fewer scheduled monuments than memorials in Britain. Mebsuta 1080 (talk) 09:18, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Even if the image cannot be used for that competition, it is still usable. And there's FOP for 3D sculptures in the UK, so even from a copyright point of view, this is fine to keep. PaterMcFly (talk) 10:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete: This is a request by the author within seven days of upload, so it's covered by CSD G7. --bjh21 (talk) 16:49, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I see that, but this is not the reason provided in the request, so I would like to know why the uploader thinks the image needs to be deleted when it can't be used for the competition. PaterMcFly (talk) 06:09, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

uploader request Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 09:57, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a useful gallery, since any major language (ancient or modern) can be the lingua franca of a given region. Also, the content is not coherent. Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribsuploads) 10:07, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

same as Phaonia angelicae-pjt1.jpg Pjt56 (talk) 10:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Does not seem like own work. Evidence of permission required. Jonteemil (talk) 10:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Does not seem like own work. Evidence of permission required. Jonteemil (talk) 10:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am afraid but we will have to delete this image as there is no freedom of panorama in France, and the photo depicts a protected work of modern architecture. Gnom (talk) 10:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not educationally useful. The fictitious flag of an unknown group. 777mxxb (talk) 11:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not educationally useful 777mxxb (talk) 11:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not educationally useful 777mxxb (talk) 11:01, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot from Youtube video, published six months before this file. Gumruch (talk) 12:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 12:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded for site; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 12:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Anastasiya o (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 12:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Likely not own works: official publicity images with disparate quality and styles, missing or inconsistent EXIF data, or credit to someone else (File:Tatar 2018он.jpg is credited to Author MONGOL MIX PROJECT).

P 1 9 9   12:52, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by MintoVillaFc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very low quality, none of these are own work

Gbawden (talk) 12:54, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by MintoVillaFc scope (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minto Villa N.jpg

Gbawden (talk) 12:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be own work. Published on the web long before publication date: https://www.rynekzdrowia.pl/Uslugi-medyczne/Kpt-dr-Siewiera-pandemia-mowi-sprawdzam-Wloscy-lekarze-rodzinni-nie-zawiedli,219391,8.html https://www.se.pl/warszawa/dowodzil-misjami-w-lombardii-i-chicago-ryzykowal-zyciem-dla-pacjenta-oficer-pokieruje-szpitalem-w-hali-expo-aa-haMA-cNm7-PLjM.html 87.205.166.75 12:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio from https://stara.wim.mil.pl/o-instytucie-mainmenu-88/dotacje-budzetowe/183-aktualnoci/3591-prezydent-donald-trump-docenil-prace-i-zaangazowanie-medykow-z-polski-w-walce-z-covid-19 87.205.166.75 13:02, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by IngridRob (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage outside sandbox, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 13:04, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Emusicismylife (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 13:41, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama in Laos. Other photographs with Patuxai as the main subject were recently deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Patuxai. BigDom (talk) 13:43, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Bistatech (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 13:44, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is unlikely to be a work of an architect who died more than 50 years ago. As the Philippines does not have Freedom of Panorama, this public building cannot be used in commercially-licensed images like this. This can be locally hosted on enwiki, though, which does not need to follow the restrictive copyright law of the Philippines and only applies the lenient U.S. FoP law for architecture to the images of unfree buildings globally. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:47, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Omerwilson (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage outside sandbox, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 13:47, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:DW, no FOP in Uzbekistan (taken not in Boston, USA, but in Bostonliq District, Uzbekistan). P 1 9 9   13:47, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi P199, I take it on the Bostonliq and camp is made by Wikistipendiya. So, is it illegal? Mrshaxas (talk) 11:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, because you need permission from the publishers of the castle photo to republish it. --P 1 9 9   13:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ycaborg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by organization; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 13:47, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See COM:FOP Philippines. As there is no Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines, this commercially-licensed image cannot be hosted on Commons. This can be locally hosted on enwiki though, which is not obliged to follow restrictive Philippine laws and is only obliged to follow lenient U.S. law that allows commercial uses of architecture without architects' licensing permits. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:52, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 13:58, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

لأساب خاصة MOHAMMED RHARMAOUI (talk) 14:01, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Similar case to this one. As a new building in one of the newest towns in the Philippines, it is certainly not a work of an architect who died many years ago, and so copyrighted and unfree for commercial uses or commercial licensing. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:02, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


{{PD-UKGov}} only applies to works created before 1974, so it would not apply to this 1985 flag. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 14:19, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Defenrob (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works as stated, but I couldn't verify if there is a free license at the source.

P 1 9 9   14:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

copy. see https://et-cetera.ru/upload/iblock/198/1985ad32e2f9c39240eacf4e1e043a3b.jpg 91.199.156.161 14:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте! Прошу удалить мою фотографию (повтор), загружу другую. @Vladimir Solovjev: Well-read MountainMan (talk) 14:55, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non free image from Newsweek Rht bd (talk) 14:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated for speedy as copyright violation. - Rht bd (talk) 09:52, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 15:03, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 15:04, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Vikrantkroy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 15:04, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 15:05, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author is Torben S.M. 200.39.139.0 15:11, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Author: Torben 200.39.139.0 15:14, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

low resolution of Stigmatisation_des_hl._Franziskus_von_Assisi,_Tafelfragment_vom_Baldachinretabel_des_Marienseitenaltars_aus_der_Nürnberger_Klarakirche.jpg Carl Ha (talk) 15:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article Oddity Seeker (talk) 15:28, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep “nonsense […] absolutely unusable” is clearly not a valid reason for deletion in this case. Dronebogus (talk) 19:06, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is totally blurry Oddity Seeker (talk) 15:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 15:37, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 15:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The lack of metadata for this file raises concerns it is not the product of the uploader CeltBrowne (talk) 15:46, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 15:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

gibberish Adinar0012 (talk) 15:55, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by IIIdefconIII (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The photograph in this logo certainly has a copyright, see the first two images. If the logo is a self creation by the uploader, as claimed, then I doubt that it is in scope. There are no Google hits for Crossplay Gaming Server Global except its own web site.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:58, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Porqué no me gusta Edelweiss2024 (talk) 16:08, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Derivative work of a deleted image Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:13, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Imagen de un niño Carlillasa (talk) 16:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag)

1928 work by an author who died in 1960, Undelete in 2031. Abzeronow (talk) 16:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Firtuna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:07, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope logo, and above TOO. Only used on sandbox page of user without any meaningful edits. P 1 9 9   17:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ddyer4 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo (Google translate: "Personal picture"), out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:18, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:DW and out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:20, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Likely not own work: watermark not matching uploader, and filename and visual characteristics suggest screenshot. P 1 9 9   17:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright infiringement - published earlier on 18/01/2019 at https://kienthuc.net.vn/kinh-doanh/ceo-golean-detox-he-lo-duyen-phan-voi-thi-truong-thuc-pham-giam-can-1173914.html 109.71.220.186 17:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I gave the wrong name. I was supposed to name it under the name File:Kit shorts kbfcgk2425h.png. Ken Tony (talk) 17:26, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can just ask to rename the file (put {{Rename|File:Kit shorts kbfcgk2425h.png|1}} on the page). --P 1 9 9   17:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I have renamed the file. --bjh21 (talk) 21:58, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not own work (Google translation of description: "The logo ... was given by the institution."). Above TOO, needs COM:VRT. P 1 9 9   17:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:PRP: Photo is likely a crop of another picture (see image closeup) that may not be freely licensed. A09 (talk) 17:34, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mislicensed non-free logo. XXN, 17:55, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I work for the team. This serves as an update to the current logo that is there. Leave it up 132.205.229.61 18:03, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You should contact COM:VRT to show them that you have the authority to freely license the logo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Above COM:TOO Germany. Jonteemil (talk) 17:55, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Above COM:TOO Germany. Jonteemil (talk) 17:58, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Above COM:TOO Germany. Jonteemil (talk) 17:59, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Above COM:TOO Germany. Jonteemil (talk) 17:59, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not entirely the own work of the uploader and not free. The uploader might have added the letters at the top of the image, but the main logo, the chain links logo, is the CSN logo. Same rationale as the similar deleted case Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo CCQCA 3.jpg: "Probably considered above the threshold of creativity. The design of the symbol was adopted by the CSN in 1974. Too recent to be public domain. The owner of the copyright on the design would be either the designer or the CSN." Also considered non free at en.wikipedia File:CSN logo.jpg and at fr.wikipedia Fichier:Logo-csn.png. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:08, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:DW of a stock photo at the very least; not own work. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:14, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of project scope - uploaded solely for use in spam article on English Wikipedia Liance (talk) 18:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused AI-generated image of a hoax "goddess of filtration". Omphalographer (talk) 18:42, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As well as File:Filteria - Bogini czystej wody w mitologii Słowiańskiej.webp - similar content with a title in Polish. Omphalographer (talk) 02:47, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1972 French publication. CC license only seems to be true for the photograph and not the work itself and this is not public domain

Abzeronow (talk) 18:42, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ismaill.ay (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: these unused, AI-generated images all depict fantasy sci-fi hospitals (complete with blue glowing holograms and icons floating in the air), not realistic scenes of health care.

Omphalographer (talk) 18:44, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1976 artwork by Luis Felipe Noé, a living artist. Uploader might be the artist themselves, VRT might be necessary. Abzeronow (talk) 18:46, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused AI-generated image of a family cutting a ribbon at a building labeled "general practice". Associated article on nlwiki already deleted. Omphalographer (talk) 18:47, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, badly misgenerated scissors, which are the focal point of the image. Belbury (talk) 09:45, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1988 logo, possibly above Japanese ToO. CC license is dubious. Abzeronow (talk) 18:47, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1945 photograph, not an own work by the uploader. We would need publication information to determine actual copyright status. Abzeronow (talk) 18:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This map is copywritten material; per Frost it is owned by Pearson Education and was only used with express permission: https://thesocietypages.org/graphicsociology/files/2009/01/frost_european_eye_color2.jpg it was previously deleted on a different upload, but the deletion page is (with explanation) is here: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Eye_colors_map_of_Europe.png A Rainbow Footing It (talk) 18:57, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Scanned newspaper of 1983, copyrighted text and photo, both are not copyright exempt, as the uploader claims. Quick1984 (talk) 18:58, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative of copyrighted artworks. No FoP in Latvia. Quick1984 (talk) 19:05, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The poster has author's signature, so he/she is neither unknown nor anonymous. The uploader must provide evidence the author is died over 70 years ago. Quick1984 (talk) 19:07, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The author is neither unknown nor anonymous. This is a work by Zenta Logina [1], who died in 1983 [2]. Quick1984 (talk) 19:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

out of scope 46.112.114.18 19:17, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete lacks edu value, out of scope. pl seems to mean "cock". Taylor 49 (talk) 21:05, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Content on the sphere is subject to copyright per COM:FOP US

(talk) 19:48, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: I've gone through all of those, and I don't think any of them is de minimis or below the threshold of originality. --bjh21 (talk) 17:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A version of this photo was published in 2022 by the casino, unlikely to be the uploader's work: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=5350706914989712&set=pcb.5350707234989680 Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:54, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file is a logo of my school and it has no copyright. However, Wikimedia has notified me of a copyright violation. I initially uploaded it to add to my school's Wikipedia page. I am concerned about which logo will be used if this one is deleted. Nevertheless, in compliance with Wikimedia's policies, I request that this file be deleted. Thank you Cerium4B (talk) 19:57, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you think it has no copyright? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


doublon d'un 2e fichier (recadré) FabriceValserradelDongo (talk) 20:17, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

سبام أو دعاية Mohammed Qays (talk) 20:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ترويج أو دعاية Mohammed Qays (talk) 20:36, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

صورة لها حقوق - صورة غلاف كتاب Mohammed Qays (talk) 20:36, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

صورة ليست لها أهمية Mohammed Qays (talk) 20:37, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

لا لشيء فقط من أجل التفرغ للبرمجه الذاتيه Talas Haroun (talk) 21:13, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


صورة ليست لها أهمية Mohammed Qays (talk) 20:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:48, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Technoedge education (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:54, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Depicts a copyrighted character (Rick Sanchez) in detail. Bonus Person (talk) 20:55, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:55, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

dubious own work; likely from his LinkedIn Jan Myšák (talk) 21:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Above COM:TOO US. Jonteemil (talk) 21:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly above TOO, however I'm not sure which is the relevant TOO. Jonteemil (talk) 21:13, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly too complex for PD-textlogo. Jonteemil (talk) 21:17, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:17, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:19, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly too complex for PD-textlogo. Jonteemil (talk) 21:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This logo is not from 1911 but rather 1970 or 1998. See https://1000logos.net/eintracht-frankfurt-logo and discussion at https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Village_pump/Copyright&oldid=925537718#File%3AEintracht_Frankfurt_Logo.svg . Glrx (talk) 21:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete pero nom. Fma12 (talk) 09:19, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:PENIS and child protection 186.172.214.71 21:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Violação de Direitos Autorais SSoster (WMB) (talk) 01:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

file loaded by mistake SSoster (WMB) (talk) 21:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

file loaded by mistake SSoster (WMB) (talk) 21:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

file loaded by mistake SSoster (WMB) (talk) 21:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

file loaded by mistake SSoster (WMB) (talk) 21:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

file loaded by mistake SSoster (WMB) (talk) 21:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:PENIS and child protection 186.172.214.71 21:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly too complex for {{PD-textlogo}}.

Jonteemil (talk) 21:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HR Hasan? 186.172.214.71 21:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Art work? 186.172.214.71 21:40, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly above COM:TOO Switzerland. Jonteemil (talk) 21:40, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not own work 186.172.214.71 21:40, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Park souvenir 186.172.214.71 21:41, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook sourced 186.172.214.71 21:42, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Funny pic? What is funny and what is the scope? 186.172.214.71 21:44, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please delete. Yours sincerely --Colling-architektur (talk) 17:47, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No scope 186.172.214.71 21:47, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User without contributions 186.172.214.71 21:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly above COM:TOO Germany. Jonteemil (talk) 21:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is she in scope? 186.172.214.71 21:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ninja y Data? 186.172.214.71 21:51, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not own work. Draft with Facebook as source 186.172.214.71 21:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook? G10? 186.172.214.71 21:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is he in scope? 186.172.214.71 21:59, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook? 186.172.214.71 22:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by RS Laatamna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely copyvios.

Jonteemil (talk) 22:05, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cropped from image also nominated for deletion. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dr. Dutch Bilal Ware wisdom.jpg Adding this deletion request in the mean time in hopes that fewer people add this image to their wikis. Thesavagenorwegian (talk) 22:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Forgive me if making multiple deletion requests isn't proper practice here, and that derived images are automatically deleted when the parent is. The derived-from image's deletion nomination is here: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dr. Dutch Bilal Ware wisdom.jpg. Thesavagenorwegian (talk) 22:54, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per Ticket:2024091710013894, A person with the name Dave Brett (User:Traveldaveuk) claimed to be the Copyright holder of this file, and provided a quite evidence. As per their evidence I found the file on FlickR also, which is solid proof of their authorship. –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 23:19, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Note to Administrator: The Copyright holder also agreed to give permission if they get proper credits on the file page, so I'm looking for uploder's comments here. –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 23:47, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Unsure about copyright to San Marino stamps, but the photo itself is a 2D copy of a 2D work, so not copyrightable per our policy. Shouldn't it be marked as {{PD-Art|''whatever copyright status of the stamp is''}}? Ankry (talk) 08:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Levivich (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These architectural drawings are sufficiently detailed to be copyrightable in the United States. The archived source notes that the files are Copyright © 2017 State of Utah - All rights reserved. The uploader claims that These drawings from www.utah.gov are in the public domain per the author, citing this disclaimer. However, the disclaimer does not explicitly release the images into the public domain and it imposes several restrictions on the kinds of re-use: namely that the use be for personal or informational use and only so permitted if the content files are not modified in any respect.

Because the renderings are above COM:TOO USA, and the licensor imposes restrictions on the use for non-personal and non-informational purposes (such as commercial use) as well as restrictions on remixing (i.e. a no derivatives requirement), the hosting of these files on Commons appears to be in violation of the licensing policy as the licenses are non-free. As such, and in light of the precautionary principle, these files should be deleted from Commons.

Red-tailed hawk (nest) 23:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think all of these can probably be kept per COM:TOO US, but if not, some of them are certainly generic enough to be kept. I'll be interested to see the closing admin's decision and disappointed if it's just "Deleted per nomination" without comment. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:24, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you explain why these are below COM:TOO US? I look at things like the omega globe and I can't help but conclude that the three-dimensional drawings are more complex. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:06, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You may be right. I was looking at these as simple schematics of generic houses. I hope the closing admin is expert in this field of U.S. law. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:02, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by likely company rep; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:37, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]