Commons:Propositions d'images remarquables
Cette page recense les images qui sont proposées pour être affichées dans les Images remarquables. Notez qu'il ne s'agit pas de la même chose que l'image du jour ou que les images de qualité.
Les archives des votes précédents se trouvent sur cette page.
Il existe également une liste chronologique des images remarquables.
Voir aussi les Images de qualité, les propositions d'images de qualité et les critiques photographiques.
Procédure
[edit]Conseils avant de proposer une image
[edit]partie en cours de traduction depuis la version anglaise, votre avis est le bienvenu.
Lisez entièrement le guide avant de commencer
Quelques règles informelles à retenir avant de proposer une image (les termes en italiques sont la traduction anglaise des termes).
- Définition (display resolution) : les images de Commons peuvent être utilisées sur d'autres supports qu'un écran d'ordinateur, par exemple pour être imprimées ou vues à très haute résolution. Il est important que les images proposées aient la plus haute résolution possible. Au moins 2 millions de pixels (par ex. 2000 x 1000) semble raisonnable à présent. Les images de définition inférieure sont systématiquement rejetées sauf s'il y a une bonne raison.
- Mise au point (focus) : tous les objets importants de l'image devraient être nets. Dans l'idéal les objets non primordiaux sont nets.
- Avant-plan et arrière-plan (background and foreground): ils peuvent être dérangeants. Le sujet principal ne devrait pas être caché par le premier plan, ni se confondre avec l'arrière-plan.
- Qualité générale (general quality) : Les images proposées devraient avoir une très haute qualité technique.
- Une retouche (digital manipulations) ne doit pas tromper l'observateur. La correction de quelques défauts dans l'image est acceptée pour autant que ce soit limité, bien fait, et non pour tromper. Les retouches courantes sont le recadrage, la correction de la perspective, de netteté, des couleurs ou de l'exposition. Des manipulations plus importantes, tels quel l'élimination d'éléments dans l'arrière plan, doivent être décrites dans la description de l'image, par le biais du modèle {{RetouchedPicture}}. Les retouches non décrites ou mal décrites qui transformeraient le sujet sont inacceptables.
- Utilité (value) : notre but principal est de présenter des images utiles et précieuses. Les images devraient ainsi être spéciales d'une façon ou d'une autre, donc, entre autres :
- La plupart des coucher de soleil sont beaux, et la plupart ne sont pas différents des autres existant déjà.
- Les photos de nuit sont souvent belles mais davantage de détails sont visibles de jour.
- "Beau" ne veut pas dire "utile".
Au niveau technique, nous avons l'exposition, la composition, le mouvement et la profondeur du champ.
- L'exposition (exposure) est l'obturation du diaphragme qui modifie la luminosité (brightness) pour rendre avec qualité les ombres et les lumières au sein de l'image. Le manque d'ombres dans le détail n'est pas nécessairement négatif, cela peut être un effet désiré.
- La composition (composition) est l'arrangement des éléments dans l'image. La "Règle de trois" est un bon guide pour la composition, c'est un héritage des écoles de peintures. L'idée est de diviser l'image par deux lignes horizontales et deux lignes verticales, nous avons donc trois parties dans chaque sens. L'objet ne doit pas forcément être centré. Les sujets intéressants doivent êtres placés aux 4 croisements des lignes. L'horizon ne doit jamais être mis au milieu, car il couperait l'image en deux. L'idée principale ici est de rendre l'image dynamique.
- Netteté (sharpness) renvoie à la manière dont les mouvements sont représentés dans l'image. Ils peuvent être nets ou flous. Ils ne sont pas mieux l'un que l'autre, cela dépend de l'intention du photographe. L'impression de mouvement dépend des différents objets de l'image. Par exemple, photographier une voiture de course qui apparaît nette par rapport à l'arrière plan ne donne pas une idée de la vitesse. Il faudrait en fait que la voiture soit représentée nette, mais avec un arrière plan flou, créant ainsi le mouvement. D'un autre coté, représenter le saut d'un joueur de basket net avec le reste de l'image flou, en raison de la nature peu habituelle de la photo, lui conférerait de l'intérêt.
- La profondeur de champ (depth of field or DOF) renvoie à la zone de mise au point devant et au delà du sujet principal. La profondeur de champ est choisie en fonction des besoins spécifiques à chaque image. Une profondeur grande ou petite peut améliorer ou dégrader la qualité de l'image. Une faible profondeur de champ peut attirer l'attention sur le sujet principal, en le séparant de son environnement. Les lentilles à petite distance focale (grand angle) ont une grande profondeur de champ, et vice versa, les lentilles à grande distance focale (petite ouverture) ont une petite profondeur de champ.
Proposition
[edit]Si vous pensez avoir trouvé ou créé une image qui puisse être considérée comme parmi les meilleures de Commons, avec une description et une licence appropriée, copiez le nom de l'image dans la boîte ci-dessous (en incluant le préfixe File:), après le texte déjà présent :
Après cela, vous devrez insérer un lien vers la page que vous venez de créer en haut de Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.
Vote
[edit]A l'exclusion de tous autres, vous pouvez utiliser les modèles suivants:
- {{Pour}} ( Support),
- {{Contre}} ( Oppose),
Ainsi que :
- {{Neutre}} ( Neutral),
- {{Comment}} ( Comment),
- {{Info}} ( Info),
- {{Question}} ( Question).
- IMPORTANT: veuillez notamment NE PAS UTILISER les modèles {{weak support}} ( Weak support) ni {{weak oppose}} ( Weak oppose), ils ne sont pas reconnus par le robot, et votre vote serait considéré comme non valide.
Merci d'inclure quelques mots expliquant pourquoi vous soutenez ou non la promotion de l'image, surtout si vous votez contre. N'oubliez pas de signer avec ~~~~.
Règles
[edit]Règles générales
[edit]- Le résultat est donné 9 jours après la proposition (voir le planning en bas de page). Les votes ajoutés le 10e jour ou après ne sont pas décomptés.
- Les utilisateurs non-enregistrés peuvent proposer des images, faire des commentaires, mais pas voter.
- La proposition elle-même ne compte pas comme un vote : il faut l'ajouter explicitement.
- Le proposant peut retirer une image à tout moment, en écrivant : {{Withdraw}} ~~~~
- Souvenez-vous que le but de Wikimedia Commons est une bibliothèque pour tous les projets Wikimedia, y compris des projets futurs ; les images n'ont pas à être utiles uniquement pour Wikipédia.
- Les images peuvent être retirées de la liste dès le 5e jour si elles n'ont reçu aucun vote "pour".
- Soyez attentifs et très sélectifs dans les choix que vous faites, car il ne peut y avoir que deux propositions actives par proposant. Toute proposition supplémentaire sera rejetée sans examen.
- Seulement 2 nominations actives par même utilisateur (qui est, en nomination sous "review" et non encore close) sont autorisées. Le principal but de cette mesure est de contribuer à une meilleure qualité moyenne des nominations, par un choix plus judicieux des photos présentes en nominations.
Règles de promotion
[edit]L'image candidate devient une image remarquable si elle remplit les conditions suivantes :
- Une licence appropriée (bien sûr !)
- Au moins sept votes "pour".
- un ratio de 2/1 de votes "pour"/"contre".
- Deux versions différentes de la même image ne peuvent pas être promues en même temps, mais seulement celle avec le plus grand score.
Contestations
[edit]Avec le temps, les critères d'évaluation évoluent, et il peut être décidé qu'une image qui était auparavant assez bonne pour être dans la liste ne peut plus l'être.
Pour qu'une image soit déchue, il faut qu'une majorité de 2/3 avec au moins 5 votes accepte de retirer l'image, autrement elle reste "remarquable". Pour voter, utiliser les modèles {{Keep}} ( Keep : mérite de rester "remarquable") ou {{Delist}} ( Delist : ne mérite plus le label).
Pour contester une image, copiez son nom avec le préfixe dans la boîte ci-dessous à la suite du texte déjà présent :
Vous devriez inclure les informations suivantes :
- Informations sur l'origine de l'image (créateur, importateur).
- Un lien vers le vote d'origine.
- La raison pour laquelle vous contestez le label, avec votre signature.
Insérez ensuite un lien en haut de Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal.
Sommaire
[edit]Pour ajouter votre proposition à la liste
[edit]Pour ajouter votre proposition à la liste, cliquez ici et ajoutez votre proposition en haut de la liste : {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:FILENAME}}
Propositions en cours
[edit]Featured picture candidates
[edit]Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 21:19:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany
- Info created by Superbass - uploaded by Superbass - nominated by Superbass -- Superbass (talk) 21:19, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 19:45:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Cheloniidae (Sea Turtles)
- Info Hawksbill sea turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata), Ad Dimaniyat Islands, Oman. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 14:02:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
- Info The picture shows 3 Bavarian Architectural Monuments
Hohenschwangau Castle
It is on the list of cultural monuments of Bayern, no. D-7-77-169-30.
Hotel Alpenrose
It is on the list of cultural monuments of Bayern, no. D-7-77-169-29.
Neuschwanstein Castle
It is on the list of cultural monuments of Bayern, no. D-7-77-169-33.
and 2 Protected Areas
This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID 395500
|
This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID 555537966
|
created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 14:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 14:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 11:47:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phoenicopteridae_(Flamingos)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:47, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:47, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 16:11, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 16:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Mounir Neddi (talk) 17:36, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:54, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 09:10:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
- Info created by Dirtsc - uploaded by Dirtsc - nominated by Dirtsc -- Dirtsc (talk) 09:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Dirtsc (talk) 09:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The sunspot devalues the image. Sorry. --Ermell (talk) 16:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I should say the light spot ads a touch of magic to the scene --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:25, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 08:55:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#Victoria
- Info created and uploaded by Uzman Naleer - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 08:55, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:55, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – nice composition and atmosphere. —Bruce1eetalk 09:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing moisture sucking of Charaxes psaphon (Westwood, 1847) - Plain Tawny Rajah WLB.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 06:03:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 06:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 06:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The Focus is a little too far forward. Unfortunately, the eyes are not sharp as a result. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 16:18, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
File:004 Greater flamingos walking in the Camargue during mating season Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 01:28:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phoenicopteridae_(Flamingos)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:28, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:28, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent focus, high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:54, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:53, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support excellent. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support amazing shot. --Rbrechko (talk) 11:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 16:11, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:42, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 21:11:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors#United_States
- Info The Browsing Room and Manuscripts Reading Room at the Indiana State Library. The symbols along the ceiling are American printers' marks. Most of the room is paneled with walnut, and those bookshelf finials are owls -- one of the symbols of the library. Two-frame panorama. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 21:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 21:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 20:48:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Others
- Info Large milkweed bug (Oncopeltus fasciatus). Despite the name, this fellow is about 13mm long. No FPs in this family, it seems (Lygaeidae). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 20:48, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 20:48, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:39, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 18:32:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
- Info Bull's head from the Mithraeum, Ruins of Castellum Tidditanorum (Tiddis), Numidia, Algeria. Created by Carole Raddato - uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 18:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 18:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 15:28:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
- Info An emission nebula in the constellation of Cassiopeia. No FPs of this nebula. Not a NASA photo, amateur astrophotography by a Commons user - always makes it more impressive to me, that we have users who can make content of NASA-level quality. created by Cpayoub - uploaded by Cpayoub - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:28, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:28, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment A real talent, see here. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:55, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- What an equipment! -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:01, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sure! Yann (talk) 16:03, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sette-quattro (talk) 20:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC) 20:48, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:01, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:38, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:50, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very beautiful, great find. No coma, not even in the corners; maybe a little bit of spherical aberration, but it looks just natural here. – Aristeas (talk) 10:55, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:38, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Collared lory (Vini solitaria) on octopus tree (Heptapleurum actinophyllum) Colo-I-Suva.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 15:13:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Psittaculidae (True Parrots)
- Info A Fijian endemic. No FPs. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:15, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition. Beautiful red bird and tasty branch, good focus on both, smooth bokeh -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:58, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:47, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice shot. --Rbrechko (talk) 11:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:38, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 16:35, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 05:53:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#South Korea
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:53, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:53, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:14, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Drawn to the composition. — Rhododendrites talk | 21:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – the geometric shapes are appealing. —Bruce1eetalk 07:28, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Honestly, I think what Bruce said is what makes this photo so appealing.--SHB2000 (talk) 08:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support The geometric shapes of the foreground, indeed, and also their contrast with the natural irregular shapes of the trees in the middle ground and of the mountains in the background. – Aristeas (talk) 10:50, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 11:35, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Cesenatico - Chiesa di San Giacomo Apostolo - Vista notturna - 2024-09-21 20-07-45 001.JPG
[edit]Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 21:46:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info This is one of my favorite photos that would like to represent simplicity and serenity. - c/u/n by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 21:46, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 21:46, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good. Wolverine X-eye 04:39, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very beautiful. Composition, mirror image, sky with pink cloud, and blue hour lightings -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:55, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Basile; pleasant evening atmosphere. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:17, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:26, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 09:00, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:02, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Truly wonderful Cmao20 (talk) 16:14, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very beautiful light, colours, and atmosphere. – Aristeas (talk) 18:23, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:33, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:42, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 11:36, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sharpness could be better but a great shot overall Poco a poco (talk) 19:52, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 19:52:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Russia
- Info created by Ted.ns - uploaded by Ted.ns - nominated by Till Niermann -- Till (talk) 19:52, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Till (talk) 19:52, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Looks downsampled, but good nonetheless. — Rhododendrites talk | 22:51, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Rhododendrites. Exceptional landscape that looks almost surreal. -- Radomianin (talk) 23:05, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Stunning mix of desert of snow dunes & glaciers, and light & darkness -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:24, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I think it's rather small for a landscape and coming from a 5DII, and there's this other picture which is better IMO and at 45 Mpx: File:Before it rains.jpg --Kadellar (talk) 08:43, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Two pictures taken one day apart... Till (talk) 12:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I don't like this camera model card pulled here in Featured Pictures. It doesn't make sense. It encourages contributors to submit images of worse quality and remove EXIF. As long as photographer submits 18 Mpix photos from their Canon 60D, the images are ok, Featured worthy. God forbid the photographer uses the same lens in Canon 5Ds. Submitting full resolution 51 Mpix? Quality is bad, can't be Featured. Decreasing resolution to 30 Mpix to compensate average lens quality? You shouldn't decrease resolution, can't be Featured. Cropping a subject from a 51 Mpix image to create an 18 Mpix photo, because photographer can afford only one lens? It can't be Featured, because your camera is capable of 51 Mpix.--Tupungato (talk) 14:22, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Tupungato has a point here. I would always encourage fellow photographers to upload their photos in full resolution, but to be just we must judge high-resolution photos a bit differently. People sometimes think that taking photos with the newest cameras is much easier because the AF is so much better; but AF is not everything, actually it’s much more difficult to take pin-point sharp photos with today’s high-resolution cameras, especially when we talk about landscape or architecture photos where every detail matters. Lenses which appeared flawless on 12 or even 24 MPix cameras reveal significant aberrations and unsharp borders on 42, 50 or 62 Mpix cameras, also because the latter often drop the traditional on-sensor anti-alias filter which used to hide many fine details and defects; focussing needs more care, because even the slightest field curvature will visibly influence the final results; stopping down to ƒ/11 etc. becomes problematic because diffraction shows its effect very early. A practical solution, proposed by various users, is that we judge low-resolution or downscaled photos rather strictly (if somebody provides only about 6 Mpix, these 6 Mpix should be pin-point sharp and there should be no visible CAs, no noise etc.); be a bit more relaxed with 12 to 24 Mpix photos; and forgive some slight softness, small CAs, a little bit of noise etc. with photos > 36 Mpix. Of course there are exceptions – e.g. difficult wildlife photos often require significant cropping, so we must understand and accept that, too. – Aristeas (talk) 10:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support The other picture Kadellar links is definitely better, but it's a v different composition from this one Cmao20 (talk) 16:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Rhododendrites. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:42, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Cmao20. IMHO we can (and should) feature both photos. – Aristeas (talk) 10:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:36, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:53, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 19:39:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Morocco
- Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 19:39, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 19:39, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Beautiful landscape but sorry, IMO not an outstanding composition Cmao20 (talk) 16:04, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 19:30:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Ukraine
- Info All by Nikride -- Nikride (talk) 19:30, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Nikride (talk) 19:30, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support White balance seems a little warm to me, but cool architecture and nice composition so deserves a star Cmao20 (talk) 15:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Normally prominent street lights are a big problem in such photographs, but here the two big lights have been successfully included in the composition. – Aristeas (talk) 09:22, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 19:27:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Morocco
- Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 19:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 19:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment That bit of vegetation on the right in the middle of the water should be cropped out, but this is a good composition and there is potential here. Cmao20 (talk) 15:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Cmao20 Done Thank you Mounir Neddi (talk) 20:33, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Pretty good now IMO Cmao20 (talk) 20:46, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose A nice scene, but I find the tree in the foreground to be fighting [compositionally] with the hill in the background. I wonder if it would make a nicer shot to be a bit to the right and stepping back a bit. — Rhododendrites talk | 21:15, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Problem of composition in my view, and the lake itself is not out of ordinary. Cut off tree at the left, branches in the shadow hiding the mountains, flat water and midday light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:43, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 17:57:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
- Info created by Kabelleger - uploaded by Kabelleger - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 17:57, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tupungato (talk) 17:57, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:30, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 21:50, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:50, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 00:04, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition and lighting --Tagooty (talk) 03:00, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:22, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:09, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 15:26, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as always Cmao20 (talk) 15:30, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Another one from the master of the "trains in fabulous landscapes" genre of photography. :) — Rhododendrites talk | 21:18, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- I think he has long been promoted from Master to Grandmaster. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:49, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:33, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition, viaduc, and, as always, picture taken at the right moment with the train -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:43, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Outstanding – excellent composition, beautiful light and colours. The surroundings appear a bit soft, especially the bushes and trees look somewhat mushy, but that’s probably unavoidable due to the small sensor of the drone camera. – Aristeas (talk) 09:19, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:53, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 09:27:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Jordan
- Info Temple of Zeus (Gerasa, Jerash - Jordan; معبد زيوس). My shot. - Mile (talk) 09:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 09:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:29, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:00, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Ratekreel (talk) 18:02, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support the picture is well taken and the ruins of the temple are great, of course. However, someone is selling T-shirts just there... a pity. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:33, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment There's a problem at the lower right corner -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Basile Morin But original. I dont know what is it. Will leave as it is. Stones are problem to "draw". --Mile (talk) 11:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 05:22:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#South Korea
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:00, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 08:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 15:16, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:12, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:33, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support, but I doubt the symmetry of the left and right pillars. But maybe that wasn't symmetrical in reality either.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Famerborst. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive place and photograph. – Aristeas (talk) 09:14, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support The imperfect symmetry makes the picture interesting.--Ermell (talk) 16:09, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 22:34:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Canidae_(Canids)
- Info created by Максим Яковлєв - uploaded by Максим Яковлєв - nominated by Luda.slominska -- Luda.slominska (talk) 22:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Luda.slominska (talk) 22:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not particularly large and not very sharp either. For me, the level is higher with FP.--Ermell (talk) 23:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Sorry but I agree with Ermell. It's a good QI, nice composition but a bit small for FP in 2024 for a reasonably common animal Cmao20 (talk) 14:59, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Have to agree with others — not very sharp image, thus lacking wow. Красный wanna talk? 20:37, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 21:58:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Columbidae (Pigeons and Doves)
- Info Also known as the Kererū. No FPs. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:58, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:58, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support High level of detail, nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:28, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:35, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:12, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Not the best posture imo, but representative of the behaviour of the New Zealand pigeon. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:08, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- The ones we saw spent a lot of time eating! Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:16, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 18:21, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:30, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:55, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 17:07:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Ukraine
- Info created by Rbrechko - uploaded by Rbrechko - nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 17:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 17:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Request A description in English would be appreciated. Captions, too. And more than one category -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:33, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done --Rbrechko (talk) 11:33, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:28, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful contrast between the fine natural structures and vivid green of the trees and the gray geometric shape of the fort. – Aristeas (talk) 18:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 15:54:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Motorsports
- Info Swedish rider Nils Anderberg during Gotland Grand National 2024. Created by ArildV - uploaded by ArildV - nominated by Kadellar -- Kadellar (talk) 15:54, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Kadellar (talk) 15:54, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ezarateesteban 16:49, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Nice action shot, plus a good composition. —Bruce1eetalk 17:11, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very lively.--Ermell (talk) 23:33, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:33, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Captivating angle and good quality. If you could bring a bit more space at the bottom, I think it would be amazing. But still FP in state -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:37, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Info I uploaded a new version with slightly more space.--ArildV (talk) 11:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Awesome! Well balanced! -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:52, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Info I uploaded a new version with slightly more space.--ArildV (talk) 11:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 10:24, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for nomination, votes and comments.--ArildV (talk) 11:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great action photo, well done Cmao20 (talk) 14:12, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Ratekreel (talk) 18:05, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressively beautiful shot, detailed, denoised without excess and with the bright background that does not disturb at all. Terragio67 (talk) 19:44, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:03, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Bruce1ee, Basile, Terragio67. – Aristeas (talk) 18:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:48, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:29, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:56, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 13:14:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
- Info created and uploaded by Ted.ns - nominated by FBilula (talk) 13:14, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 13:14, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:32, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment an English description will be useful, what about graffiti? no COM:FOP in Russia for artworks and it ruins the picture IMHO Ezarateesteban 16:48, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- No protectable work for me, just a few letters. --A.Savin 09:26, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- These letters have some art style (not so original IMO, but still). Anyway, it's De minimis for me, while graffiti is an unwanted intrusion here and occupies less than 10% of the frame. Красный wanna talk? 20:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- No protectable work for me, just a few letters. --A.Savin 09:26, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support nice one, but I think the picture would be better if author stepped back a little. Perspective correction here is borderline — if it would be a bit more building would look unnatural even while all verticals would be vertical. Красный wanna talk? 20:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 13:13:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
- Info created and uploaded by Ludvig14 - nominated by FBilula (talk) 13:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 13:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good composition of somewhere with a fascinating history Cmao20 (talk) 13:32, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry I don't find the structure extraordinary, nor the composition with the lower right corner -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile.--Ermell (talk) 16:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
World Maps by Abraham Ortelius, 1572
[edit]Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 09:48:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
-
America
-
Europe
-
Asia
-
Africa
-
World
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of the world
- Info created by Abraham Ortelius, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Info Theatrum Orbis Terrarum, world maps by Abraham Ortelius, 1572. First edition in German. Each of the five maps here were the standards for their time, drawn from the most important wall maps produced by Mercator, Ortelius and other leading European mapmakers.
- Support It is quite exceptional to have a whole set in such a good quality and high resolution. Each of the maps may be in the relevant FP subcategory. -- Yann (talk) 09:48, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Famous maps, definitely need to be featured Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 15:56, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Ratekreel (talk) 18:07, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'm agree with Cmao. -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:09, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Yann and Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 18:17, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sette-quattro (talk) 20:51, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:25, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 04:10:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#India
- Info The green fields surrounding Stongde village are a refreshing contrast from the stark treeless central Zanskar valley and the snow-capped 6,000 m (20,000 ft) Zanskar Range. Elevation of Stongde 3,530 m (11,580 ft). Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 04:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 04:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Better at full size than thumbnail Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:04, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:26, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Ratekreel (talk) 18:08, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:48, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:07, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Beautifully composed image. Famberhorst (talk) 05:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:27, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 23:49:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed#Book illustrations in black and white
- Info created by Jose Hernandez- uploaded by Shooke - restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 23:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support restoration based on a very damaged original-- Ezarateesteban 23:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Shooke (Talk me in spanish, english or italian) 02:01, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Blue stamp removed, weird line under "Tacuari", and natural features deleted in comparison with the original -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:46, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: The stamp wasn't original made by Jose Hernandez, was stamped by a library as catalog number, and I tried to smooth out wrinkles that ruined the material --Ezarateesteban 10:57, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Only 1,772 × 2,819 pixels, the resolution is quite low, considering this section aims to select the finest pictures of the website. The subject itself is not spectacular. I believe there are a lot of similar covers on Commons in better conservation state. About the restoration, it has gone too far in my opinion, distorting the original document a little too much (even though the weird line has now been removed) -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:03, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Removing the library stamp is OK, but reconstructing the damaged document not so IMO. More to the point, ordinary old book cover and resolution, so not FP. Yann (talk) 15:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: The stamp wasn't original made by Jose Hernandez, was stamped by a library as catalog number, and I tried to smooth out wrinkles that ruined the material --Ezarateesteban 10:57, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:27, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 18:03:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige
- Info The Saslonch group from the hamlet Sacun in Urtijëi, South Tyrol all by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:03, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:03, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:00, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Image is quite beautiful but the left side seems too empty – The People's Internet (talk) 09:12, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:03, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support For me, the composition with the mountain in the distance works. The landscape and the cloudy sky emphasize the striking beauty of the mountain. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:38, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:26, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:49, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:06, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 18:15, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:22, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Apollo 11 bootprint.jpg (delist and replace)
[edit]Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 17:18:26
- Info Same image in higher resolution (Original nomination)
- Delist and replace -- Yann (talk) 17:18, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace Cmao20 (talk) 21:59, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The file name "AS11-40-5877 (21472308758).jpg" does not seem to comply with COM:I. Also a Question: why is the resolution lower at the source on Flickr than on Commons? Has the image been upsampled or is it a display limitation? -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:57, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with a renaming. Image on Fickr is 4,048 × 3,968, so it is not lower resolution. Yann (talk) 08:55, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace You're right, I can download it at this resolution on my mobile phone (but apparently not on my computer). Please rename the file -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:04, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done Yann (talk) 09:11, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:24, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:26, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 14:17:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_Kingdom
- Info Southern facade of the Natural History Museum in London in morning light, c/u/n by me. — Julian H.✈ 14:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Julian H.✈ 14:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support Absolutely beautiful. A different and sensitive composition for an amazing building. Cmao20 (talk) 16:50, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:16, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support The beautiful lighting creates a special atmosphere. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Oddly, the building looks hazy, at thumbnail size. Especially at the top. It is almost a contrejour (see the shadows of the tree in the center, leaning towards us), so I would say the light was not so cooperative at the beginning. Composition has potential but the colors are washed out -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:08, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 16:00, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:05, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I used to go to that place often when I lived in Londonː I recognize the mist in the early morning and the translucent colors of the regal building during the morning hours. --Terragio67 (talk) 21:55, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:04, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 18:14, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:29, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 12:17:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Sandro Halank -- Sandro Halank (talk) 12:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Sandro Halank (talk) 12:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Great look! Some of the EXIF data are missing. I'd like to know the shutter speed. Yann (talk) 12:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I have a problem with the Canon EOS R3, when converting CR3 to JPG this data gets lost. It is 200 mm, 1/1,000 sec., F/3.5 and ISO 6,400. Sandro Halank (talk) 12:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- You could add this manually, but Support anyway. Yann (talk) 16:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Das ist kein Problem der R3. Mit welchem Bildbearbeitungsprogramm arbeitest Du denn? --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I have a problem with the Canon EOS R3, when converting CR3 to JPG this data gets lost. It is 200 mm, 1/1,000 sec., F/3.5 and ISO 6,400. Sandro Halank (talk) 12:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice action shot, good composition and background Cmao20 (talk) 13:36, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:57, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:24, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well frozen at high speed, but I agree with Yann the metadata could be added manually on the file page (about the conversion from RAW to JPG, it is certainly a matter of parameters) -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:15, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- I have added the information as structured data. --Sandro Halank (talk) 15:36, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 15:52, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:06, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support great shot! --Granada (talk) 06:19, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 15:49, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:58, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great shot of this magician levitating a ball. I suspect that paddle has some sort of electric charge to keep the ball so still in the air. :) — Rhododendrites talk | 22:42, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:01, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 18:12, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:49, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:56, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 10:52:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Spain
- Info all by me Fernando -- Fernando (talk) 10:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Panorama of the views from the dome of the Almudena Cathedral in Madrid. Pictures taken here at sunset are rare, since the regular visiting hours end before, and only limited, city hall-sponsored visits are allowed during the evening. -- Fernando (talk) 10:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support There is a lot of colour noise but I think it's forgiveable because of very high resolution, perfect composition (beautifully centered), nice light, and as you say difficulty of taking the photo; any improvement you can make would be appreciated though Cmao20 (talk) 13:35, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:55, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:51, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Improved version at SwissTransfer: I took the liberty of removing the color noise, as well as significantly reducing the general noise without affecting the sharpness. If you/the community like the result, please feel free to use it for an update :) Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:24, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- It looks fantastic, thank you! Uploaded and credited. Fernando (talk) 15:03, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much for the update! I am very happy that I was able to help solve technical quality issues :) Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 15:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 16:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 17:43, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:35, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking view and nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 10:24, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support the perspective correction looks good in the middle, but it radically warped the shape and degraded the quality of the buildings in the background on the left and right. was the image scaled up with that version, too? If so, it would be better to do the noise correction before trying to scale it up (otherwise we wind up with some big noise). Still weakly supporting because the light and perspective is special. — Rhododendrites talk | 22:40, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very special light, perspective, and atmosphere. Many thanks to Radomianin for the improvements, too. – Aristeas (talk) 18:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support That is amazing. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support There is a dust spot right of the right tower (see note) --Llez (talk) 11:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Please, reduce the noise, on both sides. It's a great picture but I don't understand why that cannot be improved, it is not FP-worthy IMHO. Will happily change to support when done Poco a poco (talk) 19:59, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 09:45:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#India
- Info Phuktal Monastery perched on a cliff above the Tsarap River. Elevation 3,940m (12,927ft). Zanskar, Ladakh, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 09:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 09:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:32, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:53, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Question Great place, but isn't it a bit dark? Yann (talk) 16:53, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann: It was an overcast afternoon and I underexposed to bring out the range of colours in the rocks. I've increased the exposure a bit. Please see the new version. --Tagooty (talk) 03:17, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes, good. --Yann (talk) 08:29, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Spectacular subject and nice viewpoint. -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Picturesque and vertiginous place, well captured. – Aristeas (talk) 10:18, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -Moroder — Preceding undated comment was added at 11:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support-Atudu (talk) 14:17, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support for the improved version as per Basile and Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:45, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:36, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 16:03, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:00, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:39, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Nice subject but the sharpness could be better Poco a poco (talk) 20:01, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 06:14:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
- Info created by Kabelleger - uploaded by Kabelleger - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 06:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 06:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Yann (talk) 07:57, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:46, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:31, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:50, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:51, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:27, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well frozen at 1/1,600 sec, nice golden light -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:24, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:16, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 23:37, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:37, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 10:25, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:59, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:57, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 13:56:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Propeller_aircraft
- Info Saab MFI-15 Safari of the Yellow Sparrows display team, c/u/n by me. — Julian H.✈ 13:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Julian H.✈ 13:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Outstanding panning shot! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:26, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:18, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Frank. —Yann (talk) 07:56, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Superb action shot. --Tagooty (talk) 09:47, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:04, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:51, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support Extraordinary panning, making the subject popping up from the background. Impressive settings, at 1/60 sec only, for a moving subject located far away. The plane is surprisingly sharp -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:15, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 15:59, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 10:25, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support per Basileː Shot of an expert hand. --Terragio67 (talk) 20:05, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:57, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 13:53:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Bahrain
- Info Qal'at al-Bahrain, Karbabad, Bahrain. The archaeological site, also known as the “Fort of Bahrain”, was the capital of the Dilmun civilization and a place of consistent human settlement and occupation from c. 2300 BC to the present. A Portuguese fort stands today atop the site and it became a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2005. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 13:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 13:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Superb Cmao20 (talk) 13:29, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:15, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:24, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Páření čápů bílých.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 13:53:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Ciconiidae (Storks)
- Info created by Lubomír Dajč – uploaded by Lubomír Dajč – nominated by Draceane
- Info White stork (Ciconia ciconia) mating
fiveten to twelve, Nové Veselí, Czechia — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC) - Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very eye-catching and pleasing composition, great capture. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:47, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:28, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Yann (talk) 07:58, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support A really nice and rare capture. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Captured an unusual moment precisely. --Tagooty (talk) 09:48, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Fernando (talk) 09:54, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:28, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:48, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:46, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:15, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent action of wild life. High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:32, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Tagooty and Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:14, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:38, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:15, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 20:07, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 22:31, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:56, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 02:02:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Mexico
- Info: the Ameca River, forming the natural border between the states of Jalisco and Nayarit, taken from a window of a commercial aircraft; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think it's a bit hazy but the composition is good enough for FP and it's a challenging shot of course Cmao20 (talk) 13:15, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support For the commercial aircraft photography it's outstanding. — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Yes, if the picture was shot from the window of a commercial aircraft, it should be mentioned somewhere on the file page. Currently poor categorization and description for a FP nomination. -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:42, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done: description and categorization improved. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:49, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:39, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:24, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 15:48:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others#Frescos and murals
- Info all by me -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:48, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain as author -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:48, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 15:28:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
- Info created by The People's Internet - uploaded by The People's Internet Legacy Assets - nominated by User:The People's Internet -- The People's Internet (talk) 15:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The People's Internet (talk) 15:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but IMO this is a QI not an FP. Beautiful flower and nice colours but not sharp enough for a photo of a large flower. Cmao20 (talk) 13:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Low quality and boring composition -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:43, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Cmao20. Image has merit but not FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 15:21, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 12:19:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Bangladesh
- Info Yes I know that the quality of this image is a little flawed but I think it should be FP anyway because of the composition, colours, wonderful high-key and minimalist surroundings, and the fact that it is a lovely portrait of personal devotion and prayer. created by Sultan Ahmed Niloy - uploaded by Sultan Ahmed Niloy - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:31, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 20:26, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:08, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:05, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:44, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 05:36, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Yann (talk) 07:59, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support The compo kinda makes up for its flaws. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:43, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Exactly my thoughts. Cmao20 (talk) 13:42, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:39, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice compo, but sharpness a bit soft and the white areas seems lacking of almost any details because it was likely a bit overexposed. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:55, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- I agree that it's a bit soft. It is maybe a little bit of motion blur. I nominated it because I think the composition outweighs that. I disagree that it's overexposed though. Bright light shining through a large arch window will appear white to the naked eye. I think this photo would be much less interesting if you reduced the highlights. Cmao20 (talk) 13:28, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per SHB2000. – Aristeas (talk) 10:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support By others.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:43, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support (sharpness, why not f/8 or closer?) --XRay 💬 10:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:30, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 11:51:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Lycaenidae (Blues, coppers and hairstreaks)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Anitava Roy -- Anitava Roy (talk) 11:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Anitava Roy (talk) 11:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Great composition but I think the focus has been missed on the head Cmao20 (talk) 04:10, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 11:40:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Class : Cephalopoda (will need a new subsection if promoted)
- Info created by Edward Weston, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Support "One of the most famous photographs ever made" and "a benchmark of modernism in the history of photography", according to Nautilus. -- Yann (talk) 11:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:46, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Another famous work by Weston. A pity that the resolution is relatively low. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:50, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose This image could look much better from another photo angle, the best 90 °, IHMO. -- Karelj (talk) 11:27, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Karelj: This is a notable work by a notable photographer who died in 1958, so you cannot choose another angle. Yann (talk) 11:42, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann: Anyway it is not good enough from my point of view. --Karelj (talk) 11:56, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Karelj: This is a notable work by a notable photographer who died in 1958, so you cannot choose another angle. Yann (talk) 11:42, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support More than “good enough”. It’s a classic, and for a good reason. – Aristeas (talk) 11:04, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:18, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2024 at 12:05:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Morocco
- Info created by Tupungato - uploaded by Tupungato - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 12:05, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tupungato (talk) 12:05, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose A truck, like here, or something is missing, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:54, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Resolution could be higher, but I like the scene. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- It's 24 megapixels, this seems pretty high to me Cmao20 (talk) 04:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting landscape Cmao20 (talk) 04:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Basile, something is missing here, but I'd rather see the road vanishing in the far back Poco a poco (talk) 13:57, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not out of the ordinary. --Tagooty (talk) 04:16, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose as per others. No wow. Yann (talk) 17:42, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2024 at 10:17:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#India
- Info Taj Mahal and crowd of people to see magnificent Taj Mahal. created by Sdnphotoholic - uploaded by Sdnphotoholic - nominated by Sumit Surai -- Sumit Surai (talk) 10:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Sumit Surai (talk) 10:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Sette-quattro (talk) 15:13, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support The resolution could be higher, but I love the composition, excellent framing --Kritzolina (talk) 20:47, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Off-centered, unfortunate crop of the towers, disturbing heads, frindge around the frame, and yes, far too low res. Poco a poco (talk) 15:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support I do not generally like pictures where people are ahead of the main subject, but in this case they are clearly part of the composition. The viewer becomes part of that crowd. Effective choice of the silhouette effect. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:18, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Poco. BigDom (talk) 02:47, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't get the reasons for the support here, honestly. I agree with all of Poco's criticisms. The building is of course amazing and the picture is fine but it isn't FP in either composiiton or quality, IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 04:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose very off-centre – not even a QI to me. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:07, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. --Yann (talk) 09:31, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2024 at 15:32:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Oman
- Info Panoramic view of the Wadi Bani Khalid, Ash Sharqiyah Region, Oman. Wadi is an arabic word that stands for "river valley", of which there are very few in this arid country. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 15:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 15:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Definitely one that you have to view in full size. I thought the light was a bit grey at first but looking at it for longer, i really like the colours Cmao20 (talk) 20:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:49, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well done panorama and the icing on the cake is a photographer who takes pictures :) -- Radomianin (talk) 22:05, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:52, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Contestations en cours
[edit]Featured picture candidates
[edit]Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 21:19:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany
- Info created by Superbass - uploaded by Superbass - nominated by Superbass -- Superbass (talk) 21:19, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 19:45:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Cheloniidae (Sea Turtles)
- Info Hawksbill sea turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata), Ad Dimaniyat Islands, Oman. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 14:02:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
- Info The picture shows 3 Bavarian Architectural Monuments
Hohenschwangau Castle
It is on the list of cultural monuments of Bayern, no. D-7-77-169-30.
Hotel Alpenrose
It is on the list of cultural monuments of Bayern, no. D-7-77-169-29.
Neuschwanstein Castle
It is on the list of cultural monuments of Bayern, no. D-7-77-169-33.
and 2 Protected Areas
This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID 395500
|
This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID 555537966
|
created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 14:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 14:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 11:47:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phoenicopteridae_(Flamingos)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:47, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:47, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 16:11, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 16:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Mounir Neddi (talk) 17:36, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:54, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 09:10:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
- Info created by Dirtsc - uploaded by Dirtsc - nominated by Dirtsc -- Dirtsc (talk) 09:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Dirtsc (talk) 09:10, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The sunspot devalues the image. Sorry. --Ermell (talk) 16:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I should say the light spot ads a touch of magic to the scene --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:25, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 08:55:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#Victoria
- Info created and uploaded by Uzman Naleer - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 08:55, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:55, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – nice composition and atmosphere. —Bruce1eetalk 09:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing moisture sucking of Charaxes psaphon (Westwood, 1847) - Plain Tawny Rajah WLB.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 06:03:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 06:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 06:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The Focus is a little too far forward. Unfortunately, the eyes are not sharp as a result. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 16:18, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
File:004 Greater flamingos walking in the Camargue during mating season Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 01:28:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phoenicopteridae_(Flamingos)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:28, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:28, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent focus, high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:54, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:53, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support excellent. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support amazing shot. --Rbrechko (talk) 11:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 16:11, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:42, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 21:11:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors#United_States
- Info The Browsing Room and Manuscripts Reading Room at the Indiana State Library. The symbols along the ceiling are American printers' marks. Most of the room is paneled with walnut, and those bookshelf finials are owls -- one of the symbols of the library. Two-frame panorama. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 21:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 21:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 20:48:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Others
- Info Large milkweed bug (Oncopeltus fasciatus). Despite the name, this fellow is about 13mm long. No FPs in this family, it seems (Lygaeidae). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 20:48, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 20:48, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:39, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 18:32:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
- Info Bull's head from the Mithraeum, Ruins of Castellum Tidditanorum (Tiddis), Numidia, Algeria. Created by Carole Raddato - uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 18:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 18:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 15:28:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
- Info An emission nebula in the constellation of Cassiopeia. No FPs of this nebula. Not a NASA photo, amateur astrophotography by a Commons user - always makes it more impressive to me, that we have users who can make content of NASA-level quality. created by Cpayoub - uploaded by Cpayoub - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:28, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:28, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment A real talent, see here. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:55, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- What an equipment! -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:01, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sure! Yann (talk) 16:03, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sette-quattro (talk) 20:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC) 20:48, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:01, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:38, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:50, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very beautiful, great find. No coma, not even in the corners; maybe a little bit of spherical aberration, but it looks just natural here. – Aristeas (talk) 10:55, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:38, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Collared lory (Vini solitaria) on octopus tree (Heptapleurum actinophyllum) Colo-I-Suva.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 15:13:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Psittaculidae (True Parrots)
- Info A Fijian endemic. No FPs. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:15, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition. Beautiful red bird and tasty branch, good focus on both, smooth bokeh -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:58, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:47, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice shot. --Rbrechko (talk) 11:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:38, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 16:35, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 05:53:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#South Korea
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:53, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:53, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:14, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Drawn to the composition. — Rhododendrites talk | 21:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – the geometric shapes are appealing. —Bruce1eetalk 07:28, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Honestly, I think what Bruce said is what makes this photo so appealing.--SHB2000 (talk) 08:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support The geometric shapes of the foreground, indeed, and also their contrast with the natural irregular shapes of the trees in the middle ground and of the mountains in the background. – Aristeas (talk) 10:50, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 11:35, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Cesenatico - Chiesa di San Giacomo Apostolo - Vista notturna - 2024-09-21 20-07-45 001.JPG
[edit]Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 21:46:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info This is one of my favorite photos that would like to represent simplicity and serenity. - c/u/n by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 21:46, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 21:46, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good. Wolverine X-eye 04:39, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very beautiful. Composition, mirror image, sky with pink cloud, and blue hour lightings -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:55, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Basile; pleasant evening atmosphere. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:17, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:26, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 09:00, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:02, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Truly wonderful Cmao20 (talk) 16:14, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very beautiful light, colours, and atmosphere. – Aristeas (talk) 18:23, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:33, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:42, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 11:36, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sharpness could be better but a great shot overall Poco a poco (talk) 19:52, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 19:52:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Russia
- Info created by Ted.ns - uploaded by Ted.ns - nominated by Till Niermann -- Till (talk) 19:52, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Till (talk) 19:52, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Looks downsampled, but good nonetheless. — Rhododendrites talk | 22:51, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Rhododendrites. Exceptional landscape that looks almost surreal. -- Radomianin (talk) 23:05, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Stunning mix of desert of snow dunes & glaciers, and light & darkness -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:24, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I think it's rather small for a landscape and coming from a 5DII, and there's this other picture which is better IMO and at 45 Mpx: File:Before it rains.jpg --Kadellar (talk) 08:43, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Two pictures taken one day apart... Till (talk) 12:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I don't like this camera model card pulled here in Featured Pictures. It doesn't make sense. It encourages contributors to submit images of worse quality and remove EXIF. As long as photographer submits 18 Mpix photos from their Canon 60D, the images are ok, Featured worthy. God forbid the photographer uses the same lens in Canon 5Ds. Submitting full resolution 51 Mpix? Quality is bad, can't be Featured. Decreasing resolution to 30 Mpix to compensate average lens quality? You shouldn't decrease resolution, can't be Featured. Cropping a subject from a 51 Mpix image to create an 18 Mpix photo, because photographer can afford only one lens? It can't be Featured, because your camera is capable of 51 Mpix.--Tupungato (talk) 14:22, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Tupungato has a point here. I would always encourage fellow photographers to upload their photos in full resolution, but to be just we must judge high-resolution photos a bit differently. People sometimes think that taking photos with the newest cameras is much easier because the AF is so much better; but AF is not everything, actually it’s much more difficult to take pin-point sharp photos with today’s high-resolution cameras, especially when we talk about landscape or architecture photos where every detail matters. Lenses which appeared flawless on 12 or even 24 MPix cameras reveal significant aberrations and unsharp borders on 42, 50 or 62 Mpix cameras, also because the latter often drop the traditional on-sensor anti-alias filter which used to hide many fine details and defects; focussing needs more care, because even the slightest field curvature will visibly influence the final results; stopping down to ƒ/11 etc. becomes problematic because diffraction shows its effect very early. A practical solution, proposed by various users, is that we judge low-resolution or downscaled photos rather strictly (if somebody provides only about 6 Mpix, these 6 Mpix should be pin-point sharp and there should be no visible CAs, no noise etc.); be a bit more relaxed with 12 to 24 Mpix photos; and forgive some slight softness, small CAs, a little bit of noise etc. with photos > 36 Mpix. Of course there are exceptions – e.g. difficult wildlife photos often require significant cropping, so we must understand and accept that, too. – Aristeas (talk) 10:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support The other picture Kadellar links is definitely better, but it's a v different composition from this one Cmao20 (talk) 16:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Rhododendrites. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:42, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Cmao20. IMHO we can (and should) feature both photos. – Aristeas (talk) 10:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:36, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:53, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 19:39:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Morocco
- Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 19:39, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 19:39, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Beautiful landscape but sorry, IMO not an outstanding composition Cmao20 (talk) 16:04, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 19:30:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Ukraine
- Info All by Nikride -- Nikride (talk) 19:30, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Nikride (talk) 19:30, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support White balance seems a little warm to me, but cool architecture and nice composition so deserves a star Cmao20 (talk) 15:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Normally prominent street lights are a big problem in such photographs, but here the two big lights have been successfully included in the composition. – Aristeas (talk) 09:22, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 19:27:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Morocco
- Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 19:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 19:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment That bit of vegetation on the right in the middle of the water should be cropped out, but this is a good composition and there is potential here. Cmao20 (talk) 15:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Cmao20 Done Thank you Mounir Neddi (talk) 20:33, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Pretty good now IMO Cmao20 (talk) 20:46, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose A nice scene, but I find the tree in the foreground to be fighting [compositionally] with the hill in the background. I wonder if it would make a nicer shot to be a bit to the right and stepping back a bit. — Rhododendrites talk | 21:15, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Problem of composition in my view, and the lake itself is not out of ordinary. Cut off tree at the left, branches in the shadow hiding the mountains, flat water and midday light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:43, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 17:57:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
- Info created by Kabelleger - uploaded by Kabelleger - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 17:57, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tupungato (talk) 17:57, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:30, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 21:50, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:50, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Rbrechko (talk) 00:04, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition and lighting --Tagooty (talk) 03:00, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:22, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:09, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 15:26, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as always Cmao20 (talk) 15:30, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Another one from the master of the "trains in fabulous landscapes" genre of photography. :) — Rhododendrites talk | 21:18, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- I think he has long been promoted from Master to Grandmaster. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:49, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:33, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition, viaduc, and, as always, picture taken at the right moment with the train -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:43, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Outstanding – excellent composition, beautiful light and colours. The surroundings appear a bit soft, especially the bushes and trees look somewhat mushy, but that’s probably unavoidable due to the small sensor of the drone camera. – Aristeas (talk) 09:19, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:53, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 09:27:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Jordan
- Info Temple of Zeus (Gerasa, Jerash - Jordan; معبد زيوس). My shot. - Mile (talk) 09:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 09:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:29, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:00, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Ratekreel (talk) 18:02, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support the picture is well taken and the ruins of the temple are great, of course. However, someone is selling T-shirts just there... a pity. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:33, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment There's a problem at the lower right corner -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Basile Morin But original. I dont know what is it. Will leave as it is. Stones are problem to "draw". --Mile (talk) 11:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 05:22:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#South Korea
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:00, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 08:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 15:16, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 20:12, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:33, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support, but I doubt the symmetry of the left and right pillars. But maybe that wasn't symmetrical in reality either.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Famerborst. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive place and photograph. – Aristeas (talk) 09:14, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support The imperfect symmetry makes the picture interesting.--Ermell (talk) 16:09, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 22:34:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Canidae_(Canids)
- Info created by Максим Яковлєв - uploaded by Максим Яковлєв - nominated by Luda.slominska -- Luda.slominska (talk) 22:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Luda.slominska (talk) 22:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not particularly large and not very sharp either. For me, the level is higher with FP.--Ermell (talk) 23:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Sorry but I agree with Ermell. It's a good QI, nice composition but a bit small for FP in 2024 for a reasonably common animal Cmao20 (talk) 14:59, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Have to agree with others — not very sharp image, thus lacking wow. Красный wanna talk? 20:37, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 21:58:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Columbidae (Pigeons and Doves)
- Info Also known as the Kererū. No FPs. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:58, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:58, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support High level of detail, nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:28, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:35, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:12, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Not the best posture imo, but representative of the behaviour of the New Zealand pigeon. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:08, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- The ones we saw spent a lot of time eating! Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:16, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 18:21, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:30, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:55, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 17:07:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Ukraine
- Info created by Rbrechko - uploaded by Rbrechko - nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 17:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 17:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Request A description in English would be appreciated. Captions, too. And more than one category -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:33, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done --Rbrechko (talk) 11:33, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:28, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful contrast between the fine natural structures and vivid green of the trees and the gray geometric shape of the fort. – Aristeas (talk) 18:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 15:54:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Motorsports
- Info Swedish rider Nils Anderberg during Gotland Grand National 2024. Created by ArildV - uploaded by ArildV - nominated by Kadellar -- Kadellar (talk) 15:54, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Kadellar (talk) 15:54, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ezarateesteban 16:49, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Nice action shot, plus a good composition. —Bruce1eetalk 17:11, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very lively.--Ermell (talk) 23:33, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:33, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Captivating angle and good quality. If you could bring a bit more space at the bottom, I think it would be amazing. But still FP in state -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:37, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Info I uploaded a new version with slightly more space.--ArildV (talk) 11:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Awesome! Well balanced! -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:52, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Info I uploaded a new version with slightly more space.--ArildV (talk) 11:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 10:24, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for nomination, votes and comments.--ArildV (talk) 11:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great action photo, well done Cmao20 (talk) 14:12, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Ratekreel (talk) 18:05, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressively beautiful shot, detailed, denoised without excess and with the bright background that does not disturb at all. Terragio67 (talk) 19:44, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:03, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Bruce1ee, Basile, Terragio67. – Aristeas (talk) 18:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:48, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:29, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:56, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 13:14:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
- Info created and uploaded by Ted.ns - nominated by FBilula (talk) 13:14, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 13:14, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:32, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment an English description will be useful, what about graffiti? no COM:FOP in Russia for artworks and it ruins the picture IMHO Ezarateesteban 16:48, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- No protectable work for me, just a few letters. --A.Savin 09:26, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- These letters have some art style (not so original IMO, but still). Anyway, it's De minimis for me, while graffiti is an unwanted intrusion here and occupies less than 10% of the frame. Красный wanna talk? 20:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- No protectable work for me, just a few letters. --A.Savin 09:26, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support nice one, but I think the picture would be better if author stepped back a little. Perspective correction here is borderline — if it would be a bit more building would look unnatural even while all verticals would be vertical. Красный wanna talk? 20:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 13:13:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
- Info created and uploaded by Ludvig14 - nominated by FBilula (talk) 13:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- FBilula (talk) 13:13, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good composition of somewhere with a fascinating history Cmao20 (talk) 13:32, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry I don't find the structure extraordinary, nor the composition with the lower right corner -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile.--Ermell (talk) 16:03, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
World Maps by Abraham Ortelius, 1572
[edit]Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 09:48:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
-
America
-
Europe
-
Asia
-
Africa
-
World
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of the world
- Info created by Abraham Ortelius, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Info Theatrum Orbis Terrarum, world maps by Abraham Ortelius, 1572. First edition in German. Each of the five maps here were the standards for their time, drawn from the most important wall maps produced by Mercator, Ortelius and other leading European mapmakers.
- Support It is quite exceptional to have a whole set in such a good quality and high resolution. Each of the maps may be in the relevant FP subcategory. -- Yann (talk) 09:48, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Famous maps, definitely need to be featured Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 15:56, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Ratekreel (talk) 18:07, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'm agree with Cmao. -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:09, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Yann and Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 18:17, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sette-quattro (talk) 20:51, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:25, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 04:10:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#India
- Info The green fields surrounding Stongde village are a refreshing contrast from the stark treeless central Zanskar valley and the snow-capped 6,000 m (20,000 ft) Zanskar Range. Elevation of Stongde 3,530 m (11,580 ft). Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 04:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 04:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Better at full size than thumbnail Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:04, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:26, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Ratekreel (talk) 18:08, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:48, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:07, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Beautifully composed image. Famberhorst (talk) 05:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:27, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 23:49:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed#Book illustrations in black and white
- Info created by Jose Hernandez- uploaded by Shooke - restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 23:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support restoration based on a very damaged original-- Ezarateesteban 23:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Shooke (Talk me in spanish, english or italian) 02:01, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Blue stamp removed, weird line under "Tacuari", and natural features deleted in comparison with the original -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:46, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: The stamp wasn't original made by Jose Hernandez, was stamped by a library as catalog number, and I tried to smooth out wrinkles that ruined the material --Ezarateesteban 10:57, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Only 1,772 × 2,819 pixels, the resolution is quite low, considering this section aims to select the finest pictures of the website. The subject itself is not spectacular. I believe there are a lot of similar covers on Commons in better conservation state. About the restoration, it has gone too far in my opinion, distorting the original document a little too much (even though the weird line has now been removed) -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:03, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Removing the library stamp is OK, but reconstructing the damaged document not so IMO. More to the point, ordinary old book cover and resolution, so not FP. Yann (talk) 15:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: The stamp wasn't original made by Jose Hernandez, was stamped by a library as catalog number, and I tried to smooth out wrinkles that ruined the material --Ezarateesteban 10:57, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:27, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 18:03:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige
- Info The Saslonch group from the hamlet Sacun in Urtijëi, South Tyrol all by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:03, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:03, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:00, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Image is quite beautiful but the left side seems too empty – The People's Internet (talk) 09:12, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:03, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support For me, the composition with the mountain in the distance works. The landscape and the cloudy sky emphasize the striking beauty of the mountain. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:38, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:26, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:49, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:06, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 18:15, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:22, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Apollo 11 bootprint.jpg (delist and replace)
[edit]Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 17:18:26
- Info Same image in higher resolution (Original nomination)
- Delist and replace -- Yann (talk) 17:18, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace Cmao20 (talk) 21:59, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The file name "AS11-40-5877 (21472308758).jpg" does not seem to comply with COM:I. Also a Question: why is the resolution lower at the source on Flickr than on Commons? Has the image been upsampled or is it a display limitation? -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:57, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with a renaming. Image on Fickr is 4,048 × 3,968, so it is not lower resolution. Yann (talk) 08:55, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace You're right, I can download it at this resolution on my mobile phone (but apparently not on my computer). Please rename the file -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:04, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done Yann (talk) 09:11, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:24, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:26, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 14:17:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_Kingdom
- Info Southern facade of the Natural History Museum in London in morning light, c/u/n by me. — Julian H.✈ 14:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Julian H.✈ 14:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support Absolutely beautiful. A different and sensitive composition for an amazing building. Cmao20 (talk) 16:50, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:16, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support The beautiful lighting creates a special atmosphere. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Oddly, the building looks hazy, at thumbnail size. Especially at the top. It is almost a contrejour (see the shadows of the tree in the center, leaning towards us), so I would say the light was not so cooperative at the beginning. Composition has potential but the colors are washed out -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:08, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 16:00, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:05, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I used to go to that place often when I lived in Londonː I recognize the mist in the early morning and the translucent colors of the regal building during the morning hours. --Terragio67 (talk) 21:55, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:04, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 18:14, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:29, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 12:17:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Sandro Halank -- Sandro Halank (talk) 12:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Sandro Halank (talk) 12:17, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Great look! Some of the EXIF data are missing. I'd like to know the shutter speed. Yann (talk) 12:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I have a problem with the Canon EOS R3, when converting CR3 to JPG this data gets lost. It is 200 mm, 1/1,000 sec., F/3.5 and ISO 6,400. Sandro Halank (talk) 12:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- You could add this manually, but Support anyway. Yann (talk) 16:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Das ist kein Problem der R3. Mit welchem Bildbearbeitungsprogramm arbeitest Du denn? --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:07, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I have a problem with the Canon EOS R3, when converting CR3 to JPG this data gets lost. It is 200 mm, 1/1,000 sec., F/3.5 and ISO 6,400. Sandro Halank (talk) 12:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice action shot, good composition and background Cmao20 (talk) 13:36, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:57, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:24, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well frozen at high speed, but I agree with Yann the metadata could be added manually on the file page (about the conversion from RAW to JPG, it is certainly a matter of parameters) -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:15, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- I have added the information as structured data. --Sandro Halank (talk) 15:36, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 15:52, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:06, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support great shot! --Granada (talk) 06:19, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 15:49, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:58, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great shot of this magician levitating a ball. I suspect that paddle has some sort of electric charge to keep the ball so still in the air. :) — Rhododendrites talk | 22:42, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:01, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 18:12, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:49, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:56, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 10:52:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Spain
- Info all by me Fernando -- Fernando (talk) 10:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Panorama of the views from the dome of the Almudena Cathedral in Madrid. Pictures taken here at sunset are rare, since the regular visiting hours end before, and only limited, city hall-sponsored visits are allowed during the evening. -- Fernando (talk) 10:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support There is a lot of colour noise but I think it's forgiveable because of very high resolution, perfect composition (beautifully centered), nice light, and as you say difficulty of taking the photo; any improvement you can make would be appreciated though Cmao20 (talk) 13:35, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:55, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:51, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Improved version at SwissTransfer: I took the liberty of removing the color noise, as well as significantly reducing the general noise without affecting the sharpness. If you/the community like the result, please feel free to use it for an update :) Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:24, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- It looks fantastic, thank you! Uploaded and credited. Fernando (talk) 15:03, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much for the update! I am very happy that I was able to help solve technical quality issues :) Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 15:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 16:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 17:43, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:35, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking view and nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:47, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 10:24, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support the perspective correction looks good in the middle, but it radically warped the shape and degraded the quality of the buildings in the background on the left and right. was the image scaled up with that version, too? If so, it would be better to do the noise correction before trying to scale it up (otherwise we wind up with some big noise). Still weakly supporting because the light and perspective is special. — Rhododendrites talk | 22:40, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very special light, perspective, and atmosphere. Many thanks to Radomianin for the improvements, too. – Aristeas (talk) 18:13, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support That is amazing. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support There is a dust spot right of the right tower (see note) --Llez (talk) 11:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Please, reduce the noise, on both sides. It's a great picture but I don't understand why that cannot be improved, it is not FP-worthy IMHO. Will happily change to support when done Poco a poco (talk) 19:59, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 09:45:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#India
- Info Phuktal Monastery perched on a cliff above the Tsarap River. Elevation 3,940m (12,927ft). Zanskar, Ladakh, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 09:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tagooty (talk) 09:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:32, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:53, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Question Great place, but isn't it a bit dark? Yann (talk) 16:53, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann: It was an overcast afternoon and I underexposed to bring out the range of colours in the rocks. I've increased the exposure a bit. Please see the new version. --Tagooty (talk) 03:17, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes, good. --Yann (talk) 08:29, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Spectacular subject and nice viewpoint. -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Picturesque and vertiginous place, well captured. – Aristeas (talk) 10:18, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -Moroder — Preceding undated comment was added at 11:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support-Atudu (talk) 14:17, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support for the improved version as per Basile and Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:45, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:36, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 16:03, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:00, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:46, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:39, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Nice subject but the sharpness could be better Poco a poco (talk) 20:01, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 06:14:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
- Info created by Kabelleger - uploaded by Kabelleger - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 06:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 06:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Yann (talk) 07:57, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:46, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:31, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:50, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:51, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:27, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well frozen at 1/1,600 sec, nice golden light -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:24, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:16, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 23:37, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:37, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 10:25, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:59, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:57, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 13:56:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Propeller_aircraft
- Info Saab MFI-15 Safari of the Yellow Sparrows display team, c/u/n by me. — Julian H.✈ 13:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Julian H.✈ 13:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Outstanding panning shot! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:26, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:18, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Frank. —Yann (talk) 07:56, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Superb action shot. --Tagooty (talk) 09:47, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:04, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:45, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:51, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support Extraordinary panning, making the subject popping up from the background. Impressive settings, at 1/60 sec only, for a moving subject located far away. The plane is surprisingly sharp -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:15, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kadellar (talk) 15:59, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 10:25, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support per Basileː Shot of an expert hand. --Terragio67 (talk) 20:05, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:57, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 13:53:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Bahrain
- Info Qal'at al-Bahrain, Karbabad, Bahrain. The archaeological site, also known as the “Fort of Bahrain”, was the capital of the Dilmun civilization and a place of consistent human settlement and occupation from c. 2300 BC to the present. A Portuguese fort stands today atop the site and it became a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2005. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 13:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 13:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Superb Cmao20 (talk) 13:29, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:15, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:24, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Páření čápů bílých.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 13:53:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Ciconiidae (Storks)
- Info created by Lubomír Dajč – uploaded by Lubomír Dajč – nominated by Draceane
- Info White stork (Ciconia ciconia) mating
fiveten to twelve, Nové Veselí, Czechia — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC) - Support — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very eye-catching and pleasing composition, great capture. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:47, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:28, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Yann (talk) 07:58, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support A really nice and rare capture. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Captured an unusual moment precisely. --Tagooty (talk) 09:48, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Fernando (talk) 09:54, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:28, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:48, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:46, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:15, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent action of wild life. High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:32, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Tagooty and Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 10:14, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:38, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:15, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 20:07, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 22:31, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 09:56, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2024 at 02:02:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Mexico
- Info: the Ameca River, forming the natural border between the states of Jalisco and Nayarit, taken from a window of a commercial aircraft; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think it's a bit hazy but the composition is good enough for FP and it's a challenging shot of course Cmao20 (talk) 13:15, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support For the commercial aircraft photography it's outstanding. — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Yes, if the picture was shot from the window of a commercial aircraft, it should be mentioned somewhere on the file page. Currently poor categorization and description for a FP nomination. -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:42, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Done: description and categorization improved. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:49, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:39, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:24, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 15:48:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others#Frescos and murals
- Info all by me -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:48, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain as author -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:48, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:22, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 15:28:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
- Info created by The People's Internet - uploaded by The People's Internet Legacy Assets - nominated by User:The People's Internet -- The People's Internet (talk) 15:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The People's Internet (talk) 15:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but IMO this is a QI not an FP. Beautiful flower and nice colours but not sharp enough for a photo of a large flower. Cmao20 (talk) 13:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Low quality and boring composition -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:43, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Cmao20. Image has merit but not FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 15:21, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 12:19:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Bangladesh
- Info Yes I know that the quality of this image is a little flawed but I think it should be FP anyway because of the composition, colours, wonderful high-key and minimalist surroundings, and the fact that it is a lovely portrait of personal devotion and prayer. created by Sultan Ahmed Niloy - uploaded by Sultan Ahmed Niloy - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:31, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Анастасия Львоваru/en 20:26, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:08, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:05, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:44, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:21, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 05:36, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Yann (talk) 07:59, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support The compo kinda makes up for its flaws. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:43, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Exactly my thoughts. Cmao20 (talk) 13:42, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:39, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice compo, but sharpness a bit soft and the white areas seems lacking of almost any details because it was likely a bit overexposed. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:55, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
- I agree that it's a bit soft. It is maybe a little bit of motion blur. I nominated it because I think the composition outweighs that. I disagree that it's overexposed though. Bright light shining through a large arch window will appear white to the naked eye. I think this photo would be much less interesting if you reduced the highlights. Cmao20 (talk) 13:28, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per SHB2000. – Aristeas (talk) 10:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support By others.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:43, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support (sharpness, why not f/8 or closer?) --XRay 💬 10:27, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:30, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 11:51:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Lycaenidae (Blues, coppers and hairstreaks)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Anitava Roy -- Anitava Roy (talk) 11:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Anitava Roy (talk) 11:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Great composition but I think the focus has been missed on the head Cmao20 (talk) 04:10, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2024 at 11:40:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Class : Cephalopoda (will need a new subsection if promoted)
- Info created by Edward Weston, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Support "One of the most famous photographs ever made" and "a benchmark of modernism in the history of photography", according to Nautilus. -- Yann (talk) 11:40, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:46, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Another famous work by Weston. A pity that the resolution is relatively low. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:50, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose This image could look much better from another photo angle, the best 90 °, IHMO. -- Karelj (talk) 11:27, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Karelj: This is a notable work by a notable photographer who died in 1958, so you cannot choose another angle. Yann (talk) 11:42, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann: Anyway it is not good enough from my point of view. --Karelj (talk) 11:56, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Karelj: This is a notable work by a notable photographer who died in 1958, so you cannot choose another angle. Yann (talk) 11:42, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support More than “good enough”. It’s a classic, and for a good reason. – Aristeas (talk) 11:04, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:18, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2024 at 12:05:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Morocco
- Info created by Tupungato - uploaded by Tupungato - nominated by Tupungato -- Tupungato (talk) 12:05, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tupungato (talk) 12:05, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose A truck, like here, or something is missing, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:54, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Resolution could be higher, but I like the scene. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:42, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- It's 24 megapixels, this seems pretty high to me Cmao20 (talk) 04:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting landscape Cmao20 (talk) 04:06, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:23, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Basile, something is missing here, but I'd rather see the road vanishing in the far back Poco a poco (talk) 13:57, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not out of the ordinary. --Tagooty (talk) 04:16, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose as per others. No wow. Yann (talk) 17:42, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2024 at 10:17:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#India
- Info Taj Mahal and crowd of people to see magnificent Taj Mahal. created by Sdnphotoholic - uploaded by Sdnphotoholic - nominated by Sumit Surai -- Sumit Surai (talk) 10:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Sumit Surai (talk) 10:17, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Sette-quattro (talk) 15:13, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support The resolution could be higher, but I love the composition, excellent framing --Kritzolina (talk) 20:47, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Off-centered, unfortunate crop of the towers, disturbing heads, frindge around the frame, and yes, far too low res. Poco a poco (talk) 15:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support I do not generally like pictures where people are ahead of the main subject, but in this case they are clearly part of the composition. The viewer becomes part of that crowd. Effective choice of the silhouette effect. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:18, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Poco. BigDom (talk) 02:47, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't get the reasons for the support here, honestly. I agree with all of Poco's criticisms. The building is of course amazing and the picture is fine but it isn't FP in either composiiton or quality, IMO. Cmao20 (talk) 04:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose very off-centre – not even a QI to me. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:07, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. --Yann (talk) 09:31, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2024 at 15:32:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Oman
- Info Panoramic view of the Wadi Bani Khalid, Ash Sharqiyah Region, Oman. Wadi is an arabic word that stands for "river valley", of which there are very few in this arid country. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 15:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 15:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Definitely one that you have to view in full size. I thought the light was a bit grey at first but looking at it for longer, i really like the colours Cmao20 (talk) 20:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:49, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well done panorama and the icing on the cake is a photographer who takes pictures :) -- Radomianin (talk) 22:05, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:52, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 12:33, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Planning (9e jour après proposition)
[edit]Mon 28 Oct → Wed 6 Nov Tue 29 Oct → Thu 7 Nov Wed 30 Oct → Fri 8 Nov Thu 31 Oct → Sat 9 Nov Fri 1 Nov → Sun 10 Nov Sat 2 Nov → Mon 11 Nov Sun 3 Nov → Tue 12 Nov Mon 4 Nov → Wed 13 Nov Tue 5 Nov → Thu 14 Nov Wed 6 Nov → Fri 15 Nov