Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 2011

• 
  • Nomination: Statue of Robert Stolz, Lüneburg --Taxiarchos228 16:20, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination A Delphinapterus leucas (beluga) skull.--Jebulon 00:07, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 01:22, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination River Oder, polish national park --Ralf Roletschek 22:43, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 01:22, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Catholic Parish Church of St. Ulrich in the Black Forest -- Taxiarchos228 15:59, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:35, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Overview of Russula ochroleuca -- Holleday 19:10, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion klare Sache --Carschten 11:20, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palomena prasina on a flower -- Holleday 19:17, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, sharp, beautiful background --Croucrou 11:31, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Skull of Bison bonasus (Wisent).--Jebulon 23:42, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion great composition but skull itself imo a little bit overexposured --Mbdortmund 06:11, 25 February 2011 (UTC) Thank you for review. You are right indeed, I'll try to fix this soon.--Jebulon 10:10, 25 February 2011 (UTC)  Done I hope it is better now.--Jebulon 22:26, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
    really good now --Mbdortmund 01:19, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Luxor Temple, Egypt -- MJJR 22:32, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Llez 12:10, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A shell of a Midas' Ear Cassidula, Ellobium aurismidae --Llez 18:21, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion I know there is like "mother-of-pearl", but I can see some disturbing magenta CA at high resolution. --Jebulon 00:18, 25 February 2011 (UTC))* Comment The Magenta/Lilac colours especially on the ventral side and near the sutur are the natural colours. If I try to reduce Magenta, they would disappear, but that wouldn't be the original colour then (if you mean something other, please make an annotation on the description page, I will correct then) --Llez 07:25, 25 February 2011 (UTC)* Done Thanks for further information, I did my best in correcting --Llez 12:10, 25 February 2011 (UTC)Far much better !--Jebulon 15:46, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination CN Tower, Canada: Observation deck --Taxiarchos228 10:26, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI, complicated light --Ralf Roletschek 09:31, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kandern: world war memorial at catholic church --Taxiarchos228 13:33, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good picture. Kippelt aber wohl ein klein wenig nach links, wenn ich mich nicht täusche? --Alupus 22:53, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Maaloula. --Eusebius 14:13, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Trier, Wleschnonnenkirche (Church of french nuns) --Berthold Werner 10:31, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI --Taxiarchos228 11:54, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fruit of the oil palm Elaeis guineensis at the botanical garden of Portoviejo, Ecuador. --Cayambe 17:35, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good picture, very good DoF. --Jebulon 00:12, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Herceg Novi - Church of the Archangel Michael (dome) --Pudelek 14:37, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion nice colour --Böhringer 20:24, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castle in Karlsruhe. --Cayambe 11:14, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 13:10, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vishwanath temple, Khajuraho, India --Sfu 23:07, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good lighting and the angle makes the scaffolding easier on the eye. Cayambe 13:22, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Copy of a 3th century stele in the Camp celtique de la Bure. --Coyau 14:18, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 13:22, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marcolini's chocolate box. --M0tty 23:02, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Great sharpness. IdLoveOne 00:30, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marcolini's Macarons. --M0tty 23:02, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Great quality dessert. IdLoveOne 00:30, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cupola of the Law Courts of Brussels. --M0tty 17:16, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok to me. --Cayambe 17:41, 24 February 2011 (UTC)Needs more aligning I think IdLoveOne 00:30, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination EL-DE-Haus in Cologne. A.Savin 09:06, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion --Taxiarchos228 09:40, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
    Unnatural corner. Uff
• 
  • Nomination Rhine flood in Leverkusen. A.Savin 09:06, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion --Taxiarchos228 09:40, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rhine flood in Leverkusen. A.Savin 09:06, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion --Taxiarchos228 09:40, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A large sand and dust storm is blowing into the Mediterranean Sea. -- IdLoveOne 06:35, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn The picture is not taking by a contributor. --M0tty 06:41, 24 February 2011 (UTC) Got carried away. Wasn't sure if it could win on FPC so I just brought it here. -- IdLoveOne 06:42, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Water Rail swimming in Turkey. Innotata 22:49, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice composition. IdLoveOne 09:01, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gais AR Dorfplatz --Böhringer 20:41, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Excellent ! --M0tty 20:44, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cerussite --Archaeodontosaurus 17:30, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 19:11, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Male monarch butterfly. --Avenue 17:01, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 19:11, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shell of a Moroccan Cymbium, Cymbium marocanus --Llez 16:34, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 18:38, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 16th-century timber-frame houses in Vannes, France. --Myrabella 10:10, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI for me - Small chromatic minor anomalies. --Archaeodontosaurus 17:39, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chocolate truffle in a cup. --M0tty 09:52, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, lighting and decent depth. -- IdLoveOne 06:47, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Caphernaum, Synagogue, inscription at a column --Berthold Werner 08:58, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 17:37, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Great Wall of China --Sfu 22:23, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Very good. -- IdLoveOne 06:58, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Field of Tulips near Middelharnis, South-Holland, Netherlands --Ralf Roletschek 14:00, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Vom Licht und den Farben her schönstes Bild der Serie, aber die grüne Blech"hütte" links hinter Tulpen stört sehr :-( --Alupus 22:05, 21 February 2011 (UTC)  SupportGreat perspective. -- IdLoveOne 06:58, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Efringen-Kirchen: Rock of Istein --Taxiarchos228 12:05, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  SupportVery interesting. -- IdLoveOne 06:58, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tannenkirch --Taxiarchos228 12:05, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Great angle. IdLoveOne 09:29, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church (crkva Gospa od Zdravlja), Kotor ---Pudelek 16:35, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Sfu 23:03, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination American Tree Sparrow --Cephas 23:54, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion more than QI --Taxiarchos228 08:59, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Barred Owl --Cephas 23:54, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good photo. --Qiqritiq 07:08, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chapel over the archaeoligical site of Agia Triada, Crete, Greece. --Oltau 23:08, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI --Taxiarchos228 09:00, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cariatids of the Théâtre de la Renaissance, Paris. --Coyau 22:56, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good ! --M0tty 09:48, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rapperswil SG --Böhringer 21:50, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI or even more --Taxiarchos228 10:28, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A male Italian Sparrow in Tuscany --Innotata 02:41, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 15:33, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Quebec City's mayor Régis Labeaume at municipal council meeting. Not sure 'bout this one. --Letartean 01:42, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK IMO.--Ankara 09:05, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Upper part of the skeleton of a common woolly monkey, the biggest monkey of America--Jebulon 01:13, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Cute creature.--Ankara 12:23, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Caphernaum, Synagogue, inscription at a column --Berthold Werner 18:38, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 15:34, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Latrines of the Ouvrage de Chèvremont, near Belfort, France --ComputerHotline 07:50, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 15:37, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Main entry of the Ouvrage de Chèvremont, near Belfort, France --ComputerHotline 07:50, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 15:37, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kandern: Protestant Church --Taxiarchos228 21:03, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok to me. --Cayambe 15:39, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Herceg Novi, Montenegro - old city --Pudelek 13:28, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok to me. --Cayambe 15:42, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Facade of Castello Sforzesco in Milan. --High Contrast 17:58, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline also daß die komplette fassade im Schatten liegt, stört mich hier dann doch. --Ralf Roletschek 21:08, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
    Agree with Ralf: wrong timing - the main façade is in strong shadow. --Elekhh 12:58, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Tadoussac, Canada: Hotel Tadoussac --Taxiarchos228 10:18, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: View from Milešovka.--Juan de Vojníkov 00:05, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination The cemetery chapel of Winzerhausen, Großbottwar, Baden-Württemberg. -- Felix Koenig 19:56, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline I don't like the composition. Other opinions? --Mbdortmund 22:45, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
    I don't like the chapel itself... but what shouldn't be better with the composition? -- Felix Koenig 11:31, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
    Man gewinnt keinen Eindruck vom Gebäude, im Grunde sieht man nur eine leicht verzerrte weiße Betonwand, oder? --Mbdortmund 14:50, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
    Richtig, aber das Ding ist so mit Bäumen eingerahmt, dass eine andere Ansicht unmöglich wäre. Möglich wäre nur ein Bild der Rückwand, was aber rechtliche Probleme wegen sichtbaren Grabsteinen gäbe. -- Felix Koenig 15:21, 18 February 2011 (UTC) Agree with Mbdortmund, too tightly framed. Even if the rest is covered by vegetation, would have been better to show more more of it. Probably better light/sky conditions could have been chosen as well (i.e. sunlight on the cross, darker sky, etc). --Elekhh 11:17, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Flag of Montenegro - St. John castle, Kotor city wall --Pudelek 16:35, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review The image is distorted, the flag pole is curved. Can be corrected. --Jovianeye 18:20, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Halifax, Canada: Skyline --Taxiarchos228 09:12, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review Die Gebäude auf der linken Bildhälfte kippen von der Mitte ab leicht. --Mbdortmund 17:14, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
    sehe gerade, dass ich eigentlich diese Version kandieren wollte. Abbrechen und neu starten oder überschreiben? --Taxiarchos228 09:58, 16 February 2011 (UTC) Vielleicht ist das zweite Bild einen Tick besser, aber ich würde dieses hier mit ner kleinen Korrektur der senkrechten Linien auch sofort promoten. Das Format von dem anderen ist auch etwas anderes, wir können beide gebrauchen. --Mbdortmund 20:07, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Autobahnkreuz Wetzlar --KlausFoehl 22:18, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment Starke Tonnenförmige Verzeichnung, das ist aber korrigierbar --Berthold Werner 09:23, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
     Done Verzeichnung korrigiert. -- KlausFoehl 16:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC)}
    Jetzt habe ich bei genauerer Untersuchung gesehen, dass inbesondere an den senkrechten Trägern noch CA auftritt, vielleicht läßt sich auch das noch korrigieren. --Berthold Werner 12:17, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Beat up limo --Specious 02:14, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review * is the wide-angle effect for me in this picture not appropriate --Ralf Roletschek 13:57, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shell of an Indian Tibia, Tibia insulaechorab curta --Llez 16:14, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very nice, even at high resolution. Congratulations !--Jebulon 17:49, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Equus hemionus (Onager) skull and neck vertebrae, 1838. Specimen of Ssp. kulan, which is critically endangered today. --Jebulon 15:19, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion As good as the other --Letartean 16:17, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lörrach-Brombach: Cemetery and Saint Josephs Church--Taxiarchos228 12:05, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion nice. --Ralf Roletschek 14:00, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lörrach-Hauingen: Plate for establishment Church Saint Nikolaus --Taxiarchos228 12:05, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion I like the light very much. Maybe a transcription/translation could be interesting ?--Jebulon 17:51, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The headquarters of the Swedish architectural firm White. --Ankara 09:09, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good, although I think would rather like composition to bo more toward left. Now it's a little bit to central, as for me. --Sfu 22:29, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Skull of a Diceros bicornis (Black Rhinoceros).--Jebulon 00:15, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice one! --Letartean 13:57, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The New Mosque in Luxor, Egypt -- MJJR 22:33, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
  • WARNING: third template parameter added – please remove.
• 
  • Nomination Herceg Novi, Montenegro - Church of the Ascention Day --Pudelek 13:28, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:59, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Boat Lift Scharnebeck near Lüneburg, Germany --Ralf Roletschek 10:12, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline There is a clockwise rotation. --Qiqritiq 20:03, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
    Mit Shift-N in einer Minute zu reparieren... --Mbdortmund 23:31, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
    if the building is even, then the image is in the middle 0.018° is tilted counter clockwise.--Ralf Roletschek 16:44, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wies, Germany: Protestant Church --Taxiarchos228 10:18, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok.--Ankara 11:03, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Luxemb. City, ancient fortress walls in the Petrusse valley. --Cayambe 09:48, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good (Perhaps the image is tilted very slightly to the left?)--Ankara 10:55, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Inside view of St Boniface in Berlin-Kreuzberg --Anghy 11:24, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Rue du Haut-Pavé, Paris.--Jebulon 23:25, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Das Münster Unserer Lieben Frau in Lindau. --High Contrast 21:19, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review Starkes Bild, auf jeden Fall QI, aber vllt. etwas überschärft? (Turmspitze, Hintergrund links) --Mbdortmund 22:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Shipyard „Nordseewerke“ in the harbour of Emden --Carschten 18:35, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review please adjust the image to be horizontal --Taxiarchos228 19:10, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The EVAG Terminal 1 in the harbour of Emden --Carschten 18:35, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Bakery from the 1930s in Stockholm --Ankara 14:31, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Kandern-Wollbach: Interior of the Protestant Church --Taxiarchos228 09:12, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review Die Bänke laufen nach oben; vllt. doch geradeziehen!? --Mbdortmund 22:41, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Germany, Frankfurt/O: Bridge between Germany and Poland, analogue photo to black and white film --Ralf Roletschek
  • Decline What's with the fuzziness? IdLoveOne 03:09, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
    Exagerated grain and also tilted.--Qiqritiq 07:26, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ponsan-Soubiran Church, Gers, France -- Florent Pécassou 17:49, 8 February 2011 (UTC))
  • Promotion  Comment Perspective distortion. Color noise at shadows. Noise--Lmbuga 22:30, 8 February 2011 (UTC)*Agreed, the perspective can be easily fixed in GIMP. IdLoveOne 03:09, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
    QI --Ralf Roletschek 17:59, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Apartment building, Lörrach--Taxiarchos228 15:33, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review alles ist gerade, aber aus der Perspektive würde ich die Linien doch ein wenig stürzen lassen, was meinst Du? --Mbdortmund 19:49, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
    nö. --Taxiarchos228 19:46, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Panoramic view of Lörrach-Stetten --Taxiarchos228 15:33, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review schönes Bild, aber die 3 Pinnörgel mitten im Vordergrund stören doch... --Mbdortmund 19:46, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
    und diese sprechen gegen QI? Nun denn. --Taxiarchos228 19:46, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination New townhall in Náchod --Kozuch 09:38, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI --Taxiarchos228 10:08, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Another and last rider at the big air --Letartean 03:12, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Captured cleanly. --Avenue 08:34, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination NZ flax leaf tip, backlit. --Avenue 00:28, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good, needs maybe a little crop left and above (too much sky ?) but IMO downsizing was not a good idea... I feel your picture very impressive at full size !! One may make very interesting and strange cuts or close-up. Only an opinion... --Jebulon 01:11, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
    Yes, I think you're right about the crop. I've tried something, & reverted the downsizing. --Avenue 02:01, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination typical Bicicly way in the Netherlands, Breda --Ralf Roletschek 21:55, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice --Taxiarchos228 10:08, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kandern-Wollbach: Pulpit in Protestant Church --Taxiarchos228 21:03, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion all visible, all well exposed --Ralf Roletschek 21:21, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Binnenhof in The Hague, Netherlands --Ralf Roletschek 20:22, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Strong CA (fountain, turret right), tight crop (on top) and little detail on the bricks. --Qiqritiq 20:35, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ridderzaal in The Hague, Netherlands --Ralf Roletschek 20:22, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI --Taxiarchos228 21:03, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ål's Church, Sweden (yes, the tip of the tower is tilting, it's a symbol of Christ's hanging head on the cross, have I recently learned). Perspective corrected since last nom.--V-wolf 19:22, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Not perfect, but good --Taxiarchos228 09:51, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Heliobatis radians --Archaeodontosaurus 19:15, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Wow. --Qiqritiq 20:12, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A snowboarder at the downtown Québec big air competition. --Letartean 14:44, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion for me it's too sharp this motive --Ralf Roletschek 14:50, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
    Well, I'll take that... I guess I wont get a picture almost declined here because it is too sharp very often! I guess it coudl be panning shot to but I wanted to show the urban environnement of the scene which is rare in a snowboard competition. Please someonelse give a review. Letartean 15:09, 20 February 2011 (UTC) Wow ! Possible FP IMO, even if I miss the snow... Maybe a little crop left ? --Jebulon 17:15, 20 February 2011 (UTC) Done, still ok? Letartean 17:40, 20 February 2011 (UTC) Yes, even better. --Avenue 19:13, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The pyramids of Giza --Berthold Werner 14:20, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion in the thumbnail muddy, as a full picture but very nice, typical desert --Ralf Roletschek 21:24, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cargo ship Sea Cruiser 1 in front of the Statkraft power plant, Emden --Carschten 12:55, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion unspectacular but without error --Ralf Roletschek 13:23, 20 February 2011 (UTC) CommentI marked some dustspots-like errors. Can be removed.--PetarM 13:28, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
     Done removed, thanks! --Carschten 13:46, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sherlock Holmes Museum in Baker St 221b, London --Ralf Roletschek 10:22, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline The crop left is unfortunate. Sorry.--Jebulon 17:18, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flooding of the Oder River Poland near village Sikierki --Ralf Roletschek 10:10, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion --PetarM 13:22, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
     Comment seems a bit oversaturated to me. There's also a dust spot that I marked --Carschten 14:07, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
     Done weg isses --Ralf Roletschek 14:34, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arms of James IV of Scotland. --Eusebius 08:27, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion --PetarM 13:22, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Beach in Mäntyluoto, Pori, Finland with gooses. --kallerna 07:47, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion ok, thats QI --Ralf Roletschek 14:36, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Skull of Hipparion gracile, fossil equidae (Miocene).--Jebulon 23:04, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good, QI for sure, though sharpness at full resolution is a bit limit... mais je pense que le piqué est très difficile à obtenir sur ce genre de sujet ? --Cayambe 18:27, 20 February 2011 (UTC)...Surtout à travers une vitre... ;)--Jebulon 19:50, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stuttgart Hauptbahnhof, actually in the news because of Stuttgart 21 project. -- Felix Koenig 18:45, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI. --Ralf Roletschek 23:30, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Swimming Container in the habour of Emden --Carschten 18:15, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good picture of a (sorry) boring subject (then difficult !)--Jebulon 23:47, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
    Not so boring to me - I've never seen one sitting in the water like this. --Avenue 21:07, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Woolly Rhinoceros (Coelodonta antiquitatis) skull Horns not available, sorry. Please ask Archaeodontosaurus, his specimen has some !!--Jebulon 17:47, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Avenue 08:39, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Another specimen of Rana septentrionalis in the summer of 2010. --Letartean 22:08, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, but the crop seems too remote. --Avenue 20:34, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
    Better? Letartean 15:02, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
    Yes, and better than I would have managed. Very nice. --Avenue 19:16, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Haus Hülhoven, Heinsberg-Hülhoven, Rhineland --Alupus 21:17, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion yes! --Ralf Roletschek 21:48, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tadoussac, Canada: Old chapel --Taxiarchos228 10:18, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI --Ralf Roletschek 21:48, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Halifax, Canada: Clock tower--Taxiarchos228 09:12, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Cairo, one minaret of the Al-Rifa'i-Mosque --Berthold Werner 09:02, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Picnic area near the Borne des Trois Puissances, near Beurnevésin, Switzerland. --ComputerHotline 19:05, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Inside of a bell. --Coyau 16:34, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Quimper (France) - Maison à pans de bois place Terre aux Ducs. --Thesupermat 15:45, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination The cargo ship E-Ship 1 in Emden --Carschten 15:45, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 23:46, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Inner Canal Street in Cologne. A.Savin 16:38, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion The image is ok, but I think the license plate numbers need to be blurred out don't they? IdLoveOne 03:09, 14 February 2011 (UTC) Really? Why now? A.Savin 12:28, 14 February 2011 (UTC)Well I don't know if it's official policy, I've just heard it suggested in similar cases on featured picture candidates for privacy reasons. IdLoveOne 21:07, 14 February 2011 (UTC)  Done albeit I actually see no need for A.Savin 10:31, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
    QI for me. --Ralf Roletschek 21:44, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Priscacara liops --Archaeodontosaurus 09:26, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Very good --Llez 11:27, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stinging nettles (Urtica dioica). --kallerna 07:47, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Do you sow them in rows? --Qiqritiq 08:53, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Old fossil from jurrassic Homoeosaurus maximiliani.--Jebulon 18:33, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Rather noisy and dark. Can you reduce noise and lighten the image a bit while you're at it? --Qiqritiq 18:37, 19 February 2011 (UTC) Good points. This is an old specimen, and the photo was taken through a glass. I don't know how to improve it really. I'll try.--Jebulon 23:38, 19 February 2011 (UTC)  Done Don't know if it is a QI now, but I find it much better ! Thanks for (useful) review --Jebulon 00:01, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
    Noticeable improvement. QI for me now. --Qiqritiq 08:51, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Destroyed Serbian house in Sunja, Croatia.--PetarM 18:18, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Carschten 18:30, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rotunda St. John The Baptist in Xewkija, Gozo, Malta. -- Felix Koenig 17:34, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good colors.--PetarM 18:20, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Diplomystus dentatus Eocene --Archaeodontosaurus 17:23, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice and interesting--Jebulon 18:33, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Philippe Cayla, President of the TV "euronews" --Ralf Roletschek 16:35, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good portrait. But: this stain on the right revers of the jacket: real stain or sensor stain? In german: Ich finde es sehr gut. Auf dem rechten Revers des Jackets ist aber ein Fleck. Echter Dreck oder Sensordreck? Dito evtl. auf der linken Jackenseite Höhe Armansatz, im unscharfen Bereich. Am besten mit PS 5 reinigen. --Alupus 23:00, 19 February 2011 (UTC) Good, anyway.--Jebulon 23:45, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Center of the new The hague, Netherlands --Ralf Roletschek 16:14, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Lot's of CA (people at the bottom, white building up). Probably hard to fix. --Qiqritiq 18:35, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination walking way between Poland and Czechia in Giant Mountains --Ralf Roletschek 16:14, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Carschten 18:15, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Niederfinow, Village in Germany --Ralf Roletschek 16:14, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion interessante Stimmung --Carschten 18:30, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Policeman with bicycle, The hague, Netherlands --Ralf Roletschek 16:10, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good.--Jebulon 18:34, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Melbourne Luna Park at Dusk Donaldytong 12:42, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion maybe a bit dark, but otherwise very good --Carschten 18:15, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cairo, Ibn Tulun Mosque --Berthold Werner 15:15, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion tilted cw? --Mbdortmund 20:54, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
    Better now? --Berthold Werner 11:32, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
    Yes --Mbdortmund 12:49, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kandern: Protestant Church, Organ --Taxiarchos228 08:41, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Saubere Arbeit. --Berthold Werner 18:44, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pulpit in the Saints-Michel-et-Gudule Cathedral in Brussel. Picture assembled by a HDR process. --M0tty 09:00, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Perspective is not correct and the girls are ghosts. --Qiqritiq 18:58, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Lörrach: Church of Saint Fridolin: choir with altar --Taxiarchos228 09:51, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Fire hydrant flushing with diffuser --Specious 07:40, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Christian-Pleß-straße 19 --Mdupont 06:32, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Kámen Castle. IdLoveOne 04:00, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Cookies/biscuits for sale. IdLoveOne 03:41, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Pulsatilla alpina. --Bartiebert 20:35, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review The quality of that flower is so good if only not for that guy in the background.. --IdLoveOne 00:14, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Moskovskiy Rail Terminal in St. Petersburg. A.Savin 08:05, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Needs a crop below IMO, but otherwise good.--Jebulon 18:58, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gdansk, Poland --Ralf Roletschek 14:12, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline It's a bit under-exposed, could you work on lighting it up a bit? --IdLoveOne 00:33, 14 February 2011 (UTC) a little bit brighter and Lens correction --Ralf Roletschek 09:46, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
    Not sharp, noisy too dark and bad perspective (everything is leaning towards the middle) --Qiqritiq 19:10, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Rheinfelden: Pulpit in Gallus Church --Taxiarchos228 08:12, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review Don't like the choice of angle or the crop. --IdLoveOne 00:53, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Huvudsta and Pampas Marina, seen from Stadshagen. --Ankara 09:10, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review I'm skeptical of the alignment... --IdLoveOne 06:18, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Montreal: Olympic Stadium --Taxiarchos228 08:30, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review The pixels seem strange... --IdLoveOne 06:18, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Grave stone in Starzyno. Yarl 22:22, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review I don't like that the subject is in shadow but the background isn't. IdLoveOne 03:09, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: London: A Circle Line train is waiting at Westminster station --Ralf Roletschek 15:51, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review The two people behind the guy are clearly visible, might not be fair to promote an image with people who don't know they're in it.. IdLoveOne 03:09, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Seagulls close to the Feria Fluvial Market in Valdivia (Chile) --Elemaki 05:20, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review Most of the composition seemed jammed to the left... Bgag 04:52, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: A boat at playa Junquillal, Costa Rica --Gaendalf 23:13, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review nice idea but the main object is overexposured --Mbdortmund 19:43, 11 February 2011 (UTC)Rename this after the beach and I'll support it (the boat is very minor in this image). --IdLoveOne 05:32, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Canadair Regional Jet CRJ900LR D-ACKI in Gdańsk. --Airwolf 16:16, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Great angle. IdLoveOne 17:50, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sedum rubrotinctum --Anghy 13:12, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Looks useful to me. IdLoveOne 17:50, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
    Strong  Oppose Too small for QI. Must be at least 2 Mpx --Letartean 19:15, 18 February 2011 (UTC)Why 2 Mpx? --Ralf Roletschek 20:26, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
    I don't know why but it is the rule see this. Letartean 21:07, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
    size --Mbdortmund 10:08, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tripoint Germany, France, Switzerland near Basel --Taxiarchos228 10:22, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Klasse! --Ralf Roletschek 13:02, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Main Pod of TV Tower in Münster, Germany --Taxiarchos228 10:22, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion immer diese Aussichtstürme...--Ralf Roletschek 13:02, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wies: Protestant Church --Taxiarchos228 10:22, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good.. though the shadows at left could be brightened. QI nevertheless. Please, add geotag. --Cayambe 16:48, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ötlingen: Panoramic View --Taxiarchos228 10:22, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good depth and looks well-stitched. IdLoveOne 17:50, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rheinfelden-Herten: Entrance area of Saint Josephs Church --Taxiarchos228 10:22, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. Interessantes Licht und Perspektive. --Alupus 13:50, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Alley of lime trees on the outskirts of Heinsberg, Rineland --Alupus 21:17, 17 February 2011 (UTC)~
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 10:12, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Toronto, Canada: Leslie L. Dan Pharmacy Building --Taxiarchos228 10:18, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI --Ralf Roletschek 12:35, 17 February 2011 (UTC)Personally I don't like that a lot of the foreground is in shadow. IdLoveOne 08:21, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
    there is no shadow, the street was wet after rain has falling --Taxiarchos228 13:39, 18 February 2011 (UTC)Misplaced criticism meant for this image. IdLoveOne 17:41, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hyotherium major (prehistorical ancestor of the boar) fossil skull.--Jebulon 23:42, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Fine. Lacks maybe a bit of depth? Qiqritiq 18:27, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Church of Suomenlinna, Helsinki --Ralf Roletschek 20:16, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Das Bild wirkt auf mich übersaturiert, vignettiert in den oberen Ecken und teilweise unterbelichtet, vielleicht hast Du Lust auf eine weniger krasse Ausgabe? --Mbdortmund 22:47, 17 February 2011 (UTC) Mittags bei wolkenlosem Himmel einen Monat vor Mittsommer in Finnland - da ist die Sonne wirklich kraß! Die ganze Serie ist so. Ich schaue mal, was ich machen kann. --Ralf Roletschek 13:08, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
    Also lacks some sharpness (camera problem?). The grass is all blurred. Qiqritiq 10:02, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Distribution of Semitic languages. --Rafy 12:39, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Rather random placement of labels, sloppy map borders. -Qiqritiq 10:08, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A decorative lamp, outside a "café" in Paris.--Jebulon 00:20, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Did you black out the background? Because it's really hard to tell what it is. --IdLoveOne 05:10, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
    Interesting and good for a QI. Qiqritiq 23:28, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Nativity scene. --Eusebius 10:17, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Nativity scene. --Eusebius 10:17, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: The temple of Luxor (Egypt), seen from the southeast -- MJJR 22:13, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: The temple of Luxor (Egypt), seen from the south -- MJJR 22:13, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: BMW dealer --Specious 18:48, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Panorama seen from the Planche des Belles Filles, near Plancher-les-Mines, France. --ComputerHotline 12:02, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Gdansk, Poland: Concert at the Wikimania, Katertyna Tereshchenko --Ralf Roletschek 15:51, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion beautiful avaisable light concert photography; image noise insofar doesn't reduce quality --Alupus 20:47, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Breda, Netherlands: Water Castle Bouvigne --Ralf Roletschek 15:51, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Sehr gut, nur die starken chromatic aberrations an den hereinragenden Zweigen stören. Trotzdem QI imo --Carschten 19:57, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Museum courtyard in Luxemb. City. With a remarkable purple beech. --Cayambe 11:22, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion
• 
  • Nomination A new version of a picture that is already QI. Thus, I nominate it here so as to be reassured that my corrections really improved the picture. Airwolf 22:23, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good, still QI --George Chernilevsky 07:58, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Luxemb. City, archaeological excavation: children's tombs from the Middle Ages. See also the extremities of 5 leg-bones sticking out of the wall at left... --Cayambe 21:39, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI --George Chernilevsky 07:58, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pano Obere Wildgrubenspitze --Alex.vonbun 19:30, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 21:05, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A specimen of Rana septentrionalis in the summer of 2010. --Letartean 17:12, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good --George Chernilevsky 08:00, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shell of a Giant Hairy Melongena, Pugilina morio --Llez 16:48, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI --George Chernilevsky 08:03, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination War memorial to the dead persons of the World Wars in Flein, Baden-Württemberg. -- Felix Koenig 15:21, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Alupus 21:26, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination former soviet army hospital Beelitz-Heilstätten, Germany --Ralf Roletschek 13:10, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good --Taxiarchos228 13:26, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St. Luke church in Kotor --Pudelek 13:01, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI --Taxiarchos228 13:26, 17 February 2011 (UTC)* Support--PetarM 15:41, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Serbian Orthodox Church of St. Nicholas in Kotor --Pudelek 13:01, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion The spire is a little bit blurred, but anyway a good picture --Taxiarchos228 13:26, 17 February 2011 (UTC) * Support--PetarM 15:41, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Model of the Hub gear "Rohloff Speedhub" --Ralf Roletschek 12:49, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI. Nice object --George Chernilevsky 08:04, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jarlaberg --Ankara 12:41, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion The shadows could be slightly brightened, but QI nevertheless. --Cayambe 09:33, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Roman decorated Terra Sigillata-bowl from La Graufesenque (France) in a museum in Bad Kreuznach. --Haselburg-müller 12:23, 17 February 2011 (UTC).
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 09:33, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Royal Dutch artilery firing in Afganistan. --PetarM 11:12, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn its not from an Wikipedian? --Ralf Roletschek 12:35, 17 February 2011 (UTC)* I withdraw my nominationWill put on FP. --PetarM 15:14, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Toronto, Canada: New City Hall --Taxiarchos228 10:18, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion saubere Arbeit --Ralf Roletschek 12:35, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Blue turist sign.--Juan de Vojníkov 00:05, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality trail marker. IdLoveOne 08:21, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vinnitsa state academic music drama theatre --George Chernilevsky 19:56, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 22:48, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Boka kotorska (Bay of Kotor) - view from St. John castle --Pudelek 16:35, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good --George Chernilevsky 08:06, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Picture of Stoplerstein Wilhelm Knöchel --Mdupont 06:32, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Needs to be rotated clockwise a little, maybe cropped on the right. --IdLoveOne 06:34, 14 February 2011 (UTC) Done, and adjusted contrast --Mdupont 05:48, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Could you please turn the contrast down? It's way too high, the bricks are glistening like metal. IdLoveOne 10:25, 16 February 2011 (UTC) Done --Mdupont 18:42, 17 February 2011 (UTC)Then unless anyone thinks otherwise... IdLoveOne 23:25, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A tomb on the Street of Facades, Petra --Bgag 16:17, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good --George Chernilevsky 08:10, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Uneishu Tomb, Petra --Bgag 16:17, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good --George Chernilevsky 08:11, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Green sand in iron grooves. --Avenue 11:33, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review Idea is good but picture not really sharp --Mbdortmund 11:41, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tombs on the Street of Facades, Petra --Bgag 23:41, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good --George Chernilevsky 08:13, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Tombs on the Street of Facades, Petra --Bgag 23:41, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Belgrade Centre for Clmiate Change, Serbia--Михајло Анђелковић 16:17, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review Sky is noisy. Noise reduction is needed. --Jovianeye 18:33, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Sanatorium orphanage at Kukhmar, near Pereslavl.--PereslavlFoto 15:55, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Kotor, Montenegro - archive --Pudelek 14:42, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: House entry and plaque on the house seen in the next image. --Cayambe 09:55, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review Didn't we have that one already? --Mbdortmund 11:42, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
     Info No, sorry, it's new :-). --Cayambe 11:57, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Carved head at the northern choir wall of Banada Priory, Ireland. --AFBorchert 23:18, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI --George Chernilevsky 08:17, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Renomination of Keating Sports Center (noise has been reduced) --Jovianeye 06:26, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 09:36, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination American Red Squirrel --Cephas 22:22, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion cute --Mbdortmund 22:32, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination About 40-year-old electric locomotive Škoda ChS4-072 --George Chernilevsky 19:56, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion yes, it's QI --Ralf Roletschek 20:03, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Staue of St Mathieu on a church façade in Luxemb. City. --Cayambe 18:58, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good --George Chernilevsky 20:00, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nokia Research Center building at Ruoholahti, Helsinki, Finland --Ralf Roletschek 14:52, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 19:53, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Scania CN270UB (#A589) on line 740 in Marki, Poland. --Crusier 14:10, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good --George Chernilevsky 20:00, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Intercity train in Stettin central train station, Poland --Ralf Roletschek 13:52, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good enough for QI. Please add information about locomotive type. -- MJJR 22:27, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Result of an Course in Wikiversity --Ralf Roletschek 13:47, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good and interesting. --Cayambe 08:00, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Finnish National Theater Helsinki --Ralf Roletschek 13:47, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI --Taxiarchos228 14:31, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kandern-Wollbach: Protestant Church, Organ --Taxiarchos228 08:41, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI for me. --Ralf Roletschek 13:29, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kandern-Sitzenkirch: Protestant Church --Taxiarchos228 08:41, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion nice colours and composition --Mbdortmund 22:33, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Old-growth coastal temperate rain forest along U.S. Route 101 in Washington. --Admrboltz 01:47, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline very nice! --Ralf Roletschek 13:29, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
    * Oppose Ineligible: "Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status." Wsiegmund 16:18, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination White-breasted Nuthatch --Cephas 00:53, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI --Taxiarchos228 13:21, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pferd auf dem Gehrenberg bei Wendlingen --Anghy 11:31, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Lovely and good use of the rule of thirds. --Jovianeye 18:22, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rhododendron cultivar, probably hybrid catawbiense.--Jebulon 23:39, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 08:02, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sciurus carolinensis in St James's Park --M0tty 08:07, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion A bit blurry but great composition IdLoveOne 09:51, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Great Temple of Petra, Jordan --Bgag 17:30, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 08:05, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Monumental Gate of Petra, Jordan --Bgag 17:30, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Also good. --Cayambe 08:05, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Red carpets of Anemone coronaria near Or HaNer, Israel. --MathKnight 14:52, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very much like an impressionist painting... --Cayambe 08:07, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marigold flower with raindrops. --Avenue 13:36, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion When I white-balanced this all the plants around it turned blue - why? -- IdLoveOne 23:55, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
    I don't know. It was taken in early evening, in the shade of a building under a mainly blue sky. --Avenue 07:46, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
     Support Criteria satisfied, in my opinion. Useful. --Wsiegmund 16:41, 16 February 2011 (UTC)Fine but you really should see it white balanced... IdLoveOne 09:25, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rheinfelden: Josephs Church --Taxiarchos228 08:09, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI --Ralf Roletschek 16:14, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Toronto: Rogers Centre --Taxiarchos228 08:09, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI --Ralf Roletschek 16:14, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The old town hall of Flein, Baden-Württemberg. -- Felix Koenig 16:19, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Old bridge over Western Bug, near Małkinia Górna, Poland. --Crusier 15:19, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion good work. --Ralf Roletschek 16:12, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Wittlingen: Clock Tower of St. Michaels Church --Taxiarchos228 08:12, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review Vertical perspective needs correction --Jovianeye 17:51, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Toronto: Commerce Court West --Taxiarchos228 08:12, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review Noise reduction is needed. --Jovianeye 18:01, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Toronto: Canada Trust Tower --Taxiarchos228 08:30, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion I want to promote but I think ads are against policy... --IdLoveOne 06:18, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
    It is part of cityscape. Folling your rating pictures of the Piccadilly Circus in London could not candidate here --Taxiarchos228 10:48, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
    The advert is no problem here. --Mbdortmund 13:47, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cornetite Katanga --Archaeodontosaurus 20:59, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 22:39, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dry cargo ship Schelde Highway in Emden --Carschten 18:35, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 19:25, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue de René-Théophile-Hyacinthe Laennec à Quimper - France. --Thesupermat 13:06, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI and Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 16:46, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gate in Wrought iron, Luxemb. City. --Cayambe 10:24, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Shame of the background but good.--Jebulon 00:25, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Snow, Marki, Poland. --Crusier 09:57, 15 February 2011 (UTC)~
  • Decline Does not look like snow and what are these coured points?--Berthold Werner 11:59, 15 February 2011 (UTC) These are ice crystals in sunlight --Crusier 17:19, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kandern-Wollbach: Bell tower of the Protestant Church --Taxiarchos228 09:12, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. Selective noise reduction in sky and shadow would make it even better --Mbdortmund 17:15, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marie Cazin, Les Oubliées. --Eusebius 21:22, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 03:54, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
     Comment Aren't reproductions with frames unacceptable on commons? Just to be sure... Letartean 23:08, 15 February 2011 (UTC) Not if you're the photographer (or if the photographer explicitly released his work). The thing is you can't use the PD-Art policy on such pictures. --Eusebius 08:48, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination An unidentified specimen of daisy with a drop of water on its unopened petals. IdLoveOne 03:26, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline I love how this looks in the thumbnail, or even at 800x600. Not much is sharp at larger sizes, though, and IMO a better ID is needed for a QI. --Avenue 03:15, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: NZ Fur Seal pup. --Avenue 11:31, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: View of Paris from Montmartre --Sfu 23:06, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Panorama seen from the Mont Renaud, near Boncourt, Switzerland. --ComputerHotline 19:50, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Panorama seen from the Mont Renaud, near Boncourt, Switzerland. --ComputerHotline 19:50, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Panorama seen from the Mont Renaud, near Boncourt, Switzerland. --ComputerHotline 19:50, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Capitals in Apamea. --Eusebius 21:34, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn Great quality, but might be overexposed. IdLoveOne 21:08, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
    General exposure seems ok to me, but there are blown highlights indeed, due to the strong contrast. I'm not sure why I did not see them, sorry.  I withdraw my nomination --Eusebius 12:40, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination VW Karmann Ghia 1500 --M0tty 09:19, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Shadow is too disturbing. --Berthold Werner 11:59, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mini-baja, Laval University --Cephas 02:07, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Great capture. ~~~~
• 
  • Nomination 360 Pano Wartherhorn / Austria --Alex.vonbun 23:05, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 04:09, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination An Eastern Gray Squirrel in Chicago. --Jovianeye 21:13, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Wha? Who gave the squirrel a chicken nugget? IdLoveOne 23:53, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A shell of the Philippinian landsnail Ryssota ovum --Llez 19:25, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality and useful. --Mbdortmund 20:09, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A pool near the Borne des Trois Puissances, near Beurnevésin, Switzerland. --ComputerHotline 19:05, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good --George Chernilevsky 08:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A pool near the Borne des Trois Puissances, near Beurnevésin, Switzerland. --ComputerHotline 19:05, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good --George Chernilevsky 08:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination On the France-Switzerland border; near Réchésy, France. --ComputerHotline 19:05, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good --George Chernilevsky 08:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Site of the Borne des Trois Puissances seen from France. --ComputerHotline 19:05, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good --George Chernilevsky 08:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Site of the Borne des Trois Puissances seen from Switzerland. --ComputerHotline 19:05, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good --George Chernilevsky 08:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pereslavl museum, refectory and the church of All Saints. --PereslavlFoto 17:06, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 09:06, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stora Nyckelviken. --Ankara 14:24, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --George Chernilevsky 08:24, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ottawa: Library of Parliament --Taxiarchos228 09:51, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI --Mbdortmund 15:09, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lörrach: Clock Tower of Church Saint Josef --Taxiarchos228 09:51, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion very good. --Cayambe 15:35, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Relief of a lion, Petra --Bgag 04:52, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 09:10, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Qasr al-Bint, Petra --Bgag 04:52, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 09:10, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Qasr al-Bint, Petra --Bgag 04:52, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 09:10, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pycnonotus jocosus. IdLoveOne 04:00, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Unsharp. --Makele-90 16:07, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Smaller Dome of Taj Mahal Palace Hotel --Jovianeye 21:38, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --George Chernilevsky 08:59, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Montreal: Bonsecours Market --Taxiarchos228 08:30, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion ...Is the building the market? It looks more like a government building. --IdLoveOne 05:57, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
    This building is a famous landmark in Montreal. It is not a government building, see: en:Bonsecours Market --Taxiarchos228 10:24, 14 February 2011 (UTC)Oh. IdLoveOne 23:48, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination House in Domatowo. Yarl 22:22, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline  Question Is the house on a hill? Hard to be sure because of the fence. IdLoveOne 03:09, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
    Little, it's also effect of stitching photo. Yarl 12:13, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
     Oppose stitching errors --Carschten 14:28, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Marsac Church, Hautes-Pyrénées, France -- Florent Pécassou 17:34, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment I like it, but too much color noise on the green shadows and roofs. A bit noised (sky,...). The right vertical lines are not vertical. For me, the problems can have solution. --Lmbuga 22:10, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: London Eye and Sea Life London Aquarium at night --Ralf Roletschek 15:51, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment The horizon is heavily tilted! --Gaendalf 04:04, 9 February 2011 (UTC) Google-translation: in front of the Ferris wheel are ridges in the water, on the right half we see that the horizon is just --Ralf Roletschek
• 
  • Nomination Coats of arms from Lörrach --Taxiarchos228 09:29, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good sharpness and color, but when white balanced the background is almost purple? Is this thing really red? IdLoveOne 03:09, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
    For sure it is really red, what colour else should this be? Green? Here the coat of arms File:Loerrach wappen.svg --Taxiarchos228 07:10, 14 February 2011 (UTC)I ask because this is what GIMP did. --IdLoveOne 08:51, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
    And the automatical gimp-function is a benchmark what for? --Taxiarchos228 10:28, 14 February 2011 (UTC)I'll take your word for it since GIMP hasmade mistakes before. IdLoveOne 21:04, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cairo, Ibn Tulun Mosque --Berthold Werner 12:12, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nicely framed. IdLoveOne 21:08, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Počitelj, Bosnia and Hercegovina - citadel --Pudelek 11:46, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good composition. IdLoveOne 21:08, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Street in El Carmen, Ecuador. --Cayambe 08:55, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Jumbled-up composition, but that seems to just be a jumbled street. IdLoveOne 21:08, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Graz: View out of the Castle gate to Old Town --Taxiarchos228 08:28, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Composition very nice. IdLoveOne 20:48, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Graz: Main train station --Taxiarchos228 08:28, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Cutoff I think but good quality and lighting. IdLoveOne 21:08, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Graz: Main square (Hauptmarkt) --Taxiarchos228 08:28, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Not liking the foreground darkness, but the quality of the interesting buildings is good. IdLoveOne 21:08, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Graz: Statue "Lichtschwert" --Taxiarchos228 08:28, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Might be better if the sun were angled differently, but is ok quality and composition wise as far as I can see. IdLoveOne 20:48, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kotor - view from city wall --Pudelek 11:36, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 11:56, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kotor - Serbian Orthodox church --Pudelek 11:36, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 11:56, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Windmill on Noirmoutier, France --Taxiarchos228 09:51, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion exzellent --Mbdortmund 11:52, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paris: Dôme des Invalides --Taxiarchos228 09:51, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 11:52, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Howlite - Turquenite --Archaeodontosaurus 09:37, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good (except for the blur on the left) IdLoveOne 10:06, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Guildfordia yoka. IdLoveOne 04:27, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good. --Cayambe 08:10, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sympetrum sanguineum mating(?) (Happy Valentine's day!). IdLoveOne 04:09, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 08:11, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gouache paint set. IdLoveOne 04:00, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion nice! --Mbdortmund 11:54, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A wood pidgeon on a telephone wire. IdLoveOne 03:47, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline The TV aerial is distracting, and the pigeon is too small a part of the picture. A much tighter crop might work, but this one is not a QI IMO. Also, sharpness seems marginal, and the chest verges on being overexposed. --Avenue 10:35, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A sun, Huichol string art. Colored wool threads.--Jebulon 23:27, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 23:35, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Semi-mature artichoke flower with snails and insects --IdLoveOne 23:21, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion DOF does'nt cover the whole flower, but QI nevertheless imo. --Cayambe 08:03, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pano from Rapperswil SG --Böhringer 20:40, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI --Taxiarchos228 07:52, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gothic vaults (13th century) in the "Collège des Bernardins" in Paris. To correct the perspective should be a non sense in this case, IMO.--Jebulon 17:44, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 08:01, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shell of a Leopard Cone, Lithoconus leopardus --Llez 17:08, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good and useful. --Cayambe 08:05, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Theater of Petra, Jordan --Bgag 16:25, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 08:05, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A door at the Monastery of Saint Anthony in Egypt --Berthold Werner 16:09, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 23:38, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Flettner rotors of the cargo ship E-Ship 1 --Carschten 15:45, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 23:38, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The cargo ship E-Ship 1 in Emden --Carschten 15:45, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 08:07, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The dry cargo ship Autoracer in Emden --Carschten 15:45, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality, interesting angle of choice. -- IdLoveOne 00:05, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Skull of a cave bear (Ursus spelaeus).--Jebulon 14:27, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Qi --Taxiarchos228 14:30, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fossil skull of a Saber-Toothed cat. Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris.--Jebulon 11:22, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 13:25, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Triumph Thunderbird 1600 --MrPanyGoff 11:12, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion I like the above view and the sharp reflection in the windshield. IdLoveOne 10:06, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lörrach: Altar in Germanus Church --Taxiarchos228 10:33, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Sharpness and exposure are good but too tight cropped at the bottom. --Berthold Werner 16:15, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rheinfelden: Saint Urban Church --Taxiarchos228 10:33, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline The fountain is cropped at the bottom and the perpsective of the building at the left side looks strange. --Berthold Werner 16:15, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Feluccas on the Nile at Luxor (Egypt) -- MJJR 22:13, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 19:18, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Rosa Blanda specimen in the province of Québec, Canada. --Letartean 17:15, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Levels a bit off maybe due to the weather, but not terrible. --IdLoveOne 00:26, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cristiano Ronaldo, football match Argentina vs Portugal -- Ludo29 16:21, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Fuzzy, but a lucky shot and framed well. --IdLoveOne 08:58, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tombs on the Street of Facades, Petra --Bgag 16:17, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 19:20, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dahlia x hortensis. --Bartiebert 16:12, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion The angle is kind of alluring. --IdLoveOne 08:58, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sigma 8-16mm F4.5-5.6. A.Savin 08:05, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion I see no technical flaws here (except the cutoff shadow). --IdLoveOne 00:09, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A tomb on the Street of Facades, Petra --Bgag 23:41, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 08:16, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The temple of Tod: general view (Luxor region, Egypt) -- MJJR 22:26, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Bgag 04:52, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The site of the temple of Tod (Luxor region, Egypt) -- MJJR 22:26, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 19:23, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination An Australasian Gannet greets its mate. --Avenue 19:54, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion High in quality and EV. --IdLoveOne 00:33, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain flax flower. --Avenue 20:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  RequestIt would be better (as in more promote-able) if the tiny piece of some other flower on the lower right was cropped out... -- IdLoveOne 00:33, 14 February 2011 (UTC) Thank ya very much. --IdLoveOne 07:28, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Orange sunset, Marki, Poland. --Crusier 12:49, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Too dark. --IdLoveOne 06:29, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination TV helicopter - 2010 Rally France - WRC --Jef132 17:06, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Yes, interesting and good quality! --IdLoveOne 06:18, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination General Consulate of Croatia in Kotor --Pudelek 15:11, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion A bit hazy and the levels are slightly probably off, but it's good. Not sure about the flag though, I know that on FPC they aren't considered neutral, but, if allowable... --IdLoveOne 06:18, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Boka Kotorska (Bay of Kotor), Montenegro. Ferry to Kamenari --Pudelek 15:11, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion A bit bright but good. --IdLoveOne 06:18, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination John Knox Church in Brighton, Victoria Donaldytong 14:41, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Well framed and lit. --IdLoveOne 06:18, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A niche in Petra --Bgag 00:52, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Great quality. --IdLoveOne 05:57, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cemetery in Mechowo. Yarl 22:22, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion A little bit over-exposed, but not much. IdLoveOne 03:09, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Street in Luxor, Egypt -- MJJR 22:13, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Very interesting iage, but blindingly overexposed sky. IdLoveOne 03:09, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A shell of Melo broderipii --Llez 16:55, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Really nice composition and useful but there is a problem with the blown white scratches on the upper ones --Mbdortmund 21:45, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
     Comment This are no scratches. The shell has a high-gloss surface (like a mirror) so that you can not always avoid light reflections. --Llez 05:02, 9 February 2011
    QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 09:42, 14 February 2011 (UTC)(UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rail platform Ozerishche in Minsk, Belarus. A.Savin 16:38, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Lighting looks good. IdLoveOne 03:17, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rheinfelden: Water tower --Taxiarchos228 09:29, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Great lighting, everything is visible. IdLoveOne 03:09, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Trigance castle, France --Ianare 01:22, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion *Google-translation:for me up to some "air" --Ralf Roletschek* SupportIf there's opposition, the lighting and quality is good. IdLoveOne 03:09, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Persea indica. Jardin des Plantes de Paris.--Jebulon 23:17, 7 February 2011 (UTC) New version with better colors and levels.--Jebulon 12:10, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI, good enough --George Chernilevsky 08:30, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fountain, Place Monge in Paris, by night.--Jebulon 21:59, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice colors --George Chernilevsky 08:31, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Počitelj, Bosnia and Hercegovina --Pudelek 11:46, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion A bit pixellated, but a good photo and lighting IMO -- IdLoveOne 23:38, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Auxiliary power plant of the geothermal power plant of Unterhaching. --High Contrast 23:37, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review Maybe the chimneys left should be more vertical ?--Jebulon 01:08, 7 February 2011 (UTC) Perspective correction has been proceeded. --High Contrast 07:10, 7 February 2011 (UTC) It is really leaning, and the left angle of the building is not vertical...--Jebulon 23:49, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Symphysodon tank with tetras at Paris. --Citron 17:47, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice and clear. --IdLoveOne 06:27, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Portal of St. Veit's church, Flein, Baden-Württemberg. -- Felix Koenig 17:21, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality except for the shadow on the walkway. --IdLoveOne 06:27, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flood control reservoir near Heilbronn-Sontheim, Baden-Württemberg. -- Felix Koenig 16:40, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion A boring image, but the quality is still good. --IdLoveOne 06:27, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Obla glava in Durmitor, Montenegro --Mercy 13:56, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Lighting and quality overall are pretty good. IdLoveOne 03:44, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lüneburg: Church St. Johannis --Taxiarchos228 12:00, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Pretty good, basically. I don't see any major problems. --IdLoveOne 23:59, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lörrach: serpentine --Taxiarchos228 12:00, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Horrible distortion on the left. --IdLoveOne 00:16, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arab capital, column and arch with stucco epigraphy in Alhambra, Granada, Spain --Jebulon 23:25, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment I can't decide, I like the subject very much, it's an illustrative and very interesting picture. Nonetheless I find unpleasant the underexpossure in the left upper corner. --Gaendalf 00:19, 5 February 2011 (UTC) Sorry I've done my best. Thanks for review.--Jebulon 16:25, 6 February 2011 (UTC)I like it, alot of detail. --IdLoveOne 05:39, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lörrach: Germanus Church --Taxiarchos228 10:33, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion very good quality --Carschten 10:42, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Triumph Thunderbird 1600 --MrPanyGoff 10:07, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Carschten 10:42, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church in Novgorod, Russia. A.Savin 08:05, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Perspektive nicht korrigiert. --Mbdortmund 10:34, 12 February 2011 (UTC)  Done A.Savin 12:20, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
    OK now --Mbdortmund 20:53, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St. Antönier Joch, Montafon, Austria --Alex.vonbun 12:54, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Böhringer 23:13, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Half-pediment on Al Khazneh, Petra --Bgag 00:48, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Coyau 12:35, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination "Pain au lait" (French Viennoiserie). --DocteurCosmos 11:09, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice and usefull. --Coyau 12:44, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Growing of the fern Dicksonia antarctica. Jardin des Plantes de Paris.--Jebulon 23:06, 7 February 2011 (UTC) Colors and levels improved.--Jebulon 11:26, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Much of this is good, but too much is out of focus at lower left. IMO not enough DOF. --Avenue 13:05, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marattia purpurascens, Jardin des Plantes de Paris.--Jebulon 22:32, 7 February 2011 (UTC) Colors and levels improved--Jebulon 11:28, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Light is patchy in parts of the background, but not on the main subject. QI to me. --Avenue 13:05, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Počitelj, Bosnia and Hercegovina --Pudelek 11:46, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Baroque cemetery in Střílky, CZ --Mercy 13:56, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: 360° panorama near Grosne, France. --ComputerHotline 12:20, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Coaster in Gorky Park in Moscow. A.Savin 08:05, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 10:33, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Weil am Rhein: Three Country Bridge at night --Taxiarchos228 08:09, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK --Ralf Roletschek 12:18, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Toronto: Clock Tower of the Old Townhall --Taxiarchos228 08:09, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 19:07, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Egyptian countryside south of Luxor, Egypt. In the background: the village of Al Bayadiyah. -- MJJR 22:15, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice and peaceful landscape in Egypt, and Qi to me. --Cayambe 16:08, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Boka Kotorska (Bay of Kotor), Montenegro. View from ferry to Kamenari --Pudelek 15:11, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI to me. --Cayambe 16:10, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saad Zaghlul Street in Luxor, Egypt -- MJJR 22:04, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 22:23, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lörrach: Church of Rötteln --Taxiarchos228 15:33, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
  • WARNING: third template parameter added – please remove.
• 
  • Nomination Jindřišská věž in Prague. --High Contrast 22:34, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Oh, Prague, nice! :) The shot is good, but it needs a bit turn left. BTW: At the botom of the tower is one of three pieces of Tatra T6A5 with special type of couple. ;) — Jagro 23:55, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
    Good quality. --Mbdortmund 22:27, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clock tower in Herceg Novi, Montenegro --Mercy 09:20, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
  • WARNING: third template parameter added – please remove.
• 
  • Nomination Street in Luxembourg City. --Cayambe 09:55, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Carschten 10:29, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Toronto: O.P.P.-Policecar --Taxiarchos228 08:09, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --Carschten 10:29, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Nile at Kings Island, near Luxor, Egypt. -- MJJR 22:15, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion I like the composition --Carschten 10:39, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Egyptian countryside south of Luxor, Egypt. -- MJJR 22:15, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Carschten 10:39, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Esteban_Cambiasso --Ludo29 22:00, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion very good action shot --Carschten 10:39, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Capra aegagrus hircus --Böhringer 20:52, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Sharp and otherwise also good. --Cayambe 09:57, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dieter Nuhr live in Moers, Germany --Carschten 19:24, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion yes, QI - good asymmetric composition --Ralf Roletschek 19:32, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Monastery of Saint Bishoy, Wadi Natrun. New version - new nomination --Berthold Werner 13:35, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good. --Cayambe 19:38, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mountain flax flower. --Avenue 12:12, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good to me. --Bartiebert 19:05, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bilingual streetsign in Torontos Chinatown --Taxiarchos228 11:58, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good for me --Letartean 16:24, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Härjångsfjället. --Ankara 11:06, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion ok --Carschten 10:39, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church in Leksand, Sweden --Ainali 08:55, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Carschten 10:39, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Peggys Cove Lighthouse, Canada --Taxiarchos228 08:25, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Quality seems fine but the framing is too tight. --Jovianeye 17:47, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rheinfelden: Gallus Church --Taxiarchos228 08:12, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:58, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Weil am Rhein: Vitra House --Taxiarchos228 08:12, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jovianeye 17:55, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Port of Vannes, Brittany, France. --Myrabella 07:20, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Comme qui dirait, le bout de la Rabine. A bit soft maybe (lack of contrast), but good.--Jebulon 15:58, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tobias Jundt, Singer --Arne mueseler 09:55, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline tight crop at top, below max. size of 2 MP --Carschten 16:39, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Skiing area Mellau, Damüls --Böhringer 20:42, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion very nice --Taxiarchos228 15:15, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gafier Joch, Montafon, Austria. Alex.vonbun 18:03, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion --Bgag 00:48, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of Heracles, Galerie Véro-Dodat, Paris. --Coyau 16:39, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support this one too. --Jebulon 10:49, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 1788 gloriette, probably the oldest full-metallic building in the world, Jardin des Plantes of Paris.--Jebulon 23:29, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good, despite the dark bottom zone, which at full resolution isn't that dark. :-) --Cayambe 19:41, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Graz: Statue of Madonna --Taxiarchos228 08:28, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion I dont know what ISO was used. Noise is visible in the lower dark region. I tried denoising with Neat Image as suggested by Gaendalf and the output is clean. --Jovianeye 01:12, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
    If the retouched version is really better you can rewrite the image by your edited version. --Taxiarchos228 10:12, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
     Done --Jovianeye 15:46, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Landscape of Dana Reserve, Jordan --Bgag 19:04, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 14:41, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Landscape of Dana Reserve, Jordan --Bgag 19:04, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Also good. --Cayambe 14:41, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: A golf hole at Phoenician Golf Club, Scottsdale, Arizona --Bgag 19:04, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Old wine press house in Ilsfeld, Baden-Württemberg. -- Felix Koenig 17:27, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Monastery of Saint Anthony, Egypt , photographed by me, retouched by Lmbuga --Berthold Werner 16:54, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review maybe we need something like User:Carschten/QI-retouched? --Carschten 17:53, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
    That should be discussed. --Berthold Werner 10:35, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Great Wall of China --Sfu 23:06, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI. --Jovianeye 05:34, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Petronas Twin Towers, Kuala Lumpur. Alex.vonbun 23:15, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI --Taxiarchos228 07:22, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of Mercurius, Galerie Véro-Dodat, Paris. --Coyau 16:39, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Carschten 19:44, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The ship Wind Lift I in Emden --Carschten 16:27, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --Alupus 19:31, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The street over the Friedrich-Ebert-Brücke, Duisburg --Carschten 16:27, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI --Taxiarchos228 19:09, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Panorama of the Friedrich-Ebert-Brücke, Duisburg --Carschten 16:27, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI --Taxiarchos228 19:09, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The underside of the Friedrich-Ebert-Brücke, Duisburg --Carschten 16:27, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI --Taxiarchos228 19:09, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A wood shingles wall in Canada. Letartean 14:46, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion clean craft --Ralf Roletschek 14:59, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shell of Cymbium tritonis, renomination of new version --Llez 08:30, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Far much better ! Come on Llez ! and 5 are enough (private joke)--Jebulon 10:57, 9 February 2011 (UTC) Bravo --Archaeodontosaurus 19:38, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Montreal: Mont Royal Cross --Taxiarchos228 08:30, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion nice --Carschten 19:44, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bettingen: TV Tower St. Chrischona --Taxiarchos228 08:30, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --Carschten 19:44, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Djinn Blocks, Petra --Bgag 00:52, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Carschten 19:44, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fishing boat in Swarzewo. Yarl 22:22, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion The transformer at right is cropped... but as it is not the main subject, I thinks it's QI quality. --Cayambe 16:02, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Old houses in the village of Tod, Egypt -- MJJR 22:13, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 16:04, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hippeastrum flower's stamens --Gaendalf 02:55, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose too many fuzzy areas --Archaeodontosaurus 19:42, 9 February 2011 (UTC) what do you refer to with "fuzzy". I don't understand its meaning in photographic issues. Thanks! --Gaendalf 00:14, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coco Loco Beach, Philippines --Alexander Vonbun 12:54, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Great picture. Nonetheless there's a stitching problem in the horizon. Check near the boat of the right. If it's solved I would definetely support the image. --Gaendalf 22:10, 7 February 2011 (UTC) I added an annotation on it.--Jebulon 23:40, 7 February 2011 (UTC)  Done Alexander Vonbun 21:34, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
    I found anotherone, added an annotation on it. And a weird spot appeared where the previous stitching problem was located. Please fix --Gaendalf 04:01, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
     Done the "weird spot" should be a ship, thx 17:55, 9 February 2011 (UTC) I'm glad to approve this one! Excellent pic! --Gaendalf 00:16, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Alhambra of Granada, from Generalife Gardens, Spain--Jebulon 16:34, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 18:33, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A fight during the Renaissance, relief, Palace of Emperor Charles V, Alhambra, Granada, Spain.--Jebulon 16:10, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Also good. --Cayambe 18:33, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Toronto, Canada: BMO Field --Taxiarchos228 07:41, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Gatineau: Museum of Civilisation --Taxiarchos228 08:30, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion more than QI. --Ralf Roletschek
• 
  • Nomination Obelisk Tomb and Triclinium, Petra --Bgag 00:52, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good --Taxiarchos228 09:33, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination High resolution panorama of Crater Lake in Oregon. Snottywong 00:27, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very nice --Taxiarchos228 09:33, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Old creepy Ecorché, please see description page.--Jebulon 23:52, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI. --Jovianeye 05:52, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue in Mechowo. Yarl 22:22, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. Pity though that the statue has not been maintained properly --Jovianeye 05:52, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination House on Nevsky Prospect in St. Petersburg. A.Savin 16:38, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion typical russian ;) --Ralf Roletschek
• 
  • Nomination Russian film director Boris Khlebnikov. A.Savin 16:38, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Carschten 19:57, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gzhat River in Gagarin, Russia. A.Savin 16:38, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion very good. --Cayambe 16:48, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hallstatt, Austria: Church --Taxiarchos228 09:29, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --Størtebeker 12:32, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Salzburg Cathedral: Organ --Taxiarchos228 09:29, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 16:50, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The railway station of Luxor, Egypt -- MJJR 22:04, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion very good --Pudelek 12:27, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination City walls of Vannes, France. --Myrabella 06:05, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very beautiful. --Jovianeye 06:28, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
     Comment To me poor image--Lmbuga 01:32, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
     Question On what aspect, in order to improve myself? --Myrabella 08:10, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
     Comment Now, I think you're right, but poor clarity at top, I don't like the contrast, poor definition on the human figures, it seems to me that there is horizontal distortion...; but nothing is too important. It only happens that the assembly does not like me by those reasons. Sorry--Lmbuga 19:50, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Beach restaurants in Manta, Ecuador. --Cayambe 17:22, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Perhaps good. To me, a bit noised. See the signboard with the words "Deli Jireh"--Lmbuga 20:32, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
     Comment Mmh, I don't think the signboard is noisy (ISO 200). Please, see the dark interior of the restaurant: there's no noise there, at least for my feeling. Thanks for reviewing. --Cayambe 11:37, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
    Ok. Perhaps the image is improvable, but it's good--Lmbuga 19:56, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Near the personal entry of an old NATO base. --ComputerHotline 16:35, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Near the personal entry of an old NATO base. --ComputerHotline 16:35, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Freudenberg-Niederndorf, Germany. --Bartiebert 14:38, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Lörrach-Hauingen: Church St. Nikolaus --Taxiarchos228 09:47, 2 February 2011 (UTC  Comment needs a distortion correction --Tlusťa 10:43, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
    is allready corrected --Taxiarchos228 11:17, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
     ? Sorry, but I see no change --Tlusťa 12:17, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Lörrach: hospital --Taxiarchos228 09:29, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI --Ralf Roletschek
• 
  • Nomination The Nile south of Luxor, Egypt -- MJJR 22:04, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good --Jebulon 23:37, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Santons. Too much flash? --Eusebius 21:06, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion No, IMO. Good--Jebulon 22:00, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination on the set for filming the RTL series "The Trickster" --Ralf Roletschek 20:36, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI --Taxiarchos228 20:52, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
     Comment The licence doesn't permit commercial reuse and modification. Is this picture acceptable on commons? Letartean 23:48, 7 February 2011 (UTC)  Info Yes: among the licences there is GFDL1.2. A NC-ND licence alone would not have been ok. --Eusebius 09:45, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Graz: Clock tower by night --Taxiarchos228 08:28, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion for me it's good --Badener 14:23, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mosque of Sultan Ibrahim in the fortress of Rethymno, Crete. --Oltau 20:58, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment To me, perspective distortion and not sharp enough--Lmbuga 22:36, 6 February 2011 (UTC) Good to me.--Jebulon 23:51, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Colonial house in the historical centre of Quito. --Cayambe 20:29, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good --Jebulon 23:52, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Bakery built in the 1930s. --Ankara 09:58, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Paris: Eiffel Tower --Taxiarchos228 09:47, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. I added it in some categories. Maybe a geotag of Tour Montparnasse could be useful.--Jebulon 18:00, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Lörrach: Church --Taxiarchos228 09:47, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: :Advertising of Ozujsko Beer --Tlusťa 20:11, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Panorama seen from the Ballon d'Alsace. --ComputerHotline 18:56, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Panorama seen from the Ballon d'Alsace. --ComputerHotline 18:56, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Statue of Jeanne d'Arc at the summit of the Ballon d'Alsace. --ComputerHotline 18:56, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Egypt, The Nile in Cairo --Berthold Werner 18:23, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Sanatorium orphanage at Kukhmar, near Pereslavl, Russia. --PereslavlFoto 16:49, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Australasian Gannet. --Avenue 16:43, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Sulphuric setiments near Krafla mountain --Snaevar 15:24, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Grassland near the sea in Guanacaste, Costa Rica --Gaendalf 04:21, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment horizon tilted --Carschten 13:57, 1 February 2011 (UTC)  Done --Chmee2 15:41, 1 February 2011 (UTC) Thanks for the fix --Gaendalf 17:39, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Friedrich Ebert bridge in Duisburg --Carschten 18:17, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment Die Fabrik im Hintergrund stört mich irgendwie (Vielleicht weil sie auf der Brücke "aufsitzt") --Berthold Werner 18:29, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
    I agree with the factory issue and I personally find the shadow on the left corner disturbing.--Gaendalf 20:56, 1 February 2011 (UTC) Mit Bethold Werner und Gaendalf einverstanden (aber "stitch" ist sehr gut)--Jebulon 16:59, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The former water tower in the center of Vinnitsa --George Chernilevsky 19:29, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Assuming the lamp posts are vertical, I think the image needs perspective correction. --Jovianeye 23:50, 5 February 2011 (UTC)Good to me as it is--Jebulon 16:25, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Graz: Town hall --Taxiarchos228 08:28, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 11:49, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Graz: Clock tower --Taxiarchos228 08:28, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion very good --Mbdortmund 11:50, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Abu el-Haggag mosque and the pylon of the temple at Luxor, Egypt -- MJJR 22:15, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Vertical distortion (see: the grates of the right)--Lmbuga 22:32, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
    In adition, to me, too tight at left, but...--Lmbuga 22:34, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
     Done Perspective corrected. Please notice: the left minaret is really leaning to the left! -- MJJR 08:42, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
     Support --Taxiarchos228 08:58, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Quercus robur in Marki, Poland. --Crusier 19:06, 6 February 2011 (UTC)~
  • Decline chromatic abberation in the leaves. --Jovianeye 00:17, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Memorial for 7 victims of a Death march in May 1945 --LutzBruno 18:49, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Strong chromatic aberrations at top, tilted, overexposing--Lmbuga 22:50, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bus MAN NG 363 Lion's City G (#3456) on line 718 in Marki, Poland. --Crusier 15:19, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion good Quality --Ralf Roletschek
• 
  • Nomination Bus MAN NG 363 Lion's City G (#3456) on line 718 in Marki, Poland. --Crusier 15:19, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion good Quality --Ralf Roletschek
• 
  • Nomination Lüneburg: Am Sande --Taxiarchos228 12:00, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 21:09, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lörrach: Church St. Peter--Taxiarchos228 12:00, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion saubere Arbeit, nichts auszusetzen --Ralf Roletschek
• 
  • Nomination Lörrach: Church St. Peter--Taxiarchos228 12:00, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion schöne Komposition --Ralf Roletschek
• 
  • Nomination Lörrach-Hauingen: cemetery chapel --Taxiarchos228 15:33, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 17:33, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ruins inside the Montreal Castle, Jordan --Bgag 00:25, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:47, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
    Blurry for me. Not QI for me--Lmbuga 01:45, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Toronto, Canada: GO Transit train --Taxiarchos228 07:41, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Can you add geocodes? --High Contrast 07:57, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
    don´t know why this is so important here, but I have added the geocode. --Taxiarchos228 15:26, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
    Although, geocode is not part of the guideline it is encouraged at QI. --Jovianeye 06:45, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
    QI-image. --High Contrast 23:47, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Example of a 4 sphere Venn diagram (representing this operation) --Lipedia 03:18, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good and very useful diagram. --Jovianeye 15:41, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Manta, Ecuador: Murciélago Beach. Pre-Incan figure in the foreground. --Cayambe 20:33, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 19:42, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Vaults of Saint-Antoine-l'Abbaye. --Eusebius 13:48, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline chromatic aberrations --Carschten 10:20, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
     Comment I don't think I can remove them except by local desaturation (I can barely see a fringe). --Eusebius 17:30, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paris: Palais du Luxembourg --Taxiarchos228 09:47, 2 February 2011 (UTC) Better if taken in the axis and centered, (), but good enough. Please remove the short white line above in the sky, and I'll support.--Jebulon 23:31, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
    done --Taxiarchos228 12:39, 6 February 2011 (UTC) support done too.--Jebulon 01:00, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion {{{2}}}
• 
  • Nomination Landmannalaugar landscape --Snaevar 15:24, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Great picture, nonetheless I find the overexposure in the clouds a bit disturbing. --Gaendalf 17:39, 1 February 2011 (UTC) *  Support Good for me --Archaeodontosaurus 20:06, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Main dome of Taj Mahal Palace Hotel --Jovianeye 23:19, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good to me.--Jebulon 23:46, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shell of a Pink Mouthed Murex, Hexaplex erythrostomus --Llez 14:52, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI.--Jebulon 23:41, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tram loop Podbaba, Prague — Jagro 23:50, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good compostion. --Jovianeye 23:39, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Karosa B 941, Prague — Jagro 23:50, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline The composition doesn't seam correct for me. The attention is not really focused on the bus in this composition. --Gaendalf 22:35, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Big courthouse in Hamborn, Germany; closeup view, 18 mm Canon EOS. --BlackIceNRW 20:49, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Sorry but the building is cropped at the right and upperside and perspective distortion. --Berthold Werner 15:00, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The old basilica St. Sofia in Sofia --MrPanyGoff 12:53, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose IMO, the shadows ruin the picture. It should have been taken at a different time of the day. --Gaendalf 22:29, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Toronto, Canada: Princes' Gates --Taxiarchos228 07:41, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Jovianeye 06:36, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Algonquin Provincial Park--Taxiarchos228 07:41, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good--Jebulon 23:35, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Windmill in Bukovany, CZ --Mercy 09:16, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Rheinfelden: Interior of Church St. Gallus--Taxiarchos228 08:43, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion some blown-out highlights, but overall nice --Carschten 11:52, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Canada: Confederation Bridge --Taxiarchos228 08:43, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: „Rhein-Ruhr-Halle“ in Duisburg, south-west side. --BlackIceNRW 08:35, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Koski Mehmed Pasha Mosque in Mostar - interior --Pudelek 18:54, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Landscape in Dana Biosphere Reserve, Jordan --Bgag 18:31, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Brown eye of mine --Gaendalf 23:10, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Nice, but unsharp and probably outside the scope of the project (it certainly has personal and artistic value, but educational?). Post-processing not documented and not useful to the EV of the image. --Eusebius 09:09, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Capra ibex --Böhringer 21:58, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Centred without a reason. --Eusebius 22:44, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
    Eusebius' decline reason isn't sustainable, but the comoposition isn't good to me, too. Horns cutted off at top and a really disturbing background. Schade! --Carschten 10:23, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sheikh Lotf Allah Mosque on the eastern side of Naqsh-e Jahan Square at Night --Gire 3pich2005 20:12, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Nice, but perspective issues. Check the verticals. --Eusebius 22:45, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Closeup view of Canon Powershot A lens.--PetarM 16:42, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment imho dof is too short --Berthold Werner 16:55, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
     Oppose agree (f/16 or the like should it be), also too tight crop at bottom. But should be no problem to reshoot it. --Carschten 17:04, 4 February 2011 (UTC) * Info Aperture is set exactly where it meant to be, with this DOF wanted. You just have to understand the foto. f/16 ?! Not even at FF sensor. ;) --PetarM 18:24, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
    ah ok. Maybe you should write something about the DOF in the file description. But I'm still thinking that ther's a too tight crop at bottom, sorry.... :-/ --Carschten 18:34, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Panorama from Koh Similan over the Ao Kuerk bay, Similan-Island, Thailand --Leviathan1983 14:51, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 15:05, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gipslöcher Lech --Alexander Vonbun 08:44, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 15:02, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Baie Saint-Paul, Canada: Saint Jean Baptiste --Taxiarchos228 07:41, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Frage: Warum korrigierst Du die stürzenden Linien nicht vollständig? Ich lasse manchmal auch einen Rest, als Metapher für die Höhe, aber hier scheint mir das zum Standpunkt nichtzu passen. Nebenbei: Schön, dass Du hier so viele gute Bilder einbringst. --Mbdortmund 16:26, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
    Du hast Recht, ich habe sie vollständig begradigt, außerdem auch die Lichtdynamik etwas ausgeglichener gestaltet. --Taxiarchos228 20:12, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
    schönes Bild --Mbdortmund 00:53, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
     Comment die Farben der vorherigen Version fand ich besser, denn nun hat das Bild einen leichten Blaustich... --Carschten 10:18, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Brockville, Canada: Railway Tunnel --Taxiarchos228 07:41, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion sehr schön --Carschten 16:14, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Keep of Liebenstein castle, Baden-Württemberg. -- Felix Koenig 17:56, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 16:35, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Front of Russell Glacier, Greenland --Chmee2 10:30, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI --Taxiarchos228 11:52, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
     Comment Lighting does not seem adapted to the subject, it lacks some contrast. --Eusebius 22:38, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Isunnguata Sermia glacier in Greenland --Chmee2 21:12, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good --George Chernilevsky 08:43, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
     Support Indeed. --Eusebius 22:23, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hengill hotspot volcano --Snaevar 15:24, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Also very good. --Cayambe 15:01, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
     Question Why so small?? --Eusebius 22:09, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Juvankoski Rapids damn in Paimionjoki River at Tarvasjoki, Finland. --Makele-90 16:41, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Rotunda St. John The Baptist in Xewkija, Gozo, Malta. -- Felix Koenig 15:35, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment The vertical lines are not vertical. The car is disturbing. To me, too tight crop at left, perhaps at right--Lmbuga 21:14, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Pl d'Armes in Luxemb. City, see location of the plaque over the ancient 65 m deep well of the ancient fortress, dug in 1741. --Cayambe 12:32, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment Underexposed--Lmbuga 20:32, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Dornum: Norderburg --Taxiarchos228 11:45, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review There is some CA (überall wo helle Teile vor dunklem Hintergrund stehen) --Berthold Werner 13:06, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
    the right vertical lines are not vertical--Lmbuga 19:47, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: A First Great Western HST set at Severn tunnel Junction. Mattbuck 10:29, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment Too much noise--Lmbuga 01:45, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Bust of poet Andrejs Pumpurs --Snaevar 20:46, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment To me, too tight crop at top and perhaps at bottom--Lmbuga 20:15, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Climbing the Villarica volcano, Chile --Elemaki 03:18, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI --Taxiarchos228 11:11, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lynx lynx --Böhringer 20:04, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Beautiful, but blurry or unsharp (too much). Composition: I don't like the body of the bottom, at right; to me it's disturbing--Lmbuga 20:18, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bridge pier of the Friedrich-Ebert-Brücke, Duisburg --Carschten 15:12, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Schöne Ansicht des Brückenpylons, vor allem der Aufnahmewinkel gefällt mir gut --Taxiarchos228 15:27, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bearing tower on Majorca (Bay of Alcúdia), Spain --Oltau 14:41, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Big zones with underexposition and little zones with too much exposition. To much noise (sky)--Lmbuga 20:41, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination House near harbour in Forsand, Norway --Mercy 12:54, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 17:53, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eruption of geyser Strokkur, Iceland --Chmee2 10:30, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Interesting, but nothing sharp, blurry--Lmbuga 20:46, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Young Pelophylax esculentus, Czech Republic --Chmee2 10:30, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline the frog is not exactly in focus --Taxiarchos228 10:40, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
    I agree with Taxiarchos228--Lmbuga 20:49, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination La Trinité-sur-Mer in Brittany, France. --Myrabella 10:24, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Très bien. --Cayambe 18:02, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Blauen: TV Tower --Taxiarchos228 09:34, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 18:27, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cazis, Switzerland: Stone-Church --Taxiarchos228 09:34, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 18:49, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chur, Switzerland: Old Town, in the background the Church of St. Martin --Taxiarchos228 09:34, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 18:49, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Woods at Junquillal Beach, Costa Rica --Gaendalf 22:00, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment I'll support if the tilt is fixed --Carschten 13:23, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
     Done Problem solved, sorry if I missed it. You also commented another image of mine with the same problem, it was also resolved. --Gaendalf 23:00, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
     Support Very good now --George Chernilevsky 09:16, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Iodine bolete --George Chernilevsky 21:53, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 17:51, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cargo ship Nephrit --Carschten 16:35, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Sorry, but I see in histogram that white parts of ship are overexposed, if I am not totally wrong :) I don't think so that is good candidate for QI like this. --Chmee2 20:24, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
    I know what you mean. But the white parts aren't really overexposed, they're outshined. That's a difficult situation. The sun was in by back and so it's almost impossible to get white parts not in #FFFFFF... So I think I could try a QIC... --Carschten 20:53, 2 February 2011 (UTC) OK, thank you for explanation. Let's release for another reviewer, I will quit from this :) --Chmee2 20:58, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
    * Good for me, description top. --PetarM 22:46, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
    * no significant overexposure in this picure --Taxiarchos228 12:18, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Polistes wasp. --Leonardorejorge 20:16, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose bad framing and under exposed parts (wings) --Archaeodontosaurus 17:49, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Montreal, Canada: Saint Joseph's Oratory of Mount-Royal --Taxiarchos228 11:52, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline too tight crop --Carschten 13:57, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
    so what? --Taxiarchos228 15:16, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
    I'm agree with Carschten. Right and left sides--Lmbuga 21:15, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nets winched up on a fishing boat. --Avenue 11:18, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice colours. --Cayambe 15:46, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: 378229 arrives at London Euston. Mattbuck 10:29, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: 395004 at Ebbsfleet International. Mattbuck 10:29, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Take-off of an Embraer ERJ-175LR. --Airwolf 13:04, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment Dust Spot on the cabin of the airplane. Noise color (sky). Perspective distortion (left buildings). Sharp enough?--Lmbuga 00:28, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
    Perhaps QI--Lmbuga 00:48, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rosa Damascena--MrPanyGoff 20:20, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment To me, poor composition and too much noise--Lmbuga 20:18, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
    See note in the image--Lmbuga 20:24, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
    The note you added links a bud of secondary importance in the shadow which is out of the focused main blossoms.--MrPanyGoff 19:55, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
    New note. For me, not QI--Lmbuga 20:08, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Plant in Center Don Bosco School ––Elberth 00001939 01:19, 27 January 2011 (UTC) Welcome here, but please consider that this image cannot be promoted without a scientific identification, it is a consensual rule in QIC page. --Jebulon 15:12, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
    Categorised as a Centaurea, but I think more likely an Agapanthus. Anyway, the top crop is too tight to be a QI. --Avenue 09:38, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline {{{2}}}
• 
  • Nomination Mercedes-Benz C 111 --AngMoKio 14:58, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline If we assume that pillar is vertical, then the image is wonky. I like the car, but not convinced by the composition. Perhaps this could be fixed by a rotation and crop. Mattbuck 10:39, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
    Not QI to me: Not sharp enough (see the wheels), blurred, too tight crop at right and at left, the background can be disturbing because all is orange. Tilted--Lmbuga 22:37, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tabacica mosque in Mostar - minaret --Pudelek 10:04, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Taxiarchos228 10:13, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Daruma doll --池田正樹01:34, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI for me, interesting picture! --Gaendalf 04:59, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rocks reflected on the water, Junquillal Beach, Costa Rica --Gaendalf 21:12, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good --George Chernilevsky 08:41, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kistefjellet hill with TV, Lenvik area, Norway. --Chmee2 17:23, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 17:50, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Quito, El Ejido Park: Monunement commemorating Alexander von Humboldt. --Cayambe 15:37, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion gut --Carschten 16:06, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination R/V Søløven --Carschten 15:27, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion very nice --Tlusťa 18:20, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Halifax: ferry. --Taxiarchos228 10:53, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --Carschten 15:31, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Portoviejo, Ecuador: pond covered with the invasive plant species Eichhornia crassipes. --Cayambe 10:37, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good --George Chernilevsky 08:51, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Paris: Two TGV trains --Taxiarchos228 09:47, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Sky is overexposed and left side of image is fuzzy. Also personally I have feeling that there is problem with white balance, TGVs have a bluish tinge in the front. --Chmee2 10:37, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
    you are wrong (not for the first time): TGV trains have no bluish tinge in the front, beside: a white sky is not overexposed --Taxiarchos228 10:53, 2 February 2011 (UTC) OKey, so is it normal that wires are violet and not black in France? --Chmee2 11:07, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
    discussing with you means wasting time --Taxiarchos228 11:17, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
     Oppose Not enough sharpness. Blue wirelines.--PereslavlFoto 13:35, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mostar and Neretva - view from Stari Most --Pudelek 22:16, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Definetely a good one, nice composition!! --Gaendalf 20:56, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination ice hockey arena, home of ESC Dresdner Eislöwen - Photo of User:Kolossos --Ralf Roletschek
  • Decline  Support nice picture, great composition --Tlusťa 20:41, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
     Oppose under 2MP (just 1,5 MP) --Carschten 17:42, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
    It is true, unfortunately --Tlusťa 17:59, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Topographic map of the area surrounding Tehran (Iran) --Fabienkhan 09:25, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Accurate topographic maps are always valuable! Jkwchui 03:35, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Dubrovnik - panorama of old harbour --Pudelek 00:17, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Memmories and notes of visitors in the chappel bridge @ Luzern -- Captainofhope 21:09, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Mobile starting gate at use. The track is sloped. Pitke 20:37, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Lörrach: Panorma of Hauingen -- Taxiarchos228 19:58, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment Looks just slightly tilted (clockwise). Could be fixed quite easily. --Ximonic 20:14, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Lörrach: Fire station of Hauingen -- Taxiarchos228 19:58, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Lörrach: Church St. Ottilien -- Taxiarchos228 19:58, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review The tower is strongly tilted, please fix it. --Chmee2 10:00, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Old wine press house in Ilsfeld, Baden-Württemberg. -- Felix Koenig 19:07, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: In the courtyards of the Nasrid Palaces, Alhambra, Granada, Spain. --Jebulon 15:49, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Main building in an old Plutons missiles site, near Bourogne, France. --ComputerHotline 13:46, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok to me. --Cayambe 16:21, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The ancient Roman theatre in Plovdiv. --MrPanyGoff 07:59, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI to me. --Cayambe 16:19, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cavtat (Ragusavecchia), Croatia - street --Pudelek 21:42, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good enough --Chmee2 20:28, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Yuasa town in Yuasa, Wakayama Pref. --663highland 13:06, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Good composition, but there's a fair amount of noise in dark areas, and the light area seems to lose detail. Mattbuck 10:34, 29 January 2011 (UTC) I agree with Mattbuck, sorry for it. --Chmee2 20:21, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mostar - church and mosque --Pudelek 22:16, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 10:40, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Welted thistle (Carduus crispus) --George Chernilevsky 21:38, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good. --Cayambe 10:40, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Croatia, Dubrovnik - view from city walls --Tlusťa 19:49, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice picture!! --Gaendalf 20:25, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Virgin Mary at the summit of the Ballon d'Alsace. --ComputerHotline 18:56, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very nice --Berthold Werner 19:05, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Statue of Jeanne d'Arc at the summit of the Ballon d'Alsace. --ComputerHotline 18:56, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Berthold Werner 19:05, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination South African mantis eating a fly. --Avenue 17:10, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Top! --Kuli 20:05, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lörrach: Window at Rötteln Church --Taxiarchos228 11:52, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Sehr gut --George Chernilevsky 12:18, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dornach, Switzerland: Goethanum --Taxiarchos228 11:52, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good --George Chernilevsky 12:20, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tenerife: Pico de Teide and Roque Chinchado --Taxiarchos228 11:52, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice --George Chernilevsky 12:21, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Toronto, Canada: Tyndall effect at CN Tower --Taxiarchos228 11:52, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Carschten 13:57, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The "Black Lake" in Durmitor, Montenegro --Mercy 11:12, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Sorry, but the foreground is overexposed. --Chmee2 15:35, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Taqiyah in Colombo, Sri Lanka --Bgag 22:45, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion oui
    Someone promoted and wrote "oui" but signature was not transformed to username. And this picture was declined at 31. may 2009, see here Commons:Quality_images_candidates/Archives_June_2009 --Berthold Werner 18:29, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
    I have imported a new version of the picture before submitted again. --Bgag 19:43, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
     Support ok now. --Berthold Werner 09:07, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The old bridge pier and a part of the Duisburg-Hochfeld rail bridge --Carschten 18:50, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice picture, I like the composition, eventhough I would crop it tighter in the bottom because some of the grass seams unnecessary. I added descriptions in en and es please check for mistakes --Gaendalf 18:19, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Apartment buildings in Hedemora, Sweden. Renamed QI file (wrong labelling in filename).--V-wolf 15:23, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn File moved --Sfu 19:07, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Black vulture and its natural habitat --Gaendalf 14:53, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. The geotag is there, but please also add the name of the country to the file description. --Cayambe 20:25, 1 February 2011 (UTC)  Done --Gaendalf 20:51, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Frecce Tricolori. --Airwolf 14:00, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI for me. --Jovianeye 20:48, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lörrach: Church St. Josephs --Taxiarchos228 08:43, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice picture! I like the composition --Gaendalf 17:18, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Weil am Rhein: Church St. Maria--Taxiarchos228 08:43, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion As for the purpose of this picture it would be better if trees where cut down, but I don't think is good idea generaly. --Sfu 15:47, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Old couple, photographed by user Electron in Finland, 2007. --BlackIceNRW 10:27, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn Sorry, QI can be only from Wikipedians. This is Flicker's work. --Chmee2 14:43, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
    It also has a major distracting artefact in the foreground, so would have not been promoted in any case. Pitke 11:34, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chroicocephalus ridibundus in flight --Dcastor 21:04, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline The head is good, and I like the background and reflection, but the back and parts of its left wing are overexposed. There is also too much motion blur, especially on its right wing. --Avenue 01:58, 1 February 2011 (UTC) Comment I usually do not "defend" my pictures here, but would like to make a comment in this case. I am aware of the overexposure but find it less of a problem in this picture than in many others, mainly because it's in the area of motion blur. The motion blur in contrast to the frozen head is what I like about the picture, so it is primarily the second part of criticism that I personally question. --Dcastor 04:03, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
    Yes, the contrast is interesting, and perhaps the motion blur serves the purpose of showing what is moving and what's not. Even so, I think the extent of the overexposure alone makes it not a QI. Others may disagree - feel free to move it to discussion if you like. --Avenue 16:27, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Château in Karlov, part of Smetanova Lhota village, Czech Republic. --Chmee2 12:15, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn colour fringes (see notice; a bit bluish --Mbdortmund 17:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC) Hmm, thank for notice. We will try to do something with it, let's see... --Chmee2 10:26, 30 January 2011 (UTC) Well, I will play with it in the future and possible try to candidate later. Thank you for review --Chmee2 12:24, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: A wall with stuccos, Alhambra of Granada, Spain.--Jebulon 11:38, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Common toads --Mercy 09:57, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Paris: Observation deck at Eiffel Tower --Taxiarchos228 19:08, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Late gothic tympanum of former San Sebastian Hospital, now Congress Palace, in Cordoba, Spain.--Jebulon 17:38, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Unusual representation of king Saint-Louis of France. Cathedral of Cordoba, Spain.--Jebulon 17:16, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Yodaji temple in Higashikagawa --663highland 14:30, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Horse-drawn wagon loaded with hay in Dejani, Romania. --Mercy 11:06, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review Why ISO 800 and 1/3200? Leads to lack of details...--Mbdortmund 19:03, 26 January 2011 (UTC) Before I took this one I had been taking pictures from a moving train and I had forgotten to change the settings... Moreover, I needed to take this photo very quickly. --Mercy 08:07, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aquila chrysaetos --Böhringer 20:27, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good --George Chernilevsky 21:34, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fruit of Rafia --Archaeodontosaurus 20:21, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Excellent quality --George Chernilevsky 21:32, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A fossil Strombus alatus --Llez 16:15, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 20:14, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sea activity in Junquillal Beach, Costa Rica --Gaendalf 15:28, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, nice picture --Taxiarchos228 15:40, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Alan Gilbert Building, University of Melbourne Donaldytong 13:49, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. Nice sky! --Gaendalf 04:33, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Toronto: Spire of CN Tower --Taxiarchos228 08:43, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Sky is overexposed --Chmee2 11:53, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
    I think you mix up featured/ exzellent pictures with quality picture --Taxiarchos228 12:45, 31 January 2011 (UTC) Unfortunately no. See guideline for QI. One of main parameter is technical quality/Exposure. If image strongly failed in this field, hardly be QI. However if you don't agree with my judgement, make discussion and wait for another opinion. Regards --Chmee2 13:39, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
    your privat opinion, and for sure you never made a picture out of a helicopter --Taxiarchos228 14:25, 31 January 2011 (UTC) This is not "WOW factor review" but technical review and honestly, this image has technical problems. Sorry --Chmee2 14:36, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
    the sky of this image is not more overexposed than this one File:Húsavík (8).jpg which you nominated yourself --Taxiarchos228 14:44, 31 January 2011 (UTC) Maybe I am stupid (it's possible) but where is overexposed there? Please, mark me. --Chmee2 14:47, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
    obviously the clouds have only little structure and you see only white mud, further the building in the middle have strong chromatic aberation --Taxiarchos228 14:57, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lörrach: Church St. Germanus--Taxiarchos228 08:43, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice --Chmee2 13:43, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rheinfelden: Church St. Gallus--Taxiarchos228 08:43, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Overexposed sky --Chmee2 11:51, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
    I think you mix up featured/ exzellent pictures with quality picture --Taxiarchos228 12:45, 31 January 2011 (UTC) Unfortunately no. See guideline for QI. One of main parameter is technical quality/Exposure. If image strongly failed in this field, hardly be QI. However if you don't agree with my judgement, make discussion and wait for another opinion. Regards --Chmee2 13:39, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
    your private opinion, the area of overexposed sky is insignificant small --Taxiarchos228 14:25, 31 January 2011 (UTC) Good that you agree with its existence. --Chmee2 14:36, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
    the sky of this image is not more overexposed than this one File:Húsavík (8).jpg which you nominated yourself --Taxiarchos228 14:44, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Canada: Infoboard at Confederation Bridge --Taxiarchos228 08:43, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Significant chromatic aberation --Chmee2 13:42, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
    there ist no CA, maybe you mean image noise --Taxiarchos228 14:10, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
    there are some small CAs, but not enough for a decline. But the noise is a problem. I think a soft denoising would be good. --Carschten 16:02, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bettingen: TV Tower St. Chrischona --Taxiarchos228 08:43, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Carschten 16:02, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Blüte einer Magnolia sieboldii im Botanischen Garten von Visby auf Gotland. --Schorle 20:54, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Composition and angle are good, depth of field is adequate, but the en:Gynoecium is overexposed and detail is lost. Wsiegmund 00:42, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rotwild --Böhringer 22:44, 30 January 2011 (UTC) )
  • Promotion Good lighting, composition, DOF and background. Useful. Please add to Cervus elaphus. Wsiegmund 00:50, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The power plant „Hermann Wenzel“ in Duisburg --Carschten 19:45, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good enough, see image notes for minor corrections. --Jovianeye 04:38, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
     Done corrected, thanks! --Carschten 16:30, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coptic monastery of Saint Bishoy, Wadi Natrun, Egypt --Berthold Werner 15:47, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline what's the subject of this picture? --Carschten 20:16, 30 January 2011 (UTC) The palm tree is inadequately cropped, which really creates a confusion to determine the subject of the picture as Carschten mention. The trees' leaves do not seam sharp. Nonetheless great colors and lightning. --Gaendalf 04:47, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination at Misasa Onsen Resort --663highland 14:30, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline I find the exposure inappropriate, some areas are underexposed and others like the roof way too overexposed. Perhaps the picture was not taken in the appropriate time of the day. --Gaendalf 05:10, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hiketa town view --663highland 14:30, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Nice composition, nonetheless the overexposed sky is too disturbing --Gaendalf 04:59, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: South wall of the lower court of Karak castle, Jordan --Bgag 22:49, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Iscription on Qutb Minar, Delhi, India. --Sfu 22:06, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Neum, Bosnia and Hercegovina --Pudelek 21:42, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Ražanac, Croatia - city walls and harbour --Pudelek 21:42, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Firewood in low sunshine, image by Tlusťa --Chmee2 21:14, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Shows the subject well, good overall quality.Letartean 16:22, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Facade of Praterias square, Cathedral of Santiago de Compostela, Galicia--Lmbuga 12:54, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Kallo in Mäntyluoto, Pori, Finland. --kallerna 15:27, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. Nice lightning and composition. Perhaps a bit disturbing the people in the picture, but good enough for QI --Gaendalf 05:05, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mercedes CLS 350 --Thesupermat 07:48, 31 January 2011 (UTC) )
  • Promotion Very good --George Chernilevsky 08:12, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Panorama of the Duisburg-Hochfeld rail bridge --Carschten 20:44, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Amazing panorama. Also beautiful is the slightly hazy ambiance, which is characteristical for this locality. --BlackIceNRW 09:39, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fire egines driving over the Friedrich Ebert bridge, Duisburg, because of an operation --Carschten 19:45, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Gut --George Chernilevsky 20:59, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pine Grosbeak --Cephas 19:44, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 23:17, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 6 year old photo: top of the former water tower before reconstruction --George Chernilevsky 19:29, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 23:20, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mostar and Neretva - view from Koski Mehmed Pasha Mosque --Pudelek 18:54, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Carschten 20:16, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mostar - view from Koski Mehmed Pasha Mosque --Pudelek 18:54, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --Carschten 20:16, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fruit of Entada phaseoloides --Archaeodontosaurus 18:49, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Well done, excellent photo --George Chernilevsky 19:33, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Our lady of victories church, Valletta, Malta. -- Felix Koenig 18:48, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 08:38, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Landscape in Dana Biosphere Reserve, Jordan --Bgag 18:31, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion ok --Carschten 20:16, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Reconstruction of a young mammoth, Anthropos museum, Brno, CZ --Mercy 20:13, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion interesting --Carschten 20:16, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Beacon Cove of Port Melbourne. Donaldytong 12:33, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline good composition, but heavy chromatic aberrations and too noisy (what I don't unterstand because EXIF said ISO 100...) --Carschten 20:16, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Giant Tree Frog, Litoria infrafrenata --Llez 12:31, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support QI & Useful - Best in scope go to VA --Archaeodontosaurus 14:33, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Papilio bianor caterpillar --Rehman 12:19, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Depth of field is too low. --Archaeodontosaurus 14:30, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Oxen in Mumbai, India --Sfu 11:23, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Carschten 20:16, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chapel of Liebenstein castle near Neckarwestheim, Baden-Württemberg. -- Felix Koenig 10:33, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion interesting lighting --Carschten 20:16, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Benchmark on a brick wall. --Coyau 04:02, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --George Chernilevsky 13:30, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Social and Cultural Center of Vite, parish of San Xoán de Vista Alegre, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain)--Lmbuga 01:16, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion It can't be faulted (and black+red+gold are the colors of Germany :-)) --Carschten 20:16, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dromaderies in Dana Reserve, Jordan --Bgag 00:41, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good to me. --Cayambe 19:22, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dromaderies in Dana Reserve, Jordan --Bgag 00:41, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI for me. --Jovianeye 04:28, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tarantula --Giove 23:25, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline please improve description --Mbdortmund 03:19, 30 January 2011 (UTC)  OpposeBad framing, (Tarantula undefined : this is secondary) --Archaeodontosaurus 15:52, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Entrance to former FFA building. --Ankara 20:41, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment Image is little bit tilted, however personally, I don't like the "shadow/sun game" and I don't think so this is good candidate for QI --Chmee2 09:31, 30 January 2011 (UTC) Its not a game, It's the reality if you take photos a sunny winterday in northern Europe (59th parallel north).--Ankara 09:43, 30 January 2011 (UTC) I understand that sometimes it's hard to take good image, but I don't think so, that every image is good candidate for QI. Sometimes, we have pity, that conditions are not good for photographers... But how I wrote, it's my personal opinion about it and for this reason I din not give you "decline" :) Let's wait for somebody else. --Chmee2 09:47, 30 January 2011 (UTC) I just see no relationship between image quality and contrast between the sun/shadow here. IMO You do not judge the photo, but lighting conditions at the site. It is a simplification to say "we have pity, that conditions are not good for photographers". Regards --Ankara 10:02, 30 January 2011 (UTC) White parts are overexposed with no detail - the image is out of dynamic range sensor. --Tlusťa 10:09, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flag of Russia above Gare de l'Est (Paris), due to train station twinning. --Coyau 17:25, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion IMO, image needs to be rotated CCW to correct tilt. --Jovianeye 04:26, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
     Done --Coyau 04:41, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
    Good now. --Jovianeye 04:44, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Nutmeg on tree in Kerala, India. --Jovianeye 00:10, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Bell tower. --Bartiebert 20:33, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok to me. --Cayambe 12:27, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Connaught Place, Delhi, India --Sfu 14:15, 23 January 2011 (UTC). Needs a perspective correction, otherwise good. --Cayambe 13:01, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
     Done --Sfu 11:17, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok to me now. --Cayambe 12:25, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: St. George Church in Cologne. A.Savin 12:53, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment Von einem Standort aus etwas weiter links würde die Laterne vielleicht nicht genau vor dem Eingang stehen und das Relief auch nicht verdecken. --Berthold Werner 18:25, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Skull of Crested Porcupine --Archaeodontosaurus 11:37, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good --George Chernilevsky 11:41, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint-Denis-Sainte-Foy church in Coulommiers, France. --Myrabella 10:02, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Not the best light but good. --Sfu 11:41, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Accordionist in Porta Faxeira, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain)--Lmbuga 01:07, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good quality --George Chernilevsky 11:43, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dromaderies in Dana Reserve, Jordan --Bgag 00:41, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline I don't like the "overexposed" sky and image looks strange in full-size, sorry. --Chmee2 09:25, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lynx lynx --Böhringer 22:02, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good.--Ankara 23:05, 29 January 2011 (UTC) Even the haze in left-down corner, still QI --Chmee2 09:29, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Former water tower in the center of Vinnitsa. --George Chernilevsky 21:42, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion looks tilted but is straight, strange --Mbdortmund 03:22, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Winter & Nebel --Böhringer 21:13, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good --George Chernilevsky 21:49, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tyska bron (The German bridge), Gothenburg. --Ankara 20:41, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Sorry, but I have strong feeling that this image is unsharp, isn't it? --Chmee2 09:33, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination New BMW 650i. --Thesupermat 18:38, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI. --Coyau 19:26, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
    QI. --Guzsik Dávid 20:56, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus formerly Victoria Terminus in Mumbai, India. --Jovianeye 17:45, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good enough. --Chmee2 09:35, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rolleiflex Baby. --Eusebius 16:21, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good --George Chernilevsky 21:52, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Entrance of Liebenstein castle, Baden-Württemberg. -- Felix Koenig 16:00, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Right part of image is unsharp (especially downer part), sorry --Chmee2 09:37, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fruit of coco de mer --Archaeodontosaurus 14:34, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion EV and QI --Llez 16:20, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Great pyramid of Giza --Berthold Werner 13:00, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn  Comment Sorry, chromatic aberrations (people at left), The zone in shade is disturbing, the top of the piramyd is blurry, too much sky. All perhaps only to me--Lmbuga 20:07, 29 January 2011 (UTC) Sorry, same feeling like Lmbuga --Chmee2 09:39, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eye of caged Eclectus Parrot. --Avenue 12:42, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Sorry, blurry or unsharp, but I like the composition--Lmbuga 19:50, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pl d'Armes in Luxemb. City, manhole cover over ancient well, see preceding file for location. Just a plaque, but hopefully the quality is ok. --Cayambe 12:32, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Yes it is !!--Jebulon 13:00, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Above the main entry of the former royal stables in Cordoba, Spain.--Jebulon 12:24, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice --Chmee2 09:40, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rheinfelden: Schloss Beuggen --Taxiarchos228 11:45, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good--Jebulon 12:26, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rheinfelden: Fresco at Castle Church Beuggen --Taxiarchos228 11:45, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Crop a bit tight, but good.--Jebulon 12:28, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ancestor of beech --Archaeodontosaurus 10:58, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good.--Jebulon 12:27, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Road transport in Mongolia. (by User:Yaan) --High Contrast 10:58, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good and interesting.--Jebulon 12:30, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sunset at Alibag by Ayilliath. --Jovianeye 21:26, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline Beautiful, but unnatural coloring and underexposed. To me, nothing sharp--Lmbuga 19:22, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
    Vignetting--Lmbuga 19:36, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sunset in Ennore Creek by Planemad --Jovianeye 20:37, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Decline 2,500 × 754 pixels is 1.885.000 pixels. Not 2 Mp--Lmbuga 19:29, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Coat of Arms of Mechelen --Adelbrecht 18:43, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good and useful. French informations added in the description page.--Jebulon 12:58, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Kupari, Croatia - destroyed sign of the hotel --Pudelek 10:59, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: A selection of trains at Birmingham New Street. Mattbuck 09:57, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Caledonian Road and Barnsbury station. Mattbuck 09:57, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination The community hall of Ilsfeld, Baden-Württemberg. -- Felix Koenig 17:06, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. Please add geotag. --Cayambe 13:04, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Yamaha Rhino in Yyteri, Pori, Finland. --kallerna 15:27, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. Please add geotag. --Cayambe 13:04, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: A Belgian Westland Sea King, photo taken by myself. --Airwolf 14:49, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Egypt, Saqqara, the way to the pyramid of Unas --Berthold Werner 13:17, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Cayambe 13:01, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Beavertail Lighthouse from southeast.JPG

• Nomination Beavertail Lighthouse in Rhode Island. Juliancolton 21:19, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good --George Chernilevsky 21:51, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unsharp. The clouds at top are disturbing. Rule of thirds--Lmbuga 01:32, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

• Rule of thirds would lead to 75% of empty water. Central composition is more much appropriate here. Juliancolton 23:07, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

•  Oppose I agree with Lmbuga, need to be crop --Chmee2 09:26, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   George Chernilevsky 08:21, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

File:35 East Wacker.JPG

• Nomination 35 East Wacker Chicago --Antoinetav 20:35, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Comment To me, it's impossible the correction of the perspective distortion--Lmbuga 22:23, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Yes, but in this case the distortion adds to the mood, in my opinion--Jebulon 11:40, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose The distortion is too strong. We can not accept the one that we refuse to others. Dura lex ...--Archaeodontosaurus 14:54, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
• Perspective correction is easy here, and will make the photo better and highlight the main subject.--Ankara 17:03, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Perspective distortion--Lmbuga 10:16, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   George Chernilevsky 18:36, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Citrus_sinensis_close-up.jpg

• Nomination Citrus sinensis --Ankara 15:11, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose too much background noise and spot --Archaeodontosaurus 15:54, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
• Film grain is part of the image.--Ankara 16:01, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment Requires a second positive vote to request the discussion. --Archaeodontosaurus 17:06, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
• I'm sorry, but you are simply wrong. Uploader can request a discussion, and you can change without voting. --Ankara 17:36, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment I'm sorry I misunderstood, and I made my excuses. --Archaeodontosaurus 18:29, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose as per Archaeodontosaurus, plus the orange is unsharp in wide areas. -- H005 19:11, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose I guess this film grain would be OK for Life Magazine 40 years ago, but today, with numeric technology or better film, QIs must be better than that. Less than 2 megapixels. Too small depth of field. Letartean 20:54, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

  It is a matter of taste, if you prefer digital images with noise (or noise reduction that removes details) or film grain. It's not about quality. Lack of sharpness is a valid objection , and short DOF. IMO its not too small depth of field.--Ankara 21:05, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

  I agree with you on matter of taste but if I ask myself what is the subject of this picture, my anwser would be: an orange. Then, it's not an orange from the seventies or an orange with noise, etc... QI pictures are pictures of things or places or people that are of good quality. In this case, it's front part is out of focus and back part is ok. This shows that it would need a larger depth of field to show a greater part of the fruit in focus. The picture also has to be larger than 2 megapixels which it is not. Overall, it is not of a good enough quality and if you compare to this or that you'll see that it could get better with another try. Hope it gets clearer and hope you'll try again and don't stop proposing pictures. Letartean 21:46, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

  Thank you very much for your kind explanation. Best regards--Ankara 21:52, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   George Chernilevsky 08:19, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

File:F-16 cockpit.JPG

• Nomination The cockpit section of an F-16 fuselage. Photo takem by myself. --Airwolf 22:59, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose not airwolf's usual quality, upper parts show no details --Mbdortmund 23:08, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Not so bad IMO. Please let's discuss.--Jebulon 10:06, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overexposed. Pitke 15:36, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Overexposed. Mattbuck 10:31, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   George Chernilevsky 18:34, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Taj_Mahal,_Agra,_India_edit2.jpg

• Nomination Taj Mahal by Yann. --Jovianeye 06:03, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion * Support Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:20, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose per here --Carschten 20:32, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
• Bin schwer von kapé, gönn uns doch mal einen Satz.
•  Comment It is surprising to see that edit 2 which is FP is not a QI whereas the original version is QI. IMO, the original version should delisted as QI and edit2 should be promoted! --JovianEye (talk) 14:21, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
• imho both can be QI --Berthold Werner 15:05, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality IMO. --George Chernilevsky 11:46, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support By cropping you can do both IMO: spoil a QI picture, or correct composition and make a non-QI picture a QI worth. QI should not be given automaticly to derivatives, but it should not be forbidden to add QI seal to it. --sfu (talk) 11:58, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   George Chernilevsky 18:33, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Karlsbodavägen_december_2010.jpg

• Nomination Newly built residential building in Ulvsunda industrialområde. --Ankara 12:13, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion  Comment Are the buildings leaning out from eachother in a slight v-shape in reality (seen from this position) or is it due to perspective correction? --V-wolf 08:04, 18 January 2011 (UTC) I added geocode, you can compare with the map. Perspective correction was very small here, there was basically nothing wrong with the original image.--Ankara 10:35, 18 January 2011 (UTC)  Comment I changed status to "discuss", to hear the others' opinions.--V-wolf 07:16, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Appears ok to me. --Cayambe 12:54, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   George Chernilevsky 18:31, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Estpresident 1c300 8847.jpg

• Nomination Toomas Hendrik Ilves, President of Estonia. Photo by Janwikifoto. --Wolfgangus Mozart 09:55, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
• Decline Image is created not by a wikimedian as required for a QI, besides, the flashlight shadow is disturbing. Mbdortmund 12:29, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
  There is a User:Janwikifoto, in fact. Airwolf 18:56, 23 January 2011 (UTC)*the text signed by me comes from another user, perhaps he had JS turned of and an edit of mine transformed it into my nick. --Mbdortmund 00:27, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Important artifact in the middle of the bottom edge. --Archaeodontosaurus 09:57, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   George Chernilevsky 18:30, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Népouite MHNT.MIN.2005.0.63.jpg

• Nomination Népouite from Népoui --Archaeodontosaurus 08:53, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  SupportGood --George Chernilevsky 10:20, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

*Sorry, but the black background has a problem. There is lighter line. Also in left-down part of stone is strange border between minerals and black colour. Not QI now. --Chmee2 10:04, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

• Absolutely true, it misses the last layer, I place this evening. --Archaeodontosaurus 11:18, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Done --Archaeodontosaurus 19:49, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

 SupportThank you for fixing, you have my support now --Chmee2 07:58, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. --Makele-90 03:09, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Makele-90 03:09, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Peterskirche Blansingen.jpg

• Nomination Blansingen: Church St. Peter --Taxiarchos228 11:45, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Very good. --Cayambe 12:38, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose The vertical lines are not vertical.--Lmbuga 13:00, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose spective distortion --Archaeodontosaurus 13:36, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support imo a good one --Mbdortmund 23:31, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose distortion and perspective can be corrected. --Jovianeye 05:20, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Cayambe 08:34, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Estuaire de la Gironde - Arklow Ruler.jpg

• Nomination Green boat. --Coyau 03:59, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
•  Support Good enough --Chmee2 09:23, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose poor compositions & the ship coincides with the background --Tlusťa 17:14, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry. To me, it's not QI, perhaps good, but not QI: too much noise and color noise (sky). I don`t like the color of the sky (to me, not natural, but it is a personal idea). Too tight crop at right and at left, not sharp enough. As Tlusťa--Lmbuga 22:05, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination Sorry I nominated this is ugly photo. --Coyau 06:51, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

File:LindauInsel.jpg

• Nomination Insel Lindau --Böhringer 20:51, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
• Decline Good --George Chernilevsky 08:46, 3 February 2011 (UTC)}
   Oppose totaly blurred --Taxiarchos228 11:50, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
   Oppose Beautiful, but as Taxiarchos228--Lmbuga 22:22, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 08:39, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

File:2011-02-02-salb-otan-1.jpg

• Nomination Operations room in an old NATO base. --ComputerHotline 16:35, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support QI --Taxiarchos228 11:48, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not QI to me. Bad quality. Noised. Focus? But perhaps I am not right--Lmbuga 21:05, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose much too dark and poor cloning with errors and different focussed single farmes (for both see image notes) --Carschten 21:01, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not properly lit. --Eusebius 22:01, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 22:01, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Bushman's Paradise at Spitzkoppe 28.06.2008 11-06-56.jpg

• Nomination Landscape in Namibia by Hansueli Krapf. --Bartiebert 18:57, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion *  SupportSehr schön, heißer Kandidat für exzellente Bilder / features Pictures --Taxiarchos228 19:50, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose It's really nice image, however obviously it's panorama and they are several problems fitting each images together. I will mark these problematic zones like "double borders" of stones etc. Please, try to fix it, but not QI now. --Chmee2 20:05, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support It's fixed now. Thanks, QI --Chmee2 06:47, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. I don't really like the crop on the right side though. --Eusebius 22:00, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   Eusebius 22:00, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Kuhmar sdd 9400.jpg

• Nomination Sanatorium orphanage at Kukhmar, near Pereslavl, Russia. --PereslavlFoto 16:49, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
• Decline  Oppose I don't like the composition, see the car there in the back. Moreover the lightning is not pleasant, drastic changes between light and shadow allover, perhaps it was not the best time of the day to take the picture. --Gaendalf 18:48, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
  

IMHO the lightning shows that the scene is quiet, that's the main idea.--PereslavlFoto 21:43, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

I do respect your opinion, but I don't share it. I don't perceive that through the lightning. I know the composition is not easy in this particular case because of the location. I do like the color of the building itself. It's a difficult shot, though! --Gaendalf 00:12, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Oppose Blown highlights on the main subject. --Eusebius 21:58, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 21:58, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Mercedes-Benz_F_700_3_amk.jpg

• Nomination Mercedes-Benz F 700 --AngMoKio 14:58, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
• Decline  OpposeNot enough space on the left, and I generally don't like the composition. Mattbuck 10:39, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
   SupportImo QI --Mbdortmund 23:37, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
   Oppose Too tight... Not enough space on the left, as Mattbuck--Lmbuga 21:36, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
   Comment To me, in addition, too tight crop at right--Lmbuga 21:37, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Significant noise (and denoising?), composition really not interesting. --Eusebius 21:55, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Jovianeye 23:45, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Schloss Chambord nachts 2.JPG

• Nomination France: Château de Chambord --Taxiarchos228 11:45, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:03, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose The lateral vertical lines are not vertical. Too much noise (sky). Not natural colors (yelows of the windows, blue of the sky). To me it's not QI--Lmbuga 19:42, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice mood, but the chateau is too dark IMHO, and Lmbuga isn't wrong either. -- H005 19:14, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Very good quality and useful Antoinetav 22:16, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment Really good but perspective on the left side should be corrected, and no, the chateau is not too dark for a night photograph.
•  Support Pretty picture. --King of Hearts 19:11, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support The lateral vertical lines are not vertical, as in usual life: any vertical line of such building will seem not vertical. Noise has to be removed, but this can be done later (sky, water).--PereslavlFoto 02:06, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose noisy --Carschten 13:46, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Lmbuga --Chmee2 20:19, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Noisy, DOF too shallow. --Eusebius 21:53, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Decline?   --Jovianeye 23:49, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Close-up_of_Chhatrapati_Shivaji_Terminus.jpg

• Nomination Close-up of Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus --Jovianeye 18:45, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion  Support Very good quality, except in the top, the statue, but it is normal and it is difficult to do it better--Lmbuga 20:23, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
   Neutral, leaning to oppose Good, but the fact that the picture is not taken in the axis is a bit disturbing. --Eusebius 22:42, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
   Comment looks overexposed to me, I think there's missing some contrast. Shuold be fixed before it becomes QI. --Carschten 10:11, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
   Done I've reduced the brightness level. (make sure to purge the cache of your browser)--JovianEye (talk) 16:30, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Jovianeye 18:20, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Dana Reserve 02.jpg

• Nomination Landscape in Dana Biosphere Reserve, Jordan --Bgag 18:31, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion  SupportQI for me --Gaendalf 00:06, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
   Oppose Details are really not good. Too strong denoising, I would say. --Eusebius 22:07, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
   Comment I have only denoised the sky. --Bgag 15:32, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

 Comment I'm afraid the processor of your camera did the rest... --Eusebius 18:15, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

 Support--Jebulon 23:17, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Jovianeye 18:26, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Florian Schroeder.jpg

• Nomination Kabarett artists Florian Schroeder --Taxiarchos228 08:43, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Below the line good; slightly image noise. --BlackIceNRW 10:00, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think it's more than slightly IMO. --Sfu 15:47, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with Sfu, the IMO is very visible --Gaendalf 17:21, 1 February 2011 (UTC) see comment below
• (strong)  Support OMG, noise by an indoor portrait with a visible bad stage lighting. I wanna see an image with similar conditions which doesn't have noise (NR excepted). Please change nothing at the image because now it has a reality photo atmosphere and not a photoshopping impact. --Carschten 18:37, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

  So it's perfect for having FP because of WOW factor, I'm not convinced about QI. How did disappear my stupid comment? --Sfu 18:50, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Support typical gesture of the comedian --Mbdortmund 22:06, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose There is some software to denoise, then some software to mix layers.--PereslavlFoto 02:02, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

  Pereslav is totally right, perhaps correcting it with NeatImage or even Photoshop --Gaendalf 20:42, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Oppose I like it, but noise. It is possible to work the noise, I can do it, if Taxiarchos228 want, but I cannot promise nothing--Lmbuga 22:09, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment New other image. I only can do this, It's not better--Lmbuga 00:00, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment I have a new image, in which I think the problem has been solved to acceptable levels, actually the noise was erased quite good. check it here I would support this one. --Gaendalf 00:22, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Okay, it's more than slightly noisy, but it has enough good points (composition, pose) to make up for that. --Avenue 07:31, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Alofok 17:17, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Promote?   --Alofok 17:17, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Carcasssonne_vieux_pont.jpg

• Nomination Fortified city of Carcassonne and the Pont Vieux crossing the Aude river by Jean-Pierre Lavoie --Berthold Werner 16:01, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Very nice. Some parts a bit noisy (inavoidable I guess), but good overall quality. --Eusebius 20:41, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unrealistic distortion of the perspective of the bridge. Could be acceptable if alone, but not with the city. Some overexposed areas (the walls)--Jebulon 23:44, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Jebulon--Lmbuga 23:44, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Jovianeye 00:35, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Mostar - Stari Most by Pudelek.JPG

• Nomination Mostar - Stari Most --Pudelek 10:04, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• Decline  Support Good quality, nice shot --Taxiarchos228 10:13, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
   Oppose Why crop the bridge?? This one deserves to be shown in full... --Eusebius 22:34, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

I wonder why you croped your bridge-picture File:Rio bridge - wave 1.jpg that is already a QI. --Taxiarchos228 14:40, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

I don't pretend my choices to be perfect (or even good in average), but this is just plain blatant bad faith now (in addition to an ad hominem attack). Please look at all my rejected pictures (they're many, you should be pleased) and adapt your reviewing accordingly. This should increase the general level. --Eusebius 18:15, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

 OpposePoor composition. Too tight crop--Lmbuga 23:32, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Jovianeye 00:32, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Traube des blauen Spätburgunders.jpg

• Nomination Pinot noir grapes --Taxiarchos228 09:34, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good. Please add locality and geotag to the file description. --Cayambe 11:40, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Watch your shadow... --Eusebius 22:30, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Bad composition. As Eusebius--Lmbuga 23:46, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Jovianeye 00:30, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Parkinsonia compressa 01.JPG

• Nomination Parkinsonia wuerttembergica, a Middle Jurassic Ammonite --Llez 17:57, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 17:46, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
   Oppose Unsharp. --Eusebius 22:21, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

 Info Replaced by a completely new version --Llez 08:47, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

I take the liberty to strike both votes then. --Eusebius 08:58, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

 Support OK for me. This version is better.--Archaeodontosaurus 11:40, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

 Comment I don't like it (noise, perhaps detail). I think that for me it's not QI, but I'm not sure--Lmbuga 23:31, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Jovianeye 00:29, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

File:13-34-01-site-plutons.jpg

• Nomination Inside the main building in an old Plutons missiles site, near Bourogne, France. --ComputerHotline 13:46, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
• Decline  Support Also good. The blown opening in the backround appears tolaerable to me.--Chmee2 21:12, 2 February 2011 (UTC) Sorry, but this is not my review and vote. See history (http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3AQuality_images_candidates%2Fcandidate_list&action=historysubmit&diff=49018882&oldid=49018475), it only filled my signature, but somebody else make review. --Chmee2 13:43, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Horizontal composition not adapted in my opinion. Also, no clear subject to me. --Eusebius 22:04, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

 Oppose Per Eusebius (portrait compo would be better)--Jebulon 23:14, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

 Oppose As other above. And overexposed in door (for me it's not a tecnical effect)--Lmbuga 23:13, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Jovianeye 00:27, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Gasse Victoria Gozo 2009.JPG

• Nomination Narrow Street, Victoria, Gozo, Malta. -- Felix Koenig 15:47, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion Good. --Cayambe 17:30, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
   Oppose Incredible. Distortion, strong distortion: You must see the vertical left lines. I can't understand. What can be QI?, all?--Lmbuga 00:47, 7 February 2011 (UTC) Sorry, but the walls are so in real !!--Jebulon 00:53, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  Sorry, I do not agree --Lmbuga 00:57, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  But Jebulon's definitely right. That's what's interesting about these buildings. The walls are tilted in real. Felix Koenig 17:03, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
   Support good --Taxiarchos228 10:26, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
   Support a joke, lmbuga? Alofok 17:08, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
   Support There is simply no distortion. Those walls are how they are --High Contrast 19:16, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
   SupportIt would be better without so many shadows and the girls in the back, but definetely a good one!!--Gaendalf 21:57, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  Ok, I'm mistaken --Lmbuga 20:18, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Taxiarchos228 09:51, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Krakau - Ulica Kanonicza.jpg

• Nomination Kanonicza Street, Cracow --Taxiarchos228 15:33, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Mbdortmund 00:31, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose QI it's not "Pretty Good Images". At right side there is a strong perspective distortion --- ¿? --- --Lmbuga 01:07, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  • I am sorry, but you are wrong: there is no distortion but the facades of the buildings are not yet straight. Kanonicza Street and the buildings there belong to the oldes part of Cracow. --Taxiarchos228 07:44, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
    • Ok Taxiarchos228, sorry, but the inclination, perhaps, must be indicated--Lmbuga 20:24, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support--Jebulon 15:53, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
   Support Alofok 17:09, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Jovianeye 21:02, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Smyčka Podbaba, Tatra T3SUCS na vnější koleji.jpg

• Nomination Tatra T3SUCS, Prague — Jagro 23:50, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Mbdortmund 00:34, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Nice picture, good colors. But the composition ruins it. The vehicle should clearly stand in one of the "interesting points" expressed in the Rule of Thirds. --Gaendalf 04:32, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support The composition seems all right. The rear of the tram and the headlights coincide with the 1/3 grid lines. --JovianEye (talk) 14:33, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, and therefore your eyes are guided to the rear of the tram instead of the front. IMO, the tram should be located more to the right, so that the front of it coincides with this intersection of lines. --Gaendalf 21:55, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Support nice. Alofok 17:12, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Rule of thirds is no dogma. Good colours, good composition. --Alupus 18:07, 9 February 2011 (UTC)~

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Jovianeye 17:29, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Landmannalaugar in summer 2009 (13).jpg

• Nomination Landmannalaugar area, Iceland --Chmee2 21:12, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Strong support Really beautiful!!--Gaendalf 04:48, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Beautiful, but very soft focus, background almost looks painted. --Eusebius 22:24, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus 19:49, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose As Eusebius. Not beautiful to me. Poor quality--Lmbuga 23:27, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Felix Koenig 18:00, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support "not beautiful to me" isn't a reason for an oppose. Alofok 19:54, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --Jovianeye 21:00, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

File:2011-02-02-salb-otan-2.jpg

• Nomination In an old NATO base. --ComputerHotline 16:35, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  SupportQI --Taxiarchos228 21:29, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose No clear subject and no composition to me. --Eusebius 22:20, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  
•  Support good quality and great atmosphere --Tlusťa (talk) 10:26, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support nice. Alofok 19:56, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Jovianeye 20:59, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Paris - Invalidendom - Spitze.jpg

• Nomination Paris: Spire of Dôme des Invalides --Taxiarchos228 09:47, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Mbdortmund 12:41, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Blown reflections. --Eusebius 12:46, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  Gold reflectes strong when the sun is shining. That is live. But I have uploaded a new version, maybe better. --Taxiarchos228 15:36, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

The colour looks better at least (I think). Regarding blown reflections, I don't say there shouldn't be any, I just think that they are too present here. --Eusebius 15:46, 6 February 2011 (UTC
But I don't belive you can handle it better. Only to demonstrate: I have reduced the exposure value -2. The result is: the image is very dark but the reflections are clear as well . --Taxiarchos228 16:06, 6 February 2011 (UTC))

On the basis of the picture you have taken, it is not possible to reduce much the surface of blown reflections. It has to be taken care of at shooting time (for a still subject like this, multiple exposure may help if sunlight/contrast is too strong). --Eusebius 17:28, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

As you can see (otherwise I could not reduse the EV), I have done it. This picture is a HDR. --Taxiarchos228 12:55, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Then the most underexposed take is probably not underexposed enough. --Eusebius 13:20, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Your private opinion --Taxiarchos228 14:38, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Support--Jebulon 16:20, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overexposed and a bit underexposed (too much contrast?)--Lmbuga 23:24, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support good. Alofok 19:57, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --Jovianeye 20:58, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Pichola_See.JPG

• Nomination Sunset at Lake Pichola in Udaipur, Rajasthan by Aiwok. --Jovianeye 20:37, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
• Decline  Support OKey, I watch this image for couple days and I have to say, that I really like it! :) So maybe I am not 100% objective now, but I did not find any important mistake, so why not promote to QI? :) Congrats to this nice image --Chmee2 20:38, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
   Oppose Nice, but very noisy. --Eusebius 22:06, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

 Oppose and strong CA --Jebulon 23:15, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

 OpposeAs Eusebius and Jebulon--Lmbuga 23:15, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

 Opposeper Eusebius and Jebulon --Gaendalf 04:40, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

 Comment Can't review for QI cause I don't feel qualified enough seeing your comments but I'd put that on the top of my magazine if I had one. From that, I'd say it's a quality picture but... Letartean 16:18, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Jovianeye 18:26, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Cymbium_tritonis_07.JPG

• Nomination The volute Cymbium tritonis --Llez 13:42, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
•  Support QI (traditionally :) --Tlusťa 13:49, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not so sharp (because of f/32 diffraction, probably), noisy in many places. --Eusebius 09:16, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Eusebius. --Alchemist-hp 20:30, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Problems with f32, but enough quality to QI --Archaeodontosaurus 11:47, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support I think that is possible to improve the image: chromatic aberrations, sharp... But it's 9,440 × 7,040 pixels--Lmbuga 23:01, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

   Done Completely overworked, as suggested. --Llez 16:31, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

I would suggest that you withdraw this nomination and make a new one at the top since this has been reshot. --Jovianeye 05:08, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nomination as suggested a renominate the new version --Llez 08:27, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --Jovianeye 02:03, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Salzburg - Salzburger Dom8.jpg

• Nomination Salzburg Cathedral: Fresco --Taxiarchos228 09:29, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
• Decline  Support Good. --Cayambe 16:50, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
   Oppose The window portion is blown and has chromatic abberations. --Jovianeye 18:54, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
   Oppose Per Jovianeye, and tilted--Lmbuga 22:26, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Jovianeye 00:38, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Kirche Bözberg 028.jpg

• Nomination Light of church-windows (Bözberg CH) on the wall --Badener 14:21, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Nice idea, but the wooden pew is unsharp...--Jebulon 23:45, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment Oh, sorry, for my eyes it's sharp, otherwise I wouldn't promote it :( --Badener 10:04, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Support meets QI imo. Maybe not the best sharpness, but ok for the full resolution and the darkness. Very nice composition. --Carschten 11:59, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support for me it's good and sharp enough--Størtebeker 12:41, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support sharp enough for me --Ralf Roletschek 16:14, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Jovianeye 00:38, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Roman Theatre Plovdiv 2.jpg

• Nomination The ancient Roman theatre in Plovdiv --MrPanyGoff 21:45, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
• Decline  Comment To me, vertical distortion and perhaps tilted (see the right side). I don't like the detail--Lmbuga 22:41, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
  I did some lens correction that can be seen in the preview size. There is some uploading error because when you open the full size of the new version the old one is shown.--MrPanyGoff 07:49, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
   Support I disagree with Lmbugas evaluation, the picture has good quality and looks good, QI is not featured picture --Taxiarchos228 08:36, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
   Oppose A significant and interesting part of the subject is in a strong shadow. --Eusebius 09:20, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

 Comment I would like to remind you that this is not FP candidate. I think that a valid ground of opposition here is only if the parts in shadow are underexposed in other words - almost black. This is not the case here. All parts in shadow are clearly visible.--MrPanyGoff 13:58, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

And I would like to remind everyone that reviews for the Quality Image status must be made according to the Image guidelines. "Underexposure", as well as the "loss of details" you're referring to, is listed is the "common problems" and can definitely be a reason for opposing, since it has a huge impact on the overall quality. It is not the first time images are refused the QI status because of too strong shadows on the main subject. --Eusebius (talk) 14:23, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

ack MrPanyGoff, this picture is cleary visible and a shadow has nothing to do with a underexposed picture. To underexpose a picture means to choose the wrong exposure time. --Taxiarchos228 14:34, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Just to clarify my position: the stairs are perfectly exposed, but because of the very strong contrast the scene and screen, which are the most interesting part of the subject in my opinion, are necessarily underexposed ("in a strong shadow", in my original phrasing...). I did not imply that another exposure choice should have been made, only that the light at the moment made it impossible to take a properly exposed picture. --Eusebius 18:08, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

 Support I agree with Eusebius about the rules of QIC, he is perfectly right in my opinion, we (me first) tend sometimes to forget the reviewing guidelines. But to me, in this specific case, this "underexposure" does not have a so huge impact to the general quality of this picture. Matter of taste ? --Jebulon 16:07, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

 Oppose See above and per Eusebius--Lmbuga 21:03, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

 Oppose Shadow on the main object --Ralf Roletschek (talk) 23:17, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Campeon in Neubiberg.jpg

• Nomination Campeon in Neubiberg. --High Contrast 17:00, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion  Support I would rotate the picture clockwise about 1-2°, but good as well --Taxiarchos228 17:07, 6 February 2011 (UTC) To me
   OpposeInappropriate vignetting at top (for me perhaps not QI with this vigneting), in adition, a bit of perspective distortion --Lmbuga 00:17, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
   Support - good guality, nice view. Felix Koenig 17:58, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  

 Support like Felix Koenig --Størtebeker 15:02, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Jovianeye 00:40, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Krakau - Andreaskirche.jpg

• Nomination St. Andrew's Church, Cracow --Taxiarchos228 15:33, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Blown highlights. --Eusebius 20:37, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment I'm agree with Eusebius--Lmbuga 00:44, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Oppose A bit, only a bit (solutionable), perspective distortion. Poor detail (you can see the people of the image)--Lmbuga 00:54, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment Great sharpness, but I don't like that you see the people and you could read the licenseplates --Størtebeker 12:43, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Jovianeye 00:41, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Bischoy_Kloster_BW_7.jpg

• Nomination Building at the Monastery of Saint Bishoy, Wadi Natrun, Egypt --Berthold Werner 15:37, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
• Withdrawn

* Support A little bit too shady, but anyway a good picture -- Taxiarchos228 15:41, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

• Very good, but the shade is disturbing. Bad hour (the hour and the moment it's important)--Lmbuga 01:15, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too much sky: bad crop--Lmbuga 01:35, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose lighting --Carschten 20:20, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

 Comment ok ok. New version uploaded. --Berthold Werner 14:49, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

I would suggest that you renominate this at the top. I have struck out all comments because they are irrelevant now. --Jovianeye 21:06, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Ok. Done. --Berthold Werner 16:17, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Montreal Castle 03.jpg

• Nomination Outer wall of the Montreal Castle, Jordan --Bgag 00:25, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Clear and good picture. --Cayambe 17:32, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Blurry for me. Not QI for me--Lmbuga 01:41, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  •  Comment Blurry??? --Bgag 13:08, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Blurry ??? --Jebulon 15:45, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Alofok 17:11, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support not blurry --High Contrast 07:35, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Jovianeye 00:41, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Montreal Castle 04.jpg

• Nomination Ruins inside the Montreal Castle, Jordan --Bgag 00:25, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:47, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Blurry for me. Not QI for me--Lmbuga 01:45, 7 February 2011
  •  Comment Blurry??? --Bgag 13:12, 7 February 2011 (UTC)(UTC)
•  Support Blurry ??? --Jebulon 15:42, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support very good. Felix Koenig 17:04, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support not blurry --High Contrast 07:36, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose artifacts (with noise?!?), blurry at the left side --Carschten 12:45, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --Jovianeye 17:29, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Halifax - NS - Schlepper im Hafen.jpg

• Nomination Tugboats in the harbour of Halifax, Canada --Taxiarchos228 09:34, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• Decline Nice one!! --Gaendalf 00:26, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
   Support Excellent. --Eusebius 22:32, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

 Oppose Clear parts overexposed, dark parts underexposed IMO. Too tight crop above. I think it needs a discussion.--Jebulon 01:03, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

 Oppose Clear parts overexposed, dark parts underexposed IMO.--Lmbuga 20:28, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Jovianeye 00:42, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Rheinfelden - Nollinger Berg Tunnel.jpg

• Nomination Rheinfelden, Germany: Nollinger Berg Tunnel --Taxiarchos228 07:41, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support okay --Carschten 16:14, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Wires ruin the composition (quality is not so great, but probably acceptable). --Eusebius 09:03, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Eusebius --Gaendalf 22:24, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support No technical problem QI --Archaeodontosaurus 20:00, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Ok to me. --Cayambe 22:07, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Eusebius--Lmbuga 23:44, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support--Jebulon 00:58, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Alofok 17:14, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roletschek 16:18, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promote?   --Jovianeye 00:42, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Počitelj - Hajji Alija Mosque.jpg

• Nomination Počitelj, Hercegovina. Hajji Alija Mosque --Pudelek 10:04, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good --George Chernilevsky 14:01, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Centred composition is really not the best choice here in my opinion. --Eusebius 22:35, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
   Compensational support because Eusebius' confound QI with FP --Carschten 10:11, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment Composition is one of the criteria in the image guidelines, which apply to both QI and FP. See what they say about centring the subject. Here I have the clear opinion that the position of the building with respect to the tower disqualifies centred compositions. You have the right to disagree, but I would greatly appreciate it if you could respect my reviewing work a little bit. --Eusebius 18:06, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Good for me --Archaeodontosaurus 19:57, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Perspective distortion (see note). As Eusebius--Lmbuga 23:38, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose agree with Eusebius in this case. Too much useless part left, but I miss something right (the end of the dome below, for instance).--Jebulon 00:57, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Alofok 17:15, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Because the composition. --Bgag 21:48, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support C is for cookie, and this is good enough for me. Letartean 21:34, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Promote?   --Jovianeye 05:30, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Fumarole im Feld Námafjall Hverir 6044.JPG

• Nomination Furmarole near Námafjall mountain --Snaevar 15:24, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
• Decline  SupportVery good. Please add geotag. --Cayambe 15:01, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

 Done Geotag added--Snaevar 17:33, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 Oppose Bad quality, omnipresent chromatic noise, details masked (by denoising or some other in-camera processing I guess). --Eusebius 22:11, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

 Compensational support Normally, I wouldn´t vote on my own nomination, but I have to agree with Carsten on your reviews currently, since they are of an FP standard, but not QI.--Snaevar 16:49, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment Technical standard is the same for FP and QI. The difference between the two projects is not about technical threshold. And nominator's vote does not count in this project. --Eusebius 18:13, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose With lightroom (program) I see the image too much underexposed and a bit overexposed. --Lmbuga 20:44, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   Lmbuga 20:44, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Auditorio de Tenerife Seitlich.jpg

• Nomination Tenerife: Auditorio de Tenerife --Taxiarchos228 11:52, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Comment needs a distortion correction imo, see annotations --Carschten 13:57, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

• Bilder sollen nicht nur eine Vorstellung des Objektes vermitteln sondern auch des Raumes und der Umgebung des Objektes, dafür nutzt man WW-Objektive. Natürlich verzerrt ein WW gerade Linien. Wer allerdings von jeder Linie verlangt, sie möge mathematisch im Lot stehen hat das Prinzip nicht ganz verstanden; insbesondere wie hier wenn wenn der Stutz der Fahnenmasten im Hintergrund auch noch vergleichsweise gering ausfällt. Deswegen werde ich hier selbstredend nichts korrigieren. Wenn ein bereits exzellentes Bild nicht QI sein soll dann liegt das nicht am Bild. --Taxiarchos228 14:50, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Oppose beautiful composition, but white parts are overexposed with no details & CA around this overexposed areas. --Tlusťa 15:22, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment strong expression --Mbdortmund 22:01, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support QI for me. --Alchemist-hp 20:22, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice composition, but main subject overexposed. --Eusebius 21:57, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support White is white... I don't miss details and don't see disturbing enough CA.--Jebulon 23:10, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
•  SupportNo visible Overexposure --Archaeodontosaurus 19:45, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Alofok 17:16, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Perspective distortion (left side), overexposed with lightroom, also underexposed; chromatic aberrations.--Lmbuga 22:37, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support QI for me. --Ralf Roletschek (talk) 12:44, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promote?   --Alofok 17:16, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Brockville - ON - Rathaus.jpg

• Nomination Brockville, Canada: Town Hall --Taxiarchos228 07:41, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion please add geocode, I couldn't find it starting with geocode of the German article --Mbdortmund 16:34, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  done. --Taxiarchos228 19:30, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
  

 Support good --Mbdortmund 00:53, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 Comment To me blurried, not sharp enough. Strong horizontal distorion to me, but only to me --Lmbuga 01:26, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
I need other opinions: Discuss--Lmbuga 01:28, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

not sharp enough? maybe you try wearing this: ? --Taxiarchos228 14:45, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Harassment: I must right to think freely--Lmbuga 16:29, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

That's really outrageous and disrespectful here, as an adult and civilized man you should be able to take criticism and to have an appropriate tone of voice, independent it's the criticism right or not. --Carschten 16:53, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, Carschten. My words in Commons talk:Quality images candidates will be translated. If nobody thinks, I will leave QI--Lmbuga 17:39, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

 Support Shame of the car and the tent (a bit overexposed tivoli), but good. Some of my own QIs are far more bad !...--Jebulon 15:33, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

 Support Alofok 17:13, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

 Support Picture is in my opinion sharp enough and already perspectively acceptabel corrected. --Alupus 18:13, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

 Neutral I have criticized the image, but I am not against. (poor english) I'm not agree by the suffering that has produced me the treatment of others: I do not feel free and respected--Lmbuga 20:13, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Jovianeye 03:07, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Donkey in Dana Reserve.jpg

• Nomination A donkey in Dana Reserve, Jordan --Bgag 00:39, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good. --Cayambe 15:42, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Noise (or other digital artefacts) too visible on the main subject. --Eusebius 22:28, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Good for me --Archaeodontosaurus 19:54, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Poor quality. For me, too much white zones blown. The object is too little (and it's a mammal, not a insect). As Eusebius--Lmbuga 23:53, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Eusebius --Carschten 17:00, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Jovianeye 03:09, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Ganoderma_applanatum_2010_G2.jpg

• Nomination Artist's Conk --George Chernilevsky 21:53, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support nice colours and fine structures --Mbdortmund 18:51, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too much noise for me on the subject, and part of it seems to be out of focus. --Eusebius 22:26, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Very good --Archaeodontosaurus 19:51, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Poor quality: color noise, right zone underexposed (also bottom zone), poor DOF--Lmbuga 23:48, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe 20:54, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Jebulon 10:10, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose too dark (imo), some noise. But that should be fixable --Carschten 16:59, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promote?   --Jovianeye 03:08, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Dogs at beach gaendalf 01.jpg

• Nomination Dogs at the beach in Costa Rica --Gaendalf 22:52, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
• Decline  OpposeI dont agree with the composition. Secondly since the front dog has moved to the corner of the lens it has lost sharpness or it could be due to the shallow DOF. --Jovianeye 23:33, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
  As you can see the beach has 2/3 of the picture and the sky 1/3 that agrees with the Rule of Thirds. The position of the dogs makes the viewer think they are the guardians of the beach. The big aperture of the picture (f 3.5) would make the front dog sharper, and the dog wasn't actually in the corner of the picture, it was cropped from the original. Finally, IMHO the sharpness has an adequate level. --Gaendalf 02:12, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
   Comment The beach and sky may obey the rule of thirds, but the dogs dont. Regarding the "Guardian" opinion, the centre dog does give this feeling to me, but the dog in the corner is busy scratching himself. Given such good lighting conditions you should have tried aperture priority. --Jovianeye 02:25, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  Again, the sharpness is appropriate. Actually with this aperture the nearest objects to the camera should stand in the DOF and the background not so clear. The subjects with this arrangement are clearly the dogs, and that's the crucial aspect in composition. The background obeys the rule. The Rule of Thirds, even though important, cannot be used in the judgement of every composition. Moreover, how can two subjects so separated be located in an "interesting point" of the Rule of Thirds. As I said, sometimes it's unattainable--Gaendalf 04:27, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support perfect compostion. Alofok 17:20, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose nice composition, but both dogs oof (blurry) --Carschten 10:26, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Carschten 10:26, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Gips_01.jpg

• Nomination: Gypsum, Calcium sulfate, Ca[SO4] • 2 H2O by H. Zell --Berthold Werner 12:49, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
• Review  Support Very good quality. --Mbdortmund 18:26, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
   Oppose Noise ruins the picture (when looking for the details of course). --Eusebius 22:39, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
   Support I have to search with a magnifier to see noise here. --Carschten 10:11, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment No need for a magnifier. Look at the picture at full resolution, as required by the reviewing guidelines, and you'll see that noise blurs the edges of the crystals in most of the picture. --Eusebius 18:01, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Noise, VI. Now I think that the image can't be FP--Lmbuga 23:42, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes?   --Mbdortmund 22:25, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

File:2010-05-21-breda-by-RalfR-06.jpg

• Nomination Haven van Breda, Brabant (Niederlande); --Ralf Roletschek 14:12, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  SupportNice lighting and scenery. --IdLoveOne 00:33, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Nice scene, but strong chromatic aberrations on the left and on the right. --Myrabella 09:49, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Will you annotate them? IdLoveOne 00:44, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
    • Done. --Myrabella 07:29, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support CA imo not a big problem, good composition --Mbdortmund 15:31, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   George Chernilevsky 09:44, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

File:2010-05-22-breda-by-RalfR-24.jpg

• Nomination Uitzicht vanuit Park Valkenberg in Breda, Niederlande --Ralf Roletschek 14:12, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Nice lighting and scenery. --IdLoveOne 00:33, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose Nice scene, but strong chromatic aberrations on the left and on the right --Myrabella 09:49, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Will you annotate them? IdLoveOne 00:46, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
    • Done. --Myrabella 07:35, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment Der Leuchtturm (?) sieht irgendwie verzerrt aus, oder täusche ich mich?. --Mbdortmund 15:34, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

• Der Leuchtturm ist sowohl schief als auch krumm :-) Ich stehe jedoch ca. 45° weiter südlich als das Beispielbild. --Ralf Roletschek 19:50, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Support stimmt, sorry --Mbdortmund 03:59, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   George Chernilevsky 09:42, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Sven regener 2011 salzburg.jpg

• Nomination Sven Regener, Author & Singer --Arne mueseler 09:55, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
• Decline

 Support Very good and useful, inspite of some noise A.Savin 11:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

 Oppose Focus plane in front of the eyes, therefore unsharp. --Eusebius 10:35, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

 Oppose Noisy and vignetting. --Jovianeye 03:11, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

 Oppose Useful but technically not QI: strong CA, noise, vignetting --Mbdortmund 11:36, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

 Support per A.Savin, considering it's an indoor portrait and the resolution, the noise is acceptable imo. --Carschten 12:41, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   Carschten 12:41, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

File:2011-02-06 Toras. Vilarromarís.jpg

• Nomination Tree trunks of pine wood. Vilarromarís, Oroso, Galicia--Lmbuga 22:27, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Needs maybe a little crop below, but otherwise good.--Jebulon 01:10, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

• Sorry, I can do a crop (with RAW fle), but I can' understand: Why or how?--Lmbuga 01:18, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Oppose Technically OK but I dont agree with the composition. Other opinions? --High Contrast 07:20, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment Ok. I can crop the image, but why or what. See this other image File:2011-02-06 Toras. Vilarromarís-2.jpg. I can do a new image with your direction in two weeks, or I can crop this--Lmbuga 20:02, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

• I thought that the context in that the tree had been cut could be interesting, but it's only a opinion--Lmbuga 20:33, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment I have committed an error. It is not eucalyptus, it's pine. I have corrected it--Lmbuga 20:07, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  
•  Support neat work, good composition with the foreground, I see no weaknesses --Ralf Roletschek (talk) 21:15, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose For me, too poor composition, sorry Antoinetav 13:52, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support For quality. --IdLoveOne 00:42, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   George Chernilevsky 09:41, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Gorges du Verdon panorama.jpg

• Nomination Gorges du Verdon panorama. --Ianare 00:38, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good. --Cayambe 17:28, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Underexposed (only a bit, but underexposed and solutionable)--Lmbuga 00:26, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  • I'll be the first to admit the lighting was pretty hrash that day, but any lighter and the white rocks facing the sun get overexposed. --Ianare 01:26, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
  • On peut éclairer devant sans surexposer derrière, et même réduire l'exposition si on veut (GIMP)--Jebulon 09:43, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support The mountain in the distance, which is the subject is not underexposed. And the shadow's not too bad, it arguably emphasizes the location of the photographer way up there. --IdLoveOne 00:19, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   George Chernilevsky 09:40, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Sitta canadensis CT3.jpg

• Nomination Red-breasted Nuthatch --Cephas 00:53, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion We have a quality image of this species, that is better (pose and background), in my judgment. --Wsiegmund 05:26, 16 February 2011 (UTC) May be multiple QI of the same object. I think this is a QI. --Tlusťa 09:59, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support of course we can have more then one QI of an object/species --Ralf Roletschek 13:43, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support good one --Mbdortmund 13:45, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment I agree that both pics are similar (taken at the same spot), but this one is a male, the other is a female). If I ever come up with a third one, then you can really discard it! --Cephas 15:55, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment Two reasons to keep on contributing pictures of the Red-breasted Nuthatch: 1. There is no rule that QI should only present the one best picture of an object 2. The Cephas Fanclub wants to see more of them. --Mbdortmund 20:01, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:39, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Cayambe 11:11, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Weil am Rhein - Evangelische Kirche Märkt4.jpg

• Nomination Weil am Rhein: Tower of Protestant Church Märkt --Taxiarchos228 10:33, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion Maybe could you consider cropping out the dial, and some sky left and above ? Only an opinion, but seems to me to make a better composition. The rest (subject, sharpness, light) is very good--Jebulon 18:00, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
   Support for me QI --Mbdortmund 23:37, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support for me also QI --Ralf Roletschek 17:54, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   George Chernilevsky 09:46, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Lörrach - Röttler Kirche - Glockenstuhl.jpg

• Nomination bells --Taxiarchos228 12:00, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Mbdortmund 21:11, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment Underexposed--Lmbuga 00:21, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

• Underexposed? you are not able to see the bells? --Taxiarchos228 07:40, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment Can you use a program like lightroom and see the parameters, Taxiarchos228, please? I did it--Lmbuga 20:14, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

• you did not answer my question, I will not answer yours --Taxiarchos228 20:31, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

• Thanks. You are very amiable, but your commentary is ridiculous to me--Lmbuga 20:52, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Oppose See above--Lmbuga 20:53, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Support underexposed... alofok* 17:21, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  • ??? pro underexposed? --Berthold Werner 16:18, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
    • Das dürfte Ironie für die zweifelhaften Kommentare von Lmbuga sein. --Taxiarchos228 10:59, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
      • Perhaps it's underexposed because the background haven't detail (too dark)--null 21:53, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
        • Perhaps the image is improvable, easily improvable--null 22:00, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unpleasant shadows due to direct flash. --Coyau 17:05, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support per Mbdortmund and I find the angle interesting makes the bells seem HUGE, though Coyau is right about the flash. --IdLoveOne 00:37, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roletschek 21:59, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   --Mbdortmund 22:24, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Fassade der Basilica di San Lorenzo, Mailand.jpg

• Nomination Facade of the Basilica of San Lorenzo in Milan. --High Contrast 21:07, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
• Withdrawn
• The twins disturb. shouldn't you tell in the description when you make a composite image? --Qiqritiq 10:12, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
  • It's not a composite image : the twins are in the basilic. --M0tty 10:53, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
    
    • Please do not change my assessment. To me this looks like a composite. --Qiqritiq 14:35, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
      
•  Oppose distortion imo too strong --Mbdortmund 19:02, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
  
• See other pictures Category:San Lorenzo (Milan) - Facade, i think that it's not a composite image. --M0tty 16:24, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

 Oppose Some issues around the head of statue, and over the pots-à-feu (Feuertopf) on the roof. And the funny walking twins...Please see annotations--Jebulon 18:09, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

 Comment nomination by accident - didn't want to put this file in here. --High Contrast (talk) 21:40, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Mbdortmund 20:23, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Paris porte de Versailles - Exposition le temps des dinosaures - giganotosaure - 020.jpg

• Nomination Une maquette articulée de giganotosaure. --Thesupermat 09:03, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion  Support I like the depth and size, but I want to get more opinions for this one. IdLoveOne 17:53, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
  copyright issues? --Mbdortmund 10:34, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
  We are here only for judging the quality of photography. It is unfortunately good because it allows you to see: a fanciful reconstruction. I remain neutral. --Archaeodontosaurus 17:39, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
  I'm still on the fence. It gives an anthropomorphic (smiling of all things) feeling. So i doubt a bit the realism of the reconstruction.--Qiqritiq 19:14, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
  

 Support Discussion about the accuracy or relevance of the reconstitution are not the main QI matters. Besides, educational material isn't just about "scientific truth", it is also about how at a certain time things are represented. Good photo (technical, composition, light, historical value). --Coyau 21:08, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Neutral OK, I won't stand in the way of promotion. --Qiqritiq 22:20, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   George Chernilevsky 10:01, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Holzwachturm am rätischen Limes (Rekonstruktion) - Wp12 77.jpg

• Nomination Reconstructed wooden watchtower at the Limes Germanicus near Rainau-Buch. --Haselburg-müller 18:30, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion  SupportSomething peculiar about seeing a side in shadow, but it's not overwhelming. IdLoveOne 01:01, 15 February 2011 (UTC)IMO, the lightning conductor and his wire are killing this picture of an ancient-roman reconstruction... The angle chosen was really the worst of the four possible. Please let put this (otherwise good) image in "Consensual review".--Jebulon 17:44, 16 February 2011 (UTC) The best view you can get. On the other two sides you have a visitor's entrance (original entrances were on the 1st floor) and the small rather prickly wood visible in the left part of the picture. --Haselburg-müller 17:53, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for information. This is a very good pic, indeed...--Jebulon 18:47, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Support Bauwerke tragen heute Blitzableiter, das ist kein Manko des Fotos, das könnte man wenn überhaupt nur dem bauwerk zuschreiben. Jede Kirche hat Blitzableiter, auch die, die 1000 Jahre alt sind. Die schattige Seite gefällt mir gut, das bringt Plastizität. Rundum saubere Arbeit. Google-Translation: Buildings now wear lightning rod that is not a shortcoming of the photo that could be attributed, if at all only the building. Each church has lightning rod, even those that are 1000 years old. The shady side I like it, which brings plasticity. Completely clean work. --Ralf Roletschek 12:43, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe 09:38, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support - don't see any problem, excellent picture. Felix Koenig 17:56, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support - Ok, ok, I support ! but shame of the wire nevertheless...--Jebulon 18:47, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support} Good picture. Auch wenn ich den Blick genau aus der Diagonalen nicht besonders prickelnd finde, ist es das Bild aus enzyklopädischer Sicht sehr gut zur Darstellung geeignet, da der Bau schön plastisch und detailreich wiedergegeben ist. --Alupus 22:07, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   George Chernilevsky 09:59, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Old crucifix in Kotor cathedral.jpg

• Nomination Old crucyfix in Kotor cathedral, Montenegro --Pudelek 14:42, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Face in shadow, flash. --Mbdortmund 22:20, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Comment This is lamp, not flash --Pudelek 10:48, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

• Face is me too dark. --Ralf Roletschek 19:59, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Question Is the lighting supposed to be symbolic? --IdLoveOne (talk) 00:40, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  • all this photo is symbolic --Pudelek 11:27, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
    •  Support That's what I figured. Doesn't make sense to oppose because of shadows if they're intended to serve an artistic purpose. IdLoveOne 00:48, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support ok, it is symbolic and avable light. --Ralf Roletschek 17:52, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Wrong color temperature. Questionable symbolism, which is outside the criteria of QI --Archaeodontosaurus 17:27, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Archaeo.--Jebulon 18:39, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with the French school. --Qiqritiq 19:19, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   George Chernilevsky 10:00, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Visit-suomi-2009-05-by-RalfR-225.jpg

• Nomination Lutheran Cathedral in Helsinki, Finland --Ralf Roletschek 14:32, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Its good. --PetarM 15:47, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Hmm, I see noise, lack of sharpness and unfortunate lantern poles. I think, judging from the category, a better position sure is possible.--Qiqritiq 09:59, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unfortunate composition, lack of sharpness, digital artefacts. --Eusebius 17:43, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   Elekhh 11:26, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Wetteraumuseum Muenzschatz Ober Florstadt.jpg

• Nomination Roman coin hoard from Ober-Florstadt, 1136 denarii. --Haselburg-müller 04:57, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Not really sharp, no details --Mbdortmund 15:25, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
   Comment Replaced it with a sharper version from the same series, objects in the mirror cropped. --Haselburg-müller 21:51, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
  •  Comment This version is much better, but I would like to have a second opinion. --Mbdortmund 22:41, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unsharp. --Eusebius 17:42, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Elekhh 11:24, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Snowboard saut tremplin et neige.jpg

• Nomination A snowboarder. --Ludo29 17:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
• Decline  Oppose The moment is captured clearly, but the composition is unfortunate, with their head hitting the mountain. --Avenue 20:30, 15 February 2011 (UTC)...But it is a very good action shot. Needs a discussion before to be so quickly rejected IMO.--Jebulon 00:23, 16 February 2011 (UTC) - this is me too much frozen because there is no Fuzziness --Ralf Roletschek 16:00, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

I can't have this effect with snow behind the snowboarder if I work a Fuzziness. Ludo29 18:04, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Support very good, clearly QI to me. -- Felix Koenig 21:43, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose quality (unsharp, noisy), colors (blown-out/overexposed parts, oversaturated), composition (snowboarder looks on the false side and is in front of the mountain [see Avenue]) --Carschten 13:50, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support--Jebulon 18:41, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unsharp and blown parts. --Qiqritiq 19:16, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Carschten. --Eusebius 17:40, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline?   --Avenue 21:36, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Immeuble building safety net filet protection.jpg

• Nomination A safety net, covering a whole building.--Jebulon 17:12, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support white background but great picture, main object is correct, for me QI --Ralf Roletschek 19:23, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Perspective correction needed. --Johannes Robalotoff 14:54, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose blown out sky, CA, but nice composition. --Elekhh 12:42, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
  •  Comment The CA are the consequence of this d...ed winter blown out sky...Roll on spring (in Europe) !!--Jebulon 18:55, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   George Chernilevsky 10:50, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Toronto - ON - Old City Hall.jpg

• Nomination Toronto, Canada: Old City Hall --Taxiarchos228 10:18, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Personally I don't like that a lot of the foreground is in shadow. IdLoveOne 17:41, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
  
•  Support QI for me --Mbdortmund 20:32, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support QI IMO.--Ankara 10:42, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support very good with some minor issues only: slight perspective distortion on the right and slightly opulent orange men. --Elekhh 12:45, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   George Chernilevsky 10:49, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Feuerbach - Kirche1.jpg

• Nomination Kandern-Feuerbach: Protestant Church --Taxiarchos228 08:41, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose The moon and the ball on the tower look warped. Qiqritiq 18:29, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
  
•  Support for me QI. --Ralf Roletschek 22:38, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support for me QI. --Böhringer 21:58, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   George Chernilevsky 10:48, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Lörrach - Josefskirche - Seitenkapelle.jpg

• Nomination Lörrach: Baptismal font at Saint Joseph --Taxiarchos228 13:42, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Parts of the stained glass are overexposed, but that's almost inevitable I guess. Otherwise very good image, and certainly good enough to deserve a QI promotion IMO. -- MJJR 22:39, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
• Composition, and light: overexposed unsigned, scratched by Letartean 14:25, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Because promotion was stopped by an unsigned comment, Letartean 14:25, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Mbdortmund 11:23, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Pargolovo SPB railplatform.jpg

• Nomination Pargolovo train station, St. Petersburg. A.Savin 09:06, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  SupportQI --Taxiarchos228 09:40, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
• Perspective distortion unsigned, scratched by Letartean 14:25, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Because promotion was stopped by an unsigned comment, Letartean 14:25, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support very nice! --Ralf Roletschek 20:28, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Mbdortmund 11:23, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Restaurantschiff, Emder Hafen.jpg

• Nomination Restaurant ship in the habour of Emden --Carschten 13:46, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good. --Cayambe 15:42, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
• Unnatural clear left side. QI? unsigned, scratched by Letartean 14:25, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Because promotion was stopped by an unsigned comment, Letartean 14:25, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Mbdortmund 11:23, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Auslikon - Strandbad - Fulica atra 2010-10-20 16-35-08.JPG

• Nomination Fulica atra - Eurasian coot. IdLoveOne 04:18, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support OK. Qiqritiq 18:31, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose too yellow for me. --Ralf Roletschek 22:41, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Ok for me, Letartean 16:52, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Probably too tight crop below, but good QI nevertheless IMO.--Jebulon 18:11, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment I agree with Ralf Roletschek; the feathers on the body should be gray. Instead, they are reddish. I will support it if the color balance is corrected. --Wsiegmund 21:38, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Mbdortmund 20:26, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Paradise River 8217.JPG

• Nomination Subalpine zone in Mount Rainier National Park --Wsiegmund 07:27, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support QI. Interesting place --George Chernilevsky 08:09, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Dark and lacking details. --Qiqritiq 13:53, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

• Lightened shadows. --Wsiegmund 22:23, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Support Good picture of an interesting place. On my screen it looks not under underexposed. --Alupus 20:26, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Wsiegmund 20:26, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Lörrach - Wohnanlage Stadion.jpg

• Nomination Housing area "Stadion", Lörrach--Taxiarchos228 15:33, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Good quality. --Mbdortmund 19:47, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
   RequestCan we please get this white balanced? IdLoveOne 03:14, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  the colour space is already balanced --Taxiarchos228 19:48, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment It might be a bit warm, but I'm not particularly good at judging this. --Eusebius 17:45, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment I didn't see it, but there seems to be a tendency versus red on the walls. --Mbdortmund 20:31, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support both visually and technically balanced tones --Ralf Roletschek 12:07, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support The Colours in my opinion do not look unnatural. Perhaps the wall paint could have been very shlightly reddish graded? --Alupus 20:20, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Alupus 20:20, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

File:2010-04-25-breda-by-RalfR-58.jpg

• Nomination Bicycle Street near Breda, Netherlands --Ralf Roletschek 15:34, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support nice composition --Mbdortmund 20:01, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice composition, but see the trees that are middle of the road section. --Makele-90 20:42, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
  • What's the problem? And I can't see CA, annote these issues please. -- IdLoveOne 10:38, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Highly visible CA for example at the rightmost trunk. But nice composition to show an typical dirt road lined with poplars in the nederlands or northern german lowlands. --Alupus 21:55, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --ELEKHH^T 23:59, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

File:IT SHIT AND DIE!.JPG

• Nomination: Vulgar carved inscription.--Juan de Vojníkov 00:05, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
• Review It should be "Eat" but anyway I'm putting this in discussion with me as  Neutral for now. This is a bit miscellaneous. -- IdLoveOne 06:38, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → More votes?   George Chernilevsky 07:07, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Giraffe, Giraffa camelopardalis 7.JPG

• Nomination Giraffe --Böhringer 21:04, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
• Promotion  Support Good --Qiqritiq 10:12, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
   Oppose too noisy imo --Carschten 17:49, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

 Support--Jebulon 17:22, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Oppose Noise too significant for me too. Also, the autofocus caught the end of the nose, not the eyes. --Eusebius 17:47, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support for me QI --Ralf Roletschek 18:01, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose I am the same opinion as Eusebius. --Alupus 20:28, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Image quality a bit weak, but the expression of the animal rescues photography. We must also consider those he has to see. --Archaeodontosaurus 13:14, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promote?   Eusebius 18:11, 27 February 2011 (UTC)