User talk:Anime Addict AA

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Anime Addict AA!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−

Star in heraldry

[edit]

Hi,

I just see that you created Category:One star in heraldry but I just created (too) Category:1 star in heraldry. If we just read the name it seems to be the same. But I see that you only categorized pieces and not shield, maybe you should change the category name. Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 09:40, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I put the template category redirect.
The structure of the "shields" is not simple and far not perfect. So you could propose improvement if you want.
For example, in heraldry we musn't use colors like yellow or red, but tinctures : Or or gules. I launch a discussion there about renaming : Commons talk:WikiProject Heraldry.
Category:Star in heraldry by color is still a good idea (maybe we should rename later but the idea of categorizing is good) but Category:Bordered stars in heraldry isn't because there is no borders concept in heraldry (all stars are bordered !).
Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 08:50, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add Category:Pentagrams in cases where there's only a simple filled 5-pointed star... AnonMoos (talk) 07:24, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Penta-" means "five" in Greek, so the word pentagram cannot be used to refer to the Star of David at the top of that pic... AnonMoos (talk) 17:54, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect name in a category

[edit]

Hi mate! you are the creator of the category SVG flags - aspect ratio of 3:2 and its technically incorrect. See the section 4 of the FIAV code: [1], the correct name would be: "SVG flags - aspect ratio of 2:3". See you. --Xavigivax (talk) 14:14, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse my English, I have a poor level and I feel very tired. I think that this is a task for a bot. There are hundreds mechanical editions that not required an human decision. We only must agree with the name of the category and ask to a boot to solve it. Regards and see you! --Xavigivax (talk) 21:34, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Motivator Eurabia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Liftarn (talk) 19:40, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wikipedia_death_motivator.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

99kerob (talk) 16:16, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anonymous_Flag_by_D3L1GHT.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 07:51, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strange heraldic categories

[edit]

Hi (nearly one year later),

I just found some strange categories :

Could I delete this unuseful categories ? Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 14:11, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Romania as a sister project to the multilingual WP:ROMANIA versions (currently en, fr, ro and ru) to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to Romania and the Romanians. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 22:44, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Flag_with_three_stripes has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:16, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Colour recognition

[edit]

Did your monitor work correctly when you made this change? Or the cause does not belong to the computer hardware? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:14, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Omphalographer (talk) 22:00, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:ED USflag.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:51, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Flags with more than twenty stars has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Justin (koavf)TCM 06:54, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]