Skip to main content

A Comparative Study: Influence on Real-World Consumer Perception of Products Presented in Augmented Reality

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2022 Posters (HCII 2022)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1582))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1628 Accesses

Abstract

With the development of the mobile device, augmented reality (AR) is moving from the laboratory into the consumer market. Product presentation in the augmented environment has become a compelling function that helps consumers have a better perception of the product. In this article, we proposed a comparative study to figure out how users perceive the product model in the AR environment and the difference compared with the real-world product. Through this research, we will further understand which attributes of the product can be better perceived in AR. The product semantic differential method was used here to build the product evaluation metrics and compare the user perception of 3 types of product presentation based on product semantic.

Supported by organization x.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alcántara, E., Artacho, M.A., González, J.C., García, A.C.: Application of product semantics to footwear design. Part I - identification of footwear semantic space applying differential semantics. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 35(8), 713–725 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2005.02.005

  2. Alves, C., Luís Reis, J.: The intention to use e-commerce using augmented reality - the case of IKEA place. In: Rocha, Á., Ferrás, C., Montenegro Marin, C.E., Medina García, V.H. (eds.) ICITS 2020. AISC, vol. 1137, pp. 114–123. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40690-5_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Artacho-Ramírez, M.A., Diego-Mas, J.A., Alcaide-Marzal, J.: Influence of the mode of graphical representation on the perception of product aesthetic and emotional features: an exploratory study. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 38(11–12), 942–952 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2008.02.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Azuma, R.T.: Survey of augmented reality (October), 355–385 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Daponte, P., De Vito, L., Picariello, F., Riccio, M.: State of the art and future developments of the augmented reality for measurement applications. Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confederation 57, 53–70 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2014.07.009

  6. Downes, M.J., Brennan, M.L., Williams, H.C., Dean, R.S.: Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS). BMJ Open 6(12), 1–7 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoffman, D.L., Novak, T.P.: Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: conceptual foundations. J. Mark. 60(3), 50–68 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299606000304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang, T.-L., Liao, S.: A model of acceptance of augmented-reality interactive technology: the moderating role of cognitive innovativeness. Electron. Commer. Res. 15(2), 269–295 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-014-9163-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Javornik, A.: ‘It’s an illusion, but it looks real!’ Consumer affective, cognitive and behavioural responses to augmented reality applications. J. Mark. Manag. 32(9–10), 987–1011 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vandersypen, L.M.K., Steffen, M., Breyta, G., Yannoni, C.S., Sherwood, M.H., Chuang, I.L.: Experimental realization of Shor’s quantum factoring algorithm using nuclear magnetic resonance. Nature 414(1976), 883–887 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee, T., Hollerer, T.: Handy AR: markerless inspection of augmented reality objects using fingertip tracking. In: 2007 11th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, pp. 83–90. IEEE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. McLean, G., Wilson, A.: Shopping in the digital world: examining customer engagement through augmented reality mobile applications. Comput. Hum. Behav. 101(November 2018), 210–224 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.002

  13. Milgram, P.: A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. Ind. Eng. 12, 1–14 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nakada, K.: Kansei engineering research on the design of construction machinery. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 19(2), 129–146 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(96)00009-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Osgood, C.E., Anderson, L.: Certain relations among experienced contingencies, associative structure, and contingencies in encoded messages. Am. J. Psychol. 70(3), 411–420 (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Smink, A.R., Frowijn, S., van Reijmersdal, E.A., van Noort, G., Neijens, P.C.: Try online before you buy: How does shopping with augmented reality affect brand responses and personal data disclosure. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 35(April), 100854 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Verhagen, T., van Nes, J., Feldberg, F., van Dolen, W.: Virtual customer service agents: using social presence and personalization to shape online service encounters. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 19(3), 529–545 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yim, M.Y.C., Chu, S.C., Sauer, P.L.: Is augmented reality technology an effective tool for e-commerce? An interactivity and vividness perspective. J. Interact. Mark. 39, 89–103 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaiyuan Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chen, K., Choi, Y.M. (2022). A Comparative Study: Influence on Real-World Consumer Perception of Products Presented in Augmented Reality. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds) HCI International 2022 Posters. HCII 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1582. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06391-6_58

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06391-6_58

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06390-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06391-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy