Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Engineering application of fuzzy evaluation based on comprehensive weight in the selection of geophysical prospecting methods

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Earth Science Informatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Faced with complex engineering geological problems, the application of comprehensive geophysical prospecting technologies allows for various technical achievements to complement each other, verify each other, reduce the ambiguity in geophysical prospecting results, and improve the accuracy of geophysical prospecting interpretations. At present, comprehensive geophysical prospecting is predominantly a simple synthesis of quantification, lacks effective intelligent decision-making methods, and cannot maintain pace with the development direction of future intelligent geophysical prospecting technologies. Therefore, this study proposes a geophysical prospecting selection evaluation method based on comprehensive weights to realize the transformation from empirical to scientific decision-making. In the proposed method, four criteria—specifically, detection accuracy, technical reliability, economic rationality, and data richness level—are first selected to establish an evaluation index system. Then, analytical hierarchy process and entropy weight method are used to combine subjective experience with objective data to form a comprehensive weight for the evaluation of geophysical prospecting selection through the fuzzy evaluation method. The efficacy of the proposed method was evaluated through application to karst exploration in the limestone mining area of the Hepu in Guangxi, for which an optimal geophysical prospecting scheme, composed of electrical resistivity tomography, microtremor survey method, and cross-hole resistivity computed tomography, was obtained. The scheme realizes the asymptotic detection of karst development from coarse to fine and improves the timeliness and economics of disaster management. These results verify the effectiveness and scientific soundness of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdullah L, Zulkifli N (2015) Integration of fuzzy AHP and interval type-2 fuzzy DEMATEL: an application to human resource management. Expert Syst Appl 42(9):4397–4409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afshar A, Abedi M, Norouzi GH (2015) Geophysical investigation of underground water content zones using electrical resistivity tomography and ground penetrating radar: a case study in Hesarak-Karaj, Iran. Eng Geol 196:183–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asadi M, Bagheripour MH, Eftekhari M (2013) Development of optimal fuzzy models for predicting the strength of intact rocks. Comput Geosci-UK 54:107–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bao F, Li ZW, Tian BF (2019) Sediment thickness variations of the Tangshan fault zone in North China from a dense seismic array and microtremor survey. J Asian Earth Sci 185

  • Braitenberg C, Sampietro D, Pivetta T (2016) Gravity for detecting caves: airborne and terrestrial simulations based on a comprehensive karstic cave benchmark. Pure Appl Geophys 173(4):1243–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrière SD, Chalikakis K, Sénéchal G (2013) Combining electrical resistivity tomography and ground penetrating radar to study geological structuring of karst unsaturated zone. J Appl Geophys 94:31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Confalonieri R, Bregaglio S, Bocchi S (2010) An integrated procedure to evaluate hydrological models. Hydrol Process 24(19):2762–2770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danielsen JE, Auken E (2003) The application of the transient electromagnetic method in hydrogeophysical surveys. J Appl Geophys 53(4):181–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis JL, Annan AP (2010) Ground-penetrating radar for high-resolution mapping of soil and rock stratigraphy. Geophys Prospect 37(5):531–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deceuster J, Delgranche J, Kaufmann O (2006) 2D cross-borehole resistivity tomographies below foundations as a tool to design proper remedial actions in covered karst. J Appl Geophys 60(1):68–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer JS (2011) Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process. Manag Sci 36(3):249–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feizizadeh B, Roodposhti MS, Jankowski P (2014) A GIS-based extended fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation for landslide susceptibility mapping. Comput Geosci-UK 73:208–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu YV, Gao Y, Li AB (2016) The anisotropic structure in the crust in the northern part of North China from ambient seismic noise tomography. Geophys J Int 204(3):1649–1661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao CL (2017) The risk assessment of tunnels based on Grey correlation and entropy weight method. Geotech Geol Eng 36(3):1621–1631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Ortiz D, Martín-Crespo T (2012) Assessing the risk of subsidence of a sinkhole collapse using ground penetrating radar and electrical resistivity tomography. Eng Geol 149:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang HD, Zhao D, Zhang RW (2010) Seismic attribute optimization method based on grey relational analysis and genetic algorithm. Oil Geophys Prospect 45(3):381–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamshidi-Zanjani A, Rezaei M (2017) Landfill site selection using combination of fuzzy logic and multi-attribute decision-making approach. Environ Earth Sci 76(13)

  • Jeannin PY, Malard A, Rickerl D (2015) Assessing karst-hydraulic hazards in tunneling-the Brunnmuhle spring system-Bernese Jura, Switzerland. Environ Earth Sci 74(12):7655–7670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenifer MA, Jha MK (2017) Comparison of analytic hierarchy process, catastrophe and entropy techniques for evaluating groundwater prospect of hard-rock aquifer systems. J Hydrol 548:605–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kai L (2011) Progress of surface wave exploration technology in engineering exploration. Chin J Eng Geophys 8(01):97–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Lan JB, Xu Y, Huo LA (2006) Research on weight of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Syst Eng Theory Pract 09:107–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Li TB, Meng LB, Zhu J (2009) Comprehensive analysis method of tunnel advanced geological prediction. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 28(12):2429–2436

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Shao J, Xu W (2014) Comprehensive stability evaluation of rock slope using the cloud model-based approach. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47(6):2239–2252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B, Liu ZY, Li SC (2017) Comprehensive surface geophysical investigation of karst caves ahead of the tunnel face: a case study in the Xiaoheyan section of the water supply project from Songhua River, Jilin, China. J Appl Geophys 144:37–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lv ZF, Pu SM, Wang SX (2015) Application of comprehensive geophysical prospecting method in landslide stability evaluation. Chin J Geotech Eng 37:142–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma FS, Di QY, Li KP (2016) Application of high-density resistivity method in detecting water bearing structures at a seabed gold mine. Chin J Geophys 59(6):717–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma F, He J, Ma J (2017) Evaluation of urban green transportation planning based on central point triangle whiten weight function and entropy-AHP. Transp Res Proc 25:3638–3648

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Moreno FJ, Galindo-Zaldívar J, Pedrera A (2014) Integrated geophysical methods for studying the karst system of Gruta de las Maravillas (Aracena, Southwest Spain). J Appl Geophys 107:149–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman GA (2010) Deep transient electromagnetic soundings with a grounded source over near-surface conductors. Geophys J Int 98(3):587–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh HJ, Pradhan B (2011) Application of a neuro-fuzzy model to landslide-susceptibility mapping for shallow landslides in a tropical hilly area. Comput Geosci-UK 37(9):1264–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlando L, Cardarelli E, Cercato M (2017) Pavement testing by integrated geophysical methods: feasibility, resolution and diagnostic potential. J Appl Geophys 136:462–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pace F, Godio A, Santilano A (2019) Joint optimization of geophysical data using multi-objective swarm intelligence. Geophys J Int 218(3):1502–1521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B (2013) Application of weights-of-evidence and certainty factor models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran. Arab J Geosci 6(7):2351–2365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sener E, Sener S (2015) Evaluation of groundwater vulnerability to pollution using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method. Environ Earth Sci 73(12):8405–8424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su MX, Qian QH, Li SC (2011) An advance geology prediction method of urban subway under karst geological conditions. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 30(7):1428–1434

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun TX, Hao JX, Niu JX (2013) The application of Ture reflection tomography and drilling comprehensive advanced geological forecast technology to the mine. Chin J Eng Geophys 10(01):123–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun HF, Cheng M, Su CX (2017) Characterization of shallow karst using electrical resistivity imaging in a limestone mining area. Environ Earth Sci 76(22)

  • Theodoridou PG, Varouchakis EA, Karatzas GP (2017) Spatial analysis of groundwater levels using fuzzy logic and geostatistical tools. J Hydrol 555:242–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J (2012) The application of seismic wave exploration method to the detection of goaf in small coal mine. Geophys Geochem Explor 36(135):124–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang XH, Yang ZH, Hong DJ (2019) Comprehensive geophysical interpretation of the deep geological structure in northern Nanjing-Wuhu basin. J Geol 43(02):288–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilken D, Rabbel W (2012) On the application of particle swarm optimization strategies on Scholte-wave inversion. Geophys J Int 190(1):580–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu PF, Ling SQ, Li CJ (2012) Mapping deeply-buried geothermal faults using microtremor array analysis. Geophys J Int 188(1):115–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu S, Xu D, Liu L (2019) Construction of regional informatization ecological environment based on the entropy weight modified ahp hierarchy model. Sustain Comput 22:26–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang JQ, Qian RY, Deng GL (2012) Applied research Rayleigh wave refraction tomography and cross-borehole seismic CT exploration in survey of Bedrock foundation. Chin J Eng Geophys 9(02):231–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang K, Tannant DD, Zheng W (2018) Prediction of karst for tunnelling using fuzzy assessment combined with geological investigations. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 80:64–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Much of the work presented in this paper was supported by the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (grant number ZR2014EEM028), National Natural Science Foundations of China (grant numbers 41877239, 51379112, 51422904, 40902084), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant number 2018JC044), and Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (grant number 2019GSF111028 and JQ201513). We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geotechnical & Structural Engineering Research Center, Shandong University, Jinan, 250061, Shandong, China

    Maoxin Su, Congcong Li, Yiguo Xue, Peng Wang, Kai Cheng & Yimin Liu

Authors
  1. Maoxin Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Congcong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yiguo Xue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kai Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yimin Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yiguo Xue.

Ethics declarations

Accompanied statements

All authors agree with the submission. The work has not been published elsewhere, either completely, in part, or in another form. The manuscript has not been submitted to another journal.

Additional information

Communicated by: H. Babaie

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Su, M., Li, C., Xue, Y. et al. Engineering application of fuzzy evaluation based on comprehensive weight in the selection of geophysical prospecting methods. Earth Sci Inform 15, 105–123 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-021-00701-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-021-00701-7

Keywords

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy