This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Forum
editThe forum whilst (possibly) deserving of a mention I do not feeldeserves such a detail analysis and detail and have edited the article accordingly, because it's not that much to do with Panini Comics themselves though if someone wants to make a Panini Comics Forum Page go ahead. If you disagree and can explain why feel free to. Stupid Ape 09:30, 28 March 2007 (UTC) a seperate forum page has been created before[by myself] ,was deleated a day later, forums that small apprently not allowed have own page
Should there be a link to Panini (stickers)? Or should both articles be merged to Panini (publishers) or similar? Daibhid C 01:12, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
- It seems to me they should be merged. In the meantime I added a link. --Galaxiaad 16:59, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Spidey100.jpg
editImage:Spidey100.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Category
editLooking at things like Fantastic Four Adventures, it strikes me those reprints might be better going in a new "Panini Comics titles" (probably under a "Panini Comics" one which would have Category:Marvel UK as a child, following the general convention with similar circumstances) but I may be overlooking something so I thought I'd float it here first. (Emperor (talk) 01:04, 27 May 2008 (UTC))
Well; technically the Collector's editions such as Fantastic Four Adventures are still Marvel UK as they are under the Marvel UK licence (I believe) so the current category isn't wrong.
Though a new category would clarify things slightly though instead of "panini comics titles" would "Panini UK Collectors' editions" be better or something broader again to encompass Superman Legends (published by Titan magazines and Ultimate Spider-Man and X-Men (by Panini but not technically a Collectors' edition). Stupid Ape (talk) 13:25, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
International=
editSince Panini Comics publish in a wide range of countries, shouldn't this page refer to all of their publications in every country? I was looking for informations on the company business in Brazil that I know to have different deals with reprinting Marvel and DC comics, plus deals with local producers, in fact, judging from this article Panini Comics Brazil seems to have a much larger number of publications than the U.K. version. It probably has reference to it in the portuguese language version, but that should be available for english readers too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kosmonauta (talk • contribs) 07:20, 8 January 2009 (UTC)