Thermal shock is a phenomenon characterized by a rapid change in temperature that results in a transient mechanical load on an object. The load is caused by the differential expansion of different parts of the object due to the temperature change. This differential expansion can be understood in terms of strain, rather than stress. When the strain exceeds the tensile strength of the material, it can cause cracks to form, and eventually lead to structural failure.

Methods to prevent thermal shock include:[1]

Effect on materials

edit

Borosilicate glass is made to withstand thermal shock better than most other glass through a combination of reduced expansion coefficient, and greater strength, though fused quartz outperforms it in both these respects. Some glass-ceramic materials (mostly in the lithium aluminosilicate (LAS) system[2]) include a controlled proportion of material with a negative expansion coefficient, so that the overall coefficient can be reduced to almost exactly zero over a reasonably wide range of temperatures.

Among the best thermomechanical materials, there are alumina, zirconia, tungsten alloys, silicon nitride, silicon carbide, boron carbide, and some stainless steels.

Reinforced carbon-carbon is extremely resistant to thermal shock, due to graphite's extremely high thermal conductivity and low expansion coefficient, the high strength of carbon fiber, and a reasonable ability to deflect cracks within the structure.

To measure thermal shock, the impulse excitation technique proved to be a useful tool. It can be used to measure Young's modulus, Shear modulus, Poisson's ratio, and damping coefficient in a non destructive way. The same test-piece can be measured after different thermal shock cycles, and this way the deterioration in physical properties can be mapped out.

Thermal shock resistance

edit

Thermal shock resistance measures can be used for material selection in applications subject to rapid temperature changes. A common measure of thermal shock resistance is the maximum temperature differential,  , which can be sustained by the material for a given thickness.[3]

Strength-controlled thermal shock resistance

edit

Thermal shock resistance measures can be used for material selection in applications subject to rapid temperature changes. The maximum temperature jump,  , sustainable by a material can be defined for strength-controlled models by:[4][3]   where   is the failure stress (which can be yield or fracture stress),   is the coefficient of thermal expansion,   is the Young's modulus, and   is a constant depending upon the part constraint, material properties, and thickness.

  where   is a system constrain constant dependent upon the Poisson's ratio,  , and   is a non-dimensional parameter dependent upon the Biot number,  .

 

  may be approximated by:   where   is the thickness,   is the heat transfer coefficient, and   is the thermal conductivity.

Perfect heat transfer

edit

If perfect heat transfer ( ) is assumed, the maximum heat transfer supported by the material is:[4][5]

 

  •   for cold shock in plates
  •   for hot shock in plates

A material index for material selection according to thermal shock resistance in the fracture stress derived perfect heat transfer case is therefore:  

Poor heat transfer

edit

For cases with poor heat transfer ( ), the maximum heat differential supported by the material is:[4][5]  

  •   for cold shock
  •   for hot shock

In the poor heat transfer case, a higher thermal conductivity is beneficial for thermal shock resistance. The material index for the poor heat transfer case is often taken as:  

According to both the perfect and poor heat transfer models, larger temperature differentials can be tolerated for hot shock than for cold shock.

Fracture toughness controlled thermal shock resistance

edit

In addition to thermal shock resistance defined by material fracture strength, models have also been defined within the fracture mechanics framework. Lu and Fleck produced criteria for thermal shock cracking based on fracture toughness controlled cracking. The models were based on thermal shock in ceramics (generally brittle materials). Assuming an infinite plate, and mode I cracking, the crack was predicted to start from the edge for cold shock, but the center of the plate for hot shock.[4] Cases were divided into perfect, and poor heat transfer to further simplify the models.

Perfect heat transfer

edit

The sustainable temperature jump decreases, with increasing convective heat transfer (and therefore larger Biot number). This is represented in the model shown below for perfect heat transfer ( ).[4][5]

  where   is the mode I fracture toughness,   is the Young's modulus,   is the thermal expansion coefficient, and   is half the thickness of the plate.

  •   for cold shock
  •   for hot shock

A material index for material selection in the fracture mechanics derived perfect heat transfer case is therefore:  

Poor heat transfer

edit

For cases with poor heat transfer, the Biot number is an important factor in the sustainable temperature jump.[4][5]

 

Critically, for poor heat transfer cases, materials with higher thermal conductivity, k, have higher thermal shock resistance. As a result, a commonly chosen material index for thermal shock resistance in the poor heat transfer case is:  

Kingery thermal shock methods

edit

The temperature difference to initiate fracture has been described by William David Kingery to be:[6][7]   where   is a shape factor,   is the fracture stress,   is the thermal conductivity,   is the Young's modulus,   is the coefficient of thermal expansion,   is the heat transfer coefficient, and   is a fracture resistance parameter. The fracture resistance parameter is a common metric used to define the thermal shock tolerance of materials.[1]

 

The formulas were derived for ceramic materials, and make the assumptions of a homogeneous body with material properties independent of temperature, but can be well applied to other brittle materials.[7]

Testing

edit

Thermal shock testing exposes products to alternating low and high temperatures to accelerate failures caused by temperature cycles or thermal shocks during normal use. The transition between temperature extremes occurs very rapidly, greater than 15 °C per minute.

Equipment with single or multiple chambers is typically used to perform thermal shock testing. When using single chamber thermal shock equipment, the products remain in one chamber and the chamber air temperature is rapidly cooled and heated. Some equipment uses separate hot and cold chambers with an elevator mechanism that transports the products between two or more chambers.

Glass containers can be sensitive to sudden changes in temperature. One method of testing involves rapid movement from cold to hot water baths, and back.[8]

Examples of thermal shock failure

edit
  • Hard rocks containing ore veins such as quartzite were formerly broken down using fire-setting, which involved heating the rock face with a wood fire, then quenching with water to induce crack growth. It is described by Diodorus Siculus in Egyptian gold mines, Pliny the Elder, and Georg Agricola.[citation needed]
  • Ice cubes placed in a glass of warm water crack by thermal shock as the exterior surface increases in temperature much faster than the interior. The outer layer expands as it warms, while the interior remains largely unchanged. This rapid change in volume between different layers creates stresses in the ice that build until the force exceeds the strength of the ice, and a crack forms, sometimes with enough force to shoot ice shards out of the container.
  • Incandescent bulbs that have been running for a while have a very hot surface. Splashing cold water on them can cause the glass to shatter due to thermal shock, and the bulb to implode.
  • An antique cast iron cookstove is a simple iron box on legs, with a cast iron top. A wood or coal fire is built inside the box and food is cooked on the top outer surface of the box, like a griddle. If a fire is built too hot, and then the stove is cooled by pouring water on the top surface, it will crack due to thermal shock.
  • The strong gradient of temperature (due to the dousing of a fire with water) is believed to cause the breakage of the third Tsar Bell.
  • Thermal shock is a primary contributor to head gasket failure in internal combustion engines.

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ a b Askeland, Donald R. (January 2015). "22-4 Thermal Shock". The science and engineering of materials. Wright, Wendelin J. (Seventh ed.). Boston, MA. pp. 792–793. ISBN 978-1-305-07676-1. OCLC 903959750.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  2. ^ US Patent 6066585, Scott L. Swartz, "Ceramics having negative coefficient of thermal expansion, method of making such ceramics, and parts made from such ceramics", issued 2000-05-23, assigned to Emerson Electric Co. 
  3. ^ a b Ashby, M. F. (1999). Materials selection in mechanical design (2nd ed.). Oxford, OX: Butterworth-Heinemann. ISBN 0-7506-4357-9. OCLC 49708474.
  4. ^ a b c d e f Soboyejo, Wole O. (2003). "12.10.2 Materials Selection for Thermal Shock Resistance". Mechanical properties of engineered materials. Marcel Dekker. ISBN 0-8247-8900-8. OCLC 300921090.
  5. ^ a b c d T. J. Lu; N. A. Fleck (1998). "The Thermal Shock Resistance of Solids" (PDF). Acta Materialia. 46 (13): 4755–4768. Bibcode:1998AcMat..46.4755L. doi:10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00127-X.
  6. ^ KINGERY, W. D. (Jan 1955). "Factors Affecting Thermal Stress Resistance of Ceramic Materials". Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 38 (1): 3–15. doi:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1955.tb14545.x. ISSN 0002-7820.
  7. ^ a b Soboyejo, Wole O. (2003). "12.10 Thermal Shock Response". Mechanical properties of engineered materials. Marcel Dekker. ISBN 0-8247-8900-8. OCLC 300921090.
  8. ^ ASTM C149 — Standard Test Method for Thermal Shock Resistance of Glass Containers
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy