User talk:Bernie44/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

File permission problem with File:LChaimLogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:LChaimLogo.jpg, which you've sourced to http://lchaimkoshervodka.com/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Haz _talk 19:16, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Outing yourself as a paid editor

This interview wasn't a smart idea, Erez. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schtetl (talk • contribs) 17:59, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Welcome from 'Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry'

Welcome!

Hello, Bernie44, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

The one firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. It is also worth noting that Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which specifically link them to one company or corporation. If your username does have such a name, it would be advisable for you to request a change of username.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! You can also just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! The Cavalry (Message me) 20:35, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Best regards, Cindy(talk to me) 21:46, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:LCHAIM Matisyahu.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:LCHAIM Matisyahu.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gobōnobo ^{+ c} 21:55, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Diwon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diwon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diwon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gobōnobo ^{+ c} 00:40, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Paid editing advice

Unlike what was said above, maybe it was smart to come out, for you clearly need some help. If you are going to edit ethically as a paid editor, you need to say so on the talk pages of the articles you work on. I see you have been proposing your articles thru the AFC process, and I must say I am a little amazed some of them were approved in the current condition.

The subjects are notable (in my opinion, though i cannot really judge hip-hop artists), and I think it was important to have articles on them. I'm delighted someone is finally working on Jewish newspapers; perhaps you will turn your attention next, as a volunteer, to some of the others on which we have had longstanding inadequate articles. And in fact, as far as NPOV goes, they do meet the basic requirements and are less promotional than a good many paid articles. So you might as well learn how to write in a more encyclopedic fashion, avoiding equally one-sentence paragraph, and very long sections without subheadings. You should learn not to use Myspace and facebook links, and to avoid unsourced opinion, or opinion sourced only to press releases. You should learn to omit needless words, and avoid repetitive use of the subject's name ("he" and "it" are useful substitutions). You'll see what I mean more exactly from the corrections I've entered in a brief run-through--but they are only samples of what is needed. I'm also a little concerned with the extreme level of detail in some of the articles, like the Chicago news box and mezuzah controversies. (The mezuzah one in articular might well be split off into a separate article.

I imagine you will get a fair number of other comments. since you are in NYC, why not come to some of the NYC Chapter meetings? [1]. Other paid editors have done so. DGG ( talk ) 02:38, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Wikiproject Cooperation

I thought I should let you know about Wikiproject Cooperation. Since, at this point, it would be far better for you to write userspace drafts of articles and have one of us move them to mainspace. Otherwise, there's going to be a significant amount of resistance to your editing, now that the cat's out of the bag, so to speak. Silverseren^C 09:24, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

More advice.

I'd highly recommend reading our plain and simple conflict of interest guide. Among other things, it recommends that you disclose your financial conflict of interest, use drafts, seek other editors' opinions, make sure articles are neutral and well-referenced, and take extra care to write without bias. You're going to be under much greater scrutiny from now on, and I'd suggest you view it as a learning opportunity to make your content even better. There are editors who are available to help you, but you'll have to seek them out through the thicket of those who may make your editing life more difficult in the interest of protecting the encyclopedia. Ocaasi ^{t | c} 03:05, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

General Statement

In an article in the New York Daily News, my business associate and I transparently stated that we receive payment for Wikipedia entries. We noted that we reject purely promotional requests not about notable figures or companies, and that we heavily source every entry, spending hours on research. Following the appearance of the article, one Wikipedian nominated for deletion an article I wrote and photo I uploaded, and placed conflict of interest flags atop ten previously accepted, clean articles I submitted. Another placed COI flags atop two articles I submitted and two I contributed to. A third flagged an article I contributed to.

This tactic is improper, as it constitutes a presumption of wrongdoing on my part, and is in and of itself a violation of the “aim of Wikipedia, which is to produce a neutral, reliably sourced encyclopaedia,” and it doesn’t follow the Wikipedia guideline to “assume good faith.” Instead of flagging my work across the board, a neutral individual would have referenced examples of my work which suggest a conflict of interest or are otherwise improper.

Per the Conflict of interest page, it is “not actually required” to declare any potential conflicts of interest. As per the guidelines on that page, I have attempted to “carefully [follow] Wikipedia’s neutral point of view policy” to “help counteract [perceived] biased editing.” I have not written or edited any entry in which “advancing outside interests is more important to an editor than advancing the aims of Wikipedia.” My goal is to contribute positively by producing “neutral, reliably sourced” entries about notable figures deserving of inclusion on Wikipedia. I’m prepared to discuss any contribution I’ve made with the purpose of confirming the statements above and clarifying any questions. --Bernie44 (talk) 01:57, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

But dude.. you work for a company... and companies are eeeeeeevil. Also rich people. Occcupy maaaaaan.101.118.55.144 (talk) 05:00, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

You are quite right that you are not required to place COI tags. But anyone may do so. I am placing them on all articles you have written, and I would very strongly advise you not to remove them. I consider them fair notice. If you care to dispute that you have a coi on the articles, bring the matter to an appropriate noticeboard. DGG ( talk ) 03:54, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

WikiProjects

Welcome to Wikipedia. Some WikiProjects you may be interested in helping with as a pro bono service:

• Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography
• Wikipedia:WikiProject Cooperation (already mentioned above)
• Wikipedia:WikiProject Hip hop
• Wikipedia:WikiProject Israel
• Wikipedia:WikiProject Jewish history
• Wikipedia:WikiProject Journalism
• Wikipedia:WikiProject Judaism
• Wikipedia:WikiProject New York City

... and check out Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory for a big ol' list of other great projects. Cheers. -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI Declaration) 12:43, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the info. I'll check some of these WikiProjects out. --Bernie44 (talk) 22:47, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Deletion of articles, questions on image permissions, ANI discussion

So, a lot to notify you about that you need to know.

First off, L'CHAIM Vodka and Shemspeed were speedy deleted. I'm challenging that in DRV here, so you may want to get involved in those discussions.

Next, before I created those DRVs, I mistakenly took the deleting admin to ANI first, the discussion of which is here. Another section has been made in the ANI discussion though, where the images you had put up in L'CHAIM vodka (the images still exist and were not deleted) have questionable permissions. Users there don't believe the person who sent the OTRS ticket had the authority to release the images. That section of the discussion is right here and you definitely need to get involved in it. Silverseren^C 23:37, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

seren, I appreciate the heads up, as well as your attention to these matters. Thanks. --Bernie44 (talk) 03:47, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Instead of giving away for free the intellectual property of the Shemspeed recording label,[2] you might instead upload the Shemspeed Logo to Wikipedia using fair use. See Wikipedia:Logos. Also, your clients might be upset once they realize that you potentially gave away their intellectual property (e.g.,L'CHAIM vodka[3][4]) instead of merely posting it to the Internet under fair use. L'Chaim's owner probably is relying on your business advise. To protect your consuting business, you might want to first have L'Chaim's owner's lawyer sign off on giving away L'Chaim's image for the world to use at it's discretion. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 12:02, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Uzma Gamal, I will look into uploading using fair use. --Bernie44 (talk) 12:44, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of L'CHAIM Vodka for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article L'CHAIM Vodka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L'CHAIM Vodka until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:43, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs

Thank you for your recent articles, including Ben Burns. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 22:32, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages

Thank you for your recent articles, including Ben Burns. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. This can help you too, as the WikiProject members will often defend your work from deletion and try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 22:33, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Will do. Thanks for the advice, Piotrus.--Bernie44 (talk) 00:41, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Ben Burns for DYK?

Hello, Bernie44. Thank you for writing up the article on Ben Burns. I have nominated it for DYK on MainPage. The nomination can be found here. There is a question from DYK reviewers about the referencing for the fact to be shown on MainPage. Should Ref34 be page 136 rather than page 63 in Nitty Gritty? Please join the discussion at T:TDYK#Ben Burns. --PFHLai (talk) 21:57, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the nomination! You're right about the reference, that was my mistake. I've made the correction to the article, and noted it on the DYK nomination page.--Bernie44 (talk) 00:59, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Approved! I did not realize until now that it is your first DYK! Keep watching the nomination, it will change once more when it goes to the preparation section, where you could still make minor changes. Perhaps watch that page also. When it gets into a queue, only admins can change, and you can see which 8 hours it will be on the Main page. I am watching here, you can ask questions ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:35, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Great, thanks! Looking forward to it.--Bernie44 (talk) 17:24, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Ben Burns

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Precious

	fascinating people
	Thank you for introducing interesting biographies, a white publisher of black publications, a food and travel columnist, an innovative musician, - you are an awesome Wikipedian! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:30, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you!--Bernie44 (talk) 16:12, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

A year ago, you were the 237th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:35, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ethel G. Hofman

The article Ethel G. Hofman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

her source of notability "recognized authority on international jewish food" stems from a mention in the Glasgow Caledonian University News & Events. Article is relentlessly promotional, and was created by a COI editor. No real notability here.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CitizenNeutral (talk) 01:55, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/William Peacock concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/William Peacock, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 18:21, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

That articles for creation page can be deleted, as William Peacock, a disambiguation page, has already been created. --Bernie44 (talk) 19:00, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jamaican Queens

The article Jamaican Queens has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BAND

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Logical Cowboy (talk) 16:04, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alexandra Levit

The article Alexandra Levit has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable individual. References are examples of her articles or trivial mentions of subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 02:44, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs

Thank you for your recent articles, including Itshak Holtz, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 17:57, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks!--Bernie44 (talk) 18:37, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Jewish Star (Alberta) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Chronicle'', a publication appearing on a semi-annual or up to a quarterly basis beginning in 1960 (Lewis Levendel, ''A Century of the Canadian Jewish Press: 1880s-1980s'', 1989, pp. 243, 246.</ref><

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:08, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jason Mraz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polaroids (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jewish Journal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Precious again

fascinating people
Thank you for introducing interesting biographies, a white publisher of black publications, a food and travel columnist, an innovative musician, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:30, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Two years ago, you were the 237th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, repeated in br'erly style, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:51, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Itshak Holtz Evening Street Scene 1961.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Itshak Holtz Evening Street Scene 1961.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:05, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Itshak Holtz Self Portrait 1975.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Itshak Holtz Self Portrait 1975.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:05, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Itshak Holtz Evening Street Scene 1961.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Itshak Holtz Evening Street Scene 1961.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:02, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Paid editing

Have any of your recent article/photo additions been the result of a paid engagement? You may want to read the current Terms of Use (section 4) and work up some statement of compliance. If I've missed that you've already done this, please point me to it. Kuru (talk) 22:42, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi Kuru (talk), I did write up a statement a couple of years ago, it is on my talk page above, under General Statement. --Bernie44 (talk) 02:46, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Policy has changed; please read the TOU link above. A general statement will not suffice. Kuru (talk) 03:57, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Seph Lawless

Can you provide further details of your involvement with Seph Lawless. Per recent legal and personal threats by (Redacted)/Seph Lawless, I have taken a particularly nasty case to Oversight. Your cooperation is welcomed. seicer | talk | contribs 17:10, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4