User talk:Guillaume2303/Archive 15
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Guillaume2303. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 10 | ← | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
Guillaume, when you have a moment, would you mind looking at this AfD? Oh, this reminds me: did I get back to you on the topic of ice cream? If not, forgive me. What I meant to tell you was that it looks fine to me, and there is no need to worry about tone and invalshoek. Drmies (talk) 19:24, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
- I will. And thanks, guess I owe you an ice cream :-) --Guillaume2303 (talk) 19:50, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
- You may feel differently after you see what I had to say on the AfD for Feminist Africa... sorry... (but at least now no one can claim we're each other's socks. Who was that again?) Drmies (talk) 20:02, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
- I actually am looking for good reasons to keep myself... I got a bit irritated this afternoon, wading through these edits while preparing an ANI post, not one of my more favorite things. So I got irritated with this one, too, and took it to AfD. I don't think the few citations that you found contribute to notability, but the 1.5 page discussion probably will do. I'm watching a movie right now, I'll have a look at it later and if it is sufficient, I'll withdraw the nom. Or it may have to wait till tomorrow, as I may get some more red wine (which I buy from a winery 100 m from my house) because my wife is visiting friends in Paris, the cats are asleep, and there's nothing else to do (Oh, wait, yes, there is, a good book... Rule 34; you may remember -or perhaps I didn't tell you yet- that I'm a science fiction fan - 36 m of books last time I measured, one third of the way to the winery... No Kindle for me... :-) --Guillaume2303 (talk) 20:12, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
- Oh yes, Euroflux. That reminds me I meant to stop at ANI to leave some comments. Later--I'm watching Silver and Gold, a Neil Young video, trying to play along. A la votre, Drmies (talk) 21:17, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Civility Barnstar |
| Awarded for being a really nice and generous editor, besides a kick-ass critic. Drmies (talk) 20:27, 29 October 2012 (UTC) |
- -) Thanks! --Guillaume2303 (talk) 20:28, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
- Do you ever have this--you're sitting at home with a sick kid playing a Bob Dylan album you should have been listening to 30 years ago? Fall greetings from Alabama, Drmies (talk) 14:23, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
- Not really. Remember years ago people used to talk about "dinkies" (double income, no kids), well, we're sinkies (single income, no kids). We do have two cats, though... :-) Apart from that little detail, I understand the feeling... --Guillaume2303 (talk) 22:22, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
- Do you ever have this--you're sitting at home with a sick kid playing a Bob Dylan album you should have been listening to 30 years ago? Fall greetings from Alabama, Drmies (talk) 14:23, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Inventiones
Could you please let me finish with the references?. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lojano (talk • contribs) 08:54, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- I reverted 20 minutes after you stopped editing and as you had made the same unsourced edit before, I assumed that was all that was coming. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 21:48, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Society for Occupational Health Psychology
Thank you for all your work on the footnotes on SOHP web site. I was busy updating the URLs, which changed since I first placed them on the Wikipedia entry. I had wanted to place each link to the external web site at the end of the footnote rather than in the middle of the footnote. That was why I edited them the way I did. I am not as familiar as you with the format you used. Would it be possible for you to arrange the footnotes you edited such that the link would be at the end of the footnote rather than in the middle of the citation? Thanks. Iss246 (talk) 17:48, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- If you use the template, the whole title of an article will be linked, not just a little number at the end of the line. This is clearer and more convenient for readers. This is, indeed, the recommended way to format references (see WP:CITE). --Guillaume2303 (talk) 21:53, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. I preferred to have the entire citation precede the link to the paper. But I will leave the page as it is.Iss246 (talk) 22:59, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
My last edition
Hello Guillaume2303,
I just saw the changes you made to my recent edition to the Latindex article, I will review your comments and recommended sections and wil back to you. I made this last edition thinking that what was required to solve the previous comments to the article was more information and linking to all the participating institutions.
With respect to the comment that the article is written as an advertisement I do not agree because this is a nonprofit academic system and the only intention in having a Wikipedia article is to provide information to potential users and give all the details we consider relevant.
On the other issue about the close connection of one of the contributors I would say that in my opinion is better to have an informed and authorized person within the institution writing the article with the only intention of informing in a clear way not seeking to self promoting in any way.
I appreciate your work and your comments and hope to improve the article in a way that satisfies Wikipedia standards. Any other comment or recommendation from you will be greatly appreciated. Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by FRRE (talk • contribs) 18:07, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, well, "advert" does not necessarily mean that someone is out to make some money. It applies to non-profits as much as to companies and such. Please read WP:COI and WP:POV. Any subject has to be described in a neutral manner and somebody associated directly with an organization will naturally have more difficulty remaining neutral than someone uninvolved. AS for all the other issues, long lists of external links are undesirable. If the organizations are notable, perhaps there are already articles on them or there ought to be articles oin them and in that case they should have internal links ("wikilinks"). Have a look at some articles on similar organizations that have a good rating (like at least C or better even B-class) to get an idea of what is needed. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 21:46, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
Bonjour, J'aimerais que vous m'expliquiez pourquoi avoir supprimé le paragraphe "Speaker" ?
Car depuis son départ en retraite, il y a 13 ans, Guy Lebègue s'est beaucoup investi dans la vulgarisation scientifique sur les activités satellites ; et cette conférence, il la prononce plusieurs fois chaque année, dont une fois pour l'Association Aéronautique et Astronautique de France. Elle avait d'ailleurs fait l'objet de publications écrites : Un satellite de télécom : A quoi ça sert?, Comment ça marche?, Combien ça coûte? », dans Nouvelle Revue Aéronautique & Astronautique, Dunod juin 1994, (ISBN 1247-5793); repris dans la même année, dans la Revue des anciens éléves de l'Ecole Centrale de Paris.
Par ailleurs :
- il est membre de l'association PARSEC et coordinateur des visites du Centre spatial de Cannes Mandelieu, dont des visites sont organisées tous les samedis.
- depuis un an, président de l'association Cannes Aéro Spatial Patrimoine travaillant à la reconstitution historique du centre spatial.
Friendly, --Sosak fr (talk) 14:12, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, I have re-reviewed the deleted section and still think that it cannot be maintained. To start with, the image is taken from a website and therefore a potential copyvio. The reference given for the image caption is taken from a blog, which is not a reliable source. All other information in that section is sourced to Lebègue's own website. What is needed here are sources independent of the subject, showing that these presentations are important. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 19:52, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
- La photo a été prise par Francoise Lebegue (c'est dans le panneau d'information de la photo), l'épouse de Guy Lebegue, et chargée dans les commons sous licence libre, donc pas de copyvio.
- Le blog n'est pas celui de Lebegue mais de l'Association Aéronautique et Astronautique de France, groupe régional Côte d'Azur, une société savante, produisant de nombreuses conférences sur de nombreux sujets des domaines aéronautique et astronautique, et des conférenciers célèbres.
- --Sosak fr (talk) 22:00, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
- I see that the photo has indeed gone through the OTRS system, so the copyright situation is OK. But apart from that, the other problems remain: above I didn't say that the blog was Lebègue's, I said that all other sources in that section were to his own website. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 22:08, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
- C'est bien de faire amende honorable! Mais que pensez-vous de remettre en place les paragraphes que vous avez supprimés et aller en discuter dans la page de discussion associée à l'article lui-même, où d'ailleurs un début de discussion y a été ouvert?
- Je pratique très peu WP anglophone, car assez peu calée pour écrire dans la langue de Shakespeare (rire). Dans WP francophone, c'est la pratique courante que cette discussion au plus près de l'article.
- --Sosak fr (talk) 08:22, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- I see that the photo has indeed gone through the OTRS system, so the copyright situation is OK. But apart from that, the other problems remain: above I didn't say that the blog was Lebègue's, I said that all other sources in that section were to his own website. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 22:08, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
Mena Report
Hi, I have been trying to put back relevant information on this news source. Please do not remove it. The publisher's location, access volumes etc. are entirely relevant. My goal is to provide information that our readers may be interested in. There are other forums for discussing merge or deletion. Thanks, Aymatth2 (talk) 19:23, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, this stuff is not relevant. The article is about the Mena Report, not about the publisher. If the publisher is notable, then this info could go into an article on them, but not here. As another example, we do not give large descriptions of Elsevier in every article on every single journal this company publishes, either. This is not a merge/deletion issue either, unless you want to propose mergin an article on the publisher into the Mena article? --Guillaume2303 (talk) 19:27, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
- When describing a magazine it is relevant to say who publishes it and where. Yes, "where" may be found by clicking through to the article on the publisher, but it is given here for the reader's convenience. See, for example, the lead section of The New York Times, which informs the reader that the newspaper is published in New York City by The New York Times Company. Aymatth2 (talk) 19:59, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
- I've responded on the article talk page. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 21:32, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
Irving Gottesman GAed
Yay! Now for an FA. I am actually in touch with Gottesman. But I don't think we can get a photo; the problem is WikiCommons requires the photographer to upload an image, not the subject. Too complicated to push through. The references have to be changed to the {{sfn}} template, but I have done that for a couple of articles before, so should be okay. Also need to add more stuff about his books, since FA requires "full" coverage. Churn and change (talk) 03:58, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
- Awesome job! Congratulations! --Guillaume2303 (talk) 07:53, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
You may be interested, as you previously worked on this article , and I mentioned you at the AfD. See also Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Imexco General Ltd. and my comments on User talk:Yesikan DGG ( talk ) 04:24, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note, I didn't have this on my watchlist any more. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 08:02, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Biotechnology and Bioengineering, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fermentation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Precious
|
professional science |
| Thank you for quality articles and contributions on scientific articles, especially neuroscience, on a professional level with a focus on science in Europe, - you are an awesome Wikipedian! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:00, 8 November 2012 (UTC) |
Note
I was going to email but it is disabled. You have been a great editor and an asset to wikipedia. You could try and create a new account by notifying arbcom and by not linking it to this account. IRWolfie- (talk) 00:22, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- Support!. —MistyMorn (talk) 10:06, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
Why is Guillaume2303 retiring?
The note above says that this user was getting off-wiki harassment. What happened? Blue Rasberry (talk) 21:14, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, the off-wiki stuff was already a while ago: I received phone calls and one person whose bio I had taken to AfD (closed as a "delete") actually emailed colleagues of mine that he thought were in an authority position over me. The most recent happenings was harassment including the Dutch, German, and Italian WPs and that was the last drop... I'm still wrapping up some loose ends, but that won't be much any more (couple of dozen edits at most). Thanks for the interest :-) --Guillaume2303 (talk) 22:46, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- I really wish that you could close your account with some suggestions for what you want changed to prevent this from happening to anyone else, or otherwise for what kind of community support you think would be useful for other people to have if what happened to you ever happens to anyone else. Blue Rasberry (talk) 23:18, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- There is a process for renaming an account as well, maybe that would be helpful in putting off attempted doxing or whatever. IRWolfie- (talk) 01:20, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
Too bad - I think the only solution is to have a truly anonymous account that nobody can tie to a real person. Otherwise this type of harassment is all too easy. For those who tuned in late, the most recent harassment was due to wildly out of proportion anger from now banned User:Euroflux. And we end up losing an exceptionally good-hearted and productive editor. Best of luck and regards to you, Guillaume2303. First Light (talk) 04:05, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
- The User:Euroflux count has been blocked définitivly on the French WP--Sosak fr (talk) 07:34, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
- In response to the above comments: When the conflict with Euroflux started, he had already been banned on the French WP. Due to his attacks on me, he is now also indeffed on the German WP and clocked for a week on the Dutch WP. On the Italian WP, his attacks have been ignored and that seems to have been an effective strategy, too. So in all, the community has been quite responsive in defending an editor from undue harassment. Nevertheless, these things cause stress (and time). In the almost six years that I have been editing here, I have been attacked several times. I originally edited under my own name, because I stand to what I do here and felt that I have no reason to hide. I was mistaken, because unfortunately, not all people coming here are reasonable. So after the off-wiki harassment referred to above, I had my account renamed, as IRWolfie also suggested above. This reduced the problems a bit: your run-of-the-mill IP vandal usually is not wiki-literate enough to find this out, so for them I was anonymous whereas the regulars here still were aware of my identity. But along came Euroflux, who got very upset that I didn't agree with his grand unification interwiki categorization scheme and his pointy attacks on several biographies here. Next thing I know, my own biography is being attacked on different WPs with Euroflux pasting long walls of (sometimes rather silly) accusations on article and user talk pages. At that point, I was already reducing my involvement in WP (pruning back my watchlist from about 7000 items to about 4000 in the space of a couple of weeks). Euroflux was just the last drop.
- I'm not sure whether events like this can be avoided completely. One way would be to have everybody here edit under their real-life identity. If people are not anonymous any more, they will think twice before acting like a spoiled child. It wouldn't remove the problem, but certainly reduce it greatly. However, I see the problem with this solution, too: many people will be hesitant to use their real name if they are editing sensitive subjects (such as articles on sex-related themes or politics, especially if it concerns countries that have no free speech and/or totalitarian regimes). The only other solution is what First Light suggests: absolute anonymity for all. I don't like that, but if in the future I decide to come back to WP, that's what I'll do: choose a handle that cannot be traced back to my real life identity and carefully avoid ever giving any clue as to who I am, where I live, and what my profession is. For the moment, though, Euroflux has won and I'm going to take a break from editing. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 08:38, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think I've ever encountered you before, and I haven't looked into the background of all this, but I want to say that if you're retiring primarily as a result of the cross-wiki behavior of another user who has been blocked for that behavior on multiple wikis, I think that indicates a systemic problem that the stewards should have been empowered to deal with globally. Rivertorch (talk) 20:18, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:TSWjournal logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading File:TSWjournal logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:08, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:PFcover.png)
Thanks for uploading File:PFcover.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:09, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:MCPcover.gif
Thanks for uploading File:MCPcover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 02:27, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
A year ago you PRODded this, and it was deleted. Undeletion has been requested at WP:REFUND, so per WP:DEL#Proposed deletion I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to consider AfD. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:16, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Request to take part in a survey
I am Piotr Konieczny, a fellow Wikipedian (User:Piotrus) and a researcher of Wikipedia (http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=gdV8_AEAAAAJ). I am currently (in collaboration with WMF) embarking on a project trying to understand why the most active Wikipedia contributors (such as yourself) may reduce their activity, or retire. We have a growing understanding of why an average editor may do so (see http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Former_Contributors_Survey_Results), but we have a very limited understanding of why the top editors would limit their contributions. Yet it is the top editors like yourself who contribute most of Wikiepdia's content, thus understanding this is of vital concern to Wikipedia's project future.
I am contacting you because you are among the top Wikipediana by number of edits, yet your editing activity shows a decline. I would very much appreciate if you would take a minute and answer the following four short questions. Please note this is not a mass email; I am contacting only few dozen of editors like yourself, and each response is extremely valuable. Your response will not be made public, and your privacy will be fully respected.
If you would like to help out in this project and take part in a very short survey, please send me a wikiemail, so that I can send you an email with the survey questions. Alternatively I can post them here (please reply on my talk page or ping me so I know you have replied as I may not be able to monitor your userpage for replies). Cheers, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:35, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:IJMScover.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:IJMScover.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Blurred Lines 20:29, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Fluorine peer review
Remember good stuff from you. If you're about in any way, request peer review and fix "Fluorine". If it's too long, just hit a section.-TCO — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.127.137.171 (talk) 07:56, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter
Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...
New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian
Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.
New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??
New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges
News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY
Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions
New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration
Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:25, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library Survey
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 15:37, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians
You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. XOttawahitech (talk) 01:46, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
Category:American Psychological Association academic journals
Category:American Psychological Association academic journals, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fgnievinski (talk) 01:00, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Category:Anesthesiology and palliative medicine journals
Category:Anesthesiology and palliative medicine journals, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Everymorning talk 02:27, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Category:Informa academic journals
Category:Informa academic journals, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 13:53, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Merger discussion for History (journal)
An article that you have been involved in editing—History (journal) —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 14:59, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Category:Academic literature
Category:Academic literature, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. fgnievinski (talk) 23:20, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:BMJcover2009.gif
Thanks for uploading File:BMJcover2009.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Science cover.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Science cover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:MaM2010cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:MaM2010cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Notability (academic journals)
Wikipedia:Notability (academic journals), a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Notability (academic journals) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Notability (academic journals) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. jps (talk) 20:17, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:TRJcover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:TRJcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:54, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Wulfeniacover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Wulfeniacover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:42, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Journal of Molecular Ecology listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Journal of Molecular Ecology. Since you had some involvement with the Journal of Molecular Ecology redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:00, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:JNCIMcover.gif
Thanks for uploading File:JNCIMcover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:JoH2009cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:JoH2009cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Military Medicine cover.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Military Medicine cover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Biometrikacover.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Biometrikacover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Precious and missed
| | |
| Six years! |
|---|
The file File:PLoSgenetlogo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused logo with no article used.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 08:26, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
American Studies Journal listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect American Studies Journal. Since you had some involvement with the American Studies Journal redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 04:21, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Category:Maney Publishing academic journals has been nominated for discussion
Category:Maney Publishing academic journals, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:05, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:SciELOlogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:SciELOlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
| | |
| Seven years! |
|---|
"OnLine Journal of Biological Sciences" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect OnLine Journal of Biological Sciences. Since you had some involvement with the OnLine Journal of Biological Sciences redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 12:18, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Darucover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Darucover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:AJSEcover.png
Thanks for uploading File:AJSEcover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:23, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:EJNcover.gif
Thanks for uploading File:EJNcover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:PRcover2011.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PRcover2011.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Health Affairs (cover).gif
Thanks for uploading File:Health Affairs (cover).gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:30, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:JPETcover.gif
Thanks for uploading File:JPETcover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
"African Philosophy (1533–1067)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect African Philosophy (1533–1067) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 14#African Philosophy (1533–1067) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 05:31, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
"Functional Ecology – journal" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Functional Ecology – journal and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 15#Functional Ecology – journal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 02:23, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
"Higher Education – Journal" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Higher Education – Journal and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 15#Higher Education – Journal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 02:29, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:IJScover.gif
Thanks for uploading File:IJScover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
The article Fyssen Foundation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not meet the bar for WP:NCHARITY. Expect unopposed good-faith delete votes at AFD.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. बिनोद थारू (talk) 23:45, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Fyssen Foundation for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fyssen Foundation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.