Loch Muick
Loch Muick

Archives

1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14  · 15  · 16  · 17  · 18  · 19  · 20

christiebot-gan.err

edit
Extended content

<pre> cryptic@tools-bastion-13:0/mnt/nfs/labstore-secondary-tools-project/ganfilter$ tail -n50 christiebot-gan.err CRITICAL: Exiting due to uncaught exception OtherPageSaveError: Edit to page [[User talk:ChristieBot/Bug messages]] failed: Editing restricted by {{bots}}, {{nobots}} or site's equivalent of {{in use}} template Sleeping for 9.1 seconds, 2024-10-03 02:40:05 Page [[User talk:ChristieBot/GAN errors]] saved Page [[Talk:Luochahai City]] saved Traceback (most recent call last): File "/data/project/ganfilter/www/python/src/GANbot.py", line 307, in <module> nom.add_a_review(gan_conn) File "/data/project/ganfilter/www/python/src/GA.py", line 882, in add_a_review GAN.notify_error("GANbot: add_a_review","counting reviews", "found prior review for " + str(self.title) + '/' + str(self.page_num) + " by " + str(row['reviewer']), False) File "/data/project/ganfilter/www/python/src/GA.py", line 2284, in notify_error page.save("Reporting an error in " + location) File "/data/project/ganfilter/www/python/venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pywikibot/page/_basepage.py", line 1273, in save raise OtherPageSaveError( pywikibot.exceptions.OtherPageSaveError: Edit to page [[User talk:ChristieBot/Bug messages]] failed: Editing restricted by {{bots}}, {{nobots}} or site's equivalent of {{in use}} template CRITICAL: Exiting due to uncaught exception OtherPageSaveError: Edit to page [[User talk:ChristieBot/Bug messages]] failed: Editing restricted by {{bots}}, {{nobots}} or site's equivalent of {{in use}} template Sleeping for 9.1 seconds, 2024-10-03 03:00:09 Page [[User talk:ChristieBot/GAN errors]] saved Page [[Talk:Holzwarth gas turbine]] saved Traceback (most recent call last): File "/data/project/ganfilter/www/python/src/GANbot.py", line 307, in <module> nom.add_a_review(gan_conn) File "/data/project/ganfilter/www/python/src/GA.py", line 882, in add_a_review GAN.notify_error("GANbot: add_a_review","counting reviews", "found prior review for " + str(self.title) + '/' + str(self.page_num) + " by " + str(row['reviewer']), False) File "/data/project/ganfilter/www/python/src/GA.py", line 2284, in notify_error page.save("Reporting an error in " + location) File "/data/project/ganfilter/www/python/venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pywikibot/page/_basepage.py", line 1273, in save raise OtherPageSaveError( pywikibot.exceptions.OtherPageSaveError: Edit to page [[User talk:ChristieBot/Bug messages]] failed: Editing restricted by {{bots}}, {{nobots}} or site's equivalent of {{in use}} template CRITICAL: Exiting due to uncaught exception OtherPageSaveError: Edit to page [[User talk:ChristieBot/Bug messages]] failed: Editing restricted by {{bots}}, {{nobots}} or site's equivalent of {{in use}} template Sleeping for 9.0 seconds, 2024-10-03 03:20:17 Page [[User talk:ChristieBot/GAN errors]] saved Page [[Talk:Holzwarth gas turbine]] saved Traceback (most recent call last): File "/data/project/ganfilter/www/python/src/GANbot.py", line 307, in <module> nom.add_a_review(gan_conn) File "/data/project/ganfilter/www/python/src/GA.py", line 882, in add_a_review GAN.notify_error("GANbot: add_a_review","counting reviews", "found prior review for " + str(self.title) + '/' + str(self.page_num) + " by " + str(row['reviewer']), False) File "/data/project/ganfilter/www/python/src/GA.py", line 2284, in notify_error page.save("Reporting an error in " + location) File "/data/project/ganfilter/www/python/venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pywikibot/page/_basepage.py", line 1273, in save raise OtherPageSaveError( pywikibot.exceptions.OtherPageSaveError: Edit to page [[User talk:ChristieBot/Bug messages]] failed: Editing restricted by {{bots}}, {{nobots}} or site's equivalent of {{in use}} template CRITICAL: Exiting due to uncaught exception OtherPageSaveError: Edit to page [[User talk:ChristieBot/Bug messages]] failed: Editing restricted by {{bots}}, {{nobots}} or site's equivalent of {{in use}} template </pre>

Looks like the bot hasn't edited the GAN page since 00:52, 2 October 2024 (t · c) buidhe 04:14, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks -- this is now fixed; see WT:GAN. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 07:28, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

October music

edit
 
story · music · places

You may remember Maryvonne Le Dizès, my story today as on 28 August. Some September music was unusual: last compositions and eternal light, with Ligeti mentioned in story and music. - I don't know why BWV 130 was approved as GA, but has no icon in the article and no credit, - perhaps related to the above? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:01, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you today for Tomorrow Speculative Fiction, "about a science fiction magazine edited by Algis Budrys in the 1990s. It began as a print magazine and was one of the first to attempt the migration to an online format, but Budrys could not get enough subscribers to make the magazine profitable. It was never a major force in the genre, but it published material by some well known writers, including Ursula Le Guin and Harlan Ellison."! - I remember an organist who was pictured on the Main page on his birthday ten years ago, and I found two recent organ concerts to match, - see top of my talk ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:55, 11 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I made Leif Segerstam my big story today. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:43, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

According to the GA review and the talk page, Was Gott tut, das ist wohlgetan, BWV 99 became GA today, but not for the list and the article and the credit. Bot or something else missing? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:31, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

It can take a day or two for the new GAs to show up in the stats. If it's not there in a couple of days, let me know and I'll take a look. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 22:05, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Good to know, thank you. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Someone added the icon manually, and I just added it to the list. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:14, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
I misunderstood what you were asking about -- the bot never adds the article to the list; that always has to be done by the reviewer. It should add the icon, but I think what probably happened is that the bot stopped partway through a run. If the system gets busy, it can refuse to let the bot continue. The bot is written to try to pick up where it left off when this happens, but it doesn't handle every possible case. If you see that happen again, once the bot runs and doesn't add the icon, then you can be sure it isn't going to try again and you can just add it yourself. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 10:22, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
thank you, always learning! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:38, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Happy whatever you celebrate today, - more who died, more to come, and they made the world richer. Greetings from Madrid where I took the pic of assorted Cucurbita in 2016. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:09, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Promotion of Freston (causewayed enclosure)

edit
Congratulations, Mike Christie! The FAC you nominated, Freston (causewayed enclosure), has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best FACs on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. Keep up the great work! Bot could not update the page due to a {{nobots}} template that I placed. D'oh! I have corrected this. Cheers, Hawkeye7 (discuss) 03:00, 19 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to participate in a research

edit

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC) Reply

Checklist reviews

edit

Hi Mike, just saw your comment at one of the RFA votes on old checklist reviews, where you noted checklist reviews were not discouraged six years ago. I can't say I remember off the top of my head the culture six years ago, and we have tightened up on reviewing reviews over the past few years, but checklists reviews have been discouraged since at least 30 March 2007[1]. CMD (talk) 09:52, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks -- I should have been more careful, and of course it's too late to change my comment since the discussion phase has closed. I have the impression that the last few years have seen more discussion about tightening up standards than before -- DCGAR for instance alarmed many of us. But next time I make a comment like that I'll try to be more precise. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oh no need to change, just noting as I came across it for the future. I'm still a bit sad about DCGAR. CMD (talk) 15:03, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yes. I actually lost sleep over it at the time, thinking about how overwhelmingly hostile it must have felt to Doug, who had put so many hours into those articles. The saddest part to me was that he really seemed genuinely unable to see what the problem was. I don't think he could ever have been one of our best content contributors, but there was a place for someone willing to work that hard and read old sources, if he'd understood how to make the work he liked doing fit with the project's goals. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:14, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
I was not a fan of the process, but I wasn't able to come up with an effective alternative path, and I suppose no-one else could either. Relatedly, feel a bit down about the current GAN drive. I reviewed two, and ended up failing both. Not the ratio I hope for. CMD (talk) 15:56, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Planet Stories cover

edit

Hi Mike. I added the Planet Stories cover to the Planet Stories article because I'm trying to get it promoted as a featured image over at WP:FPC (you can see its nomination here) and a couple of people have said they'll support it only if it's in the Planet Stories article. I think your point about sandwiching is fair, but is there someplace else in the article it could go? It's by far the highest-resolution copy of a Planet Stories issue we have. My first instinct was actually to replace the article header image, but since it's a Featured Article I thought that might cause umbrage. Moonreach (talk) 18:59, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I think that's an unnecessary requirement -- it's easily possible to imagine a set of top quality images all suitable for an article to small to include them. And it presumes that the image has no value to a reader unless it's in an article, which is not true. Anyway, why don't you replace the Ingels image with the new one? That one is already in Ingels' article and is more of interest to comic aficionados than pulp readers. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 19:11, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'm with you on the idea of merit existing outside of context, but I'm trying to please people who are on the fence. I'll replace the Ingels image, thank you. Moonreach (talk) 19:34, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy