Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 in Super Fight League
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Bad faith, pointy nomination; speedy closed. The Bushranger One ping only 22:11, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- 2012 in Super Fight League (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This organization has absolutely zero notability or impact. It is a brand new minor league upstart organization confined to India that does not employ even a single top 25 ranked fighter. Perhaps if this organization even survives and expands into something notable it would warrant an article, but as of now it is of no significance whatsoever. Pull lead (talk) 19:39, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: Article is sourced, demonstrates reasonable (if not grand) notability. Super Fight League exists and is decently source. This article represents a condensing of previous individual event articles into a "YEAR in Promotion" style article that is also being done (EX: 2012 in UFC events) on other MMA articles. Several experienced editors have gone over this article and improved it from it's original train wreck into something that is at least passably acceptable for Wikipedia. Hasteur (talk) 19:51, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]- Speedy Keep: Nominator seems to be a editor who is more interested in removing the omnibus articles in favor of restoring individual articles and therefore is making a disruptive nomination to make a point. Hasteur (talk) 20:00, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep The omnibus system is the result of several discussion, AFD closings, etc. This includes the AFDs at UFC 149 [1] and [2] plus the comments at the close of UFC 142. This isn't the first AFD on the omnibus system that has already been agreed to, and doesn't prevent any other article from existing. Dennis Brown 2¢ © 21:05, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.