Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bielefeld (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Bielefeld no longer exists, demolition will commence on 31 April 2023. (non-admin closure) AlphaBeta135talk
This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Bielefeld (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Per WP:HOAX and Bielefeld conspiracy.[April Fools!] – CityUrbanism 🗩 🖉 10:26, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- Bielefeld does actually exist, and to say it doesn’t is just plain ignorant. Mecklenburg-Vorpommern on the other hand… --delta (talk) 13:50, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Mrspagehttiwe2019 Please see this definitive, unbiased and verifiable source that Bielefeld doesn't exist [1]. – CityUrbanism 🗩 🖉 14:57, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.