- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Shadazzle. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:54, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Brett Barnett (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
"Claim to fame" is having directed a webseries, Shadazzle (see separate AFD), apparently a nicely-produced amateur production. No indication that this has generated any coverage in reliable sources, however. The only two sources listed in the article are from two very local publications of unclear status. A Google search mainly shows links related to a cleaning product of the same name. Fails WP:BIO, hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 14:06, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:38, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:38, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Shadazzle, which seems to be his only claim to notability. If Shedazzle is deleted, then this should probably be deleted, as well. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:41, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- REdirect/delete, according to outcome on Shadazzle, which I have voted to delete. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:31, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.