Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cardiak (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. slakrtalk / 04:08, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cardiak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Restored for a new discussion, per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2016 November 17. This is an administrative action on my part; I have no opinion on the outcome. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:15, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:21, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Very good call to reopen. Yes, this was part of what I would call a mass nomination of hip hop producer/recording artists by User:DBrown SPS, one that I found at times to be very tenuous, rejecting and mis-representing independent media interviews as "primary," as I've stated elsewhere. At any rate, Cardiak appears to have worked with some of the biggest names in hip hop. More importantly, we see an interview in Vice's Noisey, a feature on him at MTV.com, prominent mentions in reviews found at HotNewHipHop, an interview feature at Stupidope, which begins, "You may be familiar with Super-producer Cardiak, the man is responsible for a number of hits from today’s biggest and best MC’s." And there's more at Gnews. I know next-to-nothing about rap but he appears to be notable. Keep Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:35, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • WP:MUSICBIO excludes publications where the musician or ensemble talks about themselves. — JJMC89(T·C) 23:40, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:01, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:02, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:28, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy