Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Critical data studies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:50, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Critical data studies

Critical data studies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable field of research. power~enwiki (π, ν) 06:27, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

• Keep. Discussed in Ben Williamson (24 July 2017). Big Data in Education: The digital future of learning, policy and practice. SAGE Publications. pp. 38–. ISBN 978-1-5264-1632-2., Stefan Selke (14 June 2016). Lifelogging: Digital self-tracking and Lifelogging - between disruptive technology and cultural transformation. Springer. pp. 63–. ISBN 978-3-658-13137-1. and several other works. New, but seems notable to me. Nominator seems to have totally ignored WP:BEFORE. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:54, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:57, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

• Keep per the !vote above. Needs some rewriting for comprehensibility to outsiders, but that's just standard for academic prose. XOR'easter (talk) 19:24, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lourdes 08:32, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

• Keep as has coverage in reliable sources as shown by Piotrus, passes WP:GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 17:32, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.