Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firaydoun Javaheri
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:40, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
- Firaydoun Javaheri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:BIO. NikolaiHo☎️ 04:20, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Babymissfortune 08:41, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Babymissfortune 08:43, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - many similar articles have already been deleted of members of the UHJ. Membership does not establish notability. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 16:19, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - agreed. Smkolins (talk) 17:33, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep The top leaders of a major world faith, as the members of the UJH are, clearly are notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:20, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
- The members makes collective decisions by majority vote on a council, and they don't serve as clergy. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 06:09, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Notability is defined as the number of third-party reliable sources. Just being a leader without any particular third party sources doesn't make one notable, and that's the case here. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 04:32, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.