Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goli Rezai Rashti
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 15:54, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
- Goli Rezai Rashti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:PROF. References for the article are entirely from press releases and her CV at the university. Her name gets 106 Google hits. Bueller 007 (talk) 18:29, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete totally and completely fails the notability guidelines for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:36, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:12, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:12, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:12, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:12, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:12, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. To add, no RS is a dealbreaker. Agricola44 (talk) 13:13, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.