Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gurral the Smasher

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colossal Kaiju Combat (franchise) makes this inevitable SpinningSpark 11:12, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Gurral the Smasher

Gurral the Smasher (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable character. Not notable, though I'm not against a redirect to the article on the franchise it's from. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:38, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

If it comes to making it a blank page with a link to the franchise, then delete it completely, as those pages are actually quite disgusting to the average internet user. On the other hand, I don't see where in the criteria for speedy deletion it mentions notability. On the topic of notability, Gurral is drawn by fan-artists on Deviantart who were not commissioned or requested. He is listed in wikis that aren't run by Sunstone Games, as reference in his article. Where is the line for relevancy?
User:OgreTusk 01:31, 30 June 2014 (CST)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 13:30, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:31, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

• Delete - I didn't find any coverage in reliable sources. The sourcing, in the article, is not reliable. -- Whpq (talk) 10:39, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 07:58, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

---

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:37, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.