Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hot Flash and Diet
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Hot flash. ‑Scottywong| soliloquize _ 02:25, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- Hot Flash and Diet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article appears to be a literature survey with the purpose of drawing a conclusion, which falls under the definition of synthesis, a form of original research that is disallowed at Wikipedia. The article's author goes so far as to conclude that the literature is "inconclusive and inconsistent", but then goes on to make recommendations about diet changes anyway based on an unreliable source. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:34, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
- I agree with the nomination that WP:SYN appears to be a problem with this article, but I'm not sure that deletion is the best option. Some of the content, if separated from its bias, could fit well in hot flash, particularly in the underdeveloped sections like Hot_flash#Lifestyle_changes. Someone knowledgeable could trim, merge, and redirect... Deli nk (talk) 09:50, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 15:00, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
- Merge into Hot Flash, cut right back and condense into a section on diet? Lifestyle changes there looks rather thin, and this could pad it out.AdventurousMe (talk) 15:40, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.