Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IGap

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. J04n(talk page) 16:13, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

IGap

IGap (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable app + advertising or promotion Freshman404^Talk 12:00, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 December 9. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:25, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 13:13, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

• Keep Article covered by several sources. Tebyan, Tasnim and the Sputnik.Each of them has worked on it.Diyarenoon (talk) 21:34, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
  • The last of those, at least, is not a reliable source. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:24, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:30, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

• Keep the coverage by Tasnim News and Financial Tribune [1] are more than trivial mentions and can pass WP:GNG. And more sources might exist in Farsi. Promotiinal tone will be trimmed.–Ammarpad (talk) 14:05, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.