- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 23:18, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- InforMax Inc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
While I can find a number of mentions of this company and their software, I can't find anything that shows they are notable. Sam Walton (talk) 16:49, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 17:23, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 17:23, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 17:26, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:42, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 21:21, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect to Invitrogen#Mergers_and_acquisitions, maybe. Informax is briefly mentioned there. Of course Invitrogen itself got bought, but it's still the likely search target. Opabinia regalis (talk) 22:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - "InforMax Inc" at News, Books, highbeam and thefreelibrary nothing even close to good coverage. SwisterTwister talk 06:50, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.