- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 07:47, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
- Jamie Treacher (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article about non notable person was deprodded by IP with promise they will provide sources to demonstrate notability. I waited for a while to give the IP user a chance but nothing is forthcoming, confirming my earlier WP:BEFORE check, that the subject is not notable. Article claims of significance is only by namechecking his father's name who have another bare minimum biography but notability is WP:NOTINHERITED–Ammarpad (talk) 01:14, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 01:39, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 01:39, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 01:39, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 01:39, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete I am less than convinced the role is significant, but since guidelines require multiple significant roles, I think we have nothing here. I have been going through articles on actors, and realized that we have far too many only based on directory listings with nothing substantive in them.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:45, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete I found two reviews for a couple of stage productions in which the subject played supporting roles. Appears to have done little else. Per nom, the subject is not notable. Fails WP:GNG. AuthorAuthor (talk) 03:48, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.