Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jared Remy (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Procedural close. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:54, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Jared Remy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This page on Jared Remy should be deleted because Wikipedia's page on biographies of a living person specifically notes that, "[a] person accused of a crime is presumed innocent until proven guilty and convicted by a court of law. For people who are relatively unknown, editors must give serious consideration to not including material in any article suggesting that the person has committed, or is accused of committing, a crime unless a conviction is secured." In this case, the subject is notable only as an individual accused of a crime with no other notable characteristics. As such, this is an inflammatory article that should be deleted.SantoTrafficante18 (talk) 03:00, 18 September 2013 (UTC) — SantoTrafficante18 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 September 18. —cyberbot I NotifyOnline 03:21, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Undone; it's currently at the wrong name. Can be redone once it's moved. Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:25, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 September 18. —cyberbot I NotifyOnline 04:07, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – First nomination was closed as “no consensus” less than 24 hours ago. The norm is to wait at least two months before re-nominating a page. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 15:09, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, meets GNG, multiple events. And what Hirolovesswords said. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:45, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:53, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:53, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:53, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Procedural close AfD begun too soon after previous. The nom appears inexperienced in AfD procedure. --- Green Cardamom (talk) 15:21, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.