Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Jimerson
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:55, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
- Jessica Jimerson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional and refbombed BLP lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) Loaded with primary source and non-independent refs but nothing reliable and in-depth about the individual. I don't think a redirect to any one work would be worthwhile but open to suggestions. czar 04:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. czar 04:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. czar 04:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete of all the 43 references in this revision, not one is to an independent, reliable source. Mduvekot (talk) 20:13, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as failing WP:CREATIVE and WP:GNG. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:45, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as the article has no obvious signs of the applicable notability, nothing actually convincing to keep. SwisterTwister talk 06:34, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.