- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 08:36, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Judy Clendening (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject is a trial court judge for an individual judicial district at the provincial level. Not a province-wide official, and not remarkable in any encyclopedic sense. BD2412 T 04:26, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and Canada. BD2412 T 04:26, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:10, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Subject just doesn't meet the GNG. User:Let'srun 15:08, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.