- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:47, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Kai Man Wong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not Notable per WP:GNG Brainclub (talk) 11:56, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, not a producer of major movies. NintendoFan (Talk, Contribs) 12:27, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note Possible Speedy Deletion per WP:CSD#G4 with 'Kai W' found in deletion log. Brainclub (talk) 12:31, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Content already exists at DigitalRev_TV#Kai_W_.282009-present.29 which is better anyway. Not enough sourcing to justify a standalone article per GNG. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 00:47, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- I find it hard to believe that the producer of a web-only channel is notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:26, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.