Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lists of resignations
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 14:49, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
- Lists of resignations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unnecessary list IMO - orphaned so nothing is reaching this list Gbawden (talk) 14:14, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment. See List of lists of lists, which I just linked this page to. We have plenty of lists like this. Jenks24 (talk) 14:26, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment. Seems kind of pointless to me, but Wikipedians do love their lists. Like Jens24 says, these sorts of things do exist on Wikipedia. I guess maybe WP:OSE could apply on either side of the argument. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:13, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:43, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Seems like a reasonable list to me, to which I will add a couple more entries. I'm also going to replace the three lists from the See also section of Resignation with this one. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:52, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep as a disambiguation page. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:31, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.