Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Michael Castielle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:04, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Patrick Michael Castielle

Patrick Michael Castielle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete Not notable Phatwa (talk) 14:19, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Delete. Fails WP:BIO and promotional 176.26.163.111 (talk) 17:28, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

• Delete not notable. seems mostly like a promo article.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:20, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

• Unsure/comment/possible redirect and merge to Olinda Castielle - I'm really not sure. He's clearly done quite a bit of assorted stuff, but perhaps not enough for notability in any particular field. His wife also has an article. While I suspect her notability is also borderline, and her article also has similar problems, she does seem a touch more notable than her husband (particularly if it's true that her song was the "world's most popular mobile ringtone" in 2005... that's quite a claim) so a condensed bio on Patrick could be moved over there along with the redirect. Mabalu (talk) 09:30, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Comment Something made me glance at the nominator's edit history and it is slightly worrying. While the subject's notability is certainly dubious, I think a closer look at this nom in relation to the edit history (including deleted pages) of Phatwa might be necessary. The actual nomination is not much of a reason, and the ISP backing up the nom mere hours afterwards, while not implausible, does look a tiny bit fishy considering this. Mabalu (talk) 12:27, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.