- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 15:53, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
- Peter Eglin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Stub article lacking references (and edit history suggests it was merely copied verbatim from his university website when it still existed). No indication that he meets WP:PROF. Bueller 007 (talk) 17:02, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 18:43, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. No RS, ORPHAN, etc, etc. Obvious delete. Agricola44 (talk) 16:59, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete not in any way even close to meeting notability guidelines for academics. That this article has survived 8 years indicates we need to work to have more people participate in monitoring aritcles on Wikipedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:18, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.