Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PicaBot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:41, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

PicaBot

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

PicaBot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not for advertisment of products. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Amon Stutzman (talk) 23:49, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:48, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:48, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
• Delete: This is more of an advert than an encyclopedic article, poorly written and sourced and does not proves how notability is met. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 13:10, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.