Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Powdair (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jujutacular (talk) 00:04, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Powdair

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Powdair
• Articles for deletion/Powdair (2nd nomination)

Powdair (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• Comment This article about yet-to-be established virtual airline was deleted via AfD in August. Now I am completing this second nom on behalf of IP user who cannot complete the process. The deletion rationale is: "The virtual airline deferred its ops until further notice according to its website due to a lack of funding, the relevance of this article is heavily questionable again."diff –Ammarpad (talk) 10:40, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 December 3. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:57, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 11:16, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 11:16, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, and for the same reason the original article was deleted. There are a handful of news reports which appear to be based on the company's original round of press releases, and a few more recent ones about the financial backer pulling out, but nothing that meets WP:CORPDEPTH. As the organisation's website acknowledges, "We expect to relaunch during 2018 as an airline", so the rationale for deleting or keeping the article is exactly the same as for the original AfD. Without prejudice, it boils down to WP:TOOSOON. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 11:41, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
• Delete as per above. It's WP:CRYSTAL to assume this will ever operate, and it's not notable as speculation/hype. power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:11, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

• Delete: as WP:TOOSOON. ww2censor (talk) 11:11, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
• Comment "The airline is yet to be established because the single benefactor changed his mind midway into arrangement, they are expecting to get funding from new source and relaunch in 2018." I found this reason very odd and seem this is just business venture struggling to even exists. And they have Wikipedia article before their full existence –Ammarpad (talk) 16:28, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:44, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. And WP:TOOSOON. And the arguments put forward by Dom Kaos. Guliolopez (talk) 15:49, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Spleodrach (talk) 18:19, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.