- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 06:47, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Priyanka Jain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is, simply put, not a notable person, a few hits and some achievements notwithstanding. Drmies (talk) 03:40, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I have added new information to the entry to make it more notable. Let me know your thoughts. jheditorials00:45, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks to me like she meets the WP:GNG based on multiple independent sources. Given her age and achievements, this article seems like one that will only grow over time. LinkBender (talk) 16:40, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- — LinkBender (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 20:54, 4 April 2012 (UTC).[reply]
- Looks to me like she meets the WP:GNG based on multiple independent sources. Given her age and achievements, this article seems like one that will only grow over time. LinkBender (talk) 16:40, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I have added new information to the entry to make it more notable. Let me know your thoughts. jheditorials00:45, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: There's only one source that might be considered both independent and reliable, the Leaders Online article about her father, where there's a short paragraph on her. I say "might be considered" because the author is from a pr company. Looks like the source is a drummed-up pr piece. --Ronz (talk) 02:21, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per nom and lack of independent sources. --Ronz (talk) 16:05, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 17:35, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, notability not established by reliable independent sources. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:08, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.