Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punggol Waterway Sundew
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Relisted twice, with no one advocating keeping the article. Deor (talk) 14:11, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- Punggol Waterway Sundew (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP: Too soon - they haven't started building the place yet - how can it be notable enough before its built? Gbawden (talk) 11:35, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Too early. It should be held off until it's finished. EMachine03 (talk) 11:38, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 06:09, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 03:36, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete At best WP:TOOSOON. Delete. --Jersey92 (talk) 00:14, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.