- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. CSD A7 and G11 DGG ( talk ) 04:58, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- RideFlag (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a non-notable service and company, written by a COI SPA. As far as I can tell, they've received no independent coverage whatsoever. Of the 26 cited references, only one even mentions the company - and that's the company's "About Us" page. The rest is a mess of original synthesis about carpooling in general. Kolbasz (talk) 19:04, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - non-notable, blatant promo piece to raise publicity. 80 percent of the article aren't even about the company, but an essay about the concept and advantages of carpooling in general. No reliable sources found via Google. GermanJoe (talk) 11:52, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete; couldn't find a single source about this. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 18:00, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.