Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rubber Road

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ceradon (talk • edits) 03:06, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Rubber Road

Rubber Road (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any sources discussing this organisation. Sam Walton (talk) 14:26, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

• Comment, see subsidiary corporation TradeInDetectives, which most of the WP:RS refs at Rubber Road actually discuss, and the associated WP:Articles_for_deletion/Trade_In_Detectives_(2nd_nomination). 75.108.94.227 (talk) 18:24, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:45, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:46, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

• Delete. No good + solid sources available. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 19:40, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
• Merge. Two articles aren't appropriate for the same small company, but the refs look OK so one should be kept. Szzuk (talk) 21:07, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello User:Szzuk, I also thought a merge might make sense, specifically into comparison shopping#Niche players, but consensus was to delete TradeInDetectives a second time. As an aside, the refs are 'okay' but they are pretty bursty aka narrow in timeframe (Aug'13-Dec'13) and to a lesser extent in diversity (100% English-only and 90% videogame press albeit there are a couple in more-mainstream-publishers). Can you please say where specifically you would want to merge? 75.108.94.227 (talk) 20:57, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 10:57, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ☮JAaron95 ^Talk 13:39, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

• Delete as the article does not show how the company is notable. Anarchyte 12:27, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.