Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S4 League (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Neowiz Games. Clear consensus that the subject is not notable. There was an even split concerning the redirect, but no argument was offered against one, and redirects are cheap. Did not delete the underlying article history as that is not required to effect this close, and may be of some use later should the subject attain notability. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 13:43, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- S4 League (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:N and WP:V. I am unable to find any reliable, third-party published sources. The WP:VG/RS custom Google searches return zero results. Other Google searches return the usual unreliable sites, spam sites, forums, and press releases. The single third-party source in the article is a press release, not a reliable source suggesting notability. Woodroar (talk) 03:55, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) Woodroar (talk) 03:56, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: press releases after press releases with no actual coverage. Esquivalience t 04:03, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
Weak delete. Has some coverage[1][2] but no reviews and not enough to write a full article. – czar 04:42, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect to Neowiz Games as a useful redirect term. Didn't see that it existed. – czar 16:55, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Had tagged this with notability guidelines before waiting for a more experienced video game editor. Feel confident this isn't notable enough now. Sulfurboy (talk) 09:08, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:21, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:21, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Redirect to Pentavision or Neowiz Games. Pentavision is the developer, although that article is a one line stub which should probably be merged with its parent company Neowiz Games. --The1337gamer (talk) 14:04, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect to Neowiz Games. I don't have much experience with video games editing, but it seems like a game without a review listed at Metacritic or GameRankings is probably not notable. - A Texas Historian (Impromptu collaboration?) 05:17, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.