- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 • (talk) 15:07, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- Sasha Chanoff (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject does not appear to meet WP:BIO notability criteria. Coverage in secondary sources is minimal. Perhaps this should be merged into RefugePoint, the organization he co-founded. PinkBull 18:47, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- I have added multiple citations from secondary sources. -CB212 — Preceding unsigned comment added by CB212 (talk • contribs) 00:04, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 16:09, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Strong keep, notable humanitarian, in-depth multiple coverage easily meets WP:GNG.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 03:39, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.