Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stryker & MFT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:NOQUORUM, closing in favour of delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:55, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Stryker & MFT

Stryker & MFT (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Steel1943 (talk) 23:10, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:44, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

• Note: In case this matters, this article was created by an editor whose name matches the title of this article, and even admitted somewhere that the subject of the article and the editor were the same person/group. This AFD is here because the PROD I placed on the article was denied by that editor prior to them receiving an indefinite block due to their self-promotion. In all honesty, at this point, this article could probably be speedy deleted per criterion A7. Steel1943 (talk) 05:17, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:58, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:58, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

• Delete at best because none of this including the listed coverage is enough for the applicable music notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:55, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.