Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 1

< Wikipedia:Categories for discussion | Log
< August 31 September 2 >

September 1

edit

Category:Bodyweight exercise

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. ✗plicit 01:17, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This is a set category for bodyweight exercises so it should be plural per WP:Categorization rules (t · c) buidhe 21:35, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Medieval Islam

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. ✗plicit 01:17, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The category is about a civilization rather than a religion. Privybst (talk) 20:37, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:WikiProject Religious texts participants

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 01:17, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WikiProject is now defunct. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:14, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Heroes of the Storm characters

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. The option of having a list in the article was also rejected at Talk:Heroes_of_the_Storm#Roster. – Fayenatic London 08:46, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Not defining. These are pretty much all characters from other games who just appear in this crossover. ★Trekker (talk) 15:53, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Dead by Daylight characters

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. – Fayenatic London 08:47, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Not defining, all these characters (except David King) are guest characters in the game. ★Trekker (talk) 15:37, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely not, and the Super Smash Bros. fighters category shouldn't exist either, it survived last CFD by pure luck.★Trekker (talk) 21:18, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you insist, then I suggest that you nominate that category for deletion as well. I'm in the camp that both should be kept, but it is unjust for both to be on the Wiki if there is no distinguishing reason why one crossover franchise can stay and one has to be removed. HadesTTW (he/him • talk) 04:29, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I was the one who nominated it a couple of months ago, it would be bad form for me to renominate it so soon again.★Trekker (talk) 11:00, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Revolvers-stub

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: wrong venue. A template is being nominated, not a category. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 02:19, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unused plaintext template. Suggest redirecting to Template:Weapon-stub Template:Revolver-stub. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:03, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Téléfilm Canada films

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 01:17, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Telefilm is not a film studio, but merely a funding agency that provides grants to the studios, primarily for films by new and emerging filmmakers -- so it frequently gets "with the participation of" credits on Canadian films, but is never the producing studio because that's not what it does.
This category, further, was created only a few months ago by a now-blocked editor with no established record of editing on Canadian film and a habit of obsessive overcategorization, but was never deemed as desirable or warranted by those who actually edit on Canadian film. As well, they randomly selected just 20 films for the category, out of the hundreds upon thousands of films that received Telefilm grants -- but there's no value in making any attempt to hunt down the stragglers, because (a) there's no comprehensive list that can be consulted (even Telefilm itself doesn't self-publish a complete directory of every film it's ever given a grant to since 1967), and (b) films are defined by the studios that made them, not by the agencies or companies that happened to give money to the studios.
Also, it's unclear why the creator used the French form of the name instead of the English one — this is the English Wikipedia, so even if there were grounds to keep this it would have to be renamed to "Telefilm Canada films" anyway. Bearcat (talk) 14:10, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Kingdom of Ireland

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. ✗plicit 01:18, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The same period, Category:Kingdom of Ireland contains only two subcategories. Privybst (talk) 13:34, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ulster loyalism

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 9#Category:Ulster loyalism

Category:17th-century British people by occupation

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 9#Category:17th-century British people by occupation

Tropical storm "disambiguation" categories

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename all. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 16:21, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: All of these categories have "disambiguation pages" in their titles, but every one of the pages contained in these categories uses a "set index article" template, namely {{Storm index}}, not a disambiguation template. The categories should be renamed to accurately reflect what they contain. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 20:12, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 12:20, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Rename to match the contents. Yes, the parent category should be renamed to. Yes, (disambiguation) page titles should be sorted out somehow. Yes, the entire concept of "set index articles" is a mess. None of these things influence the merits of this CfD. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:14, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Roads in Hong Kong

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Diffuse to new sub-categories. – Fayenatic London 13:13, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Split according to the four statutory regions of the territory. 42.200.55.111 (talk) 08:40, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional natural features of Earth

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. ✗plicit 01:18, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: rename to align with Category:Landforms. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:07, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. –Aidan721 (talk) 12:18, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fictional landforms may be not of Earth, and the proposed new title would accomodate that. Daranios (talk) 10:17, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Split to Category:Fictional landforms and Category:Fictional bodies of water to parallel the real-world structure. The category currently includes a mixture of both. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 16:25, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. Category:Fictional bodies of water is currently a subcategory and could easily be re-categorized through the ordinary editing process. Jontesta (talk) 19:26, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Gymnastics manoeuvres

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. ✗plicit 01:18, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: That is what these are called in official gymnastics lingo, see Gymnastics elements named after Simone Biles, Gymnastics elements named after Romanian gymnasts, etc. In addition this category also contains static positions such as planche, bridge (exercise), etc. (I moved them to a new subcategory) which are not maneuvers. I could also support a rename to "gymnastics skills". (t · c) buidhe 04:29, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Privybst (talk) 11:56, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Druze people by nationality subcategories

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 9#Category:Druze people by nationality subcategories

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2022_September_1&oldid=1109399003"
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy