September 28
edit
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Seems like no consensus on whether it's PD in the UK. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:31, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
- File:Human League Love and Dancing.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ericorbit (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Is this image copyrightable in the United Kingdom? The "THE" looks slighted. I recently changed the image's status to US-ineligible. George Ho (talk) 06:18, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
I don't understand. What do you mean when you wrote that "The The looks slighted"? The definition for slighted means insult, or treating someone or speaking of them without proper respect or attention. What does looking "slighted" have to do with changing the image to US-ineligible? BeckiGreen (talk) 18:39, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- I apologize, Becki. Maybe I should have said "italicized", not "slighted". I couldn't find the right word to say it. The "THE" looked something that's not easy to describe to me. Also, the Edge (magazine) logo was in Commons and subject to UK jurisdiction, but the UK court decided that the drawing of the "E" looks original enough to one judge, resulting in the deletion of the logo in Commons. Am I clear? --George Ho (talk) 20:27, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- I would say italicized is correct. I'm not sure that's enough creative input to pass the threshold of originality, though. clpo13(talk) 23:53, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
George Ho, I understand now. You don't need to apologize, but I share the same view/opinion as Clpo13. BeckiGreen (talk) 16:06, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:09, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
- File:Penwith Ives.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mammal4 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Delete - unused PNG locator map. Kelly hi! 06:21, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:09, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
- File:Penwith PZ.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mammal4 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Delete - unused PNG locator map. Kelly hi! 06:22, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:09, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
- File:Chocolate World.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wt90401 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Subject of photo is probably copyrighted. Kelly hi! 13:06, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:09, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
- File:CHOfromTarmac.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sailsbystars (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Delete - unused, blurry. Kelly hi! 13:07, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:09, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
- File:Choir-T-Shirt.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by TARDIS (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
It doesn't appear the uploader is the copyright holder of the photos depicted on the shirt. Kelly hi! 13:09, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: While the English Wikipedia does not require its images to be in the public domain in the source country (and thus, whether Mozambique has a FoP for architecture is not relevant to us), it does require the photography itself to be freely licensed. This one isn't, and as an existing building it could be recreated as a freely licensed image. Thus it violates WP:NFCC#1. Given the FoP situation, such an image is likely going to be PD-USonly. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:29, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
- File:Zimpeto-stadium.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by TheBigJagielka (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Stadium has been built; no need for this anymore. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:02, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: I want to say delete per WP:NFCC#1 and that file could have also been tagged with Template:Replaceable fair use), but this stadium is in Mozambique and according to c:COM:FOP#Mozambique there is no FOP in the country (or only a limited version not acceptable for Commons) and that "FOP cases in Mozambique should be treated with increased care". It's not 100% clear then (at least to me) whether a freely licensed equivalent to serve the same purpose can be created. It's possible that something in c:COM:FOP#Choice of law may apply to this particular case, but I think determining that might require more discussion to determine. Regardless, the file is currently being used in 2017 Lusophony Games, Athletics at the 2011 All-Africa Games, Estádio do Zimpeto, Football at the 2011 All-Africa Games, but only has a non-free use rationale for the satdium article. If this file is kept as "non-free", then its use in the event articles is highly unlikely to satisfy WP:NFCCP even if corresponding rationales weree added, so it should only be used in the stadium article. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:55, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- Hmm. This image infringes two copyrights -- the copyright for the image itself which appears to be a computer generated drawing and the copyright for the stadium as a work of architecture. It is possible, even likely, that the drawing was created by the architect, so there is possibly only one copyright holder.
- I'm not completely familiar with WP:EN fair use (Marchjuly asked me to comment here because I have very considerable experience with copyright and FOP), but if there is any desire to reduce the number of copyrights infringed, I would think you might want a freely licensed aerial photograph of the stadium rather than this drawing of it. From a purely encyclopedic point of view that might be better as well -- to show how it actually is, particularly its surroundings -- rather than an idealized drawing of how it might be. However even if you replace the drawing with a photograph, the photograph will still infringe on the architect's copyright and require either a license from the architect or a fair use rationale.
- That brings me to a second unfamiliarity with WP:EN implementation of policy. NFCCP says
- "1) No free equivalent. Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose. [emphasis added]
- This is not a dead person or razed structure. As long as the stadium exists, a free work could be created, but only with the cooperation of the architect. I don't know which side of NFCCP#1 that falls on. . . Jim - Jameslwoodward (talk to me • contribs) 11:44, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:09, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
- File:Upload practice.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Klkraft (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File should either be renamed to something that describes the image (sleeping baby), or be deleted. If this was a test upload, perhaps the editor should consider the test wiki, or another wiki venue. enwiki shouldn't be the place for this — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 20:04, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:09, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
- File:This is an image I created to act as a placeholder for my test infoboxes.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Patrick.hoye (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unused. User who uploaded this has been inactive for a year. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 23:03, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.