Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Arthur Phillip/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Kept. Cremastra (u — c) 23:37, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
There are uncited statements throughout the article, including entire paragraphs. The "Legacy" section has a "more citations needed" banner dated July 2023. Z1720 (talk) 22:10, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Working I've fixed the legacy section and started fixing uncited statements. Cremastra 🎄 u — c 🎄 16:07, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Z1720 How is the article now. Do you have further concerns, and did I miss anything? I think I've done the possible sourcings and necessary removals. Cremastra (u — c) 16:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Citations are needed for each of the entries for the "In popular culture" section. After that, I will have no other concerns. Z1720 (talk) 17:27, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Z1720 Better now? Thanks, Cremastra (u — c) 21:24, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep. No further concerns. Z1720 (talk) 22:58, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! Cremastra (u — c) 23:32, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep. No further concerns. Z1720 (talk) 22:58, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Citations are needed for each of the entries for the "In popular culture" section. After that, I will have no other concerns. Z1720 (talk) 17:27, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Z1720 How is the article now. Do you have further concerns, and did I miss anything? I think I've done the possible sourcings and necessary removals. Cremastra (u — c) 16:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.