Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 31

< Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion | Log

December 31

edit

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 31, 2024.

Inter-presidency of Donald Trump

edit

Too many levels of "huh?" going on here to know what is going on, including the double section redirect target and the lack of this term being in the target article. Steel1943 (talk) 22:12, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vietcong01

edit

Links to article that had fan-cruft shoved in to support this redirect. UtherSRG (talk) 12:41, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as this sounds like another act of wikilittering. 67.209.129.48 (talk) 21:13, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per @Presidentman's vote on a discussion with nearly the exact same precedent User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 10:07, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Someone-123-321: Can you link to said comment? At this moment this vote lacks any meaningful context. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:46, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 19#c-Presidentman-20241219170000-UtherSRG-20241219124100 User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 05:40, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The WordsmithTalk to me 22:04, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wading bird(s)

edit

Seems to me that these should point to the same target, possibly a disambiguation page. Cremastra ‹ u — c › 16:40, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Target both to Wader? Or to Wader (American)?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:26, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Same question as the prvious relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 10:41, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The WordsmithTalk to me 22:01, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GEOTUS

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Complex/Rational 00:55, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target article. Apparently, it stands for "God Emperor of the United States", and humorously refers to the target, but there's no context in the target article. With all that being said, delete or weak retarget to God Emperor Trump (for reasons that are probably clear by the article name and content, but the redirect and what it means isn't specifically mentioned there either). Steel1943 (talk) 21:30, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete purely humorous and of no apparent relation to the statue besides sharing a name. TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 23:09, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ryan Andrew Quigley

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:18, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No reliable source shows 'Andrew' as the middle name. Red Director (talk) 21:18, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wikipedia:EC

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Cremastra has a draft disbiguation page drafted below the redirect for now; that can be improved upon if anyone feels like anything else needs added to it. Hog Farm Talk 04:28, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Since so many things could be explained by EC, why not disambiguate to the following: 1. Edit count 2. Extended confirmed users 3. Extended confirmed protection 4. Edit conflict TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 20:54, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Hee hee

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:19, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be an apparent joke. Yes, it is true that "hee hee" is often repeated in the target page's subject's songs, but that does not justify keeping for a redirect for that. TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 19:05, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I merged the discussion for Hee Hee into this one, no good reason for them to be separate. @TheTechie, SNUGGUMS, Crouch, Swale, and Emir of Wikipedia: Since this merge slightly affected your comments (but probably not your stances), feel free to fix any blunder I may have made but didn't see. Steel1943 (talk) 21:44, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the ping. My comment was basically to say the same applies for them both, so no blunder has arisen from the merge. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:46, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Steel1943 Thanks! Appreciate you merging it. Doesn't look like you've made any mistakes as far as I can see. TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 21:47, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fine by me. In fact, I debated merging the threads myself before you did so. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 05:19, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Go ahead I don't remember making the uncapitalized one lol CheeseyHead (talk) 01:16, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

I Saw It: The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima: A Surivor's True Story

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:19, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

49 straight characters correctly typed out of a book's full title and you mess up by forgetting a v? And type the rest out correctly? Delete this implausible typo. mwwv converse∫edits 18:55, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 19:07, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; I also created a redirect for the correct title. Link20XX (talk) 19:59, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Surivors: The Original Series

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:19, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

One of the two "surivor" redirects. Doesn't seem to be all too plausible of a typo. mwwv converse∫edits 18:54, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 19:08, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Chasca

edit

Change to disambiguation page due to zero mentions of the term "Chasca" anywhere in the target article. Chasca (Salvadoran folklore) was already on the redirect page before my proposal. Another entry for the proposed disambiguation page would be List of Genshin Impact characters#Chasca. HKLionel (talk) 18:40, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I realized that Chasca was an alternative spelling for Ch'aska. Added to the article but disambiguation proposal still stands. HKLionel (talk) 15:22, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguate between two possible listed targets. TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 19:08, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Iansan

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Utopes (talk / cont) 20:13, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Change to disambiguation page due to the presence of Iansan, a Genshin Impact character. HKLionel (talk) 18:13, 31 December 2024 (UTC) Proposal modified: Redirect instead to List of Genshin Impact characters#Iansan; no direct mention of the term "Iansan" anywhere in target article, closest terms are "Yàńsàn", "Iansá", "Iansã" and "Ìyáńsàn", none of which justify a redirect - and even if they do, not justified over direct usage of "Iansan" in the character's name. I could also argue that the character has more modern relevance than the deity, but not my main point. HKLionel (talk) 18:26, 31 December 2024 (UTC) No objection to 59.149.117.119. Nomination can be closed. HKLionel (talk) 15:02, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

La Muerte y la brújula

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:20, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect from a film title to a List of Country films of YYYY list, for a film not appearing at all in that list to provide any context for why it redirects there. The country-by-year film lists are not the preferred target for film title redirects, further, so just adding it to the list isn't the solution here. Bearcat (talk) 16:52, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Trump the sequel

edit

The only sites that mention a sequel to Trump are non-notable extremely right-leaning websites Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 07:04, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

as cool as it is that people can have sequels, donald trump 2: orange you glad he's back? isn't mentioned yet, so delete per nom cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 11:34, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
> as cool as it is that people can have sequels, donald trump 2: orange you glad he's back? isn't mentioned yet
a quote for the books Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 12:00, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • hmm, let's have a look at the citations in order, even though i'm absolutely no expert on burgerland political systems
    1. doesn't directly refer to his second presidency as a sequel. rather, it seems to be about his wacky hijinks in the not burning the world department
    2. i guess "the trump sequel" is close enough
    3. evidently refers to it as a sequel as a joke, but it's probably good enough
    4. seems to refer to everything about the presidency and how people are handling it, except what the annoying orange will actually do. also evidently refers to those effects as a sequel as a joke, but it probably works
    5. "hollywood's trump resistance: the sequel" is not the same as "trump: the sequel"
    6. oh, it's an episode of a tv program. hate that that's how i finally pieced it together, but it's about that episode, and not necessarily the presidency
    overall, i'm starting to think a better option would be returning to red until that episode of panorama is covered, though an astronomically weak keep would work as a second option cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 23:15, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    wait, what do you MEAN that episode was released in march!? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 23:16, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 14:38, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cremastra 🎄 u — c 🎄 16:42, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merkur XR4TiMerkur XR4Ti

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:20, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural nomination since it was PRODded but PRODs are not allowed on redirects. Reason left by @Kumboloi: Title appears to be a typing error. No pages link here. mwwv converse∫edits 14:42, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomDelete per nom. jlwoodwa (talk) 23:48, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Doreen Welsh

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 8#Doreen Welsh

Johnson (soccer)

edit

Ambiguous target, as there are multiple association football/soccer players with surname Johnson, as per List of people with surname Johnson. No evidence that people would be primarily looking for a 1904 Olympian (when the Olympics was not a big deal) over any other soccer player with that surname. Retarget to List of people with surname Johnson#Sports or delete would be better. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:30, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To bundle Johnson (footballer), a former name of the former article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 16:50, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Notified of this discussion at the proposed target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 09:44, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GRFJ

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 10:02, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Does not give a single result for Ford on searching, even with the words 'person' or 'president' added DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 08:30, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Googling GRFJ gives me stuff like "Get Ready for Japan", a stock ticker symbol for a company called "Group 5", and various social media profiles. Nothing remotely related to Gerald Ford. 🦬 Beefaloe 🦬 (talk) 11:04, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

JECJ

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 10:11, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Searching for this does not give a single result for Carter, even with 'person' or 'president' added. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 08:28, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per my comment on GRFJ above, it's mostly used for stuff with no relation to Jimmy Carter whatsoever. 🦬 Beefaloe 🦬 (talk) 11:05, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Great Mosque of Elsett

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 10:18, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target; I can't find any uses of this phrase anywhere or what "Elsett" is in this context. Rusalkii (talk) 06:57, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW the creator of the page (Hujjat al-Umari (talk · contribs)) was blocked for socking. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:44, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete "Elsett" in this context is a quirky romanisation of الست 'the lady' in several Arabic dialects. It's the same word for example as in the nearby Qabr Essit, or the alternative name Sitt Zaynab mentioned in the lead of Sayyidah Zaynab itself. That said, even in Arabic مسجد الست 'mosque of the lady' is ambiguous, and in English this exact phrase "Great Mosque of (El/Al/Es/As) (Sitt/Sett/Sit/Set)" seems totally unused, with zero Google or Google Books hits for any of the various plausible romanisations. 59.149.117.119 (talk) 23:22, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, neither Elsett, nor any varieties of such are mentioned at the target. Utopes (talk / cont) 19:04, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Tradiční Lovecký salám

edit

lovecký salám (hunting salami, apparently) is mentioned in the article, but not necessarily its "traditional" variant. has incoming links, but their classification as traditional seems to be unsourced and not necessarily correct cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:43, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

should mention that lovecký salám already exists, so the links could easily be fixed, if any fixing needs to be done cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Lovecký salám was applied for as a EU Traditional Speciality Guaranteed-product (TSG). That means that -in order to use the name- all products in the EU have to be produced according to the specs provided in the application. following opposition, the name Tradiční Lovecký salám was accepted as a TSG (see here). That means that one can use the name Lovecký salám without regards to what the product looks like, but Tradiční Lovecký salám is subject to the characteristics in the description. The name is therefore worth a redirect as people may be interested and this is the closest page we can offer. Having said that, the current characterisation of Lovecký salám as a TSG i incorrect; and I will change that. An alternative is redirecting to List of traditional specialities guaranteed by country, but for me that feels too generic... L.tak (talk) 09:29, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per L.tak's changes. Thanks. Jay 💬 07:53, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
corrected the page now in line with what I stated. Thanks for bringing the oversight to my attention. L.tak (talk) 22:36, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Was going to close as Keep, but it appears @L.tak's changes have been removed. Relisting to see if it should still be kept without these changes, or if they could be re-introduced.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SmittenGalaxy | talk! 03:27, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The WordsmithTalk to me 05:07, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

0-3-5

edit

No mentions of these numbers in the target article. 2A0E:1D47:9085:D200:E9BC:B9ED:405A:596B (talk) 19:56, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete, essentially per nom. no opposition to keeping it if a reliable source can be found and inserted into the article, but as is, i'm not in the mood to rely on already knowing a joke to figure out why a redirect exists consarn (formerly cogsan) 01:44, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
also pretty lucky that it's 0-3-5. if it was 0-2-5, results would be 99% btd6 consarn (formerly cogsan) 01:45, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Consarn. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:36, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The WordsmithTalk to me 05:03, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as confusing. If I didn't know what this was and got a song with no explanation in the article I would feel even more confused, and expect this would be true for most people searching for it it. Rusalkii (talk) 07:08, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TikTok Rizz Party

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Consensus has developed that a redirect is not appropriate for this term. Hog Farm Talk 02:31, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the current target. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:33, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 10:29, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The WordsmithTalk to me 04:59, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per IP starting with 35 and nom. TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 21:55, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

YV (rapper)

edit

We only have a passing mention of him in the target, and this redirect misleads potential YV fans into thinking we have more about him than we actually do Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 06:58, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 10:13, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I can't see how anyone is misled. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 20:18, 22 December 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The WordsmithTalk to me 04:57, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

.ko hell

edit

I am assuming this refers to .ko files. I wasn't able to find usage of the phrase ".ko hell" and it isn't mentioned in the target. Rusalkii (talk) 04:22, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, after nomination I found Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_December_2#So_hell, which closed as keep for .so hell to the same target. Rusalkii (talk) 04:25, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CURRENT YEAR

edit

This redirect is one space away from the magic word {{CURRENTYEAR}}. But it redirects to {{CURRENTISOYEAR}}, which apparently uses a calendar system where the year is currently 2025. Four of the five template-space usages seemed to be erroneous: [10] [11] [12] [13]. I have no opinions on retargeting vs replacing the remaining usage and deleting, but as-is, I think this is an entirely unnecessary footgun. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:21, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: @Mdaniels5757: As of this comment, this redirect has 179 transclusions, not just the 1 in the template space. (I found a few where {{CURRENT YEAR}} is hardcoded in the article itself.) Best solution here to avoid anything breaking is to replace all transclusions with either the current target or the proposed target prior to this discussion being closed. Steel1943 (talk) 00:28, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I thought I was fast enough with my stealth edit. Guess not! :) That sounds good to me. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:31, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Mdaniels5757: You were! I had an edit conflict, but I had to add "in the template space" to my comment after rereading your comment. Either way though, the nominated redirect is hardcoded in some articles, so the transclusions will have to be reevaluated after any of the pages which transclude the templates you edited are purged. Steel1943 (talk) 00:34, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_December_31&oldid=1268151244"
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy