Jump to content

User talk:JuneGloom07

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BaranBOT (talk | contribs) at 19:08, 30 October 2024 (Fix mass message error per WP:AWBREQ). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to JuneGloom07's talk page.

Please remember to sign your signature using the button or placing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your post.

Request edit assistance for Daphne Guinness article

Hi. I see you’re a member of the Fashion WikiProject - I’ve made some proposals to update the article about Daphne Guinness, posted here Talk:Daphne Guinness#Request Edits for February 2023. Because I have a conflict of interest, I can’t do these edits myself. Could you have time to look at these and consider? Thank you very much.YhSA99b3tTnCnLdr (talk) 19:12, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious
Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:54, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you GA! - JuneGloom07 Talk 23:09, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for all your work on Serendipity Gottlieb and other Neighbours and H&A articles! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 04:56, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The 25 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal

The 25 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
Thank you for all your work! --evrik (talk) 15:33, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ooh, wow! Thank you! - JuneGloom07 Talk 01:08, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

Hi there, JuneGloom07, and thank you for your biographies of Australian actresses and fictional characters. It seems to me you would be a useful member of WikiProject Women in Red where we are trying to chip away at the gender gap. If you are interested you can sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. In any case, I look forward to more of your detailed women's biographies. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 14:34, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for signing up and welcome to the project. If you haven't already done so, you might find it useful to look through some of our essays, perhaps starting with the Primer. You should be able to find some interesting candidates for biographies by browsing through our Redlist index. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 13:07, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Soaps improvement drive

Hello, I pinged you on the WP:SOAPS talk page about this so sorry to double on the message but I want to get as many on-board for this as it's ambitious, even for me. Due to the recent surge in scrutiny on soap articles, we all need to come together and improve soap articles, so I've created an improvement drive with dates and articles for the soap WikiProject to focus on improving articles each week. Right now, it's focused on Hollyoaks, but the plan is to keep it going until we get to each soap. I did not include a section to sign up as I didn't want editors to feel that they are signing their life away and are expected to edit the articles mercilessly. I hope for some level of dedication but it's not a drive with huge pressure. Are you interested in joining in? – Meena • 11:41, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Meena: Hey. I don't know how much time I can give, but I will try to help where and when I can. I remember someone tried something similar to this with the Emmerdale character articles and there were only like three of us interested/tried to help. Hopefully more people will be interested this time around. Now, when you say "each week", that's not a deadline for every article is it? Because I expect it will take longer than a week to improve some articles, especially when it comes to finding sources.
I'll also add that not every soap is in dire need of help. Myself, Raintheone and a couple of others have made damn sure that the Neighbours articles are up to a good standard. The quality of those articles are one thing I can genuinely be proud of during my time on here. The EastEnders editors have pretty much always been on top of things with their articles too. Granted, there'll always be a few strays that need improvement. - JuneGloom07 Talk 00:40, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's not necessarily a strict deadline, no, more of a time period of focus. People (and probably myself included) can and will go back to articles and add more to them. In regards to the other soaps, I was thinking more of the ITV soaps since I know that the Doctors articles are pretty much covered and wasn't going to include that, as well as the majority of the EastEnders ones (except for a bit of copyediting). A lot of the ITV soap articles seem to be in a more neglected way sadly. I haven't read the Aus soap articles so wasn't sure of their quality. Would you say they don't need to be included in this drive at all? – Meena • 08:38, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Meena: Ah okay, I was thinking that a week to improve a character list wasn't a lot of time! Although I know the '97 Hollyoaks list is up for deletion at the moment. Yeah, the ITV soaps do seem to be the ones in need of the most attention. I don't think the Neighbours articles need to be added. I'll have a look at the Home and Away ones, but they should be okay too. The character lists for the both of them have been created more recently than the other soaps, so they've had a lot of time and attention paid to them. - JuneGloom07 Talk 19:57, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Soap opera lauds

Hello. I just wanted to thank you for all the work you put into soap opera articles. I feel like these types of articles do not get as much attention so I appreciate the time and energy you have put into them. When I first joined Wikipedia years and years ago, I worked a lot on Passions-related articles, and it honestly saddens me to see so many of that show's character articles become redirects. One of these days, I'll go back to working on articles about that show. Apologies if I have already left you a message on this in the past. Just wanted to thank you for your work. Aoba47 (talk) 00:01, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of former Neighbours characters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of former Neighbours characters, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of former Neighbours characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of recurring Neighbours characters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of recurring Neighbours characters, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of recurring Neighbours characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Episode 2351

On 11 October 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Episode 2351, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Episode 2351 of the Australian soap opera Home and Away was filmed in England, marking the first time the serial was filmed overseas? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Episode 2351. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Episode 2351), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of former Home and Away characters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of former Home and Away characters, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of former Home and Away characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Episode 8000 (Home and Away)

On 9 November 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Episode 8000 (Home and Away), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that actress Jacqui Purvis performed her character's wedding vows in te reo Māori during the 8000th episode of Home and Away? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Episode 8000 (Home and Away). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Episode 8000 (Home and Away)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:02, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thank you so much for your hard work on Perdita Hyde-Sinclair! :) DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 08:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Episode 400 (Neighbours)

On 4 February 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Episode 400 (Neighbours), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 400th episode of Neighbours features the serial's first ever Christmas story? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Episode 400 (Neighbours). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Episode 400 (Neighbours)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 12:03, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious
Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:07, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you GA! - JuneGloom07 Talk 21:52, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Episode 8851

On 11 June 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Episode 8851, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Tim Robards returned to Neighbours in Episode 8851, two years after he had to quit his role early? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Episode 8851. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Episode 8851), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) and Valereee (talk) 00:03, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024 at Women in Red

Women in Red | September 2024, Volume 10, Issue 9, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 316, 317


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Rosiestep (talk) 19:00, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Writer's Barnstar
For your amazing work in creating Episode 7921! It is amazing, just like your other articles, and the Wikipedia soaps community is lucky to have you! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 01:58, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Danilo! I got there in the end with it. - JuneGloom07 Talk 21:52, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 September 2024

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:26, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mail

Hi, can i get your e-mail? I have written the text of an article and collected the sources (it's a biography article of a female media personality), but I've never created a new article and I'm looking for someone who has experience and would like to. Would you be willing to help? Mlody1312 (talk) 18:10, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 September 2024

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:09, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red October 2024

Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Unsure how to expand a stub article? Take a look at this guidance

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gina Liano, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Legal Eagle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Episode 7921

On 16 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Episode 7921, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Episode 7921 of Neighbours features Australia's first televised same-sex wedding since the country voted in favour of legalising same-sex marriage? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Episode 7921. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Episode 7921), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 19 October 2024

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Women in Red November 2024

Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:43, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JuneGloom07&oldid=1254384400"
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy