Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Jacob Rubinovitz: declined request having tagged {{copyedit}}; article is in too self-promotional to justify a request at this stage; requester informed
Line 198: Line 198:
===[[Roza Shanina]]===
===[[Roza Shanina]]===
After some recent expansion I'm seeking a prose upgrade (including smoother text flow in some places) of this GA to help it achieve an A-class and subsequent FA status. Many thanks in advance. [[User:Brandmeister|Brandmeister]]<sup>[[User talk:Brandmeister|talk]]</sup> 01:25, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
After some recent expansion I'm seeking a prose upgrade (including smoother text flow in some places) of this GA to help it achieve an A-class and subsequent FA status. Many thanks in advance. [[User:Brandmeister|Brandmeister]]<sup>[[User talk:Brandmeister|talk]]</sup> 01:25, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

===[[Military history of Asian Americans]]===
Was [[Talk:Military history of Asian Americans/GA1|failed at GAR]] by another editor. That editor suggested that it be reviewed again, prior to next GAN attempt.--[[User:RightCowLeftCoast|RightCowLeftCoast]] ([[User talk:RightCowLeftCoast|talk]]) 17:55, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:55, 4 February 2013

Guild homeHow to copy editTemplatesBarnstarsParticipantsCoordinators
RequestsDrivesBlitzesMailing listNewsletters
Guild of Copy Editors' requests page

On this page, you can request that the Guild of Copy Editors copy-edit specific articles.

Instructions for requesters

To make a request, remove any existing {{copy edit}} tags from the article, then click this button and follow the instructions:

Please remove any existing {{copy edit}} tags from the article to avoid edit conflicts during the copy edit.

Please note:

  • No request by an unregistered editor will be accepted unless the IP has done significant work on the article. Drive-by IP requests already on the list may be declined by any editor.
  • The average waiting time is two or so months. Please be patient and feel free to improve your requested article while you wait.
  • If you plan to nominate the article for good article, A-class or featured article status, please wait until the copy edit is complete before nominating it.
  • Having your article copy edited by our team does not guarantee that the prose will be considered acceptable during any of the above reviews.
  • You may have up to two open requests at any one time. This is enforced so that every request can have a fair chance of being fulfilled within a reasonable period.

Requests may be declined if the article is:


December 2012

Another one pushing to GA; moderately long but interesting read. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 23:24, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Working It's quite a recent release, so there's still potential for a lot of information to be added, but I added it to my watchlist and I'll take a look at it as soon as I can ;) Mathijsvs (talk) 05:32, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New article on a 20th century Ukrainian artist. Editor is Russian so translation from the corresponding article at ru.wikipedia is rather stilted and it needs a good review of the English. NtheP (talk) 21:48, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Working. It'll take some time because a) the article isn't stable and b) large chunks of it are fairly incomprehensible and most of the sources are in Russian and Ukrainian. Cheers, --CocoLacoste talk 05:13, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 On hold I sent an email to the main contributor a week or so ago. Waiting for his reply to pick up the copy-edit. Cheers, --CocoLacoste talk 02:56, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

In need of copy edit so can be sent for GA. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 22:34, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Working - Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 04:17, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Longer article, in need of copy edit for GA push. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 22:34, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm planning to get this to FA and I need help. — Yash [talk] 08:42, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It had failed a FL nomination due to lack of inactivity and the prose needs few tweaks so just need little push for FL. — Yash [talk] 08:42, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Needs basic copy editing and some links to related articles. Jonesey95 (talk) 19:50, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can anyone copy edit Superman: Earth One Volume Two? Thanks.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 22:46, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Working on getting it to FA. I'd appreciate a copy edit. Thanks,--Astros4477 (talk) 01:48, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article needs some serious copy edit as because it has too much details in it. Some details are not needed as all the info are regarding the album not the song. I want to take it to GA. It needs a nice copy/edit. —PKS:1142 · (TALK) 03:54, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Future FAC. FunkMonk (talk) 06:06, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Same as above. FunkMonk (talk) 10:22, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at submitting a FAC for the article after the copy-edit is complete. Thanks in advance!--Dom497 (talk) 03:08, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This has received GOCE attention twice in the past year, but its latest FAC review failed and another copy edit is requested. This needs to be someone very experienced at WP FAC-level copy edits who writes to a professional standard, please, so that we can get this one to bed. --Stfg (talk) 15:53, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold pending the addition of some further content. Shouldn't take long. --Stfg (talk) 18:36, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As a part of GA review. Ssriram mt (talk) 13:19, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Working on getting it to GA. Thanks! GleekVampire | talk! 14:50, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Working on getting it to GA. Thanks! GleekVampire | talk! 15:17, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A nice history article which needs more improvement to its form and its English, before it can reach GA. Thanks in advance! --Codrin.B (talk) 15:47, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I want to bring this up to a GA but I need someone to look over my grammar. Guerillero | My Talk 22:33, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is to bring the article up for a GA nom. Ssriram mt (talk) 04:47, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Needs a good copyedit. --TIAYN (talk) 13:12, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Needs a good copyedit. --TIAYN (talk) 13:12, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Needs a good copyedit. --TIAYN (talk) 13:12, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article is a good collection of relevant content but needs a better form and structure, as well as more copy editing to comply with the Wikipedia style. The topic is quite interesting and would be great to get professional help, ideally to help the article reach GA. Thank you in advance to the brave copyeditor! --Codrin.B (talk) 15:21, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article underwent a lot of rewrites and restructuring, mainly due to its very nature and controversies around it. It is quite an interesting topic which needs help to get a clear, neutral structure and layout. The end goal is to reach GA. Thank you! --Codrin.B (talk) 15:31, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have been working on this article for some time now. It has received a peer review and has yet to be completed. However, at this stage, a copyedit would still be very beneficial and much appreciated. My goal is to promote the article (once expanded fully) to Good article status, then Featured status. Thank you. --Another Believer (Talk) 16:31, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Newly created article. General copyediting needed. --Nizil (talk) 18:49, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Working Aeris Tiberius (talk) 19:33, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Current state of the article is GA. Planning to take it to FA in the near future. A good copy editing will surely help. - Vivvt • (Talk) 15:16, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I recently expanded the article, with intentions to nominate it to GA. Probably some good copy-editing is needed.--Rod840 (talk) 15:42, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I created this article in connection with the 250,000+ images that are now being donated by the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library and Museum to Wikimedia Commons. Please copy edit. Thanks. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 06:16, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I created this article in connection with the 250,000+ images that are now being donated by the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library and Museum to Wikimedia Commons. Please copy edit. Thanks. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 06:16, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I created this article in connection with the 250,000+ images that are now being donated by the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library and Museum to Wikimedia Commons. Please copy edit. Thanks. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 06:16, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I nominated two articles for DYK one of the reviewers send me here because the articles are in need of a copy-editing from a native English speaker. See below. So can somebody of you help me out? See Template:Did you know nominations/Koningin Regentes and De Ruyter Thx in advance, Pindanl (talk) 17:13, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I nominated two articles for DYK one of the reviewers send me here because the articles are in need of a copy-editing from a native English speaker. See below. So can somebody of you help me out? See Template:Did you know nominations/Koningin Regentes and De Ruyter Thx in advance, Pindanl (talk) 17:13, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hoping to nominate for GA staus so requires a good scrub beforehand, help much appreciated. Darkness Shines (talk) 14:27, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm preparing this article for a FAC. Needs an extensive review, specially MoS. Daniel Cavallari (talk) 16:33, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article is currently at the bottom of FAC, but SandyGeorgia still thinks theres some problems with flow. I would appreciate it if someone would copyedit any remaining problems. LittleJerry (talk) 00:46, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article needs to be copy-edited prior to being nominated for WP:FAC. Plant's Strider (talk) 15:52, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article is in heavy need of a copy-edit and check on the MOS. Tartarus talk 22:17, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help me trim down details that are irrelevant to casual readers. --George Ho (talk) 04:18, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've written down too many details. Help me trim down parts that are too irrelevant to general readers, please. --George Ho (talk) 04:18, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I want to promote this article to GA and this article has too many problems. Please help me. --Tamravidhir (২০১২) 16:27, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article reads more like an indictment than an encyclopedia article. Could someone please help with the tone? -- Mesconsing (talk) 20:41, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Would really appreciate a copy-edit, especially for the "Episode" list, before taking it to the next level; FAC. :) Cheers, --Khanassassin 08:40, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd appreciate a copyedit of the article before it becomes a GAN. Thanks! Tomobe03 (talk) 13:13, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Although it received a copyedit before, the article needs a lot of work. I think it's mainly general copyediting. I would do it myself, but I'm very busy nowadays and might not be here for a while. I tried editing it myself, but it is definitely a lot of work. I have a headache from looking at it. Thank you in advance! § WiHkibew (talk) § 00:59, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article's episode list needs condensation for general readers' comfort. --George Ho (talk) 07:36, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Future FAC, I'd appreciate a copy edit. Thanks,-- Astros4477 (Talk) 03:11, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating for FA in the future. I would appreciate if someone could copy edit. The article was copy edited not to ago in early January before the article was promoted to GA status, so much work is necessary. I don't believe it will be a lot. — DivaKnockouts (talk) 04:05, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wants to take it to GA. A good copy edit would help it in enhancing the article.Prashant  Conversation  06:59, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article has over 4,000 views every day and futurely this article will be nominated for GA. It was copy edited by few users, but it needs a good copy edit, specially the Reception subsection in Music video and the Critical reception, which are a bit WP:QUOTEFARM. Saulo Talk to Me 04:02, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cute, tiny emu, which could become an FA afterwards. FunkMonk (talk) 16:16, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wants to take the article to GA. Seeing its current position will be difficult. Needs a good copy/edit.Prashant  Conversation  03:09, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to submit the article for featured status, but I think it would be better prepared if it received an independent copyedit first. Neelix (talk) 21:08, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

WP:GA quality article, could use a copyedit, no rush, just before going for further quality improvements along the process. — Cirt (talk) 17:51, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This one is a WP:GA quality article, has already had a peer review but could use some further copyediting before proceeding along the quality improvement process. — Cirt (talk) 17:52, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a WP:GA quality article that could use some copyediting before a future potential peer review. — Cirt (talk) 17:53, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article is well referenced but it is too long and I think it could become a WP:GA article with a copyedit and a less biased view of its subject. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 00:54, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I support this request. The article is indeed over-long, and needs to be pruned as well as copy-edited with a view to improving its neutrality and readability. Ghmyrtle (talk) 22:04, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

After some recent expansion I'm seeking a prose upgrade (including smoother text flow in some places) of this GA to help it achieve an A-class and subsequent FA status. Many thanks in advance. Brandmeistertalk 01:25, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Was failed at GAR by another editor. That editor suggested that it be reviewed again, prior to next GAN attempt.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 17:55, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy