Jump to content

Impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine on nuclear power plants

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ukraine is home to four nuclear power plants, as well as the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone, site of the 1986 Chernobyl disaster.[1] As of January 2024, both the Chernobyl and the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plants saw battles during the war that resulted from the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. The invasion has prompted significant discussion about the status of the power plants, including fears of potential disasters,[2] and has also prompted debates about nuclear energy programmes in other European countries.[3]

Fires in the forests around Chernobyl between 24 February and 22 March

Nuclear energy in Ukraine

[edit]

Ukraine is Europe's second-largest producer of nuclear energy; almost half the electricity produced in the country is nuclear energy. Nuclear power plants are vulnerable to direct attack, as are nuclear waste disposal sites.[4][5][6] Apart from direct attack, human-made disasters may be caused by operational mistakes, power shortages and connection issues. For instance, without electricity, water cooling of nuclear reactors ceases which may cause a meltdown, as happened in Fukushima. Human operators working under siege or under ongoing stress are more prone to errors.[5]

Battles

[edit]

As of February 2022, the moving of heavy military vehicles has raised nuclear dust and resulted in a spike of gamma radiation levels in the Chernobyl region 28 times above normal.[7][8] With local winds mostly tending towards Russia,[5] the impact is spread over two countries currently at war with each other and therefore unlikely to be remediated in a coordinated manner at this time. Ukrainian authorities also claim the Russian army is responsible for arson in the Chernobyl exclusion zone. According to various sources, from 15 to 37 hectares (37 to 91 acres) of forest have been swept by fires.[9][10]

Chernobyl was captured on 24 February 2022, the first day of the invasion, as part of the Russian offensive on Kyiv. Russian forces captured the exclusion zone the same day.[11]

Enerhodar came under siege on 28 February 2022, as Russian forces advanced on the southern front of the invasion. The Russian assault on the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant began on 3 March 2022, capturing the power plant by the next day.[12] On 6 March 2022, the IAEA released a statement expressing concern over potential Russian military interference in the operations of the power plant and over cuts to mobile and internet networks that the plant uses for communications.[13]

In early March, hostilities reached the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, the biggest in Europe and the fifth biggest globally.[14] This nuclear plant houses an amount of nuclear material equivalent to 20 Chernobyls.[15] On 4 March 2022, fighting led to a fire in an auxiliary building. On 30 May 2022, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported loss of connection with servers at the Zaporizhzhia plant, which was not restored until 12 June 2022.[16]

Possible war crime

[edit]

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy accused Russian President Vladimir Putin of committing "nuclear terror" by ordering the attack on the plant[17] and Ukraine regulatory authorities stated that Russian forces fired artillery shells at the plant, setting fire to the training facility.[18][19] The Russian Ambassador to the UN responded that Russian forces were fired upon by Ukrainian "saboteurs" from the training facility, which they set fire to when they left.[20] Later on 4 March, the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed that the plant's safety systems had not been affected and there had been no release of radioactive materials, however, he was "... gravely concerned about the situation at Ukraine's largest nuclear power plant. The main priority was to ensure the safety and security of the plant, its power supply and the people who operate it".[21]

Attacks on nuclear power facilities are mainly governed by Article 56 of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions,[22][23] which generally prohibits attacks against civilian nuclear power plants.[24][25] According to international scholars: "if it is established that Russian forces engaged in the shelling of the Zaporizhzhia plant or objectives in its vicinity in a way that risked a radioactive leak, it is almost certain that this operation violated Article 56"[24] but it is "less likely" that Russian forces have committed a war crime in this case.[25]

Safety concerns

[edit]

Since the occupation of Chernobyl and the Zaporizhzhia power plant, a number of safety concerns have been raised by the IAEA and the Ukrainian government, including over failure to give staff proper rest and lack of regular maintenance work being carried out.[26][27][28][29] Pharmacies in several European countries reported selling out of iodine pills in the first two weeks following the invasion.[30] However, several European nuclear safety authorities have to date concluded that there is no immediate danger of a significant radioactive disaster occurring.[31][32][33]

On 6 March 2022, French President Emmanuel Macron held a call with Russian President Vladimir Putin in which he urged Putin to "ensure the safety of these plants and that they are excluded from the conflict." Following the call, the Kremlin released a statement saying that it was willing to engage in negotiations with the IAEA and the Ukrainian government over ensuring that safety.[34]

Rafael Grossi, the Director General of the IAEA, raised concerns about the extremely stressful conditions faced by station personnel. Under constant pressure from the Russian military, personnel were unable to rotate shifts with colleagues outside the facility, and were therefore unable to rest. Food and medicine shortages were also reported.[35] Grossi emphasized that exhausted and stressed personnel are more prone to mistakes.[6] On June 30, the IAEA again lost communications with the plant.[36]

While wide attention has been focused on nuclear power reactors, damage to spent nuclear fuel reservoirs and other forms of storage may be even more devastating.[37][38][39] For instance, more than 3000 spent fuel rod containers are stored at the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant under the open sky.[40] At other nuclear power plants, spent rods are kept in cooling tanks. Should water in those tanks become warmer or leak, overheated rods may ignite leading to consequences comparable to the Kyshtym disaster.[6] According to the IAEA, two Russian missiles have already hit nuclear waste ponds in Ukraine.[41][42] Spent nuclear fuel is able to release 20 times the fatal dose of radiation in one hour.[43]

Debates over nuclear power in Europe

[edit]

The invasion of Ukraine has prompted increased discussion about the future of nuclear power in Europe, with a number of commentators[who?] arguing in favour of increasing nuclear power generation in order to decrease dependence on natural gas imported from Russia.[44][45][46][47]

Germany in particular has seen debates over nuclear power phase-out, which has overseen the shutdown of most of the nuclear power plants in the country since 2011, with all remaining plants shut down in April 2023.[48][49][50] On 28 February 2022, the German economics minister stated that the German government would consider suspending the phase-out of remaining nuclear power plants in the country.[51] However, on 9 March 2022, Germany released a statement rejecting calls to suspend the phase-out of nuclear power.[52] Belgium has also seen debates about extending the life span of its existing nuclear reactors.[53]

George Monbiot wrote in The Guardian that,[54] Europe

collectively receives 41% of its gas imports and 27% of its oil imports from Russia,[needs update] [arguing that Europe] reduced ourselves to craven dependency on that despotic government, through a dismal failure to wean ourselves off fossil fuels.

Some commentators[who?] have also raised issues of Russian exports of nuclear energy technology. In Finland, the Hanhikivi Nuclear Power Plant project was cancelled due to the invasion.[55][56] Hartmut Winkler of the University of Johannesburg has stated that Russian state nuclear energy corporation Rosatom faced significant loss of international business due to the invasion, stating that the "era of Russian foreign nuclear builds is therefore soon likely to be over."[57]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Why Ukraine's nuclear power is so crucial to Russia's invasion following Zaporizhzhia attack". inews.co.uk. 4 March 2022.
  2. ^ "Ukraine's nuclear nightmare is only part of the war's environmental horrors". POLITICO. 4 March 2022.
  3. ^ "How Putin made the Green Deal great again". POLITICO. 8 March 2022.
  4. ^ "Radioactive waste disposal site near Kyiv hit by airstrike, Ukraine officials say". news.yahoo.com. Retrieved 18 April 2022.
  5. ^ a b c Castelvecchi, D. (4 March 2022). "Ukraine nuclear power plant attack: scientists assess the risks". Nature. doi:10.1038/d41586-022-00660-z. PMID 35246645. S2CID 247236712. Retrieved 11 July 2022.
  6. ^ a b c Brown, K.; Solomon, S. (18 March 2022). "One thing nuclear power plants weren't built to survive: War". The Washington Post. Retrieved 11 July 2022.
  7. ^ Polityuk, P.; Crellin, F. (25 February 2022). "Ukraine reports higher Chernobyl radiation after Russians capture plant". Reuters. Retrieved 11 July 2022.
  8. ^ "Ukraine and the others: the environmental impacts of war". Eurocommission. 30 March 2022. Retrieved 1 July 2022.
  9. ^ Nuttall, Philippa (21 May 2022). "How Vladimir Putin weaponised the environment in Ukraine". The New Statesman. Retrieved 6 July 2022.
  10. ^ "Russia Should Pay for Its Environmental War Crimes". The Wired. 22 January 2022. Retrieved 1 July 2022.
  11. ^ "Chernobyl nuclear plant targeted as Russia invades Ukraine". Al Jazeera. Archived from the original on 24 February 2022. Retrieved 24 February 2022.
  12. ^ Tim Stelloh (3 March 2022). "Nuclear plant on fire in Ukraine after Russia attacks facility". NBC. Archived from the original on 4 March 2022. Retrieved 4 March 2022.
  13. ^ "Russian forces interfering at Ukraine nuclear plant: IAEA". Al-Jazeera. 6 March 2022. Retrieved 7 March 2022.
  14. ^ "Разрушение всего живого" [Killing all life] (in Russian). Novaya Gazeta. 5 July 2022. Retrieved 6 July 2022.
  15. ^ Alejandro de la Garza (18 March 2022). "The Environmental Health Risks of War in a Highly Industrialized Country Like Ukraine". Time. Retrieved 18 July 2022.
  16. ^ "Запорожская АЭС возобновила передачу данных МАГАТЭ" [Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant restores data transmission to IAEA] (in Russian). RBC. 12 June 2022. Retrieved 1 July 2022.
  17. ^ "U.S. calls Russian attack on Ukraine nuclear power plant a "war crime"". CBS News. 4 March 2022. Retrieved 3 April 2022.
  18. ^ "Updated information about Zaporizhzhia NPP (15:00)". State Nuclear Regulatory Inspectorate of Ukraine. Retrieved 3 April 2022.
  19. ^ "Zelenskiy says 'Europe must wake up' after assault sparks nuclear plant fire". The Guardian. 5 March 2022. Retrieved 3 April 2022.
  20. ^ "Russia, Ukraine trade barbs at UN over nuclear plant attack". Al Jazeera. 4 March 2022. Retrieved 1 April 2022.
  21. ^ "Update 11 – IAEA Director General Statement on Situation in Ukraine". International Atomic Energy Agency. 4 March 2022. Retrieved 3 April 2022.
  22. ^ "Treaties, States Parties and Commentaries". International Committee of the Red Cross. Retrieved 3 April 2022.
  23. ^ Morgandi, Tibisay; Betin, Batuhan (15 April 2022). "Legal Implications of the Military Operations at the Chernobyl and Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plants". EJIL: Talk!. Retrieved 1 August 2022.
  24. ^ a b Moore, George (6 March 2022). "How international law applies to attacks on nuclear and associated facilities in Ukraine". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Retrieved 1 April 2022.
  25. ^ a b Dannenbaum, Tom (13 March 2022). "The Attack at the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Plant and Additional Protocol I". Lieber Institute West Point. Archived from the original on 13 March 2022. Retrieved 16 March 2022.
  26. ^ "Ukraine warns of danger to Chernobyl but IAEA 'sees no critical impact on safety'". POLITICO. 9 March 2022.
  27. ^ "Update 15 – IAEA Director General Statement on Situation in Ukraine". www.iaea.org. 8 March 2022.
  28. ^ "How safe are Ukraine's nuclear power plants amid Russian attacks?". the Guardian. 4 March 2022.
  29. ^ Meshkati, Najmedin (4 March 2022). "Russian troops fought for control of a nuclear power plant in Ukraine – a safety expert explains how warfare and nuclear power are a volatile combination". The Conversation.
  30. ^ "Price of anti-radiation pills spikes 100% as Putin rattles saber". www.cbsnews.com. 9 March 2022.
  31. ^ "The politics behind Ukraine's alarming nuclear warnings". POLITICO. 11 March 2022.
  32. ^ "Ukraine: As war rages what are the risks at the Chernobyl nuclear plant? | DW | 09.03.2022". DW.COM.
  33. ^ "Russia's invasion of Ukraine highlights vulnerability of nuclear power plants". PBS NewsHour. 9 March 2022.
  34. ^ "Macron urges securing nuclear plants in call with Putin". POLITICO. 6 March 2022.
  35. ^ Borger, Julian (6 March 2022). "Grave concern' as Ukraine Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant under Russian orders". The Guardian. Retrieved 27 July 2022.
  36. ^ Коваленко, Е. (20 June 2022). "IAEA lost connection to Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant". UNIAN. Retrieved 1 July 2022.
  37. ^ "Environmental trends in the Ukraine conflict, 10 days in". CEOBS. 5 March 2022. Retrieved 6 July 2022.
  38. ^ "expert reaction to Russian attacks at the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant | Science Media Centre". Retrieved 18 April 2022.
  39. ^ "Experts predict lasting environmental damage from Russia's invasion of Ukraine". ABC News. Retrieved 27 April 2022.
  40. ^ Neslen, A. (15 May 2015). "Nuclear Waste Stored in 'Shocking' Way 120 Miles from Ukrainian Front Line". The Guardian. Retrieved 11 July 2022.
  41. ^ "Russia's war in Ukraine raises nuclear risks, physicists warn". Science News. 7 March 2022. Retrieved 18 April 2022.
  42. ^ Karl Mathiesen; Louise Guillot; Antonia Zimmermann (4 March 2022). "Ukraine's nuclear nightmare is only part of the war's environmental horrors". Politico. Retrieved 1 July 2022.
  43. ^ Stapczynski, S.; Oda, S. (4 March 2022). "What We Know About Ukraine's Shelled Nuclear Plant". Bloomberg. Retrieved 11 July 2022.
  44. ^ "Ukraine war prompts European reappraisal of its energy supplies". the Guardian. 4 March 2022.
  45. ^ "Will Russia's invasion of Ukraine revive the debate about nuclear weapons and nuclear energy?". rabble.ca. 9 March 2022.
  46. ^ Tan, Huileng. "Elon Musk says Europe should restart its dormant nuclear power stations amid fears the Russian invasion of Ukraine will trigger a gas-supply shortage". Business Insider.
  47. ^ Montgomery, Scott L. "War in Ukraine is changing energy geopolitics". The Conversation.
  48. ^ Steitz, Christoph; Wacket, Markus (28 February 2022). "Explainer: Could Germany keep its nuclear plants running?". Reuters – via www.reuters.com.
  49. ^ Mathis, Will; Morison, Rachel (1 March 2022) [February 28, 2022]. "Delaying Germany's Nuclear Phaseout Is Easier Said Than Done". Bloomberg. Retrieved 16 March 2022.
  50. ^ "How Putin's Invasion of Ukraine Upended Germany". The New Yorker. 11 March 2022.
  51. ^ Berlin, David Crossland (28 February 2022). "Ukraine crisis pushes Germany to rethink nuclear phase-out" – via www.thetimes.co.uk.
  52. ^ "Germany can't recommend nuclear power life-span extension". euronews. 9 March 2022.
  53. ^ Strauss, Marine (7 March 2022). "Belgian Greens make U-turn to consider nuclear plants extension". Reuters – via www.reuters.com.
  54. ^ "It's not too late to free ourselves from this idiotic addiction to Russian gas | George Monbiot". the Guardian. 9 March 2022.
  55. ^ "Fennovoimas kärnkraftsprojekt avbryts – delägaren Åbo Energi förlorar 20 miljoner euro" [Fennovoima's nuclear power project suspended - co-owner Åbo Energi loses EUR 20 million]. Svenska Yle. 3 March 2022. Retrieved 9 March 2022.
  56. ^ "Finnish government unsure about nuclear plant with Russia, minister says". Reuters. 24 February 2022 – via www.reuters.com.
  57. ^ Winkler, Hartmut (6 March 2022). "Russia's nuclear power exports: will they stand the strain of the war in Ukraine?". The Conversation.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Impact_of_the_Russian_invasion_of_Ukraine_on_nuclear_power_plants&oldid=1260720578"
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy