'{{NoACEMM}} {{DISPLAYTITLE:<span style="color:#D02;font-family:'Segoe Script';font-size:22pt;">User talk:Magnolia⁶⁷⁷</span>}} {{Boxboxtop}} {{Archives}} {{Template:User EditsPlus|121279}} {{User articles created|365}} {{User:UBX/matrix}} {{Boxboxbottom}} == Why did you revert my edit? == Hello, I was trying to make a edit on [[Sulphur Springs, Texas]]. However, my edit has been reverted for some reason. Is there a valid reason for this? - Kittenvy :{{ping|Kittenvy}} Thanks for writing. My concern was that you added the 2020 population, but the source cited says you accessed it in 2018. You also changed all the quotation marks to [[MOS:CURLY|curly style]], which are not used on Wikipedia. You also removed the italics from all the newspaper titles, and changed them to curly quotes. [[User:Magnolia677|Magnolia677]] ([[User talk:Magnolia677#top|talk]]) 21:49, 8 July 2023 (UTC) == Green River, Utah == Hi there, I reverted your edit in the Popular Culture section of Green River, Utah. ‘’[[The Monkey Wrench Gang]]‘’ is a very famous work of fiction. You can find it in any major bookstore nationwide, even after being published almost 50 years ago. It is therefore notable and meets wikipedia’s requirements. I agree with your removal of the other parts of the section. Have a good day. :{{ping|Red Rocks and Sage Bush}} And I reverted your edit again. Please see my edit summary on the article. [[User:Magnolia677|Magnolia677]] ([[User talk:Magnolia677#top|talk]]) 15:46, 5 July 2023 (UTC) :Please see my edit of your revert. [[User:Red Rocks and Sage Bush|Red Rocks and Sage Bush]] ([[User talk:Red Rocks and Sage Bush|talk]]) 16:01, 5 July 2023 (UTC) == Mall images == [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ArticleDiscoveries1934]] - seems that the person commenting on the mall gallery, the person reinstating the mall gallery, and the person(s) adding images to the mall gallery are all the same person. Or at least that’s what I’m alleging. [[User:10mmsocket|10mmsocket]] ([[User talk:10mmsocket|talk]]) 08:12, 15 May 2023 (UTC) :{{ping|10mmsocket}} Good eye. Cheers! [[User:Magnolia677|Magnolia677]] ([[User talk:Magnolia677#top|talk]]) 08:33, 15 May 2023 (UTC) ::@[[User:Magnolia677|Magnolia677]] @[[User:10mmsocket|10mmsocket]] Hello there, but why did all of brought me to sock puppet investigations? Other editors are completely different people and I never did anything terrible or poor to this article, so I do not deserve a check on that. [[User:NorthernBladeLights9|NorthernBladeLights9]] ([[User talk:NorthernBladeLights9|talk]]) 18:07, 15 May 2023 (UTC) :::Go read [[WP:DUCKTEST]]. I see your post above, and your other protests, but all I hear is “quack, quack, quack, quack…” Wasting good, well-intentioned people’s time like this is lame and disrespectful. [[User:10mmsocket|10mmsocket]] ([[User talk:10mmsocket|talk]]) 19:58, 15 May 2023 (UTC) == Rockingham, North Carolina == Your recent edit to [[Rockingham, North Carolina]] re-introduced a link to the [[John Hutchinson]] disambiguation page, which doesn’t help the reader as there is no other article that mentions the mayor. The reference that I added to [[Rockingham, North Carolina]] was to give proof of his relationship to the town, since there’s no article on him and no other mention of him in the Rockingham article. If you wish to include him in the article, perhaps it would be better to use the title [[John Hutchinson (politician)]]. [[User:Leschnei|Leschnei]] ([[User talk:Leschnei|talk]]) 23:30, 8 June 2023 (UTC) :{{ping|Leschnei}} I fixed that less then two minutes later. He was removed from the list of notable people because he does not meet the criteria for inclusion, per [[WP:USCITIES#Notable people]]. [[User:Magnolia677|Magnolia677]] ([[User talk:Magnolia677#top|talk]]) 11:12, 9 June 2023 (UTC) :: Thanks, Magnolia677 == [[Saratoga Springs, New York]] == Hello Magnolia, hope all is well with you. I think [[Saratoga Springs, New York]] could use an extra pair of eyes. I’ve cleaned up some of the promo puffery advertorial content and there may be a COI involved. [[User:Netherzone|Netherzone]] ([[User talk:Netherzone|talk]]) 00:37, 10 June 2023 (UTC) :{{ping|Netherzone}} Hi there. Which particular section? The “in popular culture” is enormous. Cheers. [[User:Magnolia677|Magnolia677]] ([[User talk:Magnolia677#top|talk]]) 13:52, 10 June 2023 (UTC) ::I’ve cleaned up the Economics section, and a some clean up of the Gov’t, Parks & recreation, Thoroughbred racing, Arts & Culture and History, but there is more to do. If you want to tackle In Popular culture, that would be excellent. Thank you in advance! [[User:Netherzone|Netherzone]] ([[User talk:Netherzone|talk]]) 15:32, 10 June 2023 (UTC) == June 2023 == [[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I’m [[User:2600:1009:B004:7211:0:B:5E7B:E01|2600:1009:B004:7211:0:B:5E7B:E01]]. I noticed that you recently [[Wikipedia:Content removal|removed content]] from [[:Dorian Rhea Debussy]]&nbsp;without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. If this was a mistake, don’t worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use [[User:Magnolia677/sandbox|your sandbox]]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:2600:1009:B004:7211:0:B:5E7B:E01|my talk page]]. Selected publications<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> Title, topic, and publisher indicate the forthcoming work meetings wiki’s standards; no worries but please review policy on forthcoming publications before future edit here. Re-added book chapter to the list per note on edit. [[Special:Contributions/2600:1009:B004:7211:0:B:5E7B:E01|2600:1009:B004:7211:0:B:5E7B:E01]] ([[User talk:2600:1009:B004:7211:0:B:5E7B:E01|talk]]) 02:16, 11 June 2023 (UTC) == me angry == [[File:Házikecske portré.JPG|left|150px]] After all these years I wanna know, why do you keep reverting and removing my article edits ? do you specifically hate me ? Or is it that you are pro-American and hate anybody that tries to correct yours and others’ pro-American Wiki articles to reflect the Factual Canadian aspects involved. Today’s example - “Augustus Jones (c. 1757 – November 16, 1836) was an American-born Upper Canadian farmer…” – American born implies born in the U.S. which in 1757 is emphatically impossible, because the U.S. DID NOT EXIST IN 1757 ! I could have changed it to “Canadian” because Canada was noted on maps as existing at the time of his birth. but in deference to factual accuracy, I changed it to say “North American”. I see that you received quite a few awards for writing and contributing to the “10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada.” I shudder trying to imagine the shear amount of incorrect “Canada” things you contributed. DO NOT REVERT MY AUGUSTUS EDIT, NOR ANY OTHER CANADIAN EDIT BY ME EVER AGAIN. [[User:Stevehartwell|Stevehartwell]] ([[User talk:Stevehartwell|talk]]) 15:44, 17 June 2023 (UTC) <br style="clear: both;"/> :{{ping|Stevehartwell}} You’re madder than a mosquito in a mannequin factory. I’ve never edited [[Augustus Jones]]. Look at the edit history. [[User:Magnolia677|Magnolia677]] ([[User talk:Magnolia677#top|talk]]) 15:55, 17 June 2023 (UTC) ::I believe the editor is referring to something that happened in 2018. Take a look at their Talk page - you’ll also see my warning.--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 16:10, 17 June 2023 (UTC) == High Point == Remember that you’re at 3RR now. I’ve left a note for the other editor, so they are appropriately warned if they revert again. ‘’’<span style="font-family: Arial;">[[User:Acroterion|<span style="color: black;">Acroterion</span>]] <small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<span style="color: gray;">(talk)</span>]]</small></span>‘’’ 22:26, 17 June 2023 (UTC) :{{ping|Acroterion}} I removed unsourced content. I’m not sure how to have a discussion about original research falsely cited to a source. [[User:Magnolia677|Magnolia677]] ([[User talk:Magnolia677#top|talk]]) 22:42, 17 June 2023 (UTC) ::Just keep in mind that it’s not an exemption to 3RR. That doesn’t mean it can’t be reported as disruptive editing, or referred to AN3. ‘’’<span style="font-family: Arial;">[[User:Acroterion|<span style="color: black;">Acroterion</span>]] <small>[[User talk:Acroterion|<span style="color: gray;">(talk)</span>]]</small></span>‘’’ 00:44, 18 June 2023 (UTC) == Tactics to change title at article:Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory == It makes it very difficult to [[WP:AGF]] with editors that have been around a long time but seemingly make questionable claims in their edit summaries. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Biden%E2%80%93Ukraine_conspiracy_theory&diff=prev&oldid=1160648184 This] seems very questionable. I would prefer to discuss it here rather than the article page because it is off topic from discussing the actual article. [[User:Darknipples|DN]] ([[User talk:Darknipples|talk]]) 04:03, 20 June 2023 (UTC) :{{ping|Darknipples}} I believed that my edit summary was accurate, but I see you have since reverted the edit, so I’ll just wait for a clearer consensus to emerge. My apology if I misinterpreted the discussion. Thanks for writing. Cheers. [[User:Magnolia677|Magnolia677]] ([[User talk:Magnolia677#top|talk]]) 11:16, 20 June 2023 (UTC) == Be fair and equitable == https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Grass_Valley%2C_California&diff=1161268403&oldid=1161223657 explain that to me, you removed as “unsourced content” when all but three of the people in that list have no refs. So why don’t you go back remove the dozens of other unsourced people there? [[Special:Contributions/70.161.8.90|70.161.8.90]] ([[User talk:70.161.8.90|talk]]) 19:20, 22 June 2023 (UTC) :There is no source at [[Erika Flores]] to support the she lives in Grass Valley, and you also failed to add a source when you added her at Grass Valley. [[User:Magnolia677|Magnolia677]] ([[User talk:Magnolia677#top|talk]]) 19:45, 22 June 2023 (UTC) == “Edit is a tad biased”? == [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Don_Beyer&diff=prev&oldid=1161619758 "A tad"?] The edit is a BLP violation as it asserts a serious crime against someone who hasn’t been charged. {{tq|This is further proof, as with the above paragraphs that members of Democrat party are partisan hacks that do not believe what they say and are only in search of complete power.}} The IP didn’t even bother to put a Fox News or Breitbart source behind that whopper. And please keep your personal commentary out of edit summaries. The New York Post may have been founded by Alexander Hamilton, but now it’s owned by Rupert Murdoch. Much like how Republicans were the anti-slavery party in the 1850s-1860s, and then they were the ones opposing civil rights in the 1950s-1960s. &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 00:31, 24 June 2023 (UTC) :{{ping|Muboshgu}} What are you talking about? The ‘’New York Post’’ won a Pulitzer in 2018 for exposing the hoax that Russia collaborated with the Trump campaign to interfere with the 2016 election!! Wait a minute, I’m confused. Maybe it was the ‘’New York Times’’…for something Russia related. Anyway, the ‘’Post’’ steadfastly reported that the Hunter Biden laptop was ‘’’definitely Russian disinformation!’’’ Wait a minute…I’m confused again…well, it was ‘’one of those New York papers’’. Muboshgu, don’t get angry with those who offend you with the truth, get angry with those who comfort you with lies. [[User:Magnolia677|Magnolia677]] ([[User talk:Magnolia677#top|talk]]) 12:21, 24 June 2023 (UTC) ::[[WP:SUMMARYNO|Your edit summary was inappropriate]] and this comment is too. You’ve been around here long enough that you should know better than this. &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 15:21, 24 June 2023 (UTC) == Please explain the revert == Hello, Magnolia. I noticed that you reverted my edit on the page [[Titusville, Florida]] because it was “unsourced.” However, I was only looking at the census box because it was literally showing the 2020 census population. This also happened a few months ago in 2022 once I saw my edit on [[Michigan City, Indiana]] reverted. When you get the chance, please explain how it was unsourced and I will reply ASAP. Thank you. [[User:Sahas P.|Sahas P.]] ([[User talk:Sahas P.|talk]]) 15:44, 26 June 2023 (UTC) :{{ping|Sahas P.}} Thank you for writing. The source accompanying your edit did not support your edit, and the source supporting the census box edit did not support that edit either. Census data for 2022 cannot be supported by a dead link accessed eight years ago. [[User:Magnolia677|Magnolia677]] ([[User talk:Magnolia677#top|talk]]) 15:52, 26 June 2023 (UTC) ::So does that mean basically I have to change the source so that it supports the edit? [[User:Sahas P.|Sahas P.]] ([[User talk:Sahas P.|talk]]) 15:54, 26 June 2023 (UTC) :::{{ping|Sahas P.}} A consensus of editors at [[WP:CITEWEB]] have agreed that editors must link to the “URL of the specific web page ‘’where the referenced content can be found”’’. Also, updating the access date tells others the source has been updated. [[User:Magnolia677|Magnolia677]] ([[User talk:Magnolia677#top|talk]]) 19:03, 26 June 2023 (UTC) ::::You didn’t update & cleanup the reference, per your [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Titusville%2C_Florida&diff=1162027293&oldid=1159653942 edit]. The old reference wasn’t an exact link for the city, because lazy editors long ago used “census.gov” as the source. The correct way to reference it requires a lot more effort. I manually did it for every city in Kansas, thus no one can complain to me that it can’t be done properly. • [[User:Sbmeirow|<span style="color:#8D38C9;">Sbmeirow</span>]] • [[User talk:Sbmeirow|<span style="color:#8D38C9;White;">Talk</span>]] • 00:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC) ::::For example, here is the census reference for Wichita, Kansas that created about 1.5 years ago: <nowiki><ref name="Census-2020-Profile">{{cite web |title=Profile of Wichita, Kansas in 2020 |url=https://data.census.gov/cedsci/profile?g=1600000US2079000 |publisher=United States Census Bureau |access-date=November 14, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211115012419/https://data.census.gov/cedsci/profile?g=1600000US2079000 |archive-date=November 14, 2021 |url-status=live}}</ref></nowiki> :::::Here is my 2020 census [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Titusville%2C_Florida&diff=1162102134&oldid=1162099277 edit] for [[Titusville, Florida]]. • [[User:Sbmeirow|<span style="color:#8D38C9;">Sbmeirow</span>]] • [[User talk:Sbmeirow|<span style="color:#8D38C9;White;">Talk</span>]] • 00:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC) == Notice of noticeboard discussion == [[File:Information_icon4.svg|link=|alt=Information icon|25x25px]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:AN-notice--> [[User:Thomasthedarkenguine|Thomasthedarkenguine]] ([[User talk:Thomasthedarkenguine|talk]]) 19:03, 2 July 2023 (UTC) == Happy 4th of July! == <div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:#fff; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">[[File:American flag 2011.jpg|185px|left]][[File:Fourth of July fireworks behind the Washington Monument, 1986.jpg|95px|right]] [[User:Colman2000|Colman2000]] ([[User talk:Colman2000|talk]]) is wishing you a Happy [[Independence Day|4th of July]]! On this day, we recognize our independence from Great Britain with the adoption of the Declaration of Independence, which ultimately paved the way to our freedom. Celebrate this day in many different ways, such as hosting a barbecue, watching baseball games, or even attending a fireworks show! Happy Independence Day, fellow American!  <br />  {{center|’’Share this message by adding {{tls|Independence Day}} to a fellow American’s talk page.’’}} </div> [[User:Colman2000|Colman2000]] ([[User talk:Colman2000|talk]]) 06:01, 4 July 2023 (UTC) :{{ping|Colman2000}} Hey thanks. Enjoy the day! [[User:Magnolia677|Magnolia677]] ([[User talk:Magnolia677#top|talk]]) 17:30, 4 July 2023 (UTC) == Undone edits by me == Sorry for restoring some edits that were not properly sourced (that you had removed). Thanks for catching that and reverting it again. [[User:Poketama|Poketama]] ([[User talk:Poketama|talk]]) 02:29, 5 July 2023 (UTC) == Asking for clarification on “Jordan, Minnesota” edit reversion. == Hi Magnolia 677, I noticed that you reverted an edit I made on the “Jordan, Minnesota” article this past week. You left the message “WP:DUE none of these are notable”. Looking carefully through the WP:DUE section I had some ideas for places my addition to the article had fallen short on meeting this rule. However, I’m somewhat confused why all the information was reverted. 1. Since my contribution relies almost entirely on encyclopedic historical events in each places of worship history in Jordan, I’m unsure how I would go about providing a different perspective. Jordan has no other religious or non-religious places of worship that I know of and I feel the rest of the article well establishes other perspectives of the current and historic city. 2. I can see that the details I contributed for the “St.John the Baptist Catholic Church” and “Jordan Family Church” were rather detailed for such a small part of the topic of Jordan, MN. However, most of the other churches mentioned are explained a short in concise “church is X denomination; congregation formed X year; building built X year; (optionally) previously located in X building. 3. I can see that the majority of my sources come from the religious institutions explaining their own history. If this was the issue you were getting at, I can easily provide secular sources on much of the information I contributed if that would be preferable or add these sources to with the ones I contributed before. 4. Alternatively, If you suggesting that the information I contributed veers too far from the intent of the “Jordan, Minnesota” article I can move my information to its own article and just add a “see also link to what’s already in that section”. Overall, I’d like to share the information I’ve collected in a way that would satisfy Wikipedia’s guidelines agreeable to those working on this page. And am looking for clarification on my best next course of action. [[User:Werewright|Werewright]] ([[User talk:Werewright|talk]]) 00:42, 6 July 2023 (UTC) :{{ping|Werewright}} Could you please start a discussion on the article talk page. Thanks. [[User:Magnolia677|Magnolia677]] ([[User talk:Magnolia677#top|talk]]) 20:22, 6 July 2023 (UTC) == Undone Edits == You deleted an edit of mine asking for “sourced material” when there was an entire article in Wikipedia about the fact. Stop being a deleting tyrant, without actually doing any research first. [[User:Spr519|Spr519]] ([[User talk:Spr519|talk]]) 12:25, 7 July 2023 (UTC) == Edits on Vestal, New York == Hi Magnolia677. While I want to thank you for your significant improvement of the [[Vestal, New York]] article, I'd also like to remind you about a couple of Wikipedia policies. You removed content, asserting (incorrectly) in your edit summary that the Binghamton University campus is not located in Vestal. I restored that content, as it is true and has been in the article for many years - your subsequent reversion goes against [[WP:RVREASONS]], which requests that you discuss this on the talk page after removed content is restored. I have since provided multiple citations that back up the location of the campus. Certainly good to address unsourced material, but per [[WP:NOCITE]], you should really add a tag requesting citations, instead of removing longstanding content, particularly when you aren't certain of the veracity of the content yourself. You're certainly a more experienced editor than I, but I hope a refresher on these policies might help for future edits. Thanks. [[User:Vmanjr|Vmanjr]] ([[User talk:Vmanjr|talk]]) 11:23, 11 July 2023 (UTC) :{{ping|Vmanjr}} I reverted your edit because it was unsourced. A cornerstone policy on Wikipedia is [[WP:BURDEN]]. [https://www.binghamton.edu/ The university] gives its address as Binghamton, and maps also show it being in Binghamton. If Binghamton University is located in Vestal, then you will need to provide a source supporting this. I'm cautioning you though, please don't edit war to add contentious, unsourced content into an article. Thank you. [[User:Magnolia677|Magnolia677]] ([[User talk:Magnolia677#top|talk]]) 12:24, 11 July 2023 (UTC) ::@[[User:Magnolia677|Magnolia677]] I have provided multiple reliable sources in the article confirming the campus' location. At least in the U.S., [https://blog.usgeocoder.com/mailing-address-vs-physical-address/ mailing addresses do not correspond to municipal boundaries], and as such are not reliable sources on the physical location of entities. All maps with municipal boundaries clearly show the main campus as being in Vestal. There's nothing contentious about that - even [https://www.binghamton.edu/about/contact.html the university itself] calls its main location the Vestal campus, and lists its physical address as Vestal. As such, my edit was not in any form edit warring, but rather following [[WP:DOREVERT]] to correct your mistaken assumption, and to restore content previously added by other editors that was ultimately correct. [[User:Vmanjr|Vmanjr]] ([[User talk:Vmanjr|talk]]) 13:18, 11 July 2023 (UTC) == RfC on mentiong Hunter Biden's children == My RfC is quite different from yours! The question is not if Navy Joan should be mentioned or not, the questing is if a double standard should be used or not. —[[User:Menischt|Menischt]] ([[User talk:Menischt|talk]]) 17:42, 11 July 2023 (UTC) :{{ping|Menischt}} RfCs are kind of a "big thing" on Wikipedia. If you read the instructions, they are used only when other discussions have not led to consensus. All you had to do was add your opinion to the RfC I had just started, seconds before. Your RfC question doesn't even make sense. Whatever. [[User:Magnolia677|Magnolia677]] ([[User talk:Magnolia677#top|talk]]) 17:47, 11 July 2023 (UTC) ::I don't agree. Your question is the wrong one! Fundamental thing should not be the question of a limited opinion poll. I asked my question to make clear what is really a stake here, that is, should there be a double standard or not. I assume you can understand my point.—[[User:Menischt|Menischt]] ([[User talk:Menischt|talk]]) 18:10, 11 July 2023 (UTC) == Update of CT alert -- American Politics post-1992 == [[File:Commons-emblem-notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see [[Wikipedia:Contentious topics]]. <!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert --> [[User:SPECIFICO |<b style="color: #0011FF;"> SPECIFICO</b>]][[User_talk:SPECIFICO | ''talk'']] 22:59, 14 July 2023 (UTC) == Update of CT notice RE: BLP == [[File:Commons-emblem-notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] You have recently made edits related to articles about [[WP:Biographies of living persons|living or recently deceased people]], and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about [[WP:Biographies of living persons|living or recently deceased people]], and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see [[Wikipedia:Contentious topics]]. <!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert --> [[User:SPECIFICO |<b style="color: #0011FF;"> SPECIFICO</b>]][[User_talk:SPECIFICO | ''talk'']] 23:00, 14 July 2023 (UTC)'