This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness
I undid the edit from 2600:1000:B047:58D5:A530:7ECF:C425:D06E , who removed part of the section "Controversy in COVID-19 Research". The removed part is negative, but well sourced ... at least as well sourced as the positive part, therefore does not violate any "biography of living person policy". I also sourced fact-checks from BBC to support the controversy of this research. Please justify if you still plan to remove the negative part. 134.76.38.68 (talk) 13:11, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This material was removed because it violates the biography of a living person policy in so far as it is biased. While it is factual that the manuscript was "controversial" - text that was kept - claims that the researcher engaged in misconduct are heavily biased.--73.17.239.222 (talk) 14:40, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
