Jump to content

Talk:Justin Yu

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 18:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Johnson524 (talk). Self-nominated at 06:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Justin Yu; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

  • Article created 12 January. No issues of copyvio or plagiarism. All sources appear reliable. QPQ is done. Hooks are interesting and sourced. I think the primary hook is great. Looks ready to go! Thriley (talk) 20:09, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Justin Yu/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Johnson524 (talk · contribs) 18:30, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: LunaEclipse (talk · contribs) 13:34, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also reviewing this one. School might get in the way, so don't expect me to respond immediately. 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 ⚧ 【=◈︿◈=】 13:34, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@LunaEclipse: Thank you so much for taking up another Tetris article review! Take all the time you need, and cheers! Johnson524 01:35, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Johnson524: Apologies for leaving you in the dust. I'll probably start reviewing by this weekend. 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 ⚧ 【=◈︿◈=】 14:14, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·
pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy