Jump to content

Talk:Marxism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Revolutionary marxism

[edit]

Is there a need to create a section on Revolutionary Marxism or does it already exist somewhere else and I can't find it? Pallikari ap' ta Sfakia 17:41, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't Marxism culminate in revolution by its very nature? Doesn't Marx postulate that revolution is the natural outgrowth of class conflict, class consciousness of the proletariat, and the eventual desire of the proletariat to capture ownership of their own means of production, an ownership the bourgeoisie will never hand over willingly? Isn't Revolutionary Marxism redundant? Kelelain (talk) 17:35, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Terrible

[edit]

You keep talking around the subject and never explain it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.241.240.42 (talk) 22:00, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aracialism isn't necessarily South-African or Marxist but the main article isn't analytical enough.

create the pages: ideological aracialism, ideological statelessness (chosen, [usually] not because of the circumstances), ethnocultural nonconformity

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy